Savage Love Podcast
Check out the all new Savage Lovecast site!
Got a question for Dan Savage?
Call the Savage Love Podcast at 206-201-2720
or email Dan at mail@savagelove.net.
Savage Love Archives
-
May 15
Shorties -
May 8
Reading Comprehension Fail -
May 1
Move On -
Apr 24
No Problem -
Apr 17
Dick Holes
More from Dan Savage
-
SL Letter of the Day: Need to Be Stoned to Share
-
SL Letter of the Day: Seconded
-
SL Letter of the Day: Not A Prude... And Not Just Not That...
-
Great Moments In GOP Outreach to Women
-
Usually When I'm Sent a Photoshopped Image of a Gun Pointed At Me...
Books by Dan Savage
American Savage
It Gets Better: Coming Out, Overcoming Bullying, and Creating a Life Worth Living
The Commitment: Love, Sex, Marriage, and My Family
Things I've Learned from Women Who've Dumped Me
Skipping Towards Gomorrah
The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant
Savage Links
- Babeland
- Fleshbot
- Good Vibrations
- Joe Newton/Savage Illustrations
- Planned Parenthood
- Spreading Santorum
- Planned Parenthood's Teen Wire
- Kinsey Confidential
- Carnal Nation
- Tiny Nibbles
Want a Second Opinion?
Contact Dan Savage
Savage on YouTube
No on Prop. 8
October 2, 2008
I accidentally discovered that my son-in-law is into BDSM sex as a "dominant." A few weeks ago, he was holding one of my dog's leashes and tried to stop my dog (a docile golden retriever) from running up to another dog by violently yanking on the leash. My 65-pound dog was violently spun around.
I reacted in a very hostile manner. He defended his actions, and I started swearing at him. My daughter told me I was overreacting, and they left in a huff. I realized later that I was thinking about my son-in-law inflicting pain on my daughter in the same way he did to my dog. I can't stomach the thought of seeing him again and decided that I had to explain my reasons to my daughter. I said that I could not accept her husband getting pleasure from causing her pain. She reacted with hostility, first telling me it was none of my business and then denying he behaved in that manner.
I didn't tell my daughter that I had snooped in their home and found his ligatures and spanking porn. I feel that getting pleasure out of causing another person pain and humiliation is not an acceptable form of behavior. Now my daughter and son-in-law are not speaking to me. I don't ever want to see him again but would like to salvage my relationship with my daughter. Any advice?
Distressed And Depressed
Apologize.
I am a 27-year-old female with an active sex life. I enjoy sex while high, for pot's ability to help me lose my inhibitions and for the way it makes me feel. The problem is that marijuana leaves my mouth bone-dry—not conducive to a good blowjob. Water barely works to solve the problem. How can I smoke presex and still drum up enough saliva for a good blow?
Blowing Smoke
Your problem is very interesting, BS, but I have more to say to DAD. Hold tight a minute.
Look, DAD, your daughter is right. What she and her husband get up to in bed—or playroom or sex club—isn't any of your business. And while you may feel that "causing another person pain and humiliation is not an acceptable form of behavior," someone who finds pain and humiliation erotic—someone like your daughter—might come to a different conclusion.
Like the parents of the kinky gay kid whose boyfriend wrote in a couple of weeks back, DAD, you snooped and consequently learned some things about your kid that you didn't need to know. You learned stuff that you, as a parent, have a right not to know. And guess what? It's your own damn fault. Your only option now—after you apologize to your daughter and your son-in-law—is to pretend that you don't know what you damn well do know.
And, DAD, that's an awfully big leap you're making from "my son-in-law accidentally hurt my dog" to "my son-in-law is intentionally abusing my daughter." Not knowing how to pull a dog away from another dog isn't proof that your SIL engages in intentionally cruel, nonconsensual, dangerous BDSM sex. Okay, so he doesn't know from dogs. But you can rest assured, DAD, that most people into BDSM are careful and considerate and make sure their bottoms or subs are human, for starters, and enjoying the ligatures and spankings just as much as they are because, you see, that's the only way BDSM tops can keep bottoms and subs coming back for more.
