Savage Love Podcast
Check out the all new Savage Lovecast site!
Got a question for Dan Savage?
Call the Savage Love Podcast at 206-201-2720
or email Dan at mail@savagelove.net.
Savage Love Archives
-
May 15
Shorties -
May 8
Reading Comprehension Fail -
May 1
Move On -
Apr 24
No Problem -
Apr 17
Dick Holes
More from Dan Savage
-
Tornado Truthers
-
There Are No Atheists In Foxholes
-
SL Letter of the Day: Have You Ever Heard of...?
-
Senate Democrats Fuck Over Bi-National Gay Couples...
-
Rightwing Anti-Gay French Activist Commits Suicide at Notre Dame Cathedral
Books by Dan Savage
American Savage
It Gets Better: Coming Out, Overcoming Bullying, and Creating a Life Worth Living
The Commitment: Love, Sex, Marriage, and My Family
Things I've Learned from Women Who've Dumped Me
Skipping Towards Gomorrah
The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant
Savage Links
- Babeland
- Fleshbot
- Good Vibrations
- Joe Newton/Savage Illustrations
- Planned Parenthood
- Spreading Santorum
- Planned Parenthood's Teen Wire
- Kinsey Confidential
- Carnal Nation
- Tiny Nibbles
Want a Second Opinion?
Contact Dan Savage
Savage on YouTube
Teen Beat
September 11, 2008
I'm a middle-aged guy. My boyfriend just left his teens. We originally got to know each other because I like to tie up muscular young guys and he's a muscular young guy who likes getting tied up. But he's a smart kid and after a few months we started actually liking each other. At some point that like turned to love.
Here's the problem: My boyfriend's parents—who are a little younger than I am—were snooping and found video clips on his computer that clearly illustrated our activities. He still lives with his parents and they were, prior to this discovery, entirely ignorant of their son's sexual orientation and interests. They're now threatening all the things asshole parents threaten: to kick him out, to stop paying for school, to disown him.
My first reaction was, "Come live with me, you don't need that kind of crap in your life." But the more I think about it, the more I wonder if it's the right thing to do. They are his family. Would I really be acting in his best interests if I helped him walk away from them, even as horrible as they're acting? I can put him up at my place. I can pay for his schooling. I'd be proud to do it. But I wonder if I'd be facilitating a decision he'd one day come to regret. Plus, we're in Boston and he isn't yet 21. On top of everything else, is there a chance the law could decide to bite me in the ass?
Not The Bad Guy
I can't do my best work, NTBG, without seeing those video clips. But let me give it a shot...
Your boyfriend is of legal age, so I don't see how you could possibly be in trouble with the law. (Unless those bondage videos were made before he reached the age of consent, which I'm hoping they were not.) His parents might not like the fact that their son is gay and a bondage freak, or that he's involved with an older man, but there's not a lot they can do about it.
Besides, of course, tossing him out, disowning him, and refusing to pay for his education.
If they do toss him out and refuse to pay for his education, NTBG, you should take him in and pay for his education. Don't do anything—anything else—that might antagonize your boyfriend's parents. No confrontations, no accusations, no scenes. Write them one polite letter. Tell them you appreciate how distressing it must have been for them to learn about their son's interests the way that they did, and tell them that, despite how they may have interpreted those video clips, you mean their son no harm, and that you intend to look out for him and keep him in school. Close by telling them you will encourage your boyfriend to keep the lines of communication open with them.
It could be emotionally tricky for a while, perhaps a long while, as his parents adjust to the big kinky news. But that's what happens when you snoop: Sometimes you find out things that you didn't want to know, didn't need to know, or weren't ready to know.
As for the boyfriend, it's entirely possible that he may one day blame you for his estrangement from his parents. You can inoculate yourself against those charges by making sure he sees you doing whatever you can to lay the groundwork for an eventual reconciliation.
Moving on, NTBG, you say you're in love, and that's swell. But just between us grown-ups: Very few people wind up with the person they met and fell in love with in their teens. At best, you'll have a few great years with this kid. But this can be a really successful relationship even if, as the song goes, "it's only for now"—if you play your cards right. And unless his parents are seriously nuts and your boyfriend desperately needs the legal protections of marriage—he needs you to be his next of kin in case of a medical emergency, for instance—I wouldn't marry his hot and kinky 20-year-old ass. And if he does need the legal protections of marriage, make him sign a prenup.
Speaking of hot teenagers and asshole parents and vows that you may come to regret...
The 17-year-old daughter of Sarah Palin, the GOP's vice-presidential nominee, is pregnant. The news was released by the McCain camp during a busy week—a hurricane, the Republican National Convention, Dick Cheney getting us into a war with Russia—so it didn't receive the coverage it deserved. To recap:
Seventeen-year-old Bristol Palin got her ass knocked up five or so months ago by 18-year-old Levi Johnston. Among the hobbies listed on Levi's since-yanked MySpace page—"fishing, shoot some shit, and just fuckin' chillin'"—was this revealing tidbit: "I don't want kids." But Bristol, says her mom, "made the decision on her own to keep the baby," and is now engaged to Levi "Shootin' Shit" Johnston.
As the adoptive parent of a child born to a pair of unwed teenagers, I'm certainly not in favor of abortion in all circumstances. But I believe that it's a choice teenagers should be able to make for themselves—with input from their families whenever possible—and, so it seems, does the GOP's VP nominee. Sarah Palin is pleased that her daughter made the decision—on her own—to keep the baby.
But Sarah Palin doesn't believe that other girls should be able to make their own decisions. Sarah Palin believes abortion should be illegal in almost every instance—including rape and incest. So Bristol Palin is being celebrated for making a choice that Sarah Palin would like to take away from all other American women. Apparently, today's GOP believes that choice is a special right reserved for the wayward daughters of Republican elected officials.
Oh, and Sarah Palin also believes that birth control shouldn't be made available to teenagers, she opposes medically accurate sex education, and she backs abstinence-until- marriage sex "education."
Sigh.
The GOP has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into abstinence "education" programs during the Bush years. I believe this enormous investment of public funds begs the obvious question: Is our children abstaining? Sarah Palin's aren't. Despite this massive outlay on the part of the American taxpayer and the example set by her Christian parents, Bristol Palin became sexually active while still in high school. Excuse me, but if abstinence education can't keep the daughter of the evangelical governor of Alaska off the cock, what hope is there for the daughters—and some of the sons—of average Americans?
I'm a cad for writing this, of course, because shortly before Bristol and Levi were paraded before cheering throngs at the Republican National Convention, the Palins asked the media to respect their daughter's privacy.
Another special right: When it comes to respecting your family's privacy, Palin and the GOP see no need. They want to micromanage the most intimate aspects of your private life. And if their own kids fail to live up to the standards that Palin and the GOP seek to impose on your family, well, that's a private matter between the Palins, their daughter, their God, and the thousands of screaming imbeciles in elephant hats waving McCain/Palin signs on the floor of the Republican National Convention.
This hypocrisy is a fundamentally violent act towards all of us. Its too bad that some are too dumb to realize it.
I doubt they're repeats, at least no the exact same person requesting the exact same advice, but it seems poor Dan is bombarded with people who ask the same fucking questions every week.
Thankfully people do this, because Dan has an amazing job offering sex advice to folks and all the freedom that comes along with it. Unfortunately, those of us who are avid readers have to suffer through the stupidity and obstinacy of our fellow human beings.
One would think after years of Dan's amazing advice something would sink in though with his readers though.
More importantly ... where are Levi's near-naked (or totally naked) pics? I mean, doesn't every dude have some bare ass pics partying and hanging out with his bros? Streaking, shut out at flipcup, teabagging his passed out friends...?
Also, typo: "Is our children abstaining?"
WHOA! "HER" mistake?!?! Did she somehow get pregnant all by herself?! I mean - if we have to lay "blame" here, her pregnancy could be "blamed" upon her ignorance of birth control methods, which knowledge of or access to were likely never made available to her by good old mom and dad. And didn't the father of her baby have some responsiblity?
And why does her getting married to some other 17 year old somehow redeem her? And why does she even need to be redeemed here?
And it is funny - Bristol is living, breathing (for two, actually...) evidence of their sex life TOGETHER. But its only NOW they are supposed to get married? And it is only SHE that is the hapless victim that has to get married? With this logic, it would appear that it is completely ok for the boyfriend to do as many girls as he wants, as long as he actually marries the one that has evidence he had sex with her.
Are we really still stuck criminalizing Eve?
Now, should McCain and Palin get into office and start implementing their forced-birth strategy, I suggest that we all start exercising our 2nd Amendment rights. I'd like to see *anyone* try take a coat hanger away from a pistol-packing feminazi.
Thanks to having frank, open discussions about sex with my parents and a naturally antisocial nature, I'm still single at nineteen, but to be totally honest?
Even knowing the (actual, not exagerated fear-mongering) risks, even knowing that it wasn't something I actually wanted at that point in my life, walking out of my school's abstinence only program in sophomore, I really, really wanted to run out and fuck the first guy I ran into, just to spite their self-righteous, arrogant, condescending, *lying * asses.
Because that's what abstinence only education does: it lies. It tries to booby trap sex by insinuating that everyone who has sex before marriage (not before mental-emotional maturity to make big descisions, mind you, but *marriage*) will inevitably end up heatbroken, pregnant, and dead of AIDS/Chlamydia/Syphilis/whatever.
Not necessarily in that order.
And teenagers KNOW that that's not true, so the Abstinence only people lose any shot at credibility. SO instead of actually getting kids to think about what they're doing, they convince them that *all* the warnings about unsafe sex are as much B.S. as the stuff they're pushing.
Which is probably why I had so many pregnant classmates.
You hit the nail on the head with Sarah Palin and Bristle "open legs" Palin and the GOP.
Also, I as an African American Female of 20 years of age (and a virgin, whooo!) I would like to thank you so much for what you said on Bill Maher this past Friday. If Barack had a baby situation in anyway similar to Palin's the RIGHT would rip on him till they killed the election.
Must also thank you and Kelly Washington for making a point about abstinence education. I feel very sorry for anyone from the highschool I graduated from. It was an all girls highschool and the only attempt they made about sex was hiring a program called "worth the wait" just once in my 2nd year. The program was nothing but a slide show of STI'd private areas, so it was more scare than education.
p.s. Was 'Bend Over Boyfriend' pseudo-screened at Western Washington, or Pitt?
In addition to your always poignant and relevant comments, thank you for your commentary at the end of the response to this letter by the way, this particular quotation made me laugh for 15 minutes. Wait -make that 16 minutes, because I'm still laughing, and anticipate I will be all day long. You have such a way with words! I love you Dan Savage!
PRETTY PLEASE?!?!?
-----------------
curlykerry, it's easier to ask forgiveness than to ask permission. DO IT. And take out full-page ads displaying Dan's commentary in conservative rags like the Washington Times, the St. Paul Pioneer-Press, and the San Diego Union-Tribune. Over here, Dan's just preaching to the choir.
2) In fairness to Palin, her idea of "explicit" sex education -- the kind she opposes -- is something that goes beyond just discussing contraception. She has said that she is pro-contraception.
Although Ms. Palin is obviously personally against abortion, she has done nothing in her career, beyond making her own views known, to promote this.
Also, she supports teaching abstinence ALONG WITH normal sex-ed. (Wasn't personally ready for sex until way after high school, wish I'd gotten some support in the idea that that was O.K.)
Finally, Palin vetoed a bill that would have denied benefits to same sex partners in Alaska. She did this against the wishes of her base and said that she did it because the bill was unconstitutional. I'm just happy she follows the constitution.
You can read more about various Palin rumors (book banning lists, etc.) here: http://explorations.chasrmartin.com/2008/09/06/palin-rumors/
To those of you who complain about the content of his blog or column: Go write your own!
I went to a parochial high school where there was only abstinence-until-marriage education, and I never once discussed contraception with my parents or any other adults. And yet I knew to use condoms and get my ass on the pill once I started having sex (and I had a lot of it, with multiple different partners). I'm pregnant now, at the age of 20, only because the contraception I was using (birth control pills) failed. So perhaps instead of putting all the blame on the people who aren't educating kids about contraception, etc... and put some of it on the irresponsible assholes who don't think to look for a way to stop themselves from getting pregnant when they've been hearing for years "if you have sex, you will get pregnant"? And I do mean that boys and girls are equally responsible for contraception, since they are equally responsible for any child they bring into the world.
Also, "shortly before Bristol and Levi were paraded before cheering throngs at the Republican National Convention, the Palins asked the media to respect their daughter's privacy". Dan, are you suggesting that all pregnant teenagers should be locked up and hidden away for the entire length of their pregnancy? She has a right to her privacy AND to go out and celebrate at the RNC with the rest of her family.
P.S. Can you please stop with the columns with one letter and then a political rant? You have Democrat and Republican readers, and most of us are here to read sex advice, not your feelings on every political event that you find relevant. Save it for the Slog please.
There are many themes in the election (roe vs. wade, same sex marriage, civil liberties, etc) that have a direct and indirect impact on future Savage Love articles.
Keep up the great work Dan! BTW: Thought you were great on Real Time last week...as usual!
The rank hypocrisy is nauseating.
Care about her platform if you're going to care about anything, leave her fuckin kids out of it. And I say this as a staunch anti-Republican.
P.S. moar goddamn sex letters in a goddamn sex column would be most goddamn appreciated
and I'm sure there's more about Palin's record we'll want to know. I don't expect she's a Dan Savage fan. Read. THINK. Vote. Read Mr. Obama's book on constitutional law and the future of America, The Audacity of Hope http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/71312726&referer=brief_results Don't make a decision on the future of our country based on sound bites.
In general, I am all for respecting the privacy of a candidate's family. But Palin is so obviously inept--she thinks she's qualified to deal with foreign policy because 'you can see Russia' across the Bering Strait! She seems to have spent her tenure as Mayor and Governor trying to get people fired because they thwarted her personal spitefulness (a librarian refusing to ban books, a police chief refusing to fire her soon-to-be-ex brother in law)--does this vindictiveness suggest any statesmanlike quality?
And dear gawdinheaven, we've had enough of these hypocritical neocons trying to control other folks' sex lives when their own are out of control. I feel very sorry for Bristol Palin (particularly since a British reader on another blog has just posted that "a pair of Bristols" is Cockney rhyming slang for tits) but if she and Levi have any sense, they'll rethink getting married. As if they really have a choice...
This issue is relevant. Thank you for not being intimidated by the 'let's all be nicey-nice' BS!
'But this can be a really successful relationship even if, as the song goes, "it's only for now".'
One of the things polyamory taught me is that just because a relationship ends doesn't mean it fails. Like everything else, relationships have lifespans, and accepting the natural end of a relationship gracefully is a good thing, if insanely difficult at times.
Great stuff, Dan.
And she hasn't done ANYTHING to promote a Pro-Life agenda other than keep Trig. (In fact, some pro-lifers find her disingenuous on the issue).
For example, Palin decided when her amniotic fluid was leaking, in the 8th month of a Down Syndrome-fetus pregnancy she was carrying at age 44, that she knew what labor felt like, this wasn't labor, and she could get on a flight from Texas to Alaska if she wanted to.
As this excellent letter from an advocacy organization for pregnant women (http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/97457/an_open_letter_to_gov._sarah_palin_on_women's_rights/) points out, there are women all over the country getting prosecuted for making their own decisions about whether they want to give birth at home, use a midwife, refuse a C-section, etc.
I bet Dan can tell you about the legal threats facing a woman who used drugs during her pregnancy and has the misfortune of delivering a stillborn. Homicide charges are just the beginning. In some jurisdictions, if I were giving legal advice to a drug user who had gotten pregnant, I'd tell her she'd better abort -- even if she wanted to finish the pregnancy -- to avoid prosecution for having mistreated the fetus.
But if you believe that a fetus is a legal person with rights that supersede the liberty of the woman carrying it, then of course you prosecute women for failing to live up to your standards for caring for the fetus.
Anyway love your colum, and look forward to a new one each week.
The Sarah thing is not funny. She's the worst possible combination of Bush & Cheney a charming, double-faced, incompetent radical. The only improvement is that, unlike Cheney, she CAN shoot straight.
Time to do for "palin" what you did for "santorum"!
Love your column, and haven't missed one since I started reading in 1994.
Just wanted to let you know, you used the phrase "begs the question" incorrectly. It doesn't mean "invites the question" as you used it. I see it all the time, and that's why someone created this website:
http://begthequestion.info/
Now that I've pointed it out, you'll start noticing it constantly in the media and it will annoy the sh*t out of you!
I am waiting for your comments on the John Edwards affair. I feel that he is being unfairly criticized in the media. What he did might be wrong (depending on whether when and how he informed his wife about it), but I do not see why his political future should have anything to do with this. Any comments?
General consensus on the matter of sex ed is that schools should teach facts- all of them- and families should teach values like abstinence, self respect, restraint and a proper fear of consequences.
Montana's sportsmen are growing less entertained by the minute as it becomes clear that she's not a responsible steward- They love that she hunts, and are concerned about the future of gun ownership, but are starting to get a clue that it's not a love or respect for nature that fuels her enthusiasm... the shooting wolves from helicopters thing is not playing well here, nor are her lawsuit over the inclusion of polar bears on the endangered species list or her stand on development of the Pebble mine- a project that would, in a very few years kill off the largest Sockeye salmon run in the world.
Everyone is pretty much amazed by the waffling on various earmarks, like the infamous "Bridge to Nowhere", and her use of taxpayer money to fund ads for and against various Alaskan ballot measures.
As for me, and most of my tribe of disillusioned liberals, we just hate her- her attitude, her environmental record, her desire to see women stripped of reproductive rights, all of it.... Besides the reasons above, I feel that her exposing her daughter to the international spotlight at this hard and chaotic moment in the girl's life reveals a lust for power that is quite frightening, her snide remarks about community action are a slap in the face to all of us who give time and energy to the goal of improving our communities, preserving historic and natural resources, expanding social resources and providing options for our children... and don't get me started about a parent who takes on such a demanding and draining challenge with an infant who has special needs and 2 other young children still at home- Gender is not the issue for me, I'd be just as dismayed by a father adding to his family's burdens under these circumstances....
since i'm older and not so much wiser i've decided to bookmark your ass....such an honor, if i may say so myself.
You could do a favor to your readers by explaining that there are other candidates in the race for president. These include Libertarian Bob Barr, Green Cynthia McKinney, and independent Ralph Nader.
However, I understand that mentioning third party candidates might get you discredited by your publishers. It is my understanding that covering alternative candidates (as opposed to alternative forms of sex) is a major taboo of the mainstream media.
....then you start talking about Palin, haha!!! That was a classic... I really think the Palin pick is politically motivated. Someone told me before that most of the time, the most religious persons are the ones who'll screw you over. And sadly, I've been unfortunate to experience that... So yeah, her being "religious" is, for me, full of crap.
Thank you.
Normally I would say that Bristol's pregnancy is off-limits, like Obama did. However, I think it is relevant to the election when the politician is so actively against sex ed, birth control and abortion.
Keep up the good work.
Also state law in AK entirely agnostic on birth control education. Nearly all of the schools teach both birth control methods and abstinence education. I have no idea what Palin tells her daughter, it might very well be bat-shit insane, but actual state policy certainly hasn't been affected by either her or her Republican predecessor.
I'm just saying...
I think bad stuff we didn't already know about like, "The Pill Kills" for instance, is really important to know about, but can't we get off the obvious political angrytrain and start talking about sex and relationships again. I miss those days...
When I'm turned off, I am also tickly, but when I am turned on, my entire body is an erogenous zone. I have come from my ears, nipples, legs etc.
Rather than forcing oral sex, I think the husband should see how erogenous his wife is and see whether she is super-sensitive like me. In other words: explore her body, lick her nipples for minutes. Push her body where it goes.
Women are amazing creatures, use your imagination and broaden your mind.
Thanks again from us neighbours to the north.
Peace, and Savage Love :)
What Dan actually wrote: "Excuse me, but if abstinence education can't keep the daughter of the evangelical governor of Alaska off the cock, what hope is there for the daughtersand some of the sonsof average Americans?"
Marie, he said off the cock. That doesn't mean all sex, that means girls and boys who like penis. Since not all boys are gay, Dan isn't trying to oppress you, he's saying that abstinence education isn't going to keep girls and gay boys from having sex. Obviously straight boys would be included as those who abstinence education won't work for, but he was specifically referring to teenagers into cock.
Maybe you should "turn your brain on". Idiot.
RSS
Comments (107) RSS