Savage Love Podcast
-
Episode 173
(Feb 9) -
Episode 172
(Feb 2) -
Episode 171
(Jan 26) -
Episode 170
(Jan 19) -
Episode 169
(Jan 11)
Got a question for Dan Savage?
Call the Savage Love Podcast at 206-201-2720
or email Dan at mail@savagelove.net.
Savage Love Archives
- Gold Star Pedophiles (Feb 4)
- Curious Business (Jan 28)
- Coin Toss (Jan 21)
- You've Got Anti-Male (Jan 14)
- Pervs and Prejudice (Jan 7)
More from Dan Savage
-
SL Letter of the Day: Six Months of Vanilla
-
More Marriage Equality News
-
Marriage Equality Activists In New York City...
-
How's That Hopey, Changey Stuff Working Out For Childhood Obesity?
-
Now That You're Not Fooling Anyone...
Books by Dan Savage
The Commitment: Love, Sex, Marriage, and My Family
Things I've Learned from Women Who've Dumped Me
Skipping Towards Gomorrah
The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant
Savage Love: Straight Answers from America's Most Popular Sex Columnist
Savage Links
- Babeland
- Fleshbot
- Good Vibrations
- Joe Newton/Savage Illustrations
- Planned Parenthood
- Spreading Santorum
- Planned Parenthood's Teen Wire
- Kinsey Confidential
- Carnal Nation
- Tiny Nibbles
Want a Second Opinion?
Contact Dan Savage
That's Rape
January 8, 2009
Tools
I'm an 18-year-old straight female. Two nights ago, I went to a party. My ex-boyfriend was present, but my current boyfriend was not. I had several beers, and while I wasn't drunk, I was tipsy. I had to go to my car to get my cell phone, and my ex offered to accompany me. When we got to the car, he pushed me against the car and started making out with me. I tried to push him away and said, "No, I can't" several times. He kept trying to pull my pants down, and every time he did, I pulled them back up. He took his dick out and tried again to pull down my pants. I know it sounds stupid, but all I could get out were meek "nos" and "I can'ts." I was afraid of a confrontation because he and I have been friendly since we broke up. I eventually discontinued my attempts to pull my pants back up because I figured the easiest way to get out of this situation was to let him finish. He had sex with me. I wanted to cry the whole time, but as much as I wanted to scream, "Stop! Get the fuck off of me!" I couldn't get the words out.
I called my boyfriend when I got home and told him what happened. He is angry because he thinks I had a part in it. I don't know how to make him understand how many times I said no and how at first I physically stopped my ex from taking my clothes off. My boyfriend and I have been through a lot together, and we talked about getting married one day. I never wanted to cheat on him, and while I feel guilty about what happened, I think he's being harsh on me considering I succumbed to force.
I've apologized again and again, but I don't know how to make things right. I still don't want a confrontation with the ex. I just want to forget about him and never see him or speak to him again. I just want things to be okay again with my boyfriend. Is there anything I can do or say to make him understand?
Date Rape Engenders Awful Depression
Understand that you were raped, DREAD—date-ish raped, acquaintance-ish raped, gray-area-ish raped, blurry-booze-soaked-lines raped, and raped under circumstances that would make bringing charges a futile exercise. But raped. Your ex kept coming at you, and you were paralyzed by a set of inhibitions—a desire to avoid confrontation at all costs (even the cost of your own violation), a desire to avoid making your victimizer feel bad—that are pounded into the heads of girls and young women. Your ex exploited this vulnerability. Your ex may not think he raped you since you finally "let him," and perhaps he interprets that as consent and so, distressingly, does your boyfriend. But raped you were.
So what do you do now? I'd suggest a bit more contact with your ex. You need to confront him—for your own sake, DREAD, but also for the sake of all other women he's going to encounter over the course of his life. If you can't face him, call him. If you can't speak to him, write him (a letter, not an e-mail). Wherever he is right now, he's rationalizing away his responsibility for what happened. He may be telling himself that he was drunk, that you were drunk, and that, sure, he may have been aggressive at first, but that you came around and enjoyed it as much as he did. He needs to hear from you that you regard—and, for what it's worth, I regard—what happened as rape. Tell him that he didn't get away with it—that he raped you, you know it, and now he knows it. Then tell him that if the circumstances were just a little less ambiguous, DREAD, that you would be going to the police.
Hell, tell him you still might. Put the fear of God into him.
Then you need to confront the boyfriend: If your boyfriend can't take your side, DREAD, if he can't see what really happened here, if he insists on victimizing you, too, then you don't need him in your life any more than you need your ex in your life.
I'm a 23-year-old gay dude from Vancouver. My boyfriend and I have been together for four years. Thing is, he's seriously letting himself go—gaining weight, enjoying roomier pants. I drop hints about working out or eating better—but he gets offended and becomes self-conscious. I want to be supportive and not care, but I do care and it's killing me. Had I known at 19 that he would be throwing away his hot body, I might have reconsidered his LTR potential. Now, four years later, I'm stuck with a lovable fatty who I'm having a hard time being intimate with.
Is this awful? Am I selfish? I love him, but I want to enjoy sex again. I have NOTHING against fatties, Dan, I just don't want to bed one.
Really Eating At Me
Drop the subtlety, REAM. No more faux-loving hints about the importance of diet and exercise—he reacts negatively to that shit because he's picking up on your dishonesty. You're not concerned for his health, REAM, you're concerned for your sex life and what the death of your attraction to him means for this relationship. So give it to him straight: You're not attracted to fatties, which is why you pursued him four years ago, and his weight gain is killing your sex life and threatening the survival of your relationship. If he values this relationship, he'll get his ass off the couch.
And now a note to the infuriated fatsophere: I'm not saying that REAM's boyfriend is unattractive because he's heavier, or that heavy people aren't or can't be attractive, or that we all must forever maintain our "first-date weight" over the multidecade course of relationship/marriage/whatever. But to destroy a large part of what attracted someone to you early in a relationship—whether actively or through neglect—is to take your partner for granted in a way that's not okay. And that goes for a tight-bodied fag who parks his ass on the couch because he's got a boyfriend now—so, hey, why bother with the gym?—and the BBW who wastes away to skin and bones after she lands an admirer.
A close gay friend recently seroconverted after months of barebacking and meth use. He's a successful professional with years of AIDS peer-education experience. My immediate reaction was shock and anger. He claims that I am not a true friend because I should hide my feelings and shower him with empathy and understanding. Is there something wrong with me for feeling mad at my friend for his irresponsibility?
Old Fashioned Safe Sex Adherent
Let's say you've got two friends. One gets
hit by lightning, and the other plops his sopping-wet ass down on a
third rail. Do both friends—presuming both survive—deserve
your empathy and understanding, OFSSA? Of course. But one friend
was electrocuted while the other electrocuted his damn
self. Friendship does not obligate you to pretend that your friend
who sat his ass down on the third rail wasn't being idiotic and
self-destructive. Friendship, in fact, requires the opposite
reaction. ![]()
His friends at the party wondered where he went and why he was gone so long. Your friends probably wondered the same thing. There's a story there and if he isn't charged, he should at least be shamed.
Also, that sort of passive-aggressive rape-but-hey-not-really-okay-its-really-rape shit is a sign of a really, really weak person. A gonzo fuckball would just rape you, not try and con and wheedle you into it. Inside he's soft like mush and I guarantee you can get away with slugging him full in the face the next time you see him.
Sorry, I feel the same way about unsafe sexual practices.
Then go to a therapist, and figure out why you have so little respect for yourself that you'd have been with one guy who ended up date raping you, not fight back while he's doing it, and then beg forgiveness from another who blames you for GETTING RAPED.
One day I tickled her and she hurt me really badly. She explained that she just hated to be tickled and couldn't help it.
Hmmm, so being tickled is worse than being raped? If she had done what she did to me to that guy trying to have sex with her, he wouldn't have.
So, whatever.
If you don't, on the other hand, then somebody could be persuaded that you weren't entirely sure, in the moment, if it was rape -- only to decide afterward that it was, perhaps with the blessing of a sex advice columnist. And while this hesitation is both frequent and understandable, it can complicate the situation for both prosecutors and boyfriends.
After all, if you didn't say rape in the moment because you couldn't be sure it was really rape, the boyfriend can be left to wonder whether and to what extent you offered your consent.
(Sadly, I think the very force of the word prevents women from saying it, not just to avoid offending would-be rapists with the verbal nuke that is saying "rape" -- but also because women would rather think, no, I'm not actually being raped, then say yes, this horrible thing is happening to me and it's nothing but rape. Problem is, since rape is about consent, anything less than rape implies some measure of willing consent.)
DREAD, I think that you need to try one more time to talk with your boyfriend about this. If he really can't understand that it wasn't your fault -- and it *was not your fault* -- then he isn't worth it.
Tell everyone you know about what your ex did. I won't lie; there will be people who won't believe you, or who will blame you. But others will realize you're telling the truth, and they can help support you and shame the jerk who did this to you.
If you need more help, try Scarleteen(.com). I talked about my abuse experiences there, and it really helped me. Good luck healing, and I hope that either your boyfriend realizes his mistake, or you find someone who actually deserves you and will help you through therapy, like mine did.
Best of luck.
M
While being assaulted, the other person has serious control over the victim. There's a serious element of fear, and, even if the victim is physically capable of stopping them, they're often rendered powerless by fear of being hurt worse, as well as by the societal conditioning that says we aren't allowed to say no, and we have to play coy to get attackers to stop.
The two situations aren't comparable. I hope you learn that before you get involved with anyone. You really need to learn about what consent is.
Cunt.
And to everyone else, thank you also (seriously)--I've since discussed the situation at length with my boyfriend. He explained to me that his anger was directed towards the ex, not me. He's angry that another guy touched me, not that I "let" him. He's still sad, and so am I, but he no longer blames me for what happened to me.
I also kind of confronted the ex. As you might have gathered, I'm pretty non-confrontational, but I told him that I was disgusted with the situation and with him, and that I didn't want to hear from him or see him ever again. He made some half-assed apology. Whatever, it's starting to move behind me, so I'm satisfied.
I hope that you keep healing. I'm sorry that this happened to you, really. I've been through an unhealthy relationship, and several of my friends have been raped. I know how you must have felt. It gets better with time, though, really. If you're getting the right help, at least.
If you need to talk to someone, try to find a good therapist. I'd offer to talk as just a normal person, but I know that won't be enough. Try to find a really good therapist, though, not like the first one I found. Don't be afraid to change therapists if it doesn't work out.
I hate confrontations, too, by the way.
Good luck,
M
The reassurance I got back was that if it was a consentual momment of passion, I wouldn't have heard about it, doesn't exactly help my cynicism, but it did help me realize (eventually) that she was really really hurting and felt violated. And me, I felt helpless and hurt by the whole thing to. That I couldn't find this guy and beat the living shit out of him (she wouldn't tell me who or anything about him which was probably for the best).
Cut the guy some slack, let it settle in, and let this be some guy sensitivity training. Also, if possible, put the training wheels back on the relationship and get out of the serious stage. Go back to the "dating" phase and see if you fall for each other all over again.
But in all honesty, I think both parties need some perspective and time alone ... Shit like this doesn't help anyone trust. Try to take consolation in that the only thing that is worth receiving from a woman is something freely given.
Oh yeah, the emotional rollar coaster of make up-break up high emotion sex doesn't make the situation easier ... if anything it sometimes makes more difficult to let go of the pain.
Not to say abstain from sex, but just avoid the situations where make up sex is going to be the SOLE focus of dating (everything in moderation)
Do like a lot of light hearted open to the public stuff, less pillow talk and more batting cages, skiing, hiking, whatever. Physical Activity helps guys get over this stuff better, perhaps give you a better level of intimacy and you won't pick at the scab so much.
So current boyfriend is thinking something along the lines of "were I in that situation, there's no way that I would let someone else have sex with me just to avoid a confrontation. Therefore, someone who capitulates in that situation must have wanted to have sex on some level. Therefore, my girlfriend somewhat cheated on me." The current boyfriend thinks this way because *he's a boy.* The proper state of mind is "Were *a girl* in that situation..." In fact, that's the whole reason the law was changed from "reasonable man" to "reasonable person."
Current boyfriend isn't necessarily being a dick; he's just unaware how the combination of genetics and socialization conditions boys and girls to behave differently, on average. And armed with this incorrect information, he's concluded that his girlfriend cheated on him. Current boyfriend isn't malicious; he's just dumb.
I think current boyfriend needs an education in these behavioral differences. If he's unwilling to change his attitude after that-- or if he's unwilling to see that his attitude even needs adjusting-- *then* kick his ass to the curb.
So, in the end, part of it is about judgment and decisions, made, not made. Reread her letter. "I was afraid of a confrontation because he and I have been friendly since we broke up."
Yeah, don't want to risk upsetting the rapist ex-boyfriend....maybe that would ruin their great "relationship".
He assaulted her, but she eventually consented to the sexual act. It wasn't rape - it was a bad choice on her part. Her boyfriend is right to upset with her behavior.
WTF people?! She was raped? C'mon!
The way the economy is, w/ ecological collapse staring us in the face and the right-wing nutjobs ready & willing to hand the country over to a fascist dictator, we're likely looking at some tough times ahead-- the wrong time to harbor fears of confrontation. I'm just sayin'...
What about a "choice" between forced sex and a four-week hospital stay? A "choice" between forced sex and broken ribs? A "choice" between forced sex and multiple cuts and bruises? The line isn't drawn where *you* would acquiesce; it's where *she* acquiesced. Because a "choice" between two shitty options-- one of which you are being threatened with-- is not a choice at all.
When someone imposes negative consequences on another for not doing what he says, that's called "force." And forcing someone to have sex is rape. Period.
Now, for you and Bottom Line, a new concept hitherto unknown to your narrow minds: Acute Stress Reaction. Google it.
I have been raped and would not ever paint a scenario such as this young woman's. A former partner of mine claimed he was "date raped" when, in reality, he cheated on me and the story sound much like this young lady's.