While it's unfortunate that seeing your son-in-law with a leash in his hand conjured up some upsetting mental images—like, oh, your daughter being "violently spun around" —those mental images are, again, your own fault, DAD, and you're going to have to take some responsibility for 'em.
But take comfort. Ligatures and spanking porn are softcore, as BDSM gear and interests go. Spend 10 minutes surfing around www.mr-s-leather.com, www.medicaltoys.com, or www.christiandomesticdiscipline.com to get a taste of how much more extreme your daughter and son-in-law's interests could be. Then go sit down with your daughter and ask her to explain a bit about her turn-ons to you, because you need some reassurance that she's not being abused and that her sex life with the son-in-law, whatever form it takes, is mutually pleasurable, consensual, and rewarding. And finally, promise her that you will never, ever bring any of this up again, that you won't go snooping ever again, and that you won't hold any of this against your son-in-law.
Okay, BS, your problem can be solved with a can of Coke—or, better yet, Pepsi, which just donated $500,000 to Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays, all but daring the American Family Association to launch a boycott. Trust me: You'll find it easier to get cock down your throat stoned if you pour a little high-fructose corn syrup down it first.
A NOTE TO MY READERS: I get more letters at Savage Love than I could ever hope to respond to personally and infinitely more letters than I couldå ever hope to fit in this space. There's really no secret to getting your letter into the column: I just have to find your problem somewhat interesting, basically. (You are, however, better off e-mailing me on Tuesdays, when I sit down to write, than you are on, say, Fridays, when I sit down to drink.) The fact that I can't respond to every letter leads to a lot of hurt feelings. Every day I get complaints from readers who can't believe I replied to the dude with shit on his dick and not to them.
Well, dear readers, for two weeks—and two weeks only—you can get a guaranteed response from me. Just go to www.noonprop8.com, click "Donate Now," and do your part to help preserve marriage equality in California. On the left-hand side of the donation page, there's a spot where you can indicate that you're making your donation in someone's honor. Type in "Savage Love," put my e-mail address— mail@savagelove.net—in the space provided, and then send me your question in another e-mail along with the e-mail confirmation that No on Prop. 8 sent you after your donation cleared. The six biggest Savage Love donors get their letters in the October 16 and 23 installments of Savage Love. Everyone who makes a donation of $25 or more by October 16 gets a personal reply to their question from yours truly. The cutoff dates for donations that qualify for a letter in the column are October 9 for the October 16 column and October 16 for the October 23 column.
So, Cake Fart Fetishist, you've been badgering me with inane e-mails for years. This is your chance to finally get a letter in the column. You too, David in Brooklyn. Put up or shut up. But you don't have to be a stalker to participate. Got a good question and wanna help fight the good fight? Make a donation at www.noonprop8.com, send me your letter along with your receipt, and you'll hear from me in print or privately.
Also, DAD should thank the SIL for walking the dog and for keeping his dog safe. If SIL didn't pull on the leash and keep DAD's dog away from a stranger's dog, it's possible that DAD's dog could have suffered injuries from a dog fight instead of suffering only a tug on the leash. DAD says that the SIL "violently" pulled the leash, but the way he characterized the incident is most likely in congruence with the unfortunate way he now views SIL, after learning of his softcore BDSM preferences. Had the snooping never happened, DAD may not have thought anything whatsoever about the incident.
Finally, I agree with the reader who advised that dad take a look at a few hardcore BDSM sites...it will take about 3 or 4 mouse clicks to learn that a little spanking and bodage is actually quite tame, compared to the freaky shit some people do (not that I'm judging).
Also, I'm with shiraz: the SIL also owes an apology, bigtime.
Wow. I don't think I've ever seen someone pledge to put so much effort into fund raising for a cause. After the number of personal replies he'll have to write ($25? that's less than the lowest preset amount on the site), he'll either have a lot of former fans pissed off that he wrote a one-line response, or he'll need to hire someone to whom he can dictate full replies so he won't end up with carpal tunnel.
vaporize it, clean, quick, no drymouth if you keep the temp low, I'd reccomend a volcano-style model with a digital temp readout.
Cant help but think this isnt the first time they've snooped and found something they didnt like. This person would no longer be welcome in my life.
Having been in a physically abusive relationship *before* becoming a sub with my current boyfriend (not abusive), I can understand his concern. I agree with Dan's advice - in part. Certainly asking if the daughter is in an abusive relationship is a good start. But simply assuming that BDSM = abuse isn't right on DAD's part.
I have never been in a happier relationship than I currently am, with my first Dom, who doesn't get off on spanking me because he doesn't understand why I like to be hit. But he gladly obliges, because he knows it makes me happy. DAD - who knows, your daughter might be the same way!
Sure, it may be costly for a stupid prank, but you know how eccentric rich folk can be...
Women don't have as strong of protective instincts toward their daughters' sexuality. That's the father's job (or the brothers), unless he is the feminized New Age kind of guy. In some ways it's a good thing but in some ways it can get annoying if he can't let go of his princess even when she's grown up, haha.
DAD should apologize for snooping, SIL should apologize for overreacting with the dog, and it probably wouldn't hurt for DAD to tell Daughter that if SIL overreacts with her, he (or she) is there to help.
I'm with Shiraz... somebody who yanked my dog around would not be welcome in my home.
A parent of an adult (married) child who vehemently disapproves of BDSM writes to YOU? And he/she had a moment of clarity after the SIL pulled the dog's leash to hard? I was half expecting the letter to mention peanut butter and falling asleep naked on the couch. Devoted fan and all, but I hope you've got reason to believe this is real.
BDSM may be something that's just "in bed," that doesn't extend to the rest of our lives. But when one learns of such things in a loved one's life, isn't it at least understandable that he may interpret those things as indicating something more generally about the relationship?
DAD's reaction may be illogical, close-minded, or unfair, but on an emotional level, it's not incomprehensible. At least give him or her that.
The dog was a trigger event perhaps, but also an reasonable indication that the son-in-law has a tendency to (unaccetable) violence. Did that dog have a safe word?
People that are violent to animals, particularly a gentle animal that they know, should be of serious concern to us all. No wonder this guy is worried for his daughter. Scroll forward a few years and imagine how he might try to restrain his kids in a similar fashion.
http://tinyurl.com/4kxrlh
Second Opinion, Northern California
I would have thought the readers of this column would be less likely to believe in bullshit gender stereotypes than right-wing fundamentalist nutjobs, but apparently some do.
And maybe the son-in-law doesn't know how to handle a dog, but then again, maybe he does. When my dog was 13 and weighted 60 pounds, he was still a hell of a lot stronger than I was and tended to go 'visit' any passing dog. The son-in-law may have protected the dog from escaping and/or from an attack from the other dog.
On another note- SHAME ON YOU!! Unless you had a very good reason to fear for her safety, or other issues you didn't address, you had no business snooping, and letting on your awareness of your daughter's very personal life may potentially violate the future of your relationship. So- when having this conversation about your availability- BY NO MEANS should you let on your that you snooped. Forget all about what you found out- that is not your business.
And, the tenets of the BDSM sub-culture (safety, sanity, and consensus) are relevant to life, not just the dominant/submissive lifestyle. Though, the terms are signatures for the lifestyle, and may hint your awareness- that is enough to show you are there for her no matter what. Getting tied/bound and balled- hard, turns me on! But- by no means do I want my vanilla, Roman Catholic parents who've been married almost 40 years to know this.
Oh, and I am in CA, registered, and will definitely vote no on prop 8.
libel suit alert alibel suit alert.... argggg!!!!
"Men never Snoop." And men never cry, or wear dresses, either.
I think that Dan Savage should write a book about LGBT teens and their struggles too. I've been reading Savage Love since I was 12 (I am 21 now) and I think a lot of the LGBT kids I work with would love reading it so I tell everyone about it constantly. Keep writing Dan!!!
I found out My bro was gay via my sisters trashing of him.He had kept it from an adoring little sis. Luckily I went to a gay frien of a friend who explained he could be happy.I wish I had had a source.
I've seen both men and women "snoop" in equal measure.
http://www.leluv.com/
RSS
Comments (84) RSS