Savage Love Podcast
Check out the all new Savage Lovecast site!
Got a question for Dan Savage?
Call the Savage Love Podcast at 206-201-2720
or email Dan at mail@savagelove.net.
Savage Love Archives
-
May 15
Shorties -
May 8
Reading Comprehension Fail -
May 1
Move On -
Apr 24
No Problem -
Apr 17
Dick Holes
More from Dan Savage
-
Tornado Truthers
-
There Are No Atheists In Foxholes
-
SL Letter of the Day: Have You Ever Heard of...?
-
Senate Democrats Fuck Over Bi-National Gay Couples...
-
Rightwing Anti-Gay French Activist Commits Suicide at Notre Dame Cathedral
Books by Dan Savage
American Savage
It Gets Better: Coming Out, Overcoming Bullying, and Creating a Life Worth Living
The Commitment: Love, Sex, Marriage, and My Family
Things I've Learned from Women Who've Dumped Me
Skipping Towards Gomorrah
The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant
Savage Links
- Babeland
- Fleshbot
- Good Vibrations
- Joe Newton/Savage Illustrations
- Planned Parenthood
- Spreading Santorum
- Planned Parenthood's Teen Wire
- Kinsey Confidential
- Carnal Nation
- Tiny Nibbles
Want a Second Opinion?
Contact Dan Savage
Savage on YouTube
Wiggle Room
February 25, 2010
I'm writing to you to settle a dispute between my husband and me. We're not terribly adventurous, but we're not totally vanilla. However, there is one issue that is driving me insane: My husband constantly pesters me to have anal sex. We have tried it in the past, and it is NOT my bag. I don't enjoy it AT ALL. But my husband will not stop pestering. He thinks if we just keep trying, eventually I'll come around to liking it. I'm pretty GGG, Dan, but this is one thing where I draw the line. He thinks I'm being unreasonable; I think he is. Do I need to give in, or does he need to get off my back?
Needing Expert Advice
I think we should all be—as I've written about a hundred thousand times—good (in bed), giving (of pleasure, of indulgences), and game (for very nearly anything), aka GGG. And I frequently like to remind married people—particularly, married people who value monogamy—that they willingly assumed sole responsibility for their spouses' sexual fulfillment.
That said, NEA, we are each entitled to our likes and dislikes.
But before I let you off the anal hook: I'm assuming that your all-caps emphasis—"NOT my bag," "don't enjoy it AT ALL"—means that you find anal penetration to be a physical trial and/or an emotional torment. "I could TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT" or "There's nothing in that for ME" or "That leaves me COLD" are not good enough reasons to refuse to occasionally indulge your spouse in whatever it is that gets him/her off. While it would be wonderful if every couple's sex life consisted entirely of acts that both partners found equally thrilling—so egalitarian! So fairzees!—a fulfilling sex life is too important, particularly for monogamous couples, to trust in coincidence alone.
Okay, NEA, back to your ass: You tried it, you didn't like it, you don't have to keep doing it. And, yes, your husband should stop pestering you about it, NEA, but you do have to let him grieve—grieve for the ass he isn't going to get from you and, if you're monogamous, grieve for the ass he isn't going to get anywhere else.
And speaking of anal...
Nancy Elliott, a state representative in New Hampshire, wants to ban same-sex marriage in that state—where it's been legal for less than three months—and here's her reasoning: "We're talking about taking the penis of one man and putting it in the rectum of another man and wiggling it around in excrement. And you have to think... would I allow that to be done to ME?"
Where to begin? How about here...
If you're wiggling your penis around in excrement when you're having anal sex, Representative Elliott, you're doing it wrong. You would think this would be obvious even to people who've never had anal sex, but apparently not. So let me break it down for you, Representative Elliott: You don't have anal sex with an ass full of shit for the same reason you don't have oral sex with a mouth full of food. It's messy and no one wants a mess. (Except for the people who do want a mess, of course, but they're a blessed rarity.) An empty, douched, and lubed anal cavity is just as delightful as an empty, flossed, and brushed oral cavity.
I will concede that excrement is for anal what Representative Elliott is for the New Hampshire State Legislature: a PR disaster. But excrement-free anal sex is easy. Make sure there's some fiber in your diet, be regular, and only go for it when you're empty—no anal during your butt menses!—and you'll never get excrement on a wigglin' dick.
And now a question for you, Representative Elliott: Are you really sure you want to make it illegal for buttfuckers to get married?
"According to a 2005 survey conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention," Baconcat wrote on Slog, The Stranger's blog, in reaction to Elliott's remarks, "40 percent of men and 35 percent of women between 25 and 44 had engaged in heterosexual anal sex. Some studies put the incidence of anal sex in the heterosexual population as low as 24 percent and some as high as 56 percent. Averaging those numbers, let's say 38.8 percent of heterosexuals engage in anal sex. Ninety-six percent of Americans are straight. There are 190,000,000 adults between the ages of 18 and 65 in the United States, so that means 70,771,200 adults are engaging in heterosexual anal sex. Four percent of the adult population is gay, or 7,600,000 people. Roughly half—3,800,000—are gay males. Polls indicate that between 55 and 80 percent of gay males participate in anal sex. Taking the average—67.5 percent—that means the number of gay men having anal sex comes to 2,565,000."
Math is hard, Representative Elliott, but see if you can't wiggle this into your cranial cavity: 70,771,200 is more—a whole lot more—than 2,565,000. If you really want to protect the sacred sanctity of marriage from the unholy taint of penises wiggling in rectums, Representative Elliott, you need to ban straight marriage first. (We needn't protect marriage from lesbians, of course, as lesbians don't have anuses.)
I am a 26-year-old female who likes anal sex. The problem is my boyfriend's dick is too big. It's nine inches long, but the real issue is girth. I enjoyed anal with a previous partner, but with my current BF it is unpleasant, even with copious amounts of lube. Are there ways to make anal sex possible for us?
Achingly Needs Anal Love
Stop trying to wiggle that monster into your rectum, ANAL, and focus instead on fingers and toys and orgasms for you, cheeky-fucking for the boyfriend. (Think titty-fucking your ass cheeks.) Have lots of orgasms with toys of various sizes in your ass. Then every once in a while—when you're feeling it, when your ass feels like it's ready, when you're not having your butt menses—ease the boyfriend in. He should stay absolutely still while you get yourself off with your hands or a vibrator. The next time you're feeling it, put him in and let him move around just a little while you get yourself off.
The goal here—and it's a long-term goal—is to make anal sex as pleasurable for you as it is, or will be one day, for the boyfriend. Take your time, ANAL, don't rush things, and thanks for being one of the 70,771,200 straight people out there who prove every day that you can have anal sex and access to legal marriage, too.
I am an 18-year-old female college freshman. My boyfriend is also 18. He recently confided in me that he wanted to wear my panties while I wore his boxers and fucked him in the ass with a dildo. I have been reading your column since I was 13. Had I never read your column, I might have assumed my boyfriend was gay or thought he was gross or thought I was gross for liking the idea. Instead, I picked out some panties that looked sweet on him, and we had a wonderful time. Thank you so much!
Loves Boys In Panties
No, thank you, LBIP, because every time a straight girl sticks something up a straight boy's ass, a bigoted state representative dies a little inside.
4
a. Thanks so much to all of the douchebag conservatives so concerned over male on male anal sex as proof of something about gayness. Us queer ladies were wondering all this time what this "asshole" place is, since we don't have 'em. And we certainly would never think to play with this nonexistent region. Also, we crap out of our vaginas.
Which brings me to point b.
b. Please don't equate menses with shit. One is basically just blood, the other is waste products, toxic chemicals your body is expelling, and billions of bacteria, aka gross. If the person who is the source of these is disease-free, only one of them can make you sick. It's not awesome to perpetuate the idea that menses are equivalent to something much less benign (women get enough horrible messages about the dirtiness of their vaginas and menstrual blood from society as is). You are better than that Dan.
Thanks. (Steps off her soapbox).
12
That said, thank you for coming back in full form - On top of your game... good advice as always.
And while I agree that girls and women get lots of negative messages about the dirtiness of their vaginas, I'm pretty sure Dan was mocking the shit out of Rep. Elliott (or is that mocking the menses out of her?) and bears no ill will toward the average vagina, uterus, or the things that come out of them. No more than the average gay man, anyway.
I don't think Dan meant any ill will towards vaginas. I am just pointing out that wording and associations are important. There are too many people who have the incorrect idea that menstruation is somehow "dirty" for me not to want to clarify the point.
That I knew a word for what he wanted, that it was common enough to have a name, dispelled all his fears. It's been two kinky years since then.
17
Yes they certainly do! I am very good friends with a lesbian couple, and when they strap it on, one prefers vaginal penetration and the other only digs anal. Takes all kinds!
My wife used to be the same as you, she had a bad previous experience with anal with some asshole before we met and refused me entrance. It took a long time, as in years, for me to bring her around to letting me try anal. Starting with rubbing a lubed finger around her anus during foreplay and digital stimulation, later times I press inward on her anus to give her a little sensation. I had to show her that there was pleasure to be found with me touching there first before she would let me explore, and now, years later, she asks me to touch her there during foreplay. We have had anal sex a few times, and to be honest, I prefer vaginal intercourse, so I don't ask often.
So, to sum up, your husband needs to stop pestering you, it will never feel good if you feel pressured; and you need to get in touch with what feels good for you down there, or at least give it an honest try with no outside interference. You may end up being a no anal couple, and that's okay, but you should at least be able to say you tried everything.
20
what she said! otherwise, you are spot on.
http://www.fox59.com/news/wxin-youth-pas…
Oh please I'm just kidding.
And: I don't know who's a bigger idiot this week, Nancy Elliott or Lauren Ashley. There's barely half a brain between 'em.
Menstrual blood does not pose a similar health threat. Considering that women in our culture are already taught to be ashamed of their vaginal products, and shame in this context is not functional, analogies that reinforce this shame are counter-productive and perhaps even damaging.
Women have enough body-image monsters to fight. Dan doesn't need to reinforce the vaginal shame that is already too present.
28
29
That being said, you might not ever like it, and then he just needs to grow up. You, of course, could help by showing him how stuff you really like is really fun! The cheeky-fucking may be nice, but tittie-fucking is really fun, especially if there is a little oral involved.
I'm all for women not being ashamed of their menses, and I'm much more grossed out by shit than a woman on her period, but let's be realistic here. Bodily products are considered biohazards for a reason.
33
I wanted to be open -- and for her to be open -- to everything that could be pleasurable to us, acknowledging that the things we experienced with each other, in this specific partnership, might be different than what we had enjoyed or disliked in the past. So ... I when I discussed trying anal she reacted very swiftly to shut me down and then portrayed me as hounding her and refusing to respect her wishes because I had brought it up more than once (not lots, just two or three times over the course of a year). Such an overreaction suggested past issues were at play. There was that, and also since she had been through childbirth, she had some issues with hemorrhoids, as much emotional as physical.
So I left the subject alone, only to find that as time passed, she became more open to the idea. This came when our relationship became more relaxed in general, but she changed when she was TOTALLY hot, specifically after a lengthy session of oral sex. She actually initiated the anal play, getting up out of our bed and going to get some lube for me to use to penetrate her with my fingers.
Not sure how all this came to pass, but I got what I wanted: openness to different experiences, and the ability to discover new pleasures with each other. Anal came by way of oral.
What's a big deal to some guy on the internet may not be a big deal to your husband. No one here can tell you how your husband feels about fucking a hemorrhoidal ass. On the other hand, if they are painful and irritated, you will definitely mind having anal sex. So wait and see how you and your husband feel about it, and if it poses a problem, talk to your doctor about treatment options.
You know, like Mary Poppins, she obviously doesn't have an asshole either.
Honestly this is the best column he's written in a while.
Especially the woman, who is pestered by anal, the whole spirit is willing, but she is not wired for it. Totally respectable!
What does:
40 ;) 2. ;-D always :-) , me
translate to?!? I've been trying to decipher for 1/2anhour! (Yes, I'm into oral, anal and puzzles).
51
52
54
And MOCpl, yes, dear, we heard you the first time.
Why not hope they die A LOT inside? Why not die A LOT inside & outside & everywhere else?
Here's a thought: every time anyone commits a non-missionary position sex act w/ someone with whom they're not married to (including yourself), God kills a bigot?
C'mon, America! Do your part! Masturbate, sodomize, suck cock, lick pussy, peg your bf, or just straddle him in a chair, and soon our world will be free of bigots! The only problem is where to dump the ashes.... (and who gets to repopulate Alabama)
57
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/24/world/…
It's about a French anti-smoking ad that associates smoking with, um, questionably-consensual oral sex.
60
She issued a half - assed statement about not being able to "verify" her claims about children being taught anal sex.
Reading your column made me feel so much better. Thank you.
PS DOMA cost me and my husband over $7,000 in taxes last year. How about you?
I guess it's hard to know the difference when you're a constipated, hemorrhoid-ridden republican. You guys are so anal-retentive and backed-up you're constantly walkin aroind with shit up to your eye-balls. Guess that's what makes you such shitbags.
"No, thank you, LBIP, because every time a straight girl sticks something up a straight boy's ass, a bigoted state representative dies a little inside."
My husband and I do our part on a regular basis. Now, if I could only get him to wear my panties...
63
To my understanding, Dan has suggested that approach when the woman is reluctant to try anal - in this case the woman tried it and doesn't want to do it again.
My wife and I tried an anal hook last night. Not nearly as fun as it sounds.
For NEA, I didn't like anal the first time I tried it, to the extent that he couldn't get in my ass at all the 2nd time. And he really liked it, so I really wanted to like it, too. So I learned about the anatomy. I read some books, watched some videos, read some more, and talked to the fabulous women at The Smitten Kitten here in Minneapolis (soon to be opening in Denver, you lucky bastards) and invested in some good quality tushy toys. I used butt plugs while masturbating, and during vaginal intercourse. We attended an anal workshop given by The Kitten, and the even more fabulous Tristan Taormino. Tristan has a gorgeously photographed book of anal sex positions, and filled with tips. And guess what? I LOVE TO HAVE MY ASS FUCKED!!
@43, and anyone else with hemorrhoids--if you had a sore in your vagina, you'd go to the Dr, right? Why treat your ass with any less respect? You don't have to suffer with hemorrhoids, you don't have to have hemmorhoids, and not all hemmorhoids require surgery. Get it fixed, and continue to enjoy your ass play.
Dan, thank you again for the column, I'm all turned on from reading it. I want you to be my new gay BFF, but my current gay BFF (who dates my brother in law) would be jealous.
Fucking a shitty ass, and a bloody vagina are TOTALLY DIFFERENT.
One is gross.
One provides extra lube.
OMG did you know that PENISES eject this NASTY WHITE CHUNKY GOO out of them??!?!?!?! It burns your eyes and tastes bad and gets crusty and you have to DISPOSE of it later. WORSE, it happens EVERY TIME they fuck.
I kinda think if a man blows his opportunity to make his wife LOVE anal sex and ASK him frequently to fuck her in the ass, he kinda doesn't deserve a second chance. Kinda. So do your (anal) fucking research boys, or you will end up like NEA's husband. Some tips from ladies on this site:
http://www.analsexyes.com/reader_women.s…html
Also, thanks Dan... the term "butt menses" almost made me spray coffee all over my computer keyboard.
Of course, Dan has a long-standing willingness to call open homosexual behavior simply kinky -- like the Washington State politician who wore a dress to a porn shop and picked up a gay hooker and topped and bottomed and then refused to pay.
Dan called that guy straight. Speaking as a straight-but-tolerant person, it ain't so. That guy is a self-loathing homo.
If you include self-loathing homos, Republican congressmen who fondle their male pages, married dudes on the down-low, etc. all as straight, then that might possibly leave only 4% ... but that's hardly fair, is it?
Let the benefits of gay identity be spread throughout the land!
I'm shocked(!) that nobody picked up the corollary from Dan's math: half of the gay population (3.8 mil) do not engage in anal sex, plus the remaining 32.5% of gay males that do not engage in anal sex (~1.2 mil) means that there are 5 million gay people who should not be prevented from marriage! Long live marriages that are execrement-free!
;)
Thank you. We must now spread the word about the health hazard of semen. SO UNCLEAN it is. I can't BELEIVE he wants to spray that stuff in/on me. It transmits DISEASES. Wear a condom and keep that filth OFF ME.
(are we seeing the logic, squeamish period haters?)
King Marty, a dick up a guy's ass rubs up against his prostate, and that can produce very pleasureable feelings, believe it or not. An ex-boyfriend filled me in about this.
What I don't get is, what do women get out of anal sex, besides the pleasure involved in pleasing their partners? There's no prostate to tickle, after all. What makes it worth the hassle?
Pretty much the same as vaginal sex. The feeling of fullness, pressure on the G-spot if the penis is tilted correctly, massaging the tissue rich in nerve endings (internal parts of clitoris stretch all around the pelvic region, anus included), PC muscle contracting wildly during orgasm (both vagina and anus are holes in the same muscle). So it's like a second vagina, plus the extra mental turn on because you're doing something naughty.
And it's not that much of a hassle anyway. It's just a matter of using more lube, finding a position for initial penetration in which your sphincter is maximally relaxed (lying on stomach spread eagled works for me), and not penetrating in one go, but in intermittent fashion (which, too, can be completed in a few minutes, so it's only a hassle if you are in a hurry).
And if it hurts, you're not doing it right.
Menses (noun): (1) The periodic expulsion of uterine waste (2) By extension--any periodic expulsion of waste.
See? No need to infer that some kind of shaming was intended. YOU think anal sex is nasty, so you take offense on behalf of your vagina at the comparison.
xoxoxo
Oh, now that's priceless. Homosexuality is disgusting because gay male sex is disgusting. So Nancy, tell me what's disgusting about Lesbians. C'mon now... you can do it...
But the best part is how she managed to alienate half the voters in her state with that last sentence.
..>"@ 40 and others:
What does:
40 ;) 2. ;-D always :-) , me
translate to?!? I've been trying to decipher for 1/2anhour! (Yes, I'm into oral, anal and puzzles).
Posted by Wetspot on February 24, 2010
at 11:28 AM · Report
And why does everybody always say you have to try something before you decide it's not for you? I don't need to be donkey punched to know I wouldn't like it.
Sorry for lack of sex in this question. Unless you get off on "dot-dot-dot".
So, if those of you who haven't registered want people to look at websites you find fascinating, it'd behoove you to either register before posting, or include enough information about the site you want people to look at so anyone who's curious can find it with a Google search.
I like ya, but come on. Either its a funny joke, or its not, doesn't matter who's making it.
And Dan, you can't compare an empty, clean mouth to an empty, clean anus -- one dispenses FECES, the other doesn't!! Ugh!
Stop being a bunch of children who giggle everytime someone brings up pee-pee and poo-poo parts. I know it can be hilarious sometimes, but I get the feeling Europeans are laughing uncontrollably off at us in post-coital bliss...
102
how do you know if they're having anal sex? It's not exactly the best ice-breaker at parties.
106
Dan frequently expresses distaste for the female genitals, so when he implies that the vagina is hygienically equivalent to the rectum, I think it's safe to assume that there's a certain amount of anti-vagina sentiment involved.
Granted, Dan's overall rebuttal to Elliott's "appeal to repugnance" was sound enough, even if it misses the larger point: Elliott's aversion to anal sex may be based on irrational misconceptions, but more importantly, her personal aversions have no bearing on Constitutional freedoms (or at least, they shouldn't). But yeah, the vagina isn't a magical crystal cavern filled with rose-petals and fairy dust. Virtually all sex evolves bodily emissions and potentially unclean orifices and anatomical areas closely involved in waste disposal. Such is the tragedy of being a mammal.
However, regarding the "feces = menstruation?" issue, I submit the following HIGHLY SCIENTIFIC chart for your consideration:
....................................................................................................................
|...HOW I WOULD FEEL IF MY DATE INSERTED HER FINGER IN A GIVEN ORIFICE...|
|.......................................AND THEN LICKED IT CLEAN:.................................|
|............|..........Free of bodily waste...........|........Containing bodily waste........|
|............|.......standard for given orifice.......|.......standard for given orifice.......|
|............|..................................................|..................................................|
|............|..................................................|..................................................|
|..Pussy..|...........FUCK, THAT'S HOT............|.......Um, okay, whatever . . .? ......|
|............|.....................♥♥♥......................|.........If that's your thing, fine........|
|............|..................................................|..................................................|
|............|..................................................|..................................................|
|............|..................................................|..................................................|
|............|..................................................|..................................................|
|...Ass....|..You know there are still bacteria..|..Um, I have to go now. Right now..|
|............|.....up there, right? Like E. coli?.....|..No, don't bother calling me later..|
|............|..................................................|..................................................|
|............|..................................................|..................................................|
and I thought guys were crazy about ATM... does it mean I shouldn't learn about sex from porn?!
What, are you all on the rag?
Personally as a hetero man, I like Vaginas and assholes, but only if they are both present. No offense to Gay men or women with colostomy bags...they are just not my thing...
elliotitis 'The act of wiggling something around in excrement'
Love ya
I've never received anal, but I've pegged. Wasn't really my thing, but I liked how much he liked it.
I may just start going anal!
Any advice for a very small rectumed older gal like me?
Wouldn't it be better for all concerned to simply give it the old college try? (Make that high school try in the case of teenagers in communities with abstinence-only education.)
Always love your column, but Dude: You REALLY should have issued a "spew warning" before printing that. Laughed so hard I'm still wiping the coffee off my screen!
"In the USA, African American and Hispanic women account for 80 percent of AIDS cases"
http://www.avert.org/women-hiv-aids.htm
That's exactly right. And I love that chart, especially the hearts in the super hot upper left box. You win the thread.
Where does it say EXIT ONLY on your ass? Does your mouth say INPUT ONLY FOR ESOPHAGUS too?
I do agree with you in that God only intended men to take it up the rump because of where He placed the male prostate gland.
But we have to remain open-minded for those women who would like to perform this act which is unnatural for their gender. It may be unnatural but it's their body, their choice.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm/index.…
#130
Your mouth is an input for all kinds of things. And I've heard this before about the male g spot prostate. That is b.s. All straight men would be into ass play, and all gay men would be taking it up the butt. A lot of gay men refuse to be the bottom. They don't like pretending they're chicks. And they don't want a ruined rectum.
And women who have anal mostly do it because their guy demands it. They don't want to lose him. It's crazy. It's more or less the guy saying you vagina isn't tight enough and he wants to show her who's boss. What an insult! The vagina is a few inches away and made for sex.
The term men who have sex with men (MSM) refers to all men who have sex with other men, regardless of how they identify themselves (gay, bisexual, or heterosexual). In the United States, HIV and AIDS have had a tremendous impact on MSM. Consider these facts:
AIDS has been diagnosed for more than half a million MSM. Over 300,000 MSM with AIDS have died since the beginning of the epidemic.
MSM made up more than two thirds (68%) of all men living with HIV in 2005, even though only about 5% to 7% of men in the United States reported having sex with other men.
In a 2005 study of 5 large US cities, 46% of African American MSM were HIV-positive.
Since HIV/AIDS in MSM was first diagnosed in 1981, gay and bisexual men have been leaders in dealing with the challenges of the epidemic. Gay organizations and activists, through their work, have contributed greatly to many of the guidelines for prevention, treatment, and the care of people living with HIV/AIDS.
For complex reasons, HIV/AIDS continues to take a high toll on the MSM population. For example, the number of new HIV/AIDS cases among MSM in 2005 was 11% more than the number of cases in 2001. It is unclear whether this increase is due to more testing, which results in more diagnoses, or to an increase in the number of HIV infections. Whatever the reasons, in 2005, MSM still accounted for about 53% of all new HIV/AIDS cases and 71% of cases in male adults and adolescents.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm/index.…
The term men who have sex with men (MSM) refers to all men who have sex with other men, regardless of how they identify themselves (gay, bisexual, or heterosexual). In the United States, HIV and AIDS have had a tremendous impact on MSM. Consider these facts:
AIDS has been diagnosed for more than half a million MSM. Over 300,000 MSM with AIDS have died since the beginning of the epidemic.
MSM made up more than two thirds (68%) of all men living with HIV in 2005, even though only about 5% to 7% of men in the United States reported having sex with other men.
In a 2005 study of 5 large US cities, 46% of African American MSM were HIV-positive.
Since HIV/AIDS in MSM was first diagnosed in 1981, gay and bisexual men have been leaders in dealing with the challenges of the epidemic. Gay organizations and activists, through their work, have contributed greatly to many of the guidelines for prevention, treatment, and the care of people living with HIV/AIDS.
For complex reasons, HIV/AIDS continues to take a high toll on the MSM population. For example, the number of new HIV/AIDS cases among MSM in 2005 was 11% more than the number of cases in 2001. It is unclear whether this increase is due to more testing, which results in more diagnoses, or to an increase in the number of HIV infections. Whatever the reasons, in 2005, MSM still accounted for about 53% of all new HIV/AIDS cases and 71% of cases in male adults and adolescents.
Dear troll, please stop.
Dear everyone else, please do not feed the troll.
I've had the good fortune of one GF who was really into pegging, and been unable to find another since. Rest assured that none of my friends have that information, but those were the days....
Oooh! I think I have the slogan for the next big inspirational office poster!
I am a straight female who loves the occasional anal sex/play, but it took a long time and a very gentle couple of lovers to get me there, plus lots of experimentation with positions, constant stopping, blah blah blah, until I was comfortable over a long period of time. Not to mention the time it took to convince myself that no, my partner wasn't going to be rampantly disgusted if he wound up with a shit-smeared dick on occasion. Point is, I'm the one with the butt, I called the shots the whole way.
NEA owns her butt (so long as she doesn't live in Nebraska). She's totally been GGG and her husband ought to stop trying to force her to do something she isn't OK with, and also not pout like a little kid hoping she'll change her mind, either. Last time I checked there was more to marriage than "I can haz stick it in whatever orifice I want!" And on that note, Nancy Elliott can shut the fuck up too.
150
To #32 AND ALL OTHER WOMEN(!!!)- As #'s 37 and 44 have rightfully pointed out- there are way more adventurous,kinky, and ever- horny straight guys than straight women out there.
So just in case you wonder why straight men keep fucking up the world, bare in mind that women in general and gay men have much easier time getting laid.
Unfortunately we, straight men, are bunch of horny mother fuckers who rarely have a chance to have all of our needs fulfilled!!!
152
Anything one or the both of the partners don't want to do, that's fine. Love is a feast anyway. But the more ways that you can touch each other and please each other the better, and we've found over time that we always want more.
More general comment -
For my wife and I it took us about five years of easing into anal sex before she was fully comfortable. The key was patience in the long run, patience in the short run, attention and gentleness (and lube). The hemorrhoids from childbirth are a factor, but just require a little more care. As for mess - after three kids we were able to deal with a little bit of shit (and what marriage doesn't have some shit from time to time?)
So, in addition to me still making money off gay men, I am now making money off straight women and some straight men as well. I paid off one house, am renting it, and just bought another house. Someone mentioned a book, Anal Pleasure and Health. That's an oxymoron. Anal sex is not good for your health. That's kind of like saying, "have a cigarette, it's good for your health."
Most of my patients are reluctant to admit anal sex is the cause of their problems, but eventually they come around and tell me the truth. It's kind of sad people are into destroying their bodies, but their loss is money in my pocket.
BTW. I just wish my beloved, asexual bf would jam anything
up my butt occassionaly.
155
I have had to refuse anal sex (which I like) on days/nights when the above criteria are not met and I'm pretty adamant about it.
Maybe I'm a little anal, but I will not do it after a big meal either. This is why I order the salad on dates.
Enjoy your anal "fun" and I'll enjoy making money. You're choosing to do it. Do I think it's a good choice? Of course not. I work in a surgical group and we are doing very well in our practice. There are four in our practice: one gay doctor who has a partner, and the other three of us are straight and married. And none of us, even the gay doctor, practice anal sex. We do a dirty job but someone has to do it. And we're all members of the ASCRS. If you don't know what that is, Google it.
We enjoy our nice houses, our kids go to great schools, we eat well, and travel as often as possible. We thank you!
It's okay, Representative Elliott, to tell the truth. You might lose some votes, but you might gain some, and you'll still have your integrity.
Home Address:
70 Island Dr
Merrimack, NH 03054-4123
Phone: (603)424-4566
Email: nancy_elliott@elliott-controls.com
Let's all send her copies of this column.
Information taken from the NH official state website
As a legally married heterosexual, I refuse to buttfuck my wife again until all of us have the legal right to buttfuck our beloved spouses.
She should ask for a whole lot of pegging and/or as him eat her ass for so long and lovely she couldn't resist wanting a little something in there. I bet Mr. whiney-ass (again, NPI) doesn't pony up for either. So much for GGG.
Since you are so anti-anal sex, perhaps you are also anti-childbirth? Nothing wrecks a nice asshole like childbirth! And while you're at it, you should recommend that people stop having bowel movements. They just stretch that sphincter out!
Another doctor, another opinion.
I'm not a practicing butt sexer either so I'm not feeling personally defensive. But hey, you made it sound like your practice was full of people turning to the four of you to heal the injuries caused by sodomy.
Here's what I want to know. What's the link between butt sex and cataracts?
Of course, anal sphincter CAN be damaged by anal sex - if you don't let it stretch gradually and if you penetrate the anus while the sphincter is still tight. Anal sex CAN be the cause of anal fissures too, both for the reason I have just described and for the lack of proper lubrication.
I wonder if the reason why Dr.Doctor is against anal sex is because the only anal sex enthusiasts he has interacted with are those who did it wrong and ended up with damaged butts. People like me, who practiced anal sex safely and responsibly and got rid of anal fissures that way didn't go see a colorectal surgeon THANKS TO anal sex, so sadly, Dr.Doctor can't write about us. He can write only about those who didn't do it right and ended up with fissures and damage, so they had to see a surgeon.
of the mouth and the ass. What's next, opening your mouth while someone dumps some turds in there? Actually, some people are already into that, and I suspect some are here. It's called scat, a shit fetish.
Post #166 Your ass is designed for bowel movements. duh!
Post #169 makes no sense whatsoever. I think it was written by a gay porn star into fisting.
It's time to go listen to Michael Savage rather than Dan Savage.
I am a female. I am currently in a monogamous heterosexual marriage. I first experimented with anal sex at the age of 20, after I finally talked my boyfriend into it. I physically enjoyed the act before I knew if he had.
Anal sex is now a part of my married life. I have discussed it with my doctor and have learned how to do it completely safely. (a tip, use Summer's Eve, not Massengil, as the tip is rounder on one than the other.) This doctor knows I have family history of colon/rectal cancer and STILL says I can have anal sex safely as much as I want. And I still find it physically satisfying. It often plays a role in my fantasies as well, which obviously don't exist to make any males happy.
You can be opposed to anal sex all you want, and no one ever says you have to do it. But many women do enjoy it, and many straight men would too if it didn't strike them as being too gay to ever try.
174
if your doctor knows of a colon/rectal cancer history in your family and says anal sex is okay, it's time for you to get another doctor. There is an anal sex/anal cancer link I suspect he's never heard of.
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq
/treatment/anal/Patient
Risk factors include the following:
Being over 50 years old.
Being infected with human papillomavirus (HPV).
Having many sexual partners.
Having receptive anal intercourse (anal sex).
Frequent anal redness, swelling, and soreness.
Having anal fistulas (abnormal openings).
Smoking cigarettes.
The only things that don't belong in my butt are:
-your opinions
-your moral judgments
-any laws based on the aforementioned opinions or judgments
Because they weren't invited.
177
God bless you, Dan.
Thanks Dan
1. their guy thinks they have a loose pussy
2. they think if they don't do it he'll dump them
The anus/rectum is for excreting waste. If it was pleasurable everyone would be getting off every time they had a bowel movement.
You all have very active imaginations. What's next, getting off when someone puts a
cue tip in your ear or a finger up your nose?
180
I am clean, I am regular, I get plenty of fiber, I am also somewhat kinky. There are times when, pardon me here, shit happens and shit happens. No amount of planning, prep, cleansing, or regularity precludes that. If the lover knocking at my back door wasn't OK with that, they've never shown it in any way, and if they did, that would be the last time they would have the opportunity.
If you're not mature enough to handle a little human mess with someone you like well enough to fuck, you probably arn't mature enough to fuck. Not in any way I'm interested in, anyway.
One more note: smell is VERY important to me- it's one of the best things about sex. I find it tragic, and grounds for getting dressed and going home, when someone is squeamish about the natural smells of a clean healthy body.
As a side note, Rep. Elliott got in additional trouble for this outburst because she claimed that a parent had called her to tell her that fifth graders in the town of Nashua were being taught about gay sex, and being shown pornographic pictures of the act. (Apparently she thinks children should only be shown pornographic images of heterosexual people having sex?) She later couldn't support her claim by providing the name of the parent. Which means that she lied in a legislative assembly and also didn't report suspected child sexual abuse to the police.
Rep. Elliott: bigot, liar, tacit supporter of child abuse.
But please don't judge the whole state because of her outrageous behavior. I've lived here my whole life and I promise you she is an unfortunate anomaly.
As a mere med student, I could be wrong here, but if I had to guess, I'd say that receptive anal sex thing is due to the risk of STI transmission (HPV, primarily, though maybe also some other nasties) that potentially comes along with a history of receptive anal sex with multiple partners. As such, it wouldn't really apply to anal sex, however much of it you might have, in the context of a monogamous and STI-tested relationship.
There are a couple of skin cancers that can arise in scars (primarily squamous cell and basal cell carcinomas), but I really don't think the microtrauma of anal sex is enough to pose a measurable risk, and neither of the cell types in which those cancers arise even exist in the colon or rectum.
Hope that clears things up!
I wouldn't be surprised if many of these "female" posters claiming to like and want Sh*thole sex are really men making it seem more acceptable and normal for women to like and want it!
Most men would probably f*ck a mini toilet with Sh*t in it if it served their penis pleasure.Actually every time they have sh*thole sex they are f*cking a mini toilet!
Also a poster on here said that Dan Savage often puts down women's genitals so he is a common woman-hating heterosexual guy who worships his penis and just likes to use women's vaginas to serve and please his penis that he worships.
Also Pulitzer prize winning Science writer Natalie Angier explained in her best selling book,Woman An Intimate Geography that gynecologist Sharon Hillier says that even though there is a common unfortunate myth in our society that women's vaginas are "dirty" infact a normal healthy vagina is the cleanest space in the body and it's much cleaner than the mouth and much much cleaner than the rectum.The vagina unless it has an infection,has healthy bacteria in it,called lactobacilli the same healthy bacteria that is in yogurt.
DR.Hillir says that a healthy vagina is as clean and pure as a carton of yogurt.We don't sh*t out of our vaginas!Also in 1994 there was a major sex survey from around the country and people could answer anyomouslyand only about 1% of straight people said sh*thole sex was something they wanted to do or did and liked doing.Most surveys,studies and testimonies from women say they don't like Sh*thole sex,and many say it's uncomfortable at the least and painful at the most.
But there are also quite a few women who have said that after their boyfriends or husbands saw women portayed in pornography as if they want and enjoy it,and normalized and sexualized in it,they kept pressuring them or forced them to do it and they hated it and it was painful.
And there is nothing prudish about not liking or wanting sh*thole sex,because there isn't anything erotic about sh*t or the Sh*thole it comes out of every day!
The Stranger Sign Up | Log In Home Features News Savage Love Food & Drink Music Film Visual Art Theater Books Blogs Promotions Personals Classifieds Forums Question Land In the Food & Drink Section:
Food & Drink Home Page
Restaurant Search
Bar Search
Food Events
In the Music Section:
Music Home Page
Line Out: The Music Blog
Bands Page
Music Listings
In the Film Section:
Film Home Page
Movie Times
In the Visual Art Section:
Visual Art Home Page
Visual Art Listings
Theater Home Page
Performance Listings
In the Books Section:
Books Home Page
Books Listings
A list of Stranger blogs:
Slog: News & Arts
Line Out: Music & Nightlife
Podcasts
Video
In the Stranger Classifieds:
Rentals
Jobs
Services
Health
Adult
All Classifieds
Cocktail Compass | StrangerMart | Genius Awards
Previewing Your Comment
Re: Savage Love
I tried to post before my most recent comment that I noticed I made some typing mistakes in my first post and I really wish there was an edit button on here!
To the posters Caralaine and John Horstman who rightfully pointed out how gross semen is,
And most men think blood and menstrual blood is gross but blood isn't that gross at all,it's just a thin red liquid that keeps us all alive. But semen is totally gross many men and women on different message boards have said so too and called it penis snot(with 300 million sperm cells in it!).And since a lot of men think blood is gross,I'd like to know if all of these men who love to watch men ejaculating semen on women's faces & bodies & who love to do this to women in their lives,would like to see the men in pornography with menstrual blood smeared all over their faces,bodies & in their mouths,& to have women do this to them too.Oh but most would think this was gross & degrading! On a site Vegan Porn posted in 2004 the topic was Does Pornography Objectify Women and a woman posted claiming that she loves to watch porn with her boyfriend but that when they ejaculate on the woman's face she has to turn away.She said semen has the consistency of snot and she said seeing something of that consistency on someone's face or in someon'es mouth is gross and it reminds her of children with snot running down their noses.
A guy said thanks a lot for the comparison. And a woman who had posted a little while before saying if a woman wants a man to ejaculate on her face what is so bad,now was disgusted and said Oh that comparison of semen and snot,she said she would never be able to get that out of her mind and she said arrg! And another woman said most women don't want this and find it degrading and disgusting.And a man had posted on there saying he liked to watch some genuine lesbian pornography not the fake made for heterosexual men.And he said does anyone else here feel that the one thing that is shown in all heterosexual pornography no matter what,the ejaculating on the face,is the most horrendeous thing to ever come from man? He said something like it treats women as if she's they guy's property and he said it treats the women as if she's his slut and therefore He HAS NO Problem What So Ever Ejaculating All Over Her Face. He said more women are accepting it now because pornography itself has become more acceptable and mainstreamed,but he said this is nasty.
There was a 1993 study by a psychologist and other researchers I think from the University of California I found online years ago and they asked men and women about pornography and most women said that pornography sexually subordinates women,and the authors of the study said that the penis is worshipped in pornography(as it is in the whole male dominated sexist,woman-hating society) and semen is glorified.
Has anyone on here ever read any of the excellent books by acclaimed radical feminist psychologist Phyllis Chesler? When I wrote to Gloria Steinem when I was 22 she wrote me back a great response and suggested I read Women And Madness by Phyllis Chesler and that I would find that it made me feel less alone.
I was only 7 when that book came out and I had never heard of her, so I read it and it's great powerful information as are her other books that I went on to also read, her great book About Men, which came out in 1978, and (Gloria also gave a great review on the cover) and I read it about 15 years ago for the first time. She interviewed 100's of men and many of them were married. In her chapter called Wombless Men, she has pictures of sculptures and paintings by famous male artists like Salvador Dali, and Michaelangelo etc and she demonstrates and talks a lot about men's subconscious fear and envy of the womb and men's (crazy!) hatred of women. 1 of her references in her extensive bibliography is psychiatrist Wolfgang Lederer's 1968 book, The Fear Of Women in he which explained the same things.
She also has a chapter called Phallic Sexuality and in the beginning of it she has a little boy interviwed by a Dr.Richard Green about Sexual Idenity Conflict in Children and Adults and he was asked if he ever wished he had been born a girl, and he said yes. Dr.Green asks him why does he wish that, and the little boy says, girls they don't have to have a penis. The doctor says they don't have to have a penis? The little boy then says they can have babies. The doctor then says to him why do you think girls don't have to have a penis?
And the little boy says Cause they have to have babies ... and babies can't come out of a penis... babies come out of a vagina... The doctor then says to him , your penis gives you a nice feeling doesn't it? You're not scared of it when it gets big and stiff are you ? The boy says no. The doctor says good ! It's supposed to do that when you tickle it. That's one big advantage for being a boy cause girls can't do that you know. The boy says Um hum. The doctor then says to him, sure they can have babies but only boys can have a penis stand up like that.
In the beginning of her chapter Wombless Men she has woman hater Freud interviweing a 5 year old boy patient and Freud says to him, But only women have children. Hans the little boy says he's going to have a little girl. Freud says you'd like to have a little girl.Hans says yes next year I'm going to have one. Freud says to him but you can't have a little girl. Hans says, Oh yes boys have girls and girls have boys. Freud says, boys don't have children only women ,only Mummies have children. Hans says, but why shouldn't I ? She also says in the chapter,On having A Penis and she interviewed 100's of men about having a penis,that female blood regularly shed,reminds men of their "castration" fear,and that it also reminds them of their deeply repressed desire to *bear* children and of their inability to do so.She also says in the chapter,Wombless Men that male science,male alchemy,is partially rooted in male uterus envy,the desire to be able to create something miraculous out of male inventiveness.However,men in science have carried us all to the brink of total planetary,genetuc and human destruction,repressed and unresolved uterus-envy is a dangerous emotion.
She also has a chapter on Pornography and Other Male Sexual Fantasies. And she says in the chapter Wombless Men that it is no accident that books of pornographic or erotic art are also the source of many expressions of womb envy. In Dr.Chesler's great 1994 book, Patriarchy Notes Of An Expert Witness she explains that both wife beaters and serial killers of women were addicted to pornography. She also explains that serial killers are mainly white male drifters obsessed with pornography and woman-hatred who sexually use their victims, either before or after killing them and who were themselves *paternally* abused children, and as adults they scapegoat not fathers but mainly women , sometimes children , sometimes male homosexuals who are seen as "feminine" or vulnerable. She then says that serial killers may be responsible for the daily and permanent , disappearance of 1000's of prostituted and non-prostiuted women each and every year all accross the US.
She also talks a lot about how sadly, women have been taught to hate themselves and each other because of the crazy male dominated woman hating society! She has many good reviews for her book, Woman's Inhumanity To Woman which I also want to read.
Also in 1997 ( I also wrote to Dr. Chesler at this time and she wrote back a note and sent me some articles she had written) I spoke with her secretary who was in her 50's or early 60's and she told me that she read several chapters in one of Dr. Chesler's books, and that it was very interesting. I told her that I read several of her whole books. I said to her how unreal and crazy it is that men hate women for *no* rational reasons and that they are born and nurtured by *women* that their mothers are *women* and that most women have been kind to their sons, husbands and to men in general even though they have hated and discriminated against us, and have been doing all of these horrible injustices to women for 1000's of years ! And she said, it's crazy and unreal but it's true!
In 1994 I wrote to psychiatrist Dr.Linnea Smith(who has an excellent informative site on the harms of pornography including Playboy) about my experience and the harms of pornography. She wrote me back a very nice note and thanked me for my important efforts to educate people on the harms of porn. She sent me two huge folders full of important information on the harms including Playboy cartoons of women being sexually harassed in the workplace by their male bosses and child abuse cartoons!
One of the many things she sent me was a transcribed lecture by forensic psychiatrist and law professor Dr.Park Elliott Dietz, and this lecture was given before the National Conference of State Legislators on August 5 1986 and was videotaped by C-Span. Dr. Dietz served as a commissioner on the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography. He was professor of law,professor of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry,and Medical Director of The Institute of Law,Psychiatry and Medical Director of The Institute of Law,Psychiatry and Public Policy at The University of Virginia School of Law and School of Medicine.
He gave many examples of women and children's testimonies who were sexually abused by men who used pornography,and also women who were sexually harassed on the job with pornographic pictures hung up on the walls and shown to them. He said he only used a small sample of the 1000's of women and children who testified. He says many times that pornography is a health problem and human rights issue and he said one of the reasons is because so much of it teaches false,misleading,and even dangerous information about human sexuality.
This is what he said a person would learn about sexuality from pornography, "A person who learned about human sexuality in the "adults only" pornography outlets of America would be a person,who had never conceived of a man and woman marrying or even falling in love before having intercourse,who had never conceived of two people making love in privacy without guilt or fear of discovery,who had never conceived of tender foreplay,who had never conceived of vaginal intercourse with ejaculation during intromission,and who had never conceived of procreation as a purpose of sexual union.,
Instead,such a person would be one who had learned that sex at home meant sex with one's children,stepchildren,parents,stepparents,siblings,cousins,nephews,nieces,aunts,uncles,and pets,and with neighbors,milkmen,plumbers,salesmen,burglars,and peepers,who had learned that people take off their clothes and have sex within the first 5 minutes of meeting one another,who had learned to misjudge the percentage of women who prepare for sex by shaving their pubic hair,having their breasts,buttocks or legs tattooed,having their nipples or labia pierced,or donning leather,latex,rubber,or childlike costumes,who had learned to misjudge the proportion of men who prepare for sex by having their genitals or nipples pierced,wearing women's clothing,or growing breasts.
Who had learned that about 1 out of 5 sexual encounters involves spankning,whipping,fighting,wrestling,tying,chaining,gagging,or torture,who had learned that more than 1 in 10 sexaul acts involves a party of more than 2,who had learned that the purpose of ejaculation is that of soiling the mouths,faces,breasts,abdomens,backs,and food at which it's always aimed,who had learned that body cavities were designed for the insertion of foreign objects,who had learned that the anus was a genital to be licked and penetrated,who had learned that urine and excrement are erotic materials,who had learned that the instruments of sex chemicals,handcuffs,gags,hoods,restraints,harnesses,police badges,knives,guns,whips,paddles,toilets,diapers,enema bags,inflatable rubber women,and disembodied vaginas,breasts,and penises,who had learned that except with the children,where secrecy was required,photographers and cameras were supposed to be present to capture the action so that it could be spread abroad.
He said if these were the only adverse consequences of pornography,the most straightforward remedy would be to provide factually accurate information on human sexuality to people before they are exposed to pornography,if only we could agree on what that information is,on who should provide it to the many children whose parents are incapable of doing so,and on effective and acceptable means by which to ensure that exposure not precede education. In the absense of such a remedy,the probable consequences in this area alone are sufficient to support recommendations that would reduce the dissemination of that pornography which teaches false,misleading or dangerous information about human sexuality. And these are not the only adverse consequences of pornography.
He then says before he gives more examples and research,that pornography is a health problem and human rights issue because it increases the probability that members of the exposed population will acquire attitudes that are detrimental to the physical and mental health of both those exposed and those around them,pornography is a health problem and human rights issue because it is used as an instrument of sexual abuse and sexual harassment.
And look where we are now!
Posted by Your Name Here on April 20, 2010 at 10:45 AM
Your comments I tried to post before my most recent comment that I noticed I made some typing mistakes in my first post and I really wish there was an edit button on here!
To the posters Caralaine and John Horstman who rightfully pointed out how gross semen is,
And most men think blood and menstrual blood is gross but blood isn't that gross at all,it's just a thin red liquid that keeps us all alive. But semen is totally gross many men and women on different message boards have said so too and called it penis snot(with 300 million sperm cells in it!).And since a lot of men think blood is gross,I'd like to know if all of these men who love to watch men ejaculating semen on women's faces & bodies & who love to do this to women in their lives,would like to see the men in pornography with menstrual blood smeared all over their faces,bodies & in their mouths,& to have women do this to them too.Oh but most would think this was gross & degrading! On a site Vegan Porn posted in 2004 the topic was Does Pornography Objectify Women and a woman posted claiming that she loves to watch porn with her boyfriend but that when they ejaculate on the woman's face she has to turn away.She said semen has the consistency of snot and she said seeing something of that consistency on someone's face or in someon'es mouth is gross and it reminds her of children with snot running down their noses.
A guy said thanks a lot for the comparison. And a woman who had posted a little while before saying if a woman wants a man to ejaculate on her face what is so bad,now was disgusted and said Oh that comparison of semen and snot,she said she would never be able to get that out of her mind and she said arrg! And another woman said most women don't want this and find it degrading and disgusting.And a man had posted on there saying he liked to watch some genuine lesbian pornography not the fake made for heterosexual men.And he said does anyone else here feel that the one thing that is shown in all heterosexual pornography no matter what,the ejaculating on the face,is the most horrendeous thing to ever come from man? He said something like it treats women as if she's they guy's property and he said it treats the women as if she's his slut and therefore He HAS NO Problem What So Ever Ejaculating All Over Her Face. He said more women are accepting it now because pornography itself has become more acceptable and mainstreamed,but he said this is nasty.
There was a 1993 study by a psychologist and other researchers I think from the University of California I found online years ago and they asked men and women about pornography and most women said that pornography sexually subordinates women,and the authors of the study said that the penis is worshipped in pornography(as it is in the whole male dominated sexist,woman-hating society) and semen is glorified.
Has anyone on here ever read any of the excellent books by acclaimed radical feminist psychologist Phyllis Chesler? When I wrote to Gloria Steinem when I was 22 she wrote me back a great response and suggested I read Women And Madness by Phyllis Chesler and that I would find that it made me feel less alone.
I was only 7 when that book came out and I had never heard of her, so I read it and it's great powerful information as are her other books that I went on to also read, her great book About Men, which came out in 1978, and (Gloria also gave a great review on the cover) and I read it about 15 years ago for the first time. She interviewed 100's of men and many of them were married. In her chapter called Wombless Men, she has pictures of sculptures and paintings by famous male artists like Salvador Dali, and Michaelangelo etc and she demonstrates and talks a lot about men's subconscious fear and envy of the womb and men's (crazy!) hatred of women. 1 of her references in her extensive bibliography is psychiatrist Wolfgang Lederer's 1968 book, The Fear Of Women in he which explained the same things.
She also has a chapter called Phallic Sexuality and in the beginning of it she has a little boy interviwed by a Dr.Richard Green about Sexual Idenity Conflict in Children and Adults and he was asked if he ever wished he had been born a girl, and he said yes. Dr.Green asks him why does he wish that, and the little boy says, girls they don't have to have a penis. The doctor says they don't have to have a penis? The little boy then says they can have babies. The doctor then says to him why do you think girls don't have to have a penis?
And the little boy says Cause they have to have babies ... and babies can't come out of a penis... babies come out of a vagina... The doctor then says to him , your penis gives you a nice feeling doesn't it? You're not scared of it when it gets big and stiff are you ? The boy says no. The doctor says good ! It's supposed to do that when you tickle it. That's one big advantage for being a boy cause girls can't do that you know. The boy says Um hum. The doctor then says to him, sure they can have babies but only boys can have a penis stand up like that.
In the beginning of her chapter Wombless Men she has woman hater Freud interviweing a 5 year old boy patient and Freud says to him, But only women have children. Hans the little boy says he's going to have a little girl. Freud says you'd like to have a little girl.Hans says yes next year I'm going to have one. Freud says to him but you can't have a little girl. Hans says, Oh yes boys have girls and girls have boys. Freud says, boys don't have children only women ,only Mummies have children. Hans says, but why shouldn't I ? She also says in the chapter,On having A Penis and she interviewed 100's of men about having a penis,that female blood regularly shed,reminds men of their "castration" fear,and that it also reminds them of their deeply repressed desire to *bear* children and of their inability to do so.She also says in the chapter,Wombless Men that male science,male alchemy,is partially rooted in male uterus envy,the desire to be able to create something miraculous out of male inventiveness.However,men in science have carried us all to the brink of total planetary,genetuc and human destruction,repressed and unresolved uterus-envy is a dangerous emotion.
She also has a chapter on Pornography and Other Male Sexual Fantasies. And she says in the chapter Wombless Men that it is no accident that books of pornographic or erotic art are also the source of many expressions of womb envy. In Dr.Chesler's great 1994 book, Patriarchy Notes Of An Expert Witness she explains that both wife beaters and serial killers of women were addicted to pornography. She also explains that serial killers are mainly white male drifters obsessed with pornography and woman-hatred who sexually use their victims, either before or after killing them and who were themselves *paternally* abused children, and as adults they scapegoat not fathers but mainly women , sometimes children , sometimes male homosexuals who are seen as "feminine" or vulnerable. She then says that serial killers may be responsible for the daily and permanent , disappearance of 1000's of prostituted and non-prostiuted women each and every year all accross the US.
She also talks a lot about how sadly, women have been taught to hate themselves and each other because of the crazy male dominated woman hating society! She has many good reviews for her book, Woman's Inhumanity To Woman which I also want to read.
Also in 1997 ( I also wrote to Dr. Chesler at this time and she wrote back a note and sent me some articles she had written) I spoke with her secretary who was in her 50's or early 60's and she told me that she read several chapters in one of Dr. Chesler's books, and that it was very interesting. I told her that I read several of her whole books. I said to her how unreal and crazy it is that men hate women for *no* rational reasons and that they are born and nurtured by *women* that their mothers are *women* and that most women have been kind to their sons, husbands and to men in general even though they have hated and discriminated against us, and have been doing all of these horrible injustices to women for 1000's of years ! And she said, it's crazy and unreal but it's true!
In 1994 I wrote to psychiatrist Dr.Linnea Smith(who has an excellent informative site on the harms of pornography including Playboy) about my experience and the harms of pornography. She wrote me back a very nice note and thanked me for my important efforts to educate people on the harms of porn. She sent me two huge folders full of important information on the harms including Playboy cartoons of women being sexually harassed in the workplace by their male bosses and child abuse cartoons!
One of the many things she sent me was a transcribed lecture by forensic psychiatrist and law professor Dr.Park Elliott Dietz, and this lecture was given before the National Conference of State Legislators on August 5 1986 and was videotaped by C-Span. Dr. Dietz served as a commissioner on the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography. He was professor of law,professor of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry,and Medical Director of The Institute of Law,Psychiatry and Medical Director of The Institute of Law,Psychiatry and Public Policy at The University of Virginia School of Law and School of Medicine.
He gave many examples of women and children's testimonies who were sexually abused by men who used pornography,and also women who were sexually harassed on the job with pornographic pictures hung up on the walls and shown to them. He said he only used a small sample of the 1000's of women and children who testified. He says many times that pornography is a health problem and human rights issue and he said one of the reasons is because so much of it teaches false,misleading,and even dangerous information about human sexuality.
This is what he said a person would learn about sexuality from pornography, "A person who learned about human sexuality in the "adults only" pornography outlets of America would be a person,who had never conceived of a man and woman marrying or even falling in love before having intercourse,who had never conceived of two people making love in privacy without guilt or fear of discovery,who had never conceived of tender foreplay,who had never conceived of vaginal intercourse with ejaculation during intromission,and who had never conceived of procreation as a purpose of sexual union.,
Instead,such a person would be one who had learned that sex at home meant sex with one's children,stepchildren,parents,stepparents,siblings,cousins,nephews,nieces,aunts,uncles,and pets,and with neighbors,milkmen,plumbers,salesmen,burglars,and peepers,who had learned that people take off their clothes and have sex within the first 5 minutes of meeting one another,who had learned to misjudge the percentage of women who prepare for sex by shaving their pubic hair,having their breasts,buttocks or legs tattooed,having their nipples or labia pierced,or donning leather,latex,rubber,or childlike costumes,who had learned to misjudge the proportion of men who prepare for sex by having their genitals or nipples pierced,wearing women's clothing,or growing breasts.
Who had learned that about 1 out of 5 sexual encounters involves spankning,whipping,fighting,wrestling,tying,chaining,gagging,or torture,who had learned that more than 1 in 10 sexaul acts involves a party of more than 2,who had learned that the purpose of ejaculation is that of soiling the mouths,faces,breasts,abdomens,backs,and food at which it's always aimed,who had learned that body cavities were designed for the insertion of foreign objects,who had learned that the anus was a genital to be licked and penetrated,who had learned that urine and excrement are erotic materials,who had learned that the instruments of sex chemicals,handcuffs,gags,hoods,restraints,harnesses,police badges,knives,guns,whips,paddles,toilets,diapers,enema bags,inflatable rubber women,and disembodied vaginas,breasts,and penises,who had learned that except with the children,where secrecy was required,photographers and cameras were supposed to be present to capture the action so that it could be spread abroad.
He said if these were the only adverse consequences of pornography,the most straightforward remedy would be to provide factually accurate information on human sexuality to people before they are exposed to pornography,if only we could agree on what that information is,on who should provide it to the many children whose parents are incapable of doing so,and on effective and acceptable means by which to ensure that exposure not precede education. In the absense of such a remedy,the probable consequences in this area alone are sufficient to support recommendations that would reduce the dissemination of that pornography which teaches false,misleading or dangerous information about human sexuality. And these are not the only adverse consequences of pornography.
He then says before he gives more examples and research,that pornography is a health problem and human rights issue because it increases the probability that members of the exposed population will acquire attitudes that are detrimental to the physical and mental health of both those exposed and those around them,pornography is a health problem and human rights issue because it is used as an instrument of sexual abuse and sexual harassment.
And look where we are now!
I tried to post before my most recent comment that I noticed I made some typing mistakes in my first post and I really wish there was an edit button on here!
To the posters Caralaine and John Horstman who rightfully pointed out how gross semen is,
And most men think blood and menstrual blood is gross but blood isn't that gross at all,it's just a thin red liquid that keeps us all alive. But semen is totally gross many men and women on different message boards have said so too and called it penis snot(with 300 million sperm cells in it!).And since a lot of men think blood is gross,I'd like to know if all of these men who love to watch men ejaculating semen on women's faces & bodies & who love to do this to women in their lives,would like to see the men in pornography with menstrual blood smeared all over their faces,bodies & in their mouths,& to have women do this to them too.Oh but most would think this was gross & degrading! On a site Vegan Porn posted in 2004 the topic was Does Pornography Objectify Women and a woman posted claiming that she loves to watch porn with her boyfriend but that when they ejaculate on the woman's face she has to turn away.She said semen has the consistency of snot and she said seeing something of that consistency on someone's face or in someon'es mouth is gross and it reminds her of children with snot running down their noses.
A guy said thanks a lot for the comparison. And a woman who had posted a little while before saying if a woman wants a man to ejaculate on her face what is so bad,now was disgusted and said Oh that comparison of semen and snot,she said she would never be able to get that out of her mind and she said arrg! And another woman said most women don't want this and find it degrading and disgusting.And a man had posted on there saying he liked to watch some genuine lesbian pornography not the fake made for heterosexual men.And he said does anyone else here feel that the one thing that is shown in all heterosexual pornography no matter what,the ejaculating on the face,is the most horrendeous thing to ever come from man? He said something like it treats women as if she's they guy's property and he said it treats the women as if she's his slut and therefore He HAS NO Problem What So Ever Ejaculating All Over Her Face. He said more women are accepting it now because pornography itself has become more acceptable and mainstreamed,but he said this is nasty.
There was a 1993 study by a psychologist and other researchers I think from the University of California I found online years ago and they asked men and women about pornography and most women said that pornography sexually subordinates women,and the authors of the study said that the penis is worshipped in pornography(as it is in the whole male dominated sexist,woman-hating society) and semen is glorified.
There are excellent books by acclaimed radical feminist psychologist Phyllis Chesler. When I wrote to Gloria Steinem when I was 22 she wrote me back a great response and suggested I read Women And Madness by Phyllis Chesler and that I would find that it made me feel less alone.
I was only 7 when that book came out and I had never heard of her, so I read it and it's great powerful information as are her other books that I went on to also read, her great book About Men, which came out in 1978, and (Gloria also gave a great review on the cover) and I read it about 15 years ago for the first time. She interviewed 100's of men and many of them were married. In her chapter called Wombless Men, she has pictures of sculptures and paintings by famous male artists like Salvador Dali, and Michaelangelo etc and she demonstrates and talks a lot about men's subconscious fear and envy of the womb and men's (crazy!) hatred of women. 1 of her references in her extensive bibliography is psychiatrist Wolfgang Lederer's 1968 book, The Fear Of Women in he which explained the same things.
She also has a chapter called Phallic Sexuality and in the beginning of it she has a little boy interviwed by a Dr.Richard Green about Sexual Idenity Conflict in Children and Adults and he was asked if he ever wished he had been born a girl, and he said yes. Dr.Green asks him why does he wish that, and the little boy says, girls they don't have to have a penis. The doctor says they don't have to have a penis? The little boy then says they can have babies. The doctor then says to him why do you think girls don't have to have a penis?
And the little boy says Cause they have to have babies ... and babies can't come out of a penis... babies come out of a vagina... The doctor then says to him , your penis gives you a nice feeling doesn't it? You're not scared of it when it gets big and stiff are you ? The boy says no. The doctor says good ! It's supposed to do that when you tickle it. That's one big advantage for being a boy cause girls can't do that you know. The boy says Um hum. The doctor then says to him, sure they can have babies but only boys can have a penis stand up like that.
In the beginning of her chapter Wombless Men she has woman hater Freud interviweing a 5 year old boy patient and Freud says to him, But only women have children. Hans the little boy says he's going to have a little girl. Freud says you'd like to have a little girl.Hans says yes next year I'm going to have one. Freud says to him but you can't have a little girl. Hans says, Oh yes boys have girls and girls have boys. Freud says, boys don't have children only women ,only Mummies have children. Hans says, but why shouldn't I ? She also says in the chapter,On having A Penis and she interviewed 100's of men about having a penis,that female blood regularly shed,reminds men of their "castration" fear,and that it also reminds them of their deeply repressed desire to *bear* children and of their inability to do so.She also says in the chapter,Wombless Men that male science,male alchemy,is partially rooted in male uterus envy,the desire to be able to create something miraculous out of male inventiveness.However,men in science have carried us all to the brink of total planetary,genetuc and human destruction,repressed and unresolved uterus-envy is a dangerous emotion.
She also has a chapter on Pornography and Other Male Sexual Fantasies. And she says in the chapter Wombless Men that it is no accident that books of pornographic or erotic art are also the source of many expressions of womb envy. In Dr.Chesler's great 1994 book, Patriarchy Notes Of An Expert Witness she explains that both wife beaters and serial killers of women were addicted to pornography. She also explains that serial killers are mainly white male drifters obsessed with pornography and woman-hatred who sexually use their victims, either before or after killing them and who were themselves *paternally* abused children, and as adults they scapegoat not fathers but mainly women , sometimes children , sometimes male homosexuals who are seen as "feminine" or vulnerable. She then says that serial killers may be responsible for the daily and permanent , disappearance of 1000's of prostituted and non-prostiuted women each and every year all accross the US.
She also talks a lot about how sadly, women have been taught to hate themselves and each other because of the crazy male dominated woman hating society! She has many good reviews for her book, Woman's Inhumanity To Woman which I also want to read.
Also in 1997 ( I also wrote to Dr. Chesler at this time and she wrote back a note and sent me some articles she had written) I spoke with her secretary who was in her 50's or early 60's and she told me that she read several chapters in one of Dr. Chesler's books, and that it was very interesting. I told her that I read several of her whole books. I said to her how unreal and crazy it is that men hate women for *no* rational reasons and that they are born and nurtured by *women* that their mothers are *women* and that most women have been kind to their sons, husbands and to men in general even though they have hated and discriminated against us, and have been doing all of these horrible injustices to women for 1000's of years ! And she said, it's crazy and unreal but it's true!
In 1994 I wrote to psychiatrist Dr.Linnea Smith(who has an excellent informative site on the harms of pornography including Playboy) about my experience and the harms of pornography. She wrote me back a very nice note and thanked me for my important efforts to educate people on the harms of porn. She sent me two huge folders full of important information on the harms including Playboy cartoons of women being sexually harassed in the workplace by their male bosses and child abuse cartoons!
One of the many things she sent me was a transcribed lecture by forensic psychiatrist and law professor Dr.Park Elliott Dietz, and this lecture was given before the National Conference of State Legislators on August 5 1986 and was videotaped by C-Span. Dr. Dietz served as a commissioner on the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography. He was professor of law,professor of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry,and Medical Director of The Institute of Law,Psychiatry and Medical Director of The Institute of Law,Psychiatry and Public Policy at The University of Virginia School of Law and School of Medicine.
He gave many examples of women and children's testimonies who were sexually abused by men who used pornography,and also women who were sexually harassed on the job with pornographic pictures hung up on the walls and shown to them. He said he only used a small sample of the 1000's of women and children who testified. He says many times that pornography is a health problem and human rights issue and he said one of the reasons is because so much of it teaches false,misleading,and even dangerous information about human sexuality.
This is what he said a person would learn about sexuality from pornography, "A person who learned about human sexuality in the "adults only" pornography outlets of America would be a person,who had never conceived of a man and woman marrying or even falling in love before having intercourse,who had never conceived of two people making love in privacy without guilt or fear of discovery,who had never conceived of tender foreplay,who had never conceived of vaginal intercourse with ejaculation during intromission,and who had never conceived of procreation as a purpose of sexual union.,
Instead,such a person would be one who had learned that sex at home meant sex with one's children,stepchildren,parents,stepparents,siblings,cousins,nephews,nieces,aunts,uncles,and pets,and with neighbors,milkmen,plumbers,salesmen,burglars,and peepers,who had learned that people take off their clothes and have sex within the first 5 minutes of meeting one another,who had learned to misjudge the percentage of women who prepare for sex by shaving their pubic hair,having their breasts,buttocks or legs tattooed,having their nipples or labia pierced,or donning leather,latex,rubber,or childlike costumes,who had learned to misjudge the proportion of men who prepare for sex by having their genitals or nipples pierced,wearing women's clothing,or growing breasts.
Who had learned that about 1 out of 5 sexual encounters involves spankning,whipping,fighting,wrestling,tying,chaining,gagging,or torture,who had learned that more than 1 in 10 sexaul acts involves a party of more than 2,who had learned that the purpose of ejaculation is that of soiling the mouths,faces,breasts,abdomens,backs,and food at which it's always aimed,who had learned that body cavities were designed for the insertion of foreign objects,who had learned that the anus was a genital to be licked and penetrated,who had learned that urine and excrement are erotic materials,who had learned that the instruments of sex chemicals,handcuffs,gags,hoods,restraints,harnesses,police badges,knives,guns,whips,paddles,toilets,diapers,enema bags,inflatable rubber women,and disembodied vaginas,breasts,and penises,who had learned that except with the children,where secrecy was required,photographers and cameras were supposed to be present to capture the action so that it could be spread abroad.
He said if these were the only adverse consequences of pornography,the most straightforward remedy would be to provide factually accurate information on human sexuality to people before they are exposed to pornography,if only we could agree on what that information is,on who should provide it to the many children whose parents are incapable of doing so,and on effective and acceptable means by which to ensure that exposure not precede education. In the absense of such a remedy,the probable consequences in this area alone are sufficient to support recommendations that would reduce the dissemination of that pornography which teaches false,misleading or dangerous information about human sexuality. And these are not the only adverse consequences of pornography.
He then says before he gives more examples and research,that pornography is a health problem and human rights issue because it increases the probability that members of the exposed population will acquire attitudes that are detrimental to the physical and mental health of both those exposed and those around them,pornography is a health problem and human rights issue because it is used as an instrument of sexual abuse and sexual harassment.
And look where we are now!
Your comments I tried to post before my most recent comment that I noticed I made some typing mistakes in my first post and I really wish there was an edit button on here!
To the posters Caralaine and John Horstman who rightfully pointed out how gross semen is,
And most men think blood and menstrual blood is gross but blood isn't that gross at all,it's just a thin red liquid that keeps us all alive. But semen is totally gross many men and women on different message boards have said so too and called it penis snot(with 300 million sperm cells in it!).And since a lot of men think blood is gross,I'd like to know if all of these men who love to watch men ejaculating semen on women's faces & bodies & who love to do this to women in their lives,would like to see the men in pornography with menstrual blood smeared all over their faces,bodies & in their mouths,& to have women do this to them too.Oh but most would think this was gross & degrading! On a site Vegan Porn posted in 2004 the topic was Does Pornography Objectify Women and a woman posted claiming that she loves to watch porn with her boyfriend but that when they ejaculate on the woman's face she has to turn away.She said semen has the consistency of snot and she said seeing something of that consistency on someone's face or in someon'es mouth is gross and it reminds her of children with snot running down their noses.
A guy said thanks a lot for the comparison. And a woman who had posted a little while before saying if a woman wants a man to ejaculate on her face what is so bad,now was disgusted and said Oh that comparison of semen and snot,she said she would never be able to get that out of her mind and she said arrg! And another woman said most women don't want this and find it degrading and disgusting.And a man had posted on there saying he liked to watch some genuine lesbian pornography not the fake made for heterosexual men.And he said does anyone else here feel that the one thing that is shown in all heterosexual pornography no matter what,the ejaculating on the face,is the most horrendeous thing to ever come from man? He said something like it treats women as if she's they guy's property and he said it treats the women as if she's his slut and therefore He HAS NO Problem What So Ever Ejaculating All Over Her Face. He said more women are accepting it now because pornography itself has become more acceptable and mainstreamed,but he said this is nasty.
There was a 1993 study by a psychologist and other researchers I think from the University of California I found online years ago and they asked men and women about pornography and most women said that pornography sexually subordinates women,and the authors of the study said that the penis is worshipped in pornography(as it is in the whole male dominated sexist,woman-hating society) and semen is glorified.
Has anyone on here ever read any of the excellent books by acclaimed radical feminist psychologist Phyllis Chesler? When I wrote to Gloria Steinem when I was 22 she wrote me back a great response and suggested I read Women And Madness by Phyllis Chesler and that I would find that it made me feel less alone.
I was only 7 when that book came out and I had never heard of her, so I read it and it's great powerful information as are her other books that I went on to also read, her great book About Men, which came out in 1978, and (Gloria also gave a great review on the cover) and I read it about 15 years ago for the first time. She interviewed 100's of men and many of them were married. In her chapter called Wombless Men, she has pictures of sculptures and paintings by famous male artists like Salvador Dali, and Michaelangelo etc and she demonstrates and talks a lot about men's subconscious fear and envy of the womb and men's (crazy!) hatred of women. 1 of her references in her extensive bibliography is psychiatrist Wolfgang Lederer's 1968 book, The Fear Of Women in he which explained the same things.
She also has a chapter called Phallic Sexuality and in the beginning of it she has a little boy interviwed by a Dr.Richard Green about Sexual Idenity Conflict in Children and Adults and he was asked if he ever wished he had been born a girl, and he said yes. Dr.Green asks him why does he wish that, and the little boy says, girls they don't have to have a penis. The doctor says they don't have to have a penis? The little boy then says they can have babies. The doctor then says to him why do you think girls don't have to have a penis?
And the little boy says Cause they have to have babies ... and babies can't come out of a penis... babies come out of a vagina... The doctor then says to him , your penis gives you a nice feeling doesn't it? You're not scared of it when it gets big and stiff are you ? The boy says no. The doctor says good ! It's supposed to do that when you tickle it. That's one big advantage for being a boy cause girls can't do that you know. The boy says Um hum. The doctor then says to him, sure they can have babies but only boys can have a penis stand up like that.
In the beginning of her chapter Wombless Men she has woman hater Freud interviweing a 5 year old boy patient and Freud says to him, But only women have children. Hans the little boy says he's going to have a little girl. Freud says you'd like to have a little girl.Hans says yes next year I'm going to have one. Freud says to him but you can't have a little girl. Hans says, Oh yes boys have girls and girls have boys. Freud says, boys don't have children only women ,only Mummies have children. Hans says, but why shouldn't I ? She also says in the chapter,On having A Penis and she interviewed 100's of men about having a penis,that female blood regularly shed,reminds men of their "castration" fear,and that it also reminds them of their deeply repressed desire to *bear* children and of their inability to do so.She also says in the chapter,Wombless Men that male science,male alchemy,is partially rooted in male uterus envy,the desire to be able to create something miraculous out of male inventiveness.However,men in science have carried us all to the brink of total planetary,genetuc and human destruction,repressed and unresolved uterus-envy is a dangerous emotion.
She also has a chapter on Pornography and Other Male Sexual Fantasies. And she says in the chapter Wombless Men that it is no accident that books of pornographic or erotic art are also the source of many expressions of womb envy. In Dr.Chesler's great 1994 book, Patriarchy Notes Of An Expert Witness she explains that both wife beaters and serial killers of women were addicted to pornography. She also explains that serial killers are mainly white male drifters obsessed with pornography and woman-hatred who sexually use their victims, either before or after killing them and who were themselves *paternally* abused children, and as adults they scapegoat not fathers but mainly women , sometimes children , sometimes male homosexuals who are seen as "feminine" or vulnerable. She then says that serial killers may be responsible for the daily and permanent , disappearance of 1000's of prostituted and non-prostiuted women each and every year all accross the US.
She also talks a lot about how sadly, women have been taught to hate themselves and each other because of the crazy male dominated woman hating society! She has many good reviews for her book, Woman's Inhumanity To Woman which I also want to read.
Also in 1997 ( I also wrote to Dr. Chesler at this time and she wrote back a note and sent me some articles she had written) I spoke with her secretary who was in her 50's or early 60's and she told me that she read several chapters in one of Dr. Chesler's books, and that it was very interesting. I told her that I read several of her whole books. I said to her how unreal and crazy it is that men hate women for *no* rational reasons and that they are born and nurtured by *women* that their mothers are *women* and that most women have been kind to their sons, husbands and to men in general even though they have hated and discriminated against us, and have been doing all of these horrible injustices to women for 1000's of years ! And she said, it's crazy and unreal but it's true!
In 1994 I wrote to psychiatrist Dr.Linnea Smith(who has an excellent informative site on the harms of pornography including Playboy) about my experience and the harms of pornography. She wrote me back a very nice note and thanked me for my important efforts to educate people on the harms of porn. She sent me two huge folders full of important information on the harms including Playboy cartoons of women being sexually harassed in the workplace by their male bosses and child abuse cartoons!
One of the many things she sent me was a transcribed lecture by forensic psychiatrist and law professor Dr.Park Elliott Dietz, and this lecture was given before the National Conference of State Legislators on August 5 1986 and was videotaped by C-Span. Dr. Dietz served as a commissioner on the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography. He was professor of law,professor of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry,and Medical Director of The Institute of Law,Psychiatry and Medical Director of The Institute of Law,Psychiatry and Public Policy at The University of Virginia School of Law and School of Medicine.
He gave many examples of women and children's testimonies who were sexually abused by men who used pornography,and also women who were sexually harassed on the job with pornographic pictures hung up on the walls and shown to them. He said he only used a small sample of the 1000's of women and children who testified. He says many times that pornography is a health problem and human rights issue and he said one of the reasons is because so much of it teaches false,misleading,and even dangerous information about human sexuality.
This is what he said a person would learn about sexuality from pornography, "A person who learned about human sexuality in the "adults only" pornography outlets of America would be a person,who had never conceived of a man and woman marrying or even falling in love before having intercourse,who had never conceived of two people making love in privacy without guilt or fear of discovery,who had never conceived of tender foreplay,who had never conceived of vaginal intercourse with ejaculation during intromission,and who had never conceived of procreation as a purpose of sexual union.,
Instead,such a person would be one who had learned that sex at home meant sex with one's children,stepchildren,parents,stepparents,siblings,cousins,nephews,nieces,aunts,uncles,and pets,and with neighbors,milkmen,plumbers,salesmen,burglars,and peepers,who had learned that people take off their clothes and have sex within the first 5 minutes of meeting one another,who had learned to misjudge the percentage of women who prepare for sex by shaving their pubic hair,having their breasts,buttocks or legs tattooed,having their nipples or labia pierced,or donning leather,latex,rubber,or childlike costumes,who had learned to misjudge the proportion of men who prepare for sex by having their genitals or nipples pierced,wearing women's clothing,or growing breasts.
Who had learned that about 1 out of 5 sexual encounters involves spankning,whipping,fighting,wrestling,tying,chaining,gagging,or torture,who had learned that more than 1 in 10 sexaul acts involves a party of more than 2,who had learned that the purpose of ejaculation is that of soiling the mouths,faces,breasts,abdomens,backs,and food at which it's always aimed,who had learned that body cavities were designed for the insertion of foreign objects,who had learned that the anus was a genital to be licked and penetrated,who had learned that urine and excrement are erotic materials,who had learned that the instruments of sex chemicals,handcuffs,gags,hoods,restraints,harnesses,police badges,knives,guns,whips,paddles,toilets,diapers,enema bags,inflatable rubber women,and disembodied vaginas,breasts,and penises,who had learned that except with the children,where secrecy was required,photographers and cameras were supposed to be present to capture the action so that it could be spread abroad.
He said if these were the only adverse consequences of pornography,the most straightforward remedy would be to provide factually accurate information on human sexuality to people before they are exposed to pornography,if only we could agree on what that information is,on who should provide it to the many children whose parents are incapable of doing so,and on effective and acceptable means by which to ensure that exposure not precede education. In the absense of such a remedy,the probable consequences in this area alone are sufficient to support recommendations that would reduce the dissemination of that pornography which teaches false,misleading or dangerous information about human sexuality. And these are not the only adverse consequences of pornography.
He then says before he gives more examples and research,that pornography is a health problem and human rights issue because it increases the probability that members of the exposed population will acquire attitudes that are detrimental to the physical and mental health of both those exposed and those around them,pornography is a health problem and human rights issue because it is used as an instrument of sexual abuse and sexual harassment.
And look where we are now!
Semen is so gross and repulsive it's as many men and women have said on different message boards said it's really gross ,like a white penis snot with 300 million sperm cells in it!
And to state the obvious it's not a food besides being unbelivably gross to eat it,(or even have it anywhere on the body!) it's intended as a reproductive fluid to fertilize eggs and make babies!
I should open up my ovaries and take out my eggs and eat them for breakfast! But this wouldn't be nearly as gross! I have a much better idea why don't ejaculate their semen into a bowl with a woman's eggs in it,and after the sperm fertilizes it,men can eat the fertilized egg before it turns into a fetus!
And even on the site Suicide Girls Forum which has been criticized by feminists as sexist because the women pose nude as just as sex objects for men,the women said they feel semen is really gross like snot and quite a few said thank God for condoms because it's so gross they don't want to feel it inside them vaginally.
Also a guy who gave a sexist woman-hating good review to a best of cum shots porn video,CumDumpsters said lets face it cum is gross,it's penis snot.And on another site a guy said that he can't be the only one who thinks cum is really gross.And he said he doesn't want to see it on women's faces,t*ts and as*ses,and he said it's f*cking GROSS and he posted a picture of a guy with either snot or semen streaming out the guy's nose from both nostrils.
Semen is so gross and repulsive it's as many and women have said on different message boards said it's really gross ,like a white penis snot with 300 million sperm cells in it!
And to state the obvious it's not a food besides being unbelivably gross to eat it,(or even have it anywhere on the body!) it's intended as a reproductive fluid to fertilize eggs and make babies!
I should open up my ovaries and take out my eggs and eat them for breakfast! But this wouldn't be nearly as gross! I have a much better idea why don't ejaculate their semen into a bowl with a woman's eggs in it,and after the sperm fertilizes it,men can eat the fertilized egg before it turns into a fetus!
And even on the site Suicide Girls Forum which has been criticized by feminists as sexist because the women pose nude as just as sex objects for men,the women said they feel semen is really gross like snot and quite a few said thank God for condoms because it's so gross they don't want to feel it inside them vaginally.
Also a guy who gave a sexist woman-hating good review to a best of cum shots porn video,CumDumpsters said lets face it cum is gross,it's penis snot.And on another site a guy said that he can't be the only one who thinks cum is really gross.And he said he doesn't want to see it on women's faces,t*ts and as*ses,and he said it's f*cking GROSS and he posted a picture of a guy with either snot or semen streaming out the guy's nose from both nostrils.
Semen is so gross and repulsive it's as many and women have said on different message boards said it's really gross ,like a white penis snot with 300 million sperm cells in it!
And to state the obvious it's not a food besides being unbelivably gross to eat it,(or even have it anywhere on the body!) it's intended as a reproductive fluid to fertilize eggs and make babies!
I should open up my ovaries and take out my eggs and eat them for breakfast! But this wouldn't be nearly as gross! I have a much better idea why don't ejaculate their semen into a bowl with a woman's eggs in it,and after the sperm fertilizes it,men can eat the fertilized egg before it turns into a fetus!
And even on the site Suicide Girls Forum which has been criticized by feminists as sexist because the women pose nude as just as sex objects for men,the women said they feel semen is really gross like snot and quite a few said thank God for condoms because it's so gross they don't want to feel it inside them vaginally.
Also a guy who gave a sexist woman-hating good review to a best of cum shots porn video,CumDumpsters said lets face it cum is gross,it's penis snot.And on another site a guy said that he can't be the only one who thinks cum is really gross.And he said he doesn't want to see it on women's faces,t*ts and as*ses,and he said it's f*cking GROSS and he posted a picture of a guy with either snot or semen streaming out the guy's nose from both nostrils.
I was so happ to read that! I have that fantasy (fucking a boy in the ass) and it's lovely to see other couples who are keen on the idea!
You made my day!
And given your rampant disgust with seemingly every fluid the body produces, I really do hope you and all of the other feces-phobics on here are washing your hands. A lot. Because, as the gastroenterologist said so well, shit happens. Everywhere.
#1 When quoting your statistics, as far as anal sex goes you seem to miss the gals from Lesbos who like "strap-on dildos" for anal as well as for vaginal sex.
#2 speaking of strap on's, perhaps GGG might like to buy one of these & see if her partner would like to reverse roles (she can do unto/into him what he would like to enjoy with her) .. a good "old fashioned enema" or three perhaps for starters. If nothing else, they might understand each other better ... perhaps every time he asks for anal, he can have it after letting her "screw his brains out" courtesy of her strap-on dildo up to his tonsils from behind a few times first.



RSS
Comments (199) RSS