Finally, in my opinion, those that say a woman cannot stop a man from raping them are sexist morons.
If you keep saying no, keep pulling your pants back up, and keep asking him to stop, IT IS RAPE.
The fact that she finally stopped fighting does not mean she asked for it or wanted sex with the guy.
When I was assulted, I was too terrified to hardly speak. It felt unreal and I distanced myself from the reality of the rape. Its not that I didn't want to stand up for my self, I was just too horrified to be fully present in the moment.
I know from experience how unreal and horrifying it can be to call someone you know and once cared for a 'rapist'.
There is a difference between consent and being too overwhelmed to continue fighting.
And also, psilly if you tickled me I would cut your nuts off. So bring it you fucking loser.
The problem with giving credence to the phrase "gray rape" is that situations like this, some chick giving in to the "force" used by an asshole, aggressive ex, diminish trauma like mine and those of my friends, who have actually experienced real rape.
Before you say it, I'm not blaming the victim; I trying to keep you from being one. For whatever reason you made the decision not to scratch his face, grab his nuts and twist, or drop to the ground and kick like there's no tomorrow. From your own description you didn't even forcefully push him away.
Take your power back. Know that you made some decisions and next time you can make different decisions. You are not a perpetual victim. He was a jerk and totally wrong for not listening to your protests. To his defense, in your own words you only gave him "...meek 'nos' and 'I can'ts.' I was afraid of a confrontation because..."
(I don't say this to be mean but meek "I can't" is different from forceful "I don't want to!")
You knew at the time you could have said, "Stop! Get the fuck off of me!" But didn't. All I'm saying is own it. You made whatever decision you felt you had to in order to get out of the situation. You didn't deserve what happened but you have the power to stop it next time under similar situation.
I agree with Dan that you write the jerk rapists (do not call or see him). Let him know that he knows what he did and that you went to doctor to collect the evidence in case you ever do decide to press charges. In some states you have a 5-year statute of limitations to press charges. I would add that he probably want's to get checked because your exam revealed something. Leave it at that.
Sorry you had to endure this but please don't let it define you.
Of course, forcing yourself on someone is inexcusable though. And yeah, even if this guy can't get charged because she didn't seem to use all her strength to stop him, she should shame him publicly for sure. It will damage his life hugely, and maybe force him out of town, but the damage of letting men get away with rape is far worse. It starts to become accepted as normal. (scary.
I will repeat:
I said "no" multiple times
I tried to push him off me multiple times
I tried to pull my clothes back on when he pulled them off multiple times
And yes, I had been drinking. Whether or not you morons realize it, having sex with a woman who has consumed alcohol--whether you have also consumed alcohol or not--is rape. I wrote to Dan because I respect his opinion. I was humiliated, ashamed, and hurt. I needed advice from someone who knew what he was talking about, so I turned to Dan.
I didn't write to Dan asking him to tell me I was raped. I KNEW when I wrote to him that I had been date raped. I wrote to him, if you fucking read my letter at ALL, to ask if he had any insight as to how to repair things with my current boyfriend. I don't care whether you think I was raped or not. I know, and I feel strongly, that I was assaulted. I know I could have done things to avoid the situation.
I could have not gone to the party. I could have chosen not to drink. I could have chosen not to let the ex walk me to my car--I know all this. But the fact that I did those things does not give him the right to force things upon me, and force he did. He is stronger than me and I was shocked and confused and just wanted everything to be over. Given a choice between succumbing under pressure, or being confrontational and having to leave the party immediately and drive home intoxicated, I chose the former.
Thank you to all the people who sympathize. Your kind comments have made me feel less alone in my situation and less ashamed.
To the rest of you, go to hell.
Having been date raped,the thing you may have to consider is the thought of getting badly beaten, failing to protect oneself physically AND sexually seems the better option at the time. We all have had sex we weren't into,it doesn't seem so bad to imagine.and remember denal is with you in this reality too
There are many, many forms of assault. To say that one form is real while another is not is terribly narrow. And hurtful.
You use your own feeling of having your own trauma diminished to justify diminishing another's trauma.
Ouch.
Women in our society are socialized pretty much from minute one not to make a scene, not to make a fuss, to be the peacemakers, etc. We are taught that we are *not* feminine if we stand up for ourselves. Some of us have parents who get that enough to tell us that's a load of hogwash.
In my case, I was taught to defend myself from loads of crap growing up - but at the same time - yup - you got it - don't make a scene. Don't create a problem. With no defining line of when it's *you* creating a problem. Go ahead and fight racism, but don't get into a fight.
Know what that means? I was an assertive backtalking kid and I was 10 the 1st time I was molested on public transportation. Did I speak up? No. That would have been making a scene. Instead I tried to move away from the guy. (btw, I do blame the bus full of people who could clearly see *something* was wrong and not one single person said anything - more socialization of "don't make a scene" also - but they were adults and I was kid thanks). It ended when I got off the bus. Did I consent all that time? After the several times I moved out from in front of him only to have him move in back of me again? Hell no. I was trying to get away.
Play fight with a friend? Somebody tickling me? Oh, we're having physical contact - you might get chopped in the nuts - but I'm reacting to an actual physical body hurt response. Horrible as it is, rape is more traumatic to the mind than the body. Tickling is gonna make me pee myself any second now and I've got a stitch in my side and it really fucking hurts and I have *no* idea when it's going to end. This asshole on top of me raping me? I think it'll be over when he cums.
Get the picture yet?
And for all of that - after telling my parents about the perv on the bus - my parents talked to me some about self-defense - but you know - 25 years ago, self-defense concepts for women were *just* starting to include the idea that you SPEAK UP. GO AHEAD AND MAKE A SCENE. Not just "fight back if you can." or "get away and call for help if you can" (note the "get away" first part).
In the meantime, there's a lot of creeps on public transpo. I was so proud of myself for figuring out that if I turned sideways and stuck my elbow out, the creep got held at bay. Damn I thought I was slick and taking care of myself. I thought I had it so down, it was *years* before I realized what I should really be doing was looking over my shoulder and loudly asking "Pardon me, would you mind taking your dick outta my ass?"
You are soooo not alone!!
It IS overwhelming and psychologically shocking to have someone you know force themself upon you.
I know how numbing that can be.
And make no mistake, he is the one who forced himself upon you.
I'm so sorry this happened to you.
It took me so long to forgive myself for not taking more preventive action when I was assaulted. I blamed myself for failing to prevent it. I did what I could at the time. As did you.
The rapist is the one who did the deed. Not you. Not your fault.
Take heart in knowing that many of us have been in similar shoes.
Have you considered suicide? Because, IMO, the world needs way less people like you.
Why not say, "Until men stop raping women, women will be raped!" It's easy to lay the burden on women to change things isn't it? Maybe women would speak up more if men like Psilly shut their freakin' mouths and practiced some empathy for the opposite gender instead of their own.
DREAD:
The little gym bunny fag is upset because his partner put on weight? If so, he's not in the relationship for love or emotion, he's in it for the arm candy.
I'm 37, 6'1'', 180 lbs, naturally thin and semi-muscular because of genetics, and have never had to worry about a weight issue. My partner of almost 6 years isn't, and while he has put on weight since we've been together, I'm still as crazy about him as I was on Day One when we met. And our sex life is STILL great.
That twinky, shallow I-can't-be-with-you-because-you-don't-have-a-gym body shit pisses me off. That's what's wrong with the majority of us gay dudes, too much on looks, not enough on substance.
I also think we have the right to discuss what exactly constitutes rape and that this topic should, by no means, be off limit.
I feel sorry for what happened to DREAD and the pain she and her boyfriend are experiencing.
Although, it might have been better if you confronted him about the RAPE, as you see it, than the "situation", as you put it.
Also, as DREAD feels she was raped... she has the moral imperative to report to the police prevent other girls from sharing her experiences: "the same fear, depression, pain, and confusion that I feel. I hope you never have to drive home crying and I hope you don't have to stop on the way home to throw up because you are so sickened. I hope you don't have to take 4 scalding hot showers the next day and scrub your skin until it's bright red and still feel dirty."
Even though you destroyed all the evidence with your showers, it's not to late to file a report.
"Having sex with a woman who has consumed alcohol--whether you have also consumed alcohol or not--is rape"----> Not true. Forcing yourself on a woman that has been drinking is rape, whether you've been drinking or not.
When I was 11 years old, I had the ability to tell right from wrong. I knew when my dad touched my tits that it was wrong. But I was too scared, because of the power he had over me, to say anything about it. I still never told any family members about it. Assorted random exes probably still remember but I have no intention of bringing charges against him.
Now if you can understand the power of superiority that a father holds over a child and the fear instilled as a result, how is it so difficult to understand that an ex-boyfriend could have the same power over a woman? You can call her weak if you like, but she's hardly atypical. The power dynamics here are simply a matter of degree. And everyone has their own breaking point; whether you understand it or not doesn't change its existence.
Just because you would have punched the guy in the nuts doesn't mean she would or should have punched the guy in the nuts. It doesn't mean I would or should have punched my dad in the nuts (I still haven't, 13 years later--though we no longer speak except 1-2x a year).
And it was because I liked him and hoped he would call me the next day.
Our little friend in letter #1 is pretending to be weaker than she is. This is bad for ALL WOMEN. When you're in a relationship, you don't let some other guy fuck you just because you "don't like confrontation."
Was the guy an asshole for being so insistent? Of course. But she's an asshole for giving in. If she valued the ex's opinion of her so highly that she was willing to let him fuck her despite the fact that she was in a relationship, she's at the EXTREME end of feminine (or any kind of) weakness, and the new boyfriend is justified, imho, in breaking up with her. She needs some serious therapy. I wouldn't want to be in a relationship with someone as fucked-up as her either.
Rape is an act of violence, no matter its form. It is not safe to randomly go confronting a violent individual.
Also, even if the police do not press charges, they will still take the report.
It might help the next survivor who reports an attack from the same rapist.
Who knows, there may already be reports on file with the police about this rapist.
Given that both were drunk, is it not possible he interpreted her half-hearted refusals as just playing "hard to get"? I mean, I'm not saying it wasn't rape, but all these cries of "beat the guy to death and throw his corpse in jail for a million years, the dirty rapist!" are a bit extreme. None of us were there, we don't know how it really went down, from her story I can imagine it playing out quite a few different ways, some which amount to an obvious rape, and some which look just like two former lovers having a guilty, secretive reunion.
And while we're talking about socialization on this board, how about the socialization of MEN? Are men NOT socialized to see women as weak-willed, capricious, and indecisive, desiring strong, persistent mates who will "sweep them off their feet" despite their protestations, that what women WANT is a guy to overpower them a little bit? That if a guy isn't willing to "take charge", he's a wimp and not worth sleeping with? Perhaps DREAD's ex saw himself as Bruce-f'ing-CAMPBELL, demanding some "sugar" from his princess?
And maybe, just maybe, the guy is HORRIFIED to find out that she DIDN'T want him, that her acquiescence was made from a desperate desire for him to be done with her and leave her alone? Think about that, the guilt and self-disgust that comes with knowing you ACCIDENTALLY RAPED someone because you misinterpreted her reactions to your advances?
It's tough, because there ARE women out there who like being "taken" roughly, who get off on saying "no" and "I can't" and having their partner ignore that. People in the throes of passion (men AND women), especially drunk, don't always stop to make sure everything is good. Sometimes you just trust your instincts...and sometimes they're wrong, and a perfectly decent man can suddenly become a RAPIST without meaning to. Rape is rape, but is there really no moral difference between the man who jumps out of the bushes with a knife or a gun and savages a woman in some back alley, and the man who drunkenly misinterprets his drunken ex's apparently-half-hearted acquiescence after several apparently-half-hearted refusals?
Let me repeat that, HE raped her. The only one to blame for committing the crime is the person who committed the crime aka HIM. We don't say that people who were mugged were 'asking for it' because they walked down the street with a wallet or purse.
Blame the rapist who viciously and relentlessly harassed then raped the drunk girl, not the poor girl who tried her hardest to say no, get him off her, and stop him from hurting her despite being not in complete control of her faculties. The fact that she lost that verbal and physical fight does not mean that she deserves to get raped. It means that she was a victim of a particularly relentless and cruel fucking rapist.
Please ignore the assholes, do not read their comments. I recommend therapy and speaking with others who have been through similar situations. (There is a great book, I Never Called it Rape, that you might want to read).
You are NOT alone.
Bravo, DREAD. And I agree with many other posters here. Throw the book at this guy and make him go through the system. Who knows, you might be helping another woman down the line.
There is a chance that the yuck-fucker didn't know this, never was told (or had male social issues – must be strong, assertive, semi-assoholic, …) - let's play devil's advocate and say this was his first ever slip like this. Give his sorry ass a record to help ensure there won't be a second time.
However, there is an onus on YOU Dread to help make others safe in the future – give him a record and calm his yucky ass down - asap.
PS. Oh and therapy is a must – no joke.
As Rick says, WTF? Nice way to both disclaim responsibility and dress things up in passive language. He got *infected* with HIV because he didn't take any responsibility for his sexual health. Dan's advice is spot-on.
You werent raped. You let it happen. You had a choice between causing a fuss and letting someone have sex with you. Trying to lump yourself in with women who are forced down, hit, pinned down and have no choice in the matter - who are forced into a situation they can do nothing about - it despicable and overwhelmingly self pitying.
You know what? If you had screamed and fought and kicked him maybe, just maybe, a very tiny maybe, he would have forced himself on you. But the most likely scenario is that this piece of shit person wouldve run off, and you would have attracted attention.
Yes, he deserved to be pulled up for his behaviour. Take whatever route YOU think will help YOU the most. Then deal with the fact you played a role in it too.
Don't try and look to the internet to absolve yourself of the fact that you didn't defend yourself properly. And if it ever happens again, do everything you can to get out of the situation. The physical pain you go through can be on par with the psychological trauma and emotional pain induced by thinking you allowed yourself to be used.
But Dan if you're saying that someone who allows someone to have sex with them when they don't really want to, but without being threatened or extorted, then I am judging you. You're saying that I'm a rapist, that every woman I've ever dated has also raped me, and that every sexually active person I've ever known has raped and been raped. And that's bull.
And, yes, I've been in her situation, but as a child with a pushy and aggressive and manipulative stranger who'd been grooming me for weeks. I didn't want to make a scene, I didn't want him to think I didn't like him because he was black (one of his most effective hooks), and I was just trained to be obedient and not to be rude to adults. And even if I'd said "yes" it would have been rape because I was a child--but even as a child I said "no" before he could manipulate me into being alone with him. If an 11 year old can say "no" when a skilled manipulator is making him feel he's the jerk--conspicuously rude, unfriendly, distrustful, and racist--all the things I was ever taught not to be--then any adult who isn't being forced, threatened, or seriously extorted certainly can, too. Again, I'm judging your words, Dan, not DREAD's action--in the situation she described, she probably felt much more threatened than her letter let on.
DREAD, read "The Gift of Fear" for really good insight on being more assertive and getting away from the conditioning of "be good, don't make waves" that traps women into experiencing the same thing you did. You shit bags who are implying that she asked for it or is just trying to cover something up might want to consider it too (you stupid motherfuckers).
And to DREAD, go talk to the cops. even if you can’t get a conviction for the fucker, you might have the chance for every woman who comes in contact with him ever again to hear the rumors of what a piece of shit he is. Also, if you're current bf cant beyond his own feelings to comfort you while you deal with this then dtmf!
I am not weak. I am not stupid, as other people have said. And Ccouch, it's a lot easier to stand up for yourself when you have the anonymity a computer offers.
How would it change your opinion of things to hear that my current boyfriend has cheated on me, twice? Neither time was he forced by someone who repeatedly ignored his pleas to stop. And neither time did he tell me himself mere hours after the cheating occurred--I had to find out from the girl he cheated on me with months and months later.
I trusted him enough to forgive him. It was difficult, it hurt, but we've moved past it, and now we're working through this. Considering I was understanding enough to forgive him for two acts of indiscretion, perhaps he can find it in his heart to forgive me for BEING RAPED. Maybe now you'll all tell me I'm an idiot for taking him back. Whatever--I'm tired of being judged by strangers who know only a few facts about my life, so this is the last thing I'll be posting here.
Thanks again to the many commenters who've offered kind words. It truly has made me feel a lot better.
It's clear that DREAD was traumatized, less clear if the incident will result in PTSD. But in either event, her boyfriend's response is nothing less than the psychological term "re-wounding," and that's bad news for the victim.
What we need to think about here is the mindset of a man who continues to pursue a woman after she's said no and who knows she has a boyfriend (so the whole concept that maybe he thought she was just being coy is bullshit). This guy is clearly a CREEP, and I hope for DREAD's sake that she does not excuse this creep's behavior and continue to be his friend.
Believe it or not, it's much easier to excuse the creep's behavior and say it was consensual than to admit that you were raped.
It's scary to think how many men - men like Psilly Cybin and A Choice Was Made - condone the actions of this creep. This indicates to me a serious lack of respect for women. There is a difference between being coy and sexy and rejecting someone by saying no - even once!
Men need to learn to control their sexual urges if a woman even seems slightly uninterested, otherwise you're not respecting the woman or yourself.
The onus is on the man or woman making sexual advances to respect the wishes of the other party. Saying no even once is sufficient to indicate that the sexual advance is unwanted and should be stopped.
Perhaps women sometimes have a difficult time reacting violently during rape because they're in shock and disbelief, because they could never imagine forcing themselves on someone in that way.
Finally, I do believe women need to learn to deal effectively with creeps - rapist and murders - violently (e.g. biting, kicking, screaming, beating) because the reality is that there are a ton of creeps out there (even a few commenting here) and often that will save your life if you're attacked.
DREAD - I'm so sorry for what happened to you and I hope your current boyfriend is supportive of you while you heal. If he's not, kick him to the curb. I sincerely hope you've learned from this experience what a creep your ex is.
You've heard it from others, but I'll add my voice - you aren't alone. And to everyone else who thinks that rape is only when someone is forced down, kicking and screaming, you have absolutely no idea what the fuck you are talking about, or the lengths that the human mind and body will go to in order to protect the self from greater trauma. It's not at all unusual for a victim to "stop resisting" once it become inevitable. Can you imagine how much worse it would hurt if you were physically resisting while some asshole violated your body?
She said no. Could she have said it more forcefully? Probably. But why should she have to? Why wasn't one no, or one push away, or one attempt to redress herself, for fuck's sake, enough of a message for her rapist?
And the idea that just because their previous relationship may have had some aggressive sex is horseshit and just an excuse for people desparately trying to absolve this dick.
Don't blame yourself, even for becoming passive and "allowing" it to happen. You were afraid. Your mind retreated and you stopped fighting physically to protect yourself. That's a completely normal reaction, and doesn't make it consent.
I'm glad things have gotten better for your and your current. I think you need to have whatever contact or lack thereof with your rapist to help you get past this. Take care.
If this is really DREAD (which I doubt), she's as sick and manipulative as the company she keeps. Have fun playing with your friends in your cesspool. I hope you don't involve the cops, they have enough garbage to deal with.
Hetro men and lesbians are rapists if their partner has had a drink?
Sounds like you were getting back at him by having sex with the ex.
gator765, this may be one of the most dickheaded comments I've ever read on the internet, and that's saying a lot.
Listen, tough guy, I truly hope that someday you get your infantilizing, misogynistic ass beat up by a female. If/when that happens, I want you do know that you have truly earned it.
Lest we forget, men are socially conditioned, too. They're taught to have sex at any cost, and that they're in charge.
Oh, and 'gave in' can mean a number of things. Unless women have developed the ability to close up their vaginas or she had a gun to his head.
I don't really blame your bf for reacting badly at first. It sucks and in a perfect world he'd be 100% supportive right away... But he was dealing with shock, too.
---------
I can't believe some people are criticizing her exact words! I'm sure constructing effective sentences with just the right connotation were foremost in her mind at the moment.
DREAD has learned a lesson the hard way. For everyone else, remember: if you fight you MIGHT get raped and hurt. If you don't fight you DEFINATELY will.
And whatever you do and whatever force applied, do NOT get in a car and go somewhere else. FBI statistics clearly show your chances of getting out alive are very slim if you go to another place, but are pretty high if you fight.
It doesn't matter if you know how to fight, you are not trying to overpower your attacker and "win" -- you are trying to get away by whatever means necessary. Even a 6 week old kitten can get away from a burly man because the cat has one goal only: escape. And the kitten fights dirty.
Of course, the kitten hasn't been conditioned to be more concerned about a man's precious than her own physical, emotional and mental well-being. The first step is to decide ahead of time how you'll react. And try to de-condition yourself.
It can be empowering to fight back, but it isn't always possible to do so when a rape is happening.
Afterwards, though, there's a good reason to report the bastard, even (I would say especially) if you know him: If he did it to you, he's likely to try to do it to someone else, if he hasn't already. If you can find the wherewithal to go to the authorities, PLEASE do so! The fact that so many women don't is what allows these predators to get away with it.
Silence isn't golden.
None of us were there, but to suggest that someone wasn't raped because they were unable to continue protesting AFTER THEY ALREADY SAID NO is pretty feeble. Have you ever been assaulted? Literally retreated into your own head, unable to speak or move or even believe in the moment that it was really happening? Then shut the fuck up.
But from the boyfriend's perspective, well, maybe what he wants is a more confrontational/assertive girlfriend. If she's nonconfrontational, someone less dangerous such as a pushy telemarketer might also take advantage of her in a way that not illegal. I don't think it's unreasonable to want someone to be more physical or angry in defending themself.
She needs someone who is supportive and understanding and will beat the crap out of the ex for her, which is obviously not him.
Maybe pressing charges will make him understand, but probably not. Just break it off.
Forget victim-blaming and what ridiculous levels of responsibility we think we can put on women being raped to stop the crime...what the fuck does this mentality say about MEN?
If you believe that it's the woman's responsibility to stop her rapist, you're basically saying that MEN are naturally rapists, that MEN are incapable of understanding "no," that MEN can't control themselves, can't stop, can't distinguish consent from non consent and don't want to, don't care if their partners are into it, don't care about getting fucking ENTHUSIASTIC AND CLEAR CONSENT.
And to 11:11 - I'm sorry you had a traumatic experience, but you're still a fucking idiot. Rape is defined by LACK OF CONSENT not level of trauma. If you're going to sit here and say that one thing isn't rape because it's less traumatic, then your situation was obviously not rape either, because I'm guessing it wasn't as traumatic as the woman in New York who was brutally tortured (eyes gouged, poured boiling water on her) and repeatedly raped for several hours a few months ago. How DARE you diminish that poor woman's experience by saying that you were raped too?
Wait...what am I saying? I bet that woman is a cowardly little pretender, too, because I'm guessing there's some woman somewhere who had an even WORSE rape experience and only HER situation could have been REAL rape!
At the very least, try to get over your inhibitions about making noise. Walk out on the nearest busy corner and scream something harmless, like, "I loathe winter in Seattle." Give it a couple of tries, working on maximum breath and projection. Feel proud of how much noise you can make. People will no doubt look at you oddly as you wander off to have a celebratory, post-scream dessert, but you'll have learned how to wake the whole neighborhood and deafen an attacker using nothing more than the voice you were born with.
Train your reflexes. If you can break your social inhibitions just for practice, perhaps with the support of a friend, you'll be a lot more likely to manage it in an emergency.
i had this crazy idea in my mind that in the northwest we're less misogynistic and more progressive than in fucking afghanistan or the south-eastern U.S. then i read bullshit like fully half of what's above and have to think i'm delusional. or maybe i just don't hang out with assholes like those. WHO WOULD? i have no idea who their friends are. especially their girl-friends, though i'm not convinced they have any. they certainly don't deserve them.
do any of these fuckwads picture their mom, sister, girlfriend, daughter, in this same situation? or do they prefer to think of you as this anonymous entity so they don't have to realize that yes, this AND WORSE happens to women. women they know, love and care about. every fucking day. for obvious reasons, those women wouldn't tell such fuckwads about these happenings. so they think it only happens to women who could have stopped it, and chose not to. i'm sure that's more comfortable. it's also incredibly fucking stupid, at least as stupid as they *would like to think* you were.
so i'm sorry. i'm really sorry about what happened to you, and i'm even more sorry that the attitudes that allow it to happen are alive and well. i'm especially sorry we can't rule out time-travel as a solution to your suffering, e.g. 'well, if only you HAD [insert whateverthefuck here].' you've got to be kidding me. TIME TRAVEL! you should go back in time and do it the right way and then everything will be fine! WHAT THE FUCK EVER. *headdesk*
i also like how no one seemed to consider that the ex? was an ex FOR A REASON. like, you may have known what a potentially abusive, stupid, criminal asshole he is. ya think?? which leads to DTMFA which you had already done. and that knowing what you know about him, you knew what the best of all possible options was in a totally fucked-up, aggression-driven confrontation with this rapist was: to get it over with by any means as soon as possible. that is survival, exactly the instinct a person needs to go on living. so good for you that you're alive. a lot of rape victims aren't, they're called rape *and murder* victims, bitchez.
it's not just you, and it's not just the new boyfriend (at the moment, which i'm glad to hear he's gotten over), and it's not just half the douchehounds posting on this thread. our whole fucked-up society has a big problem calling rape what it is. and if you resist by any means possible? oh, they may just charge you with battery. notice that they say there's an enormous difference between what we *say* we want women to do in rape situations and what we actually want them to do. sure, you can fight him off as long as he doesn't sustain enough damage to go to the hospital. notice how the rapist-defenders are all, why didn't you 'get away' or 'keep up the resistance' or 'knee him in the jewels' not, 'why didn't you cut his dick off?' 'shoot him' or 'get in the car and run over his rapist ass'? any of which would be supportable morally, but see above for consequences.
i'm sorry. i'm sorry for american attitudes as a whole, and i want peace for you. peace and strength. look up shakesville if you want a safe place to talk from here on, they heavily moderate comments so you don't have to listen to the bullshit above.
I hate to say it, but this girl may need a different set of friends if she can't party with them safely, and if they all behave as obnoxiously when drunk as her ex. Was he drunk? She was, but as a one-time occurrence that's a tactical error, not a moral failing.
Some comments are harshing her for not fighting back. All yez, shaddup. I've had years of martial arts training and I STILL have trouble hitting people who are, or were until a few seconds ago, my friends.
I would recommend the self defense course called either Impact! or Model Mugging. I took Model Mugging over 17 years ago, and subsequently was able to use it during a mugging several years later. They teach full-force self defense with psychological training to overcome the problem she had with not being able to assert herself.
http://www.impactbayarea.org/
She was raped. She said no and he fucked her anyway and that's rape. Rape is, by definition, something done without the victim's consent, which means you cannot -ask- for it.
No girl ever asks for it. She made a choice yes, she even admits that she made the choice of giving in. It doesn't make it right. This guy is a piece of shit. Saying that she asked for it, is like saying a member from the LGBTQ community asks to be beaten in a hate crime. I will never understand why people won't admit that these things happen.
I submit you may need to broaden your definition of what constitutes an assualt, and who can be a victim.
People in a relationship who like their "no's" overridden have what's called a "safe word" to avoid rape. It's another word to mean stop right now, so they effectively have a way to say no. This was discussed in a recent column of Dan's folks. If you don't have a safe word, then "no" always means "no", not keep trying or keep going.
If you aren't sure if someone really means "no" assume it does and walk away. People who say "no" but want sex will soon learn to say "yes" if they want sex with you. And you can have the self-respect of only having sex with people who are willing to say yes; and the knowledge that you have certainly never raped someone. Surely that's worth more than one night's bedding.
I was date raped too, not drunk, in an LTR with the guy and all it took to subdue me was his raising his arm as if he was going to hit me. Of course he weighed almost twice what I did and was much stronger, but I *could* have fought harder sure. I didn't want to get hit or worse though. Unlike with a stranger rape, I was pretty sure he wouldn't kill me after; and unlike sex with a HIV partner, I was pretty sure I wouldn't die from it. In both those cases I would have feared more for my life and would have fought harder for sure. I made a choice of two evils, and I survived; but no question I was raped even though I didn't fight.
Reasonable Person, this is *completely wrong*.
Saying, "If we don't have sex, I'm break up with you" is not threatening rape. Saying "If we don't have sex, I'm never speaking to you again" is not threatening rape. The difference is whether the negative consequence is something the other person has every right to do or not, and whether it's a crime. Punching you is a crime. Breaking up with you is not. Firing you isn't a crime, but it is against the law if it's for sex-related reasons, which is why you can sue if your boss says "Sleep with me or I'll fire you."
Now DREAD might have thought he would physically hurt her if she fought back or protested loudly, but she didn't say that in the letter. If a confrontation would be yelling, making a scene, them not being on friendly terms anymore, those are negative consequences that do not qualify as force.
Consent requires something active, not just passivity (otherwise, you couldn't rape unconscious people). If she said no once, then consent requires a yes or some other positive indicator. But that doesn't mean he used force to gain her cooperation.
Why do guys think that if they just pester women long enough, somehow 'no' will magically change to 'oh baby, do me'? Why should we have to fight you or kick you in the nuts before you are willing to actually believe that 'no' actually means 'sorry, dude, not interested. Please go away'? I understand that sometimes, women get worn down from saying no and not being listened to, from having their volition totally disregarded, they feel like they are talking, but nothing is getting through, they are powerless, don't want to cause a scene, and eventual submission is what non-confrontational souls end up when they are pummeled repeatedly. And come on, cut this young woman some empathy in the fight back dept. She's only 18 years old. She hasn't come into her own power yet.
And DREAD, I agree with the suggestion to report this guy to the cops and let your whole circle of friends know what happened.
Once again you undermine your case with your own words:
"Given a choice between succumbing under pressure, or being confrontational and having to leave the party immediately and drive home intoxicated, I chose the former."
Gee, so you fucked your ex-boyfriend in the parking lot so you wouldn't have to leave the party early?
And so YES, let's stay on topic: your current boyfriend has a problem in that he is being asked to be sympathetic to this complete bullshit...he should move on.
Rape is not about sex. It is about control and power.
DREAM was drunk and agreed to have someone she TRUSTED come and make sure she was SAFE while going out to her car. Her rapist violated that trust when he did not listen to her words (NO, I can't) or her actions (attempting to push him away, pulling her pants back up). He deserves public shame and humiliation, she deserves support and healing.
I'm as GGG as the next girl, and I understand rape fantasies, but those fantasies are the choice of the participants. DREAM did not choose this.
Hang in there, girl. You're not alone.
Which is it? Can a woman run for president of the United States, OR, are women just too weak and are socialized to conform?
'cause, I am personally offended that these attitudes are being used by people who in other situations would appear enlightened.
I no you can't because I know how it was derived...do some research.
"I suggest that the current Boyfriend move on and find someone who is faithful."
What a ridiculous, ignorant, hurtful comment. The men out there who are so insecure in themselves that they can't believe the heartfelt, sworn truth of a girl they supposedly love ought not to have girlfriends at all. It's not as if most women have any chance against most men in a battle of force, especially if they're drunk and untrained in martial arts. Remember, all you machismo-I-own-this-woman-freaks, karma is a bitch.
My perspective is that in this day and age, with the empowerment that women not only deserve - but demand - that simple honesty is in order here. For DREAD's boyfriend the issue is this: whether or not DREAD wanted to have sex with her ex-boyfriend, she did, and at some point leading up to that event there other decisions being made about spending time with that ex-boyfriend at the party, going somewhere with him alone, even letting things get to the point where a Make-out style kiss could be completed (as opposed to twisting so he misses your mouth and hits your cheek) and those events were themselves small acts of unfaithfulness to him - and how he is being asked - nay, forced, to look past that and comfort her for the trauma of the rest of it.
Remember, this started with her behavior towards an ex-boyfriend while drunk. And so back the basic question - does the current boyfriend OWE her something? Does he have any right to question - even if only in his own head - how okay he is with the whole prelude to the sex? She may be a victim, and I would say that she is a victim, of a very bad person, but so is her current boyfriend and he has a good reason to believe that she is partially responsible for this happening and good reason to worry that something like it could happen again.
"been there, done that, FUCK does it suck" you are a chump. You stated that your "girlfriend" got date-raped while out with her other girlfriends. I'm sorry, did I miss something? Was she out on a date? It seems to be honest to say that yes, having sex was not part of her plan and she didn't want it to happen BUT she made a series of choices that were each unfaithful to you leading up to a situation where she was being intimate with someone in the first place in such a way that he can just go to the next step. You don't go from talking in a bar to him having sex with you without some steps in between. Once again, you are being asked to ignore her obvious infidelity to comfort her.
My bottom line message is that even though DREAD was raped, she was also being unfaithful to her current boyfriend in how she ended up in the situation in the first place.
If this is true then you're hilarious if not you suck.
As you correctly pointed out, this isn't so much about fat as it is about selfishness: "It's my body, and I can have it look any damn way I want!" But here's a thought: maybe REAM, because of a prevailing PC attitude in society, has never told his partner honestly what it is that attracts him to him; obviously, one of those things is a slim build. But that's not PC, is it? I think long ago we reached a point where PC stopped being a good thing (not hurting someone's feelings) and became a bad thing (not communicating honestly with a loved one).
Oh, and try for a counselor willing to hold a few couple's sessions if she and her boyfriend stay together.
Maybe if creeps like you actually did stop when women said no, there would be less fucking rapist in our society!
Kudos to SpookyCat and KateH. Glad to know there are some truly self-respecting people out there.
There are women who would have dealt differently the scenario that DREAD faced (perhaps more in line with what you think would be best), but that doesn’t make what happened anything other than rape.
I am advocating his position because I understand it in a rather unique way and because I think that the letter writer's own words and descriptions of the events are confusing - just image how hard it has been for two of them to communicate and what her current boyfriend has actually been told/heard.
Several comments I read put forth the idea that silence equals consent or that taking the quickest route to safety 'letting him finish' equals consent. The problem with this argument is that it assumes by default that consent is inherently given until taken away. Consent does not and cannot exist until given. Period. Therefore, silence does not and cannot equal consent. Giving in to an attacker or rapist does not and cannot equal consent.
"ask" to be raped. Think about it, people. If I walk up to you and "ask" you to rape me, it's not rape anymore, is it? It's a fetish fantasy scenario. This girl definitely ought to have taken better care of herself at that party, i.e. making sure to buddy up with a trusted friend, and not allowing the ex-boyfriend to break her off from the herd (as I doubt this is the first time he's ever done anything to indicate a lack of trustworthiness.) HOWEVER --- as was stated in my training for our local rape crisis hotline time and time again, making a mistake, having poor judgment, and being emotionally weak are NOT rapable offenses. Nothing is --- I don't care if you're Angelina Jolie crawling around naked with your ass in the air. Men are not animal/robots waiting for a cock signal to take the offensive with any woman they please. No matter how dumb/drunk another person is, YOU are still responsible for YOUR actions, and no means no.
About her eventually consenting (sort of and under force). She wanted the experience to be over as soon as possible. While that doesn't make for as convincing an argument for rape now, days of weeks later, in the moment I can see why it made the most sense.
She needs to threaten the ex, talk to the boyfriend (instead of beg him) and probably go to therapy for help with the trauma.
Dan, you're absolutely right: this was rape.
Just my 10, or so, cents.
Plus, if she had dated the guy before, she should have a pretty good idea if he was the kind of guy that would beat her up for not cooperating. Again, besides pulling her pants down, she never indicates that he forced her to have sex against her will.
If that were my GF, I would be devastated. I'm not saying she would receive no sympathy, but my reaction would be "How could you let him do that to you and not fight back?" I bet one scream would have done the trick.
That's the dumbest shit I've ever heard. In that case, he probably drank alcohol too, and you raped him back! Dumbass.
"having sex with a woman who has consumed alcohol--whether you have also consumed alcohol or not--is rape"
I guess I've raped my girlfriend hundreds of times, then...
I'm sorry, I know I said I wouldn't write anymore, but I find it so hard to keep my mouth shut after reading these comments.
As for my current man: He is a wonderful person. Despite his mistakes in the past. I got pregnant once (his) and when I was bedridden with morning sickness, he made me chicken soup from scratch and spent every spare moment by my side. He paid for the abortion in full. When I was screaming in pain from the induced miscarriage, he cried for me and took care of me until it was over. He treats me like a princess and I couldn't wish for a more loving, supportive partner. I had to beg him not to beat the ex's face in because I just didn't want any more trouble. I don't know where anyone got the idea that he's abusive. Yes, at first, he was skeptical, but then he came around. He trusts me and knows I'm not lying and now he is behind me 100 per cent.
I've been accused here of being a liar, and imposter, a slut, an idiot, a weakling, a coward, a cheater, and a bad feminist. Some people tell me I should dump my boyfriend's misogynistic, cold, self-centered ass, and others tell me I'm scum and don't deserve to be with him. I'm going to average the two out and just stick around.
He and I have great sex, and my letter--which is NOT fabricated--does not stem from a desire to seem delicate and proper. I love sex. I never said I didn't. Anyone who knows me knows how much I love to fuck--my boyfriend. But there was nothing I enjoyed about being assaulted by my ex.
Furthermore, no, I did not open my car door to be raped more easily. I opened my door, got my phone, and when I popped back up the ex was in my face. After pinning me against the side of the car for a minute he pushed me in the door (which was still open) and pushed me down on the seat. Just for your information.
Seriously, goodbye now. I'm not going to check this thing anymore because it doesn't matter--I wasn't asking for the opinions of assholes like Psilly and Mrclean, I was asking for Dan's. I got my advice. Good night and good luck.
Stop blaming the current boyfriend.
First of all, your ex raped you - your ex-boyfriend which means, at some point, you had an intimate relationship in which, I'm assuming you said you loved each other. You wanted the love of someone who ends up being a rapist capable of raping even someoe he has cared about....
Secondly, your bf - even if he's being supportive - was suspicious of you even when you told him it was without your consent.
(AND WTF commenter - Silence DOES NOT equal consent. Have you never heard the expression "paralyzed with fear"?!)
Thirdly, this current boyfriend who you are turning to for love and support during this emotionally difficult time has already cheated on you - twice.
Therapy will help you understand why you are seeking love from men who are obviously not loving you. And therapy will help you find love for your own self.
I know, this sounds preachy but really therapy has helped me immensely in my life (and I was molested by my ex-step-father when I was paralyzed with fear...)I then sought out unavailable, cruel men until therapy....
Its not between you and Dan, moron, its on a syndicated advice column - people read it for the entertainment value....you are using your own personal experience to entertain us and you know this, otherwise, how would you even know about Dan Savage?
They've only been together 4 years. While that may be long for some serial monogamists, even troubled, abusive marriages can typically limp along that long. Don't make REAM out to be a bad guy for feeling disinclined towards a partner who has no good reason to have let himself go.
In 10 years I went from 145 lbs to 195. I have a hip condition which prevents all the sorts of exercises I enjoyed doing when I was in the military. I have no self-esteem and never have, really. I -still- cared enough to exercise (as best I could) with my last girlfriend, when she was concerned about my weight gain. I valued the relationship; if REAM's boy wants to put on the blinders more than he wants to save his relationship, I don't think REAM is at fault for looking for someone who values him enough to at least make an attempt.
And psilly just stated his opinion in a straight forward non-aggressive way so I don't see why people keep attacking him.
As for the Event, I think it could have played out several different ways. Non-drunk guy refuses to take weak, wasted girl's clear "no"s and "I can't"s and rapes her.
Drunk ex-boyfriend takes weak, wasted girl's "no/I can't"s to be token objections and proceeds to convince her to have sex with him, not realizing that she really meant it.
I don't think anyone's trying to condone what the guy did, clearly he's an asshole.
But if in their relationship, DREAD said "no, I can't" and then changed her mind, it's possible the ex didn't realize her (true) lack of consent.
I mean, without the whole, unedited story, there's no knowing whether it was rape or not. This isn't a courtroom and we are not a jury...
I don't think feeling violated and dirty after an experience makes it rape. Also, I think one has to clearly express their nonconsent or be rendered unable to express their consent or nonconsent (ex: date-rape drugs, children, passed out ect.) for it to be rape.
I think that it sounds like DREAD perhaps let herself be raped but that seems a contradiction in terms...
Hypothetical:
I'm in the new BF's shoes.
My GF comes home and tells me she was raped at a party. Visions fill my head: visions of someone peeling the clothes off my GF and violating her while she's passed out drunk; visions of some ham-fisted frat boy beating and strangling her into submission; visions of a man with a knife threatening to take her life in unless she relents...
First reaction? I grab the nearest blunt object and head out the door, looking for blood. Then I calm down.
"How did this happen?" I ask.
"Well, I was drinking at this party and Vince(Let's call the ex Vince for fun) was there..."
I think to myself, "Did she know he was gonna be there?"
She continues, "We started talking and I didn't know a lot of other people, so we hung out."
To myself, "What the fuck is she doing partying with that asshole, Vince?"
"I went to get my phone out of the car and he followed me outside. We were both kinda tipsy. He pushed me against the car and we made out a little."
To her: "What do you mean, you made out a little?" To self: "How could you do that to me?"
"Well, like I said, we were both kind of tipsy. But then, out of nowhere, he totally RAPED ME!"
To self: "I'm gonna kill that fucker." To her, "What did you do?"
"Well, I said no a couple times..."
"And?"
"And I said, 'We can't do this; I have a boyfriend."
"And?"
"Well, I said it meekly. I didn't want to hurt his feelings..."
To self: "Meekly?"
"Then he started pulling down my pants. I pulled them back up, but he pulled them back down, so I pulled them back up, and he pulled them right back down..."
"And no one saw this? I mean, your car was outside a big house party..."
"Well, it probably looked like we were there together. I mean, I wasn't screaming or hitting him or anything."
"Why the hell not?"
"Because he's my friend! I didn't want to embarrass him or make him think I didn't like him. We've had a good relationship since we broke up!"
To self: "What the FUCK?!"
"Then he pulled his dick out of his pants and started rubbing it on me... By this time, my pants were down because I was tired of pulling them back up every time he pulled them down."
"So how did he get it inside you? I don't see any bruises... did he have a knife? Did he threaten you?"
"No, I just didn't want to make a scene..."
"So you just stood there in the street with your pants down while some drunk guy tried to put his dick in you... but you didn't want to make a scene."
"Well, I just figured it was easier to just be quiet and have sex with him. It's not like it was the first time anyway... Plus, I wan't ready to leave the party yet."
"It was easier? So, I guess it wasn't as traumatic of a deal as you made it out to be?"
"No, I was TOTALLY RAPED! HE FORCED ME!"
To self: "DTMFA!"
My advice now that I am much older is to take a self defense class, maybe take some martial arts. Learn to yell, loudly. Learn to protect yourself as an automatic response. Don't listen to the assholes here, but also make sure it never happens to you again.
**Unless she was raised by her father, in which case HE should have his head slapped.
it's tough for some guys to understand how powerful the impulse towards non-confrontation is. even the potential troll-like posts here implying silence = consent, or saying that if she "gave in" then it's not rape, don't mean that in the worst way possible. but they do mean it to some degree. they think saying "no" a few times is negated by the eventual silence. i don't agree with that, but it's important to understand why that is not consent.
i'm saddened and sickened by the frequency of date-rape. it's revolting how many guys do it and justify it. this makes it difficult to even discuss the matter, because the guys who say, "i knew she wanted it -- she was just playing hard to get" are so sickening and wrong.
this story is tricky not because rape is okay, and not because no doesn't means no, but rather because the way in which it is told leads the reader to view the alleged rapist through to much of their own lens. it doesn't help that DREAD kind of suggests that all drunk sex equals rape.
even as i read it, i saw the "no i can't" more as "no we can't", and was left wondering if the guy even heard the later, quiet "no" remarks at all. i guess that's to say, i wondered how much this ex-boyfriend knew he was actually raping her.
we weren't there. we weren't their for their previous relationship. i don't know how they used to have sex. i have to take her word for it, and i do.
but i can completely believe her and still wonder if they knew what he was doing. all guys who hear no should stop, end of story.
i dated a christian girl who liked to play the "no -- we can't -- it's wrong" game. it drove me crazy in a bad way. i'd say, "you right" (as my belief system at the time mandated!) to which she'd reply, "but it feels so good..." and right back at it, and so on.
this taints my lens. if i ran into that girl again, and she started in with that whole routine, i'm not sure i'd feel like a rapist.
this sort of "we shouldn't" happened with another girl as well, one i did not sleep with. she had a boyfriend, i was the other guy, and that time around i wasn't willing to play that game. she insulted me as i finally left, questing my masculinity because i couldn't "handle" her.
all that leads me to think that in the same way that our society teaches -- or forces -- some women to be non-confrontational, it also teaches some women that they should resist sex that they want to have, or they will be a slut (even though they would not be). and men are currently taught to pursue women to a point.
these norms vary. one woman friend of mine said if you ask a woman out once and she says no, you should never ask her out again. to do so would be harassment. i commented that sometimes woman play hard to get. and she said, no, guys just think women play hard to get. i could see her point in far too many cases. that is the lamest justification an unwanted suitor could use.
this demonstrates to me a disconnect in our present culture. we can't agree on how these things are supposed to happen before we even get to the sex rules.
but for most cases of date-rape, these are not issues. they are not issues. a woman knows when she's being raped -- and most guys know when they are pressuring a woman. if a guy pressures, and she says no, that should be it. too many guys use the excuse that "she's playing hard to get" to justify sexual aggression.
just because you were in a relationship were behavior was acceptable, that doesn't mean it applies to any other relationship. a hyperbolic example that easily proves this would be found in those couple who enjoy acting out rape fantasies.
i don't like the idea of "yuck fuck" so much -- there shouldn't need be a code word to stop guys from being assholes. but what is appealing is that it really removes the room for doubt in the eyes of the guy. being appealing is not good enough though. it's not fair to place additional requirements on how "no" has to be expressed. it's also appealing to suggest all rape victims go to the police (i think it would be grant), but unfortunately, there are once again reasons that doesn't always work out for the victim.
the guys saying it wasn't rape in this thread are annoying. because of them i have a hard time posting this (and because i don't want to seem to insensitive to the victim). but i am left wondering if it's possible under crazy circumstances for a girl to believe she was raped and a guy to not know he did it.
what i don't like about that is that it tends to excuse guys. and right now, there are far too many non "gray" area date rapes that are justified by lame reasoning.
i don't know if this makes sense at all, these are just some thoughts i wanted to put out there. i am still learning, and likely to change my view as i grow and understand more.
oh, and finally:
cheated on twice = treated like princess
It's a great, supportive community with NO victim-blaming.
No matter how poorly she acquitted herself afterwards, the guy remains a rapist. Yes, she could have resisted far better than she did (and we should remember that the mental state of feeling helpless is no small thing, no matter how physically capable you are). It doesn't change the fact that he is responsible for his own actions. I would also add that it's very likely that this is not his first rape, nor his last.
The statement above suggests that by default consent is inherently given unless taken away. Let's rewrite this. One has to clearly express their consent for it not to be called rape.
Again, consent doesn't exist until it is given. Period.
"No" can definitely be used in a coy and sex-baiting way. Most girls like to think they're making a guy work for it before putting out.
Of course, "no" can simply mean "no."
I'm not playing devil's advocate for rapists. I'm just saying that it's not uncommon for a girl to change her mind.
When I lost my virginity, neither of us planned to have sex (We were in our 20s, BTW). We discussed it, and she told me, flat-out that she didn't want to have sex yet, and I had no plans to push it further. Then, after a bit of slap and tickle, she changed her mind. In fact, she insisted on it, to my surprise.
Perhaps her hormones caught up with her in the heat of the moment. Whatever the case, I guess I'm lucky she didn't regret it afterward, because she could honestly tell a jury, "I said 'no' several times before he penetrated me." or "We had agreed beforehand that it would not go beyond kissing and touching."
Was this event about violence, power, and the ex BF's domination of DREAD?
Or was it about an old flame whose feelings got stirred up while he was drinking at a party with his ex?
Initially, I felt no sympathy for the ex... I still don't, really, but I wonder if he realizes what he's done?
As infrequent said above, is it possible for a man to rape someone and not even know it?
DREAD needs to call a rape crisis line and talk to someone neutral about how she feels. What she choses to do about these two men is her call. Most importantly, she needs to talk, at length, to someone who isn't telling her what to do, think or feel.
We are all allowed to change out minds, and the way you acted in the situation demonstrates that you're a gentleman and the appropriate way to deal with a woman who is saying no and might be acting coyly. You didn't make that decision for her, you let her decide for herself.
Thanks for sharing.
I also know that at 18, after a few drinks, my ass was drunk. Whether I thought it was cool to admit it or not. So we should stop calling drunk "tipsy". You were drunk. Now that you know what your limits are, DREAD, save pushing those limits for partying with people who are 110% interested in your well-being.
Anecdotal situations aside, in most states, if you fuck an intoxicated girl and she decides to call it rape in the morning, she has a case for rape. Being drunk means a person cannot give consent by law. As someone said earlier, by these guidelines I've been raped tons, but thankfully the law isn't always so cut and dry. But let's not let a few remorseful, dishonest skanks who would tell such lies distract from the fact that many of us on have gotten messed up and lost full control of ourselves / judged a situation badly. Just because DREAD got drunk and it turned violent doesn't reflect much on her character or morals.
Women are taught what to do when "stranger rape" happens from Day 1 -- scream, yell "Fire", pepper spray, claw him in the eyeballs, fight fight fight etc. People who survive stranger rape end up on Oprah and are seen as survivors. People never say, "you should have fought harder!" People never say, "you froze up and let it happen, therefore you're a slut who should be dumped."
What TV show or what class taught you what to do when someone you thought you were cool with pulls this nonsense?
DREAD, LEARN FROM THIS. The ambiguity is over -- When you say no and a guy (ANY GUY) ignores that, he's in effect giving you carte blanche to mangle his fucking face. You now know it's better to err on the side of knocking someone out than dealing with this emotional fallout. Unfortunately, over the course of your life this could happen again. Experience has cruelly made you wiser, so fight for yourself next time. You're all you got.
If you want him to continue to be a friend, then drop it. What's done is done. He's beating himself up about it as it is. it won't change what happened.
I know I hate my Dentist lecturing me. It keeps me from scheduling appointments because I don't want to hear him lay on the guilt about not flossing enough. Same thing will happen with your friend, and it's why he's complained about your behavior.
Read for clarity, people. Don't twist the facts to try to excuse the rapist.
"She didn't fight hard enough" is not "asking for it." If someone put a clip through your walls one night and you died because you hadn't thought to put a steel plate beside your bed, does that mean you actually wanted to be dead?
I feel for this girl because unfortunately I can see how it happens. I've had ex boyfriends try to squeeeeeze their way back into...er...ME and I've shut them down. I also know how alcohol works, and how it makes you BLAME YOURSELF for shit beyond your control.
I understand your boyfriend's reaction in a sense, because if the roles were reversed I would be horrified if he (even inadvertently) had sex with someone else. I can't lie, I understand that jealously no matter what.
But you were, were, WERE taken advantage of and I hope you can realize that. I'm so sorry for you, and I may love Dan for calling out your ex's bullshit when you didn't have the heart to. Stay strong, and if/when you see your ex again, HUMILIATE HIM if it's the only thing possible. Ugh, I feel for you.
DREAD is apparently quite experienced and happy with sex...and this was with an ex-boyfriend with which she had a previous sexual relationship.
And how much do we know about the story? That her ex-boyfriend aggressively hit on her after they had been drinking and she gave in. Maybe he raped her, but Jesus Christ, how about some doubt?! We have absolutely no idea of anything about this girl!
These are not comparable to this situation as it has been presented here by DREAD. So far, the most serious consequences she has expressed being afraid of are making a scene and hurting someone's feelings.
By all means, if you are assaulted with violence and intent to hurt you and you are unprepared to defend yourself, I wouldn't recommend getting killed in an effort to protect an asset like a purse, or even yourself - especially if you have children to raise - if you are even capable of making a rational decision not to resist under the circumstances.
Fight or Flight is an instinct - stronger in some than others. I am not a fighter, I have never started a fight in my life. I have been attacked three times in my life and have swiftly de-animated the person instinctually....don't ask me how. Once I literally just stepped aside as the guy dove at me, I was standing with my back to my car, and I somehow just grabbed the back of his hood as he went by me and "helped" him headfirst into the passenger window...bashing his head. He was done. His friends, however, were grabbing me just as the police pulled up - I swear!
The vast, VAST majority of rapes and sexual assaults do not involve the use of a weapon. Something like 75% are committed by an acquaintance of the victim's, but even a large number of stranger-rapes don't involve a weapon. (http://www.rainn.org/get-information/sta…)
For those of you complaining that DREAD didn't fight back hard enough to suit you - After I was raped, my counselor (highly recommend therapy) told me something very helpful: if you're here today to talk about it, if you got through the assault in one piece, then whatever you did was the right thing. DREAD, don't beat yourself up. You have some hard days ahead of you, but you are not alone and you will get through this.
Posted by Zack Dergen"
So, in essence women are not competent because they've been collectively brainwashed? I don't believe that, and I think its offensive for SNAG's (sensitive new age guys) to go around saying that.
First, I don't think she needed to "fight" and she has not said she was afraid of being killed, she was afraid of having to leave the party early and embarrass the ex-boyfriend in front of people.
I mean, she was raped, there's no doubt about it(according to her story), but she could have done something. I mean, she was outside of a party, I'm certain if she had screamed or something the bastard would have gotten scared and ran off, and if not, someone would have heard. I can't really say what I would do in a similar situation, so who knows.
But, I can see it from the side of the boyfriend too. Your girlfriend calls you, after a night of drinking, and tells you her ex boyfriend and she just slept together, but that he took advantage of her. I would find that hard to believe myself.
It would definitely be a hard case to prove. One's judgment can go out the window when drinking.
There are three sides to the story. His, hers and the truth. Maybe he did rape her, maybe he didn't, who knows.
I think, what makes it hard for me to accept, is that she would tell her boyfriend, but doesn't want to report it to the police or anyone. If I was the boyfriend, I would be wondering, why tell me, but you won't go to the police?
I wouldn't want to be any one of the three in this situation.
1)I have had drilled into my head since I was old enough to recognize my own hard-on, (I'm now 39) "No means no." We need to supplement that simple phrase with "Yes-and-ONLY-Yes means yes," and drill it likewise into people's heads. Until you get the green light, do NOT proceed. (Having someone give you a safeword is a green light; otherwise, stop.)
2)Of all the failures of the ignorance-only sex-ed curriculum, this may be the worst. We can't teach people to protect themselves from sexual assaults if we can't talk about sex at all.
3) rbryanh's suggestion that women learn to make non-emergency ruckuses on street corners, ("I hate winter!" shouted at the tops of their lungs...) to uninhibit them when they REALLY need to shout, may be the best advice ever, for women *and* men.
Concerning your advice to DREAD, I agree with everything you said, except your harshness towards the NEW boyfriend. As I understand it, a lot of guys in his situation are also the victim. His girlfriend was raped and there's nothing he can do about it. Boyfriends want nothing more than to feel that they are able to protect their girlfriends. Her getting raped I'm sure makes him feel incredibly helpless and angry. He's coping with it by blaming her.
Now, please understand, this is by no means acceptable for him to do. He clearly needs to seek some counseling and learn to deal with this. His girlfriend getting raped is by no means a knock against him as a man. When he comes around to understand this, I think he'll (and they as a couple) will be okay.
Wow Psilly Cybin, you must have been the worst rape counselor ever. Kind of like that OBGYN who mutilated and raped all those patients a while back. Or any priest who let molesters continue on dicking little kids within the church. ABorderline evil, I'd say, because you worked under the guise of being a helper and confidante. Do us all a favor and go live under a bridge. Now.
If I was tipsy (not too observant, not thinking terribly clearly) and all of a sudden a walk to the car with an ex/friend got scary, my reaction would be quite different. Presumably, DREAD used to trust this ex; he was, after all, her boyfriend. In a moment of poor mental clarity, such unexpected and personal violence must have been incredibly surreal. When people are overwhelmed by uncertainty and are forced to make an important decision quickly, a natural reaction is to freeze. If you can't process the information coming at you, let alone decide between fight and flight, freezing is an understandable response.
This is by no means a clear-cut situation, so stop treating it like one. She was raped, she wasn't raped, she should have been more forceful, should have yelled, shouldn't have trusted him, she gave unclear signals, she wanted him, her intent to resist was obvious, the current boyfriend was a dick, the current boyfriend had an overblown, irrational reaction to an emotionally charged event, he was just being protective -- there are many conflicting viewpoints here, most of them valid. The fact is that something happened. It happened quickly. What exactly transpired and what the motives were are muddled. It's hard to make sense of this. Perhaps we should leave it to DARE to figure out what really happened (should she choose to do so) and concentrate instead on how we can help her decide where she wants to go from here.
Yes, DREAD, your ex pretty much raped you, but it was the kind of "pretty much" where your boyfriend (who you talk about marrying? ...) needs to live with the expectation that if you go to a party without him, you'll end up out in the street, saying "no, I can't" before bending over the hood of your car. That's a miserable thing to think about someone who you're supposed to trust.
("I can't" is frequently used as a way to say "I would, if I were single." Maybe DREAD knew that. If she had had the strength to say "Stop," or anything unambiguous...)
This particular situation, was acquaintance rape. The victim knew her attacker, attempted to stop him, said no multiple times, and NEVER said yes. Her ability to give consent was impaired, and she said no repeatedly which means that there was no consent given in the first place.
No means no, folks. Unless no means yes and your safe-word is something like fire hydrant, but then it's preplanned...
I have only personally known one person who was raped, but it was a complete effing nightmare. While I was not in the same room as her while it was happening, that doesn't mean I do not know how uninvited and, I guess, rapey, it was. The girl was so drunk, she couldn't talk, she couldn't say no. She had bruises the next day. She was too terrified to speak up about it, to have a rape kit performed. It was her boss.
The way I understand freedom is the ability to do whatever you want to do, as long as it is of no physical or emotional consequence to another party, whenever you want to. My friend wanted to get drunk one night. She did, and then she got raped. It is not her fault, it is all on the hands of the rapist.
I applaud DREAD for being able to speak up, articulately and intelligently. She, as everyone else has failed to notice, is 18 years old. She is trying to make smart choices about how to proceed with her life after a
REALLY FUCKING TRAUMATIZING event, and I am really moved by her courage, let alone her ability to even speak after having this shit happen to her.
Additionally, I think it is super fucked up that a good portion of comments on here are pissing contests about who has sustained the most trauma in their lives. No one still standing does not have some shitty thing in their past. Instead of being 15, and arguing over who has the-worst-life-ever, why don't we just fucking show some empathy when something shitty happens and agree that it's fucked up and do what we can to make sure we're not producing more rapists, murderers, sociopaths, etc.
In the mean time, yes, go and beat the shit out of the guy that took advantage of you. Seriously. No court will convict you, no person will judge you.
And the other letter, I'm on the fence. I like bigger guys, so I wouldn't mind if my partner was bigger than me. As cheesy as it sounds, at the end of the day, the heart and brain are what'll get you through a relationship more then a six pack. That said, attraction is important, and without it, can whittle away your sex life. Argh.
DREAD was unambiguously raped; however, I have long thought there needs to be a term for the kind of gray-area experience many of my friends and I have had. Perhaps "yuckfuck" does indeed fit the bill.
"No" is not only "no" when it's accompanied by groin-shots and pepper sprays, people.
psilly and mrclean, go get yourselves some fucking sensitivity courses and learn to be human.
I'm with Ferretrick; DREAD, go see a therapist, like, yesterday, and for God's sake, DTMFA.
And hang in there -- you're not alone.
Afterwards, I knew I didn't have a case to go to the cops with. But I told one of my male friends, who offered to round up as many of HIS friends as possible to go beat the shit out of the asshole who coerced me. Unfortunately, I wasn't sure that it was a good idea, so the jerk escaped a beating. But he ended up quitting his job and moving because he flinched every time he got the death-glare from someone who had heard the story.
As for DREAD's boyfriend... He sounds more like a possessive dickweed who's pissed that someone else touched his property, or that his girlfriend didn't respect his property rights, than he's upset that his girlfriend was assaulted. What the fuck? DREAD, dump this idiot. He's just going to make you feel guilty forever, and you have nothing to feel guilty about.
But a little like the third-rail guy in the second response, I feel like I brought what happened to me on myself. I was angry at myself for being so fucking stupid and weak. But I had to realize that I was NOT guilty of making the other guy DO anything - that was all his own personal assholery. Anyway, over it now, married and happy - to a guy who, when I told the story, wanted to go back and beat the guy up.
So not true. It would have sped up the healing process a lot for me; sweeping it all under the carpet just made it feel more like *I* had something to be ashamed of.
I don't think anyone said she was "asking for it" and anyway, your totally trying to change the dynamic.
No, this was a situation where drunken messing around behind the boyfriend's back went too far, farther than DREAD wanted, and the boyfriend has no reason to be sympathetic and he's the one who should DTMFA.
If your friend got cancer from smoking, would you turn your back on him/her? If so, you are a loser.
Dan, you rock!
Truth is, she slept with her ex-boyfriend even though she didn't want to.
Question is - what does her current boyfriend owe her.
Answer is - nothing.
At the end of the day it is impossible to escape the fact the DREAD's actions preceding the rape were unfaithful to her boyfriend and he has a right to be upset about that.... her need to be comforted for the rape that happened to her is separate from his need to resolve her cheating issue. He will never get to resolve the cheating issue because she will never get out from the trauma of the rape issue...
I think they should go their separate ways....but when push comes to shove and I have to make a choice, the current boyfriend is the most innocent of the three people involved...so he should just walk first.
Sure, if hes a total creep, he may feel like he got away with something, but he will know with no doubt where the line is, and if he has any sense, he will leave this victim alone...forever.
Educate yourself on the proper way to treat rape victims before you give them advice.
She should seek therapy or rape survivor support groups only to help her get over this traumatizing experience, because her boyfriend, the one who should be helping her through it, is victimizing her further by blaming her. NOT because she has such little self respect that she "lets" herself get raped. Piss off.
You're "supposed to" be stronger and be able to overtake her, rather than the dick she was raped by? She's "supposed to" only have sex with you, whether she wants to or not? Ask yourself what you really want, rather than what everyone else is "supposed" to be for you. Do you love your girlfriend? Does she love you? Did she tell you what happened to her because she thought you would support her or because you're "supposed to?" as her boyfriend? Maybe she's the one who should look at what she really wants and be realistic about who you really are.
"Silence means consent" I'll take comfort in that, next time I'm raped during a bout of strep.
"'She let him finish' means consent"
Uh, her exact words were "I figured the easiest way to get out of this situation was to let him finish." Yeah, cause I know my favorite thing to do during consensual sex is get out of it as soon as possible.
"'I can't' really means 'I'd like to, but...'"
Ahh yes, the 10th rule of dating or whatever nonsense. Personally, when a girl says no 8 or 9 times, the suspicion enters my mind, 'maybe she's not that into me.' Naah, she finally shut up already - time to start fucking.
"She was asking for it"
Oh yes, clearly they were kinksters, and they had a cool little code, where "No" means "This scene is sooo hot!" DREAD just forgot to mention this somehow. And also didn't mention when they negotiated it. Ironically, the safeword was "On second thought, why not start fucking me."
Last, but not least "You didn't get raped as forcefully as me, so you're a pansie, and it wasn't really rape."
Ah, feminism. Now, women are free to be hypocritical cockwads, just like men! That line of thinking, right there, is probably what made Psilly such a great rape counselor: "Guess what: you weren't raped!" "Really, wow! I feel much better now!"
On a serious note, DREAD (and others in similar situations): I feel for you. Don't accept that kind of treatment, not from anyone. But also, I hope you can take comfort that all men aren't such cocks.
You can't possibly understand the shock and disbelief that permeates every fiber of your being in the moment that you realize that someone you trust has suddenly become an assailant.... Sadly, women ARE conditioned from early childhood to be sweet, gentle and non-confrontational and as a result, many women freeze in moments of intense fear.
When I was raped, I was screaming bloody murder inside my head, but my throat was paralyzed- all I could get out were whispers and whimpers and I'm not typically much of a shrinking violet.
Thank you, Dan, for your response to this young lady.
This was not like a glass of wine and a "massage," or a "I miss you so much; can we do it once more?" It is about HIS actions, and he -- and you -- should know that it is not okay to physically coerce someone into having sex, which is exactly what he did. That's the end of the argument. It doesn't matter what she was thinking, or what she secretly wanted, whether he's her ex or her current "friend," or whether she is Jenna Jameson or Mother Theresa. There's no grey area. No YUCKFUCK. No code words needed. It's about HIM. When a girl says no, you stop.
I question why she could simply say "Stop! Get the fuck off of me!" or worse - simply kicked him in his groin or simply shouted. They were still friendly she quips... sounds like the beers that make her "tipsy" were bringing back some emotional love in...
I think she didn't protest enough!
xo
Rants, Thoughts & Merde
http://rantsthoughtsmerde.blogspot.com/2…
"Psilly is reacting to false dichotomies about sex. Psilly, you're playing the game as if it were real. You've got hangups about what things are supposed to mean and actual reality."
This string of words does not mean anything, what are you trying to say?
What I am trying to say is that DREAD's experience was that of rape, and her boyfriend's experience is that of being cheated on, and then having to support his cheating girlfriend because the cheating ended in rape.
Is that clear enough for you?
Another thing that has become clear is that DREAD's way of describing what happened here (and this is the fun part, because she DID write her experience down and submit it for this exact process via a syndicated advice column that has a comments section online....) is bothering even some people who have also been raped.
So, get off your high horse and quit lumping everyone in the same group who doesn't agree with you.
Oh, and don't try using words like "dichotomies" until you learn how to properly.
What about a 'choice' between forced sex and a four-week hospital stay? A 'choice' between forced sex and broken ribs? A 'choice' between forced sex and multiple cuts and bruises? The line isn't drawn where *you* would acquiesce; it's where *she* acquiesced. Because a 'choice' between two shitty options-- one of which you are being threatened with-- is not a choice at all." is the best of all these.
And I appreciated all the other comments from people who've experienced similar horrible things, from being molested on the bus to actual rape. It IS a horrible thing, and the suffering IS more mental than physical, as one poster noted.
Yanking down my pants or pulling out a cock would be assault, not an appropriate sexual overture.
He assaulted her multiple times and she finally gave in.
Also:
Seroconversion: means now test positive for antibodies to HIV
LTR: Long term relationship
You know what, we need to have a question for jurors in rape trials about whether they understand that no means no. Get all those who can't understand this concept out of the jury pool straight off.
Fuck anyone who says that this girl wanted it, or that she cheated on her boyfriend. Also, fuck anyone who says that she should have kicked him or fought harder or protested more. You don't know; you haven't been in that situation, so you don't know. She reacted the way she thought was best or most appropriate. Doesn't change the fact that HE RAPED HER.
DREAD--I'd suggest you seek counseling from a therapist or support group. The one I am in has helped me immensely.
I've done it more times than I can remember. Every girl I've ever dated did it more than once. Everyone I've ever talked to about sex has done it, and most of them remembered a time when it had been done to them. I don't have any statistics on what percent of the time this is the case, but very frequently no really does mean "Please show me you love me."
Also, to the legal non-genius who says that having sex with a drunk person is always rape, I advise you not to quick your day job (unless your day job is a lawyer, in which case you do need to find a new line of work). In every jurisdiction I'm aware of, having sex with someone who's intoxicated with drugs or alcohol but fully conscious is only rape if the person having sex with them is responsible for getting them intoxicated in the first place.
Because a lot of women do change their minds. Simple. They do. Many girls do say no, but later change their minds.
Some girls say no before consensual sex without a safe word... I know, I've done it. No didn't really mean no, it meant "not here", wait...
How many of you female posters have ever said no and then changed your mind? How of you fully express your consent before sex?
I think silence gives consent because if you don't announce your wishes, then ohter people are going to assume that your wishes coincide with theirs.
Perhaps everyone should sit down and have a long serious chat before sex but that doesn't happen.
There's some middle ground between explicit nonconsent=rape, and explicit consent= consensual sex. There's body language for one, and tone of voice and many others.
What I think is really interesting is the spin different people place on this "script".
If different posters directed this rape scene, using all the same events and words, each scene would look different and some would show rape and others would show consent and some would show something in between...
To be completely honest DREAD's letter and posts aren't very clear. Her words say one thing but their connotaions say differently... And the letter is all we have to go on.
Here's a question: If a man thinks he partner consents and but she doesn't consent... is it rape?
hang in there DREAD.
If you're about to get raped and they're not threatening you physically - especially when they're mealy-mouthed fucks basically begging you to let them rape you - FUCKING HURT THEM.
Learn to fight, goddamnit. If you value yourself, learn to fucking fight with fists and elbows and knees. You'll be healthier physically AND ESPECIALLY MENTALLY for the effort. Ugh. You should be ashamed of yourself!
Rosa Parks thinks you're a pussy.
I won't bore you with the details of my experience but I don't think any one has mentioned something similar. I was molested by multiple people when I was a young teen, then had a similar situation as DREAD in which my virginity was taken, then later, I was attacked on the street by a stranger.
The first instance, I was young, confused, uneducated, insecure and scared and didn't do much except try and avoid the group of guys, which wasn't always possible. The second, I was trapped with the guy and used strong no's, physical rebuffs and logic to try to convince him to leave me alone and, after hours with no response to my pleas, I went numb and dissociated. The third time, I was involved in martial arts and just reacted and kicked his ass.
The third experience was the most traumatic.
That all I head to do was fight back in a small way was enough to deter the jerk was a painful revelation. I was/am part of the socialization that women shouldn't make a fuss, if my reflexes hadn't kicked in, I probably would have froze up and submitted to the creep. In the previous instances, perhaps if I had said no louder or tried to kill them or reacted in a more violent way--not the polite, feminine way that was ingrained in me--I wouldn't still be in therapy.
Regardless of the further details of DREAD's experience, questions of her character and wisdom, and judgments against the ex and the current, what the multitude of responses show is that women have a long way to go to recondition themselves against the socialization of domesticity and femininity. While there is a huge weight of responsibility on men to understand rape, not just the front page kind but the grey areas as well, and to prevent it within themselves, women need to understand their complicity in the socialization aspect--I learned my "proper role as a submissive woman" from my mother.
Ironically, she was also raped.
She was cheating on her boyfriend, she didn't deserve to get raped. Those two concepts are not mutually exclusive.
But sick people aren't magically going obey orders of "no", regardless of the Bill of Rights.
The only rights you have are those you are willing to fight for. Let this be a lesson in vigilance. No more self-pity... take a self-defense course.
what will DREAD do now to protect herself in the future from someone violating her personal sovereignty?
If it's not in your personality to fight back, change your personality.
Be thankful it didn't turn violent and prepare yourself for one that may.
I personally feel that anyone who makes an advance on someone else after hearing "no" at any volume is in the wrong. DREAD's 'giving in' after refusing her exes advances multiple times DOES NOT mean consent. Assuming her story is true as she told it, she was absolutely raped.
On the other hand, she needs to assert herself both to her current boyfriend and her ex. She certainly didn't do her best to fight her ex off during the incident--no one is arguing that. It may be that her ex was unaware that he was stepping out of bounds and that confronting him would result in a truly sincere apology. That MIGHT be the case.
Either way, she needs to make it clear to her current boyfriend that in her mind, and legally, she was raped. From the current boyfriend's point of view, without DREAD stressing her exact feelings, I can see how he might be confused about what was going on.
DREAD clearly believes it was a RAPE situation, and needs to assert herself.
The virus incubates in different people at different rates.
There's a difference between saying no and then saying yes, and just saying no over and over again.
Hopefully you know the difference.
I hope all the men who have the attitude that "some girls say no before consensual sex" read this story and all the comments by women who described similar experience and realize that many of the women they think they slept with consensually probably felt very violated by the experience. And making a comment here that girls should beat you up if they don’t really want to have sex with you because no isn’t enough, doesn’t change that fact. You're forcing yourself on women, so stop already.
Have enough self respect to sleep with women who say "Yes" or "Ok"; a "long serious chat" isn't necessary, but a simple positive affirmation is.
As much as DREAD needs to learn a lot about sex, so do the men posting here.
I've always said "yes" when I wanted someone. The only permissable thing to do after a "no" is to try some verbal persuasion and even then it should be limited.
It is not a sign of love and wanting to ignore "no". It's a sign of disrespect and self-centeredness.
Furthermore, in no way is it cheating to walk out to get a cellphone. Being alone with someone is not an invitation to sex. She expected him to protect her from rapists, not to be one. She didn't kiss him or flirt with him. She told him "no" and pushed him away.
I'm thinking women just need to stop being such wusses. Most murdered women are killed by their male S/Os. That's a fact. Women need to date smarter, quit being so forgiving of bad behavior, quit needing to be nice no matter what, quit being worried about making scenes, DTMF sooner, buy and learn to use a gun. Raise your effing voice if a guy's doing something you don't like. At the first attempt to kiss her DREAD should not have wanted that Ex as a friend anymore.
As far as her new boy"friend" goes. She needs to learn to quit being a victim of men. Tell the guy he either believes her or joins her ex in the Asshole Male Hall of Shame.
Meanwhile, DREAD, take some fucking assertiveness classes.
I hope she didn't tell him the choice was between sex with the ex, and leaving the party early, as she has asserted here at one point - if I were a boyfriend hearing that I'd just give up.
I'm female and I've never been raped or assualted.
To be honest, perhaps that's why I have less sympathy for DREAD. I am pretty assertive and fairly sure I wouldn't react that way. The guys I chose to date would never try that with me and my male friends respect my bounds as well. In short, I stand up for myself. I'm a bitch.
I feel sorry for DREAD that she's emotionally traumatized but there's a limited amount I can sympathize with her because I tend to feel sympathy for people I relate too.
In today's world, not every recieves a verbal confirmation of consent before initiating sex. *shrug* That's life. Depending on her body language and their past together (which we don't know about), DREAD's ex could have mistaken her capitulation for consent. Maybe, maybe not.
I'm just playing Devil's Advocate and exploring the philosophical idea of rape.
I don't believe that feeling violated after an encounter means it was rape. When I was in my early teens, I made out with a guy who grossed me out and felt quite awful about it later. Truly, I violated myself by not asking him to stop.
I have trouble interpreting the truth of what happened that night from DREAD's words and her viewpoint alone. While she said "no, I can't" she didn't report saying "Stop or I don't want to". I think "No/ I can't" can be misinterpreted. Hell, I wasn't there, I don't know what and how it happened.
Murder is intent. Is rape intent as well? I'm not sure, but I think so. If her ex felt she was willing, while she was not, he did not intend to rape her. I think a portion of rape in the intent of harming someone and not in the act alone.
DREAD says she was raped. If she believes that, she needs to press charges. They won't stick but that's not the point.
To be honest: I think this is an interesting case from an intellectual/philosophical viewpoint. The ambiguity of DREAD's wording and her account make for a lot of questions.
First, I would like to say that when I read your "issue" that my stomach actually turned. People like you, self centered, ignorant, vain, dishonest, cruel people like you, make me fucking sick. Do you know how lucky you are to have someone to love and that loves you back? And you're concerned with his weight gain? Fuck you. Honestly... fuck you. Maybe you could gain some weight, and a brain.
Bye.
Hopefully (through self-reflection or therapy) DREAD will come to realize that she needs to avoid people like her ex and will learn to surround herself with healthier relationships (kudos to you ccouch for having such great relationships) or people may take advantage of her (of course, there's only so much you can do to avoid these things, but clearly she could have done better). For example, I used to drink heavily at parties, but after I made stupid mistakes, I realized that I couldn't handle it and stopped. It wouldn't have been my fault if someone had taken advantage of me when I was drunk, but it is clearly in my control to not drink in the future.
It really irks me though that people would judge DREAD, because that won't help anyone, especially her.
DREAD:
As many others have said, YOU WERE RAPED! The only thing you have done wrong here was not reporting it to the authorities. While all of the legal crap that is going to come with it may try to define a "gray-area", you said NO!!! There was never any consent. You may have given up after being MANIPULATED, but you never consented.
TO ALL OF YOU WHO DON'T HAVE A CLUE:
Psilly, mrclean, and all of you others who think she "consented", or "gave-in" or "really wanted it": I pose this challenge to you - go out with your friends (if you actually have one) and enjoy a couple of drinks, then try putting up a defense of some kind (to anything) by a persistant individual who will not stop trying. Then go step off of the Aurora Bridge. You would be doing us all a favor!
If you say "no", make it simple and unambiguous. You couldn't bring yourself to say anything unambiguous like "stop!" and "get the fuck off me!"?!! You even had to qualify all your "no"s with "I can't"s. Not, "I don't want to", not even a wimpy "No, please don't".
Why on earth would you call this "date rape"? It was rape or it wasn't - but that's not my question. What in this letter would lead anyone here to think you were on a date with this guy? Did YOU think this was some sort of date?
Something is very wrong with this scenario. It sounds to me like you need to be a victim, and you needed to dump your victimhood on the current boyfriend. How did you expect him to react? Did you want him to take the law into his own hands and get put in jail? Did you just want company wallowing in your wishywashy helplessness and conflicted motives? Or are you testing him some other way? Or did you make up the story because you had drunk sex with your friendly terms ex-bf and knew someone saw it and had to make up a cover. This story does not add up, and I think your depression may have a lot to do with your not being honest with yourself.
You give yourself martyr points for being honest with the boyfriend. Even if you didn't make up the story, you just revealed yourself to him in a very unflattering way, and now he is being guilted into being compassionate and understanding and staying in a relationship with someone who is probably not as attractive to him anymore.
Dump the current boyfriend. It's over between you, quite possibly due to your own subconscious motives. Then go to AA and get a shrink who will help you face your real feelings about both boyfriends and your own role in this mess.
It'll be tough, but it's the only thing that's going to work. Good luck.
In the future, you might want to read the first page of comments (which are the ones most commonly responded to). Number ten, posted by mrclean, read as follows: "She was kind of asking for it though wasn't she?"
The comment has sparked so much response that there was even an article written about it by Megan Seling (http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archive…).
That comment is the one I was responding to, which is why you missed the context of what I was saying. Which brings us to...
Psilly Cybin said: "So, in essence women are not competent because they've been collectively brainwashed? I don't believe that, and I think its offensive for SNAG's (sensitive new age guys) to go around saying that."
I am not saying that women are incompetent. I am saying that DREAD's response is typical among rape victims and does not constitute "asking for it." One reason for the murky situation is that women are primarily prepared by society, including their parents, to confront stranger-rape (a very rare occurrence as far as rape statistics go). Date-rape/acquaintance-rape is given a softer touch and is often presented in language that suggests it is the woman's responsibility to prevent it ("Now Sally, don't let Jim go touching you on your date.").
Also, the situation with acquaintances is difficult due to the fact that one typically knows and at least somewhat trusts the imminent rapist. When you know someone, you're more likely to think you can control the situation. So you let it go a little too long and it spirals out of control.
None of this is brainwashing -- I'm not saying women are taught to let men do whatever they want. It's just an unfortunate truth about the subtle messages that still exist in society.
Don't believe these messages exist? A survey of American high school students found that 56% of the girls and 76% of the boys believed forced sex was acceptable under some circumstances. A survey by the same researchers found that among 11 to 14 year olds: 51% of the boys and 41% of the girls said forced sex was acceptable if the boy “spent a lot of money” on the girl; 31% of the boys and 32% of the girls said it was acceptable for a man to rape a woman with past sexual experiences; 87% of the boys and 79% of the girls said sexual assault was acceptable if the man and woman were married; and 65% of the boys and 47% of the girls said it was acceptable for a boy to rape a girl if they had been dating for more than six months.
That's pretty young to have such fucked up ideas -- and I don't think it makes me a SNAG to think so.
(Of course, I'm pretty sure I'm not a SNAG anyways. I'm just a gun-totin' Southern gentleman.)
I think she should call the cops and shame his ass.
At least the next vague case that comes in about him won't seem so vague after she has him on record.
Seems to me she simply realized he was going to have to have sex with her rather she consented or not.
She decided to make it the least traumatic for herself she could.
Rape is about power. He raped her.
I'm from California so let me give you California's legal definition of rape which applies to this incident.
Rape is an act of sexual intercourse carried out:
1. "against a person's will by means of force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the person or another."
In DREAD's story it's very questionable that any of the above things happened.
Read this part of her letter again:
"I was afraid of a confrontation because he and I have been friendly since we broke up. I eventually discontinued my attempts to pull my pants back up because I figured the easiest way to get out of this situation was to let him finish."
DREAD never says the Ex was menacing, frightening or violent. She never says she was afraid of a confrontation because he was going to beat or otherwise harm her. She makes it clear she was afraid of losing a friend. In fact she never talks about being scared at all. You can not charge someone with the very serious crime of rape because you didn't want get into a "confrontation" and lose a "friendship". (The homecoming queen of my high school once admitted to me she slept with a lot of boys she didn't want to so she could maintain her popularity.) DREAD talks about "making out" (an act that requires two willing participants) while pushing him away and saying "no, I can't", which does little to convince someone you were in the process of being raped.
She does talk later in her letter about succumbing to force when she is blaming her boyfriend for not being understanding enough, but when she talks about the rape itself she never talks about being forced, i.e. hands held behind her, seat belt wrapped around her neck, immobilized in some manner. Which makes everything seem to me to be a case of buyers remorse in that DREAD went to a party, had some drinks, paired off with her Ex, started making out, regretted her decision almost immediately, decided to let him "finish", regretted her decision even more, started telling people she didn't really want to do it.
They only thing crystal clear in her letter to Dan is that her asshole Ex was aggressively persistent and she gave in to that persistence. While I would never EVER do what DREAD's Ex did I still am shocked by the amount of people who are screaming for his head/balls and encouraging DREAD to press charges. You people are talking about ruining some stupid young mans life because you already believe him to be a rapist. I agree with Dan in that he needs to be told that what he did was not right but does he really need to be in jail. (If so then half my old high school football team who slept with the homecoming queen should be in jail and had their lives ruined as well.)
I feel sorrow for DREAD's situation but I feel sympathetic to her boyfriend's plight even more. DREAD definitely needs some form of counseling, there is no question about that. Perhaps the first session could be about manipulation and why it is such a bad thing.
DREAD, If this is tearing you up so much why the hell didn't you scream? Why didn't you fight more? As you say, you weren't drunk just tipsy - there's still a fighting chance in there. I can in this instance kind of understand your BF's feelings - he is hurt that you didn't value your relationship with him to put up more a fight.
On the other hand, this experience shows all too well why you left your ex in the first place - he has truly shown up what sort of vile, selfish man he really is. Whatever he tries to tell you later - whatever his reasoning, his logic - do not for a moment listen to him and his debased thinking. He forced himself on you, whether you gave in or not. This is very despicable behaviour indeed.
You need to iron matters out both with your Ex and with your current BF. Let the former know precisely how you feel (and by all means, file a report with police so you have it on record). And, secondly, make time to sit down and have a heart-to-heart with your BF and let him you wish you would have fought harder and assure him there are no feelings left for your former boyfriend. Trust me, the current one is the one to worry about.
You are hurting - but in time, and with loving friends you will heal.
And DREAD, get some counseling if you can. Feeling like it's somehow your fault, feeling vulnerable, these things affect you more than you might think they are.
This may not be a prosecutable case of rape, but that doesn't make it any less wrong. And it doesn't lessen the effect it has on it's victim.
This was wrong. This was not DREADs fault in any way. And she needs to tell him and herself that explicitly.
And everyone who thinks otherwise - you haven't experienced the situation, don'tjudge.
Posted by Barb on January 8, 2009 at 6:49 PM
She was not "obviously" raped, even if you take her at her own word.
What's obvious is that she had sex she regrets. I was in situations when I was sexually inexperienced where I went thru with sex because I tried to soften the ego blow of "no" and it got misinterpretted. I've been assaulted nonsexually, but never felt dirty afterwards (violated maybe but not dirty). The only sex I ever felt "dirty" after was the times where I hated the guy for not getting the message. But I stopped caring about them one way or the other when I understood that deep down I was really angry at myself for not trying harder to stop it. And none of those times probably required forcefulness or violence to stop. Just a clear and unambiguous "NO, I'm not interested/not attracted to you" or just "No". The first time I learned this was when a guy who had cajoled me into unwanted sex started calling me for more "dates". I couldn't believe his arrogance and delusions about his own attractiveness, but was afraid of being direct about how repulsive he was. Finally after I had said "no" meekly, he wanted to know why. At a loss for words, I just said "What?" in a slightly shocked tone. He asked again and again and I kept repeating "What?!!" in an increasingly outraged tone. It finally dawned on him and he hung up in embarrassment, and I stopped feeling dirty right then. He had no clue that he was not god's gift with a dick before that. As soon as I learned not to hem and haw with "no" I never had that problem again.
I'm tired of all this paleofeminist crap that women have no responsibility for stopping "rape" if they just can't communicate an unambiguous "no" because of societal conditioning to be nice. Yet men are presumed guilty because of societal conditioning to be aggressive and assertive. Then some of these women, who in many cases could have stopped the sex but didn't because they wanted to be "nice", decide they want to be very unnice and ruin someone else's life with charges of rape. Unless this ex was a total psycho, I'm sure he would have much preferred a little bruised ego and rejection to felony rape charges. Vagina power is not THAT strong.
If a woman is in a position to scream, yell, run, etc, then she should. Simply saying no, then later, "ok, I guess I'll let you do it", is not going to get the point across to the drunk bastard. Instead of assigning blame we should look at prevention. Drunk assholes will always try to molest women, thankfully most will stop if the woman is persistent enough.
Yeah, its wrong what guys do, and we should continue to work on educational programs to change that mindset. However, NOW, TODAY, in our society that is what happens sometimes. Women need to learn to confront today's reality, and never stop fighting back, while working to change tomorrow.
If a woman is in a position to scream, yell, run, etc, then she should. Simply saying no, then later, "ok, I guess I'll let you do it", is not going to get the point across to the drunk bastard. Instead of assigning blame we should look at prevention. Drunk assholes will always try to molest women, thankfully most will stop if the woman is persistent enough.
Yeah, its wrong what guys do, and we should continue to work on educational programs to change that mindset. However, NOW, TODAY, in our society that is what happens sometimes. Women need to learn to confront today's reality, and never stop fighting back, while working to change tomorrow.
Psilly, just WHERE in her letter do you get any evidence that she was "cheating?" She was raped, as even you get around to acknowledging: she said no when the "making out" started: so just when did she cheat?
Asketh, as a Californian I am horrified by your reading of our state law on rape. What is pushing someone into a car and repeatedly removing their clothing if not the use of force & violence?
And I agree that DREAD should go to the cops, but on the other hand, think of what the trial (assuming the bastard would be prosecuted) would be like. God forbid some sick fucks like Psilly Cybin, kennyg or mrclean should be on the jury...
DREAD, if you are still reading this, I am wishing you all the best in the world. Do not let the assholes here mess with your mind: you are a true survivor, and if you get yourself through this you will have a power and strength that these people who are criticizing you will never have. (And for the other posters here who expressed support for DREAD, much love to you all as well.)
that is just the mentality that has caused the scenario that girl UNWILLINGLY become a part of. It was a crime. Yes, a crime. You are not allowed to penetrate a woman without her consent. She did not consent and she DID NOT ask for it. What DS states is true, women have it subconsciously (or overtly) bashed into their heads to not make a scene, to please, to put other's needs first. What ex did was not provoked - he violated her. period. You should be ashamed of yourself. Is this the only way you are able to get laid yourself???
Thats the difference between violating someone's *wishes* and violating someone's *will.* I have no idea which was the case in the situation that sparked this discussion, but to conflate the two amounts to minimizing the extreme gravity of rape.
DREAD also wrote that sex with someone who has "consumed alcohol" is rape. No. "Consuming alcohol" is precise, and very different from being drunk. If sex + alcohol were automatically rape, we'd all be rapists.
None of this suggests she wasn't raped. She was. A prosection might even be successful -- if she kept saying no throughout, especially, as her letter implies. But the inconsistency doesn't help.
Where is the love?!? She deserves so much better! It sounds like she's better off without either one.
Once again, your answer was right on target, Dan.
I for one have never said "no" and then changed my mind in a date situation, at least not on the same evening. I have only done that when sleeping with men I have a long-term relationship with...when I give in so that they will leave me alone and I can get some sleep. THAT is a totally different situation than DREAD's.
"DREAD also wrote that sex with someone who has "consumed alcohol" is rape."
Perhaps she meant to say that it is rape even IF alcohol has been consumed.
Barebacking with meth thrown in. Wildly irresponsible. Blow jobs....who can say?
mrclean, you douchebag, what part of that sounds like "asking for it?"
mrclean, you douchebag, what part of that sounds like "asking for it?"
You have options.
Someone threatened to break your eye socket and you feared for you safety so you submitted to sex. Obviously rape.
Someone broke your eye socket so you submit to sex. Obviously rape.
You are in a situation where the only course of action to insure your safety is having sex with your attacker. Obviously Rape.
Not Rape:
You wanted someone to help you with your math and chemistry homework so you had sex with them even though you didn't want to have sex. NOT RAPE
You wanted someone to call you for a second date so you had sex with them on the first date even though you didn't want sex. NOT RAPE
You wanted a friend to continue to like you so you had sex with them even though you didn't want sex. NOT RAPE
You wanted to not have "confrontation because he and I have been friendly since we broke up". NOT RAPE. Read DREAD's letter this is EXACTLY what she said.
DREAD says in her own words that she had sex with her Ex because she didn't want to lose his friendship. This is NOT RAPE. To call it rape is to cheapen and demean women have been forced to have sex against their will regardless of the situation.
Everyone is choosing to focus on different parts of DREAD's story to decide if they think she was raped or not. Obviously I am focusing on the part of her story where she says she chose to have sex with her Ex to maintain her friendship with him. I will be the first and loudest to say that this makes her Ex an ASSHOLE for exploiting that weakness in her but I will also be the first and loudest to insist that she can not now claim to have been raped by him.
I was raised in a strong female oriented family in that I had four sisters and a very loving strong mother. I know beyond a shadow of doubt what constitutes a violation of consent for women as I've had to witness every possible situation growing up. Everything from "if you love me you will let me do it" to someone forcibly holding one of my sisters down and violating her while she struggled to escape.
I guess that's why DREAD's story doesn't make any sense to me.
Someone threatened to break your eye socket and you feared for you safety so you submitted to sex. Obviously rape.
Someone broke your eye socket so you submit to sex. Obviously rape.
You are in a situation where the only course of action to insure your safety is having sex with your attacker. Obviously Rape.
Not Rape:
You wanted someone to help you with your math and chemistry homework so you had sex with them even though you didn't want to have sex. NOT RAPE
You wanted someone to call you for a second date so you had sex with them on the first date even though you didn't want sex. NOT RAPE
You wanted a friend to continue to like you so you had sex with them even though you didn't want sex. NOT RAPE
You wanted to not have "confrontation because he and I have been friendly since we broke up". NOT RAPE. Read DREAD's letter this is EXACTLY what she said.
DREAD says in her own words that she had sex with her Ex because she didn't want to lose his friendship. This is NOT RAPE. To call it rape is to cheapen and demean women have been forced to have sex against their will regardless of the situation.
Everyone is choosing to focus on different parts of DREAD's story to decide if they think she was raped or not. Obviously I am focusing on the part of her story where she says she chose to have sex with her Ex to maintain her friendship with him. I will be the first and loudest to say that this makes her Ex an ASSHOLE for exploiting that weakness in her but I will also be the first and loudest to insist that she can not now claim to have been raped by him.
I was raised in a strong female oriented family in that I had four sisters and a very loving strong mother. I know beyond a shadow of doubt what constitutes a violation of consent for women as I've had to witness every possible situation growing up. Everything from "if you love me you will let me do it" to someone forcibly holding one of my sisters down and violating her while she struggled to escape.
I guess that's why DREAD's story doesn't make any sense to me.
The guy I was with when I was raped by my friend's boyfriend had a very similar reaction to DREAD's boyfriend, as did my friends. They blamed me for "seducing" the friend's boyfriend and ruining their relationship. The hardest part of the whole experience wasn't the rape, it was the blame.
I'm grateful you are no longer a rape counselor.
Who exactly are we trying to protect, here?
I have been on the other side of the coin before and had an ex-girlfriend accuse me of rape, and I got to go through the process, it is not fun. The ex and I never had sex, even when we were together, but I got to endure being threatened and assaulted by her family, shunned by my friends, some, not all. All because she was pissed off that I had broken up with her, so she decided to accuse me to get me back. Eventually the truth came out, but the damage was done, and nothing ever happened to her as a result of her accusing me.
Again, I know that No means No, my Dad taught me that many years ago when we talked about puberty. He also taught me that there are 2 sides to every story, and that over time stories change after re-thinking and talking to friends. The best advice I could give to DREAD, and is the same advice I would give my daughter at puberty; would be to take a self defence course, and grow a backbone. That way, if words fail you, a shot to a pressure point will get the point across, and you won't have people walking all over you for the rest of your life. And I agree with a previous poster who stated that saying "You're raping me", or "Stop raping me" would probably work very well in those date-rape senarios, it would eliminate any confusion if "No" doesn't work. Maybe once he whipped his dick out, asking if he was going to rape you might have sobered him up, but too late now, but at least you know if it ever happens again.
Only someone who is truly so small would ever be mad at the girl in this scenario.
He feels cheated on, like maybe she wanted to have sex with the ex and just let this be the opportunity.
FUCKING IDIOT, why don't these people come with clearly visible instructions to TURN AND WALK AWAY upon meeting.
"She was so obviously raped and anyone who says otherwise is a rape apologist. Rape victims NEED OUR SUPPORT. The responses to this are disgusting.
Posted by Barb"
----> Wow. Nice going with the "everyone who doesn't agree with me is WRONG!WRONG!WRONG!". Is is possible for yor to discuss things rationally? Chill the fuck out and use logic.
"How dare you judge a woman who's put in that position, and has to deal with the aftermath.... And everyone who thinks otherwise - you haven't experienced the situation, don't judge.
Posted by alli"
"Asketh, as a Californian I am horrified by your reading of our state law on rape.
Posted by Allyson"
--> Are you horrified by his interpretation or the fact he would dare try and use a well-formulated legal document to sort out this situation?
----> It seems like you all are saying "This women says she was raped! Put your brains away immediately and don't ask questions!" Crying rape as a magic bullet is bad for men and women too.
I'll be straight with you. I HATE rapists and other sick abusers. When used properly, I think the death penalty is Great. Rape is a Terrible crime and should be punished incredibly harshly. But women who would call rape falsely are also absolutely despicable. (Not that DREAD is necessarily, but that that is where your attitudes will lead when no one can question a rape victim.)
What you're asking for "he raped me" to equal end of story. And that's wrong.
And I am disgusted by the quality of some of the feminist posts. Shouldn't you be in favor of free speech and discussion? Shouldn't these issues, society's dirty laundry be aired on and discussed?
Imagine if every high school boy had to read this story and the comments and discuss it. Wouldn't that lead to a more enlightened populace? I think many guys would be repulsed to realize that some of the girls who had given in to them hated every minute of it.
And that would be great thing.
Maybe I'm wrong but weren't the beginnings of the feminist movement strongly rooted in the idea of open communication? I feel that some of you rather desire the opposite, the silence of those who dissent with you.
That makes you as bad as the men who think women belong solely in the kitchen and the religious nuts who burn Harry Potter books without ever reading them.
"She was so obviously raped and anyone who says otherwise is a rape apologist. Rape victims NEED OUR SUPPORT. The responses to this are disgusting.
Posted by Barb"
----> Wow. Nice going with the "everyone who doesn't agree with me is WRONG!WRONG!WRONG!". Is is possible for yor to discuss things rationally? Chill the fuck out and use logic.
"How dare you judge a woman who's put in that position, and has to deal with the aftermath.... And everyone who thinks otherwise - you haven't experienced the situation, don't judge.
Posted by alli"
"Asketh, as a Californian I am horrified by your reading of our state law on rape.
Posted by Allyson"
--> Are you horrified by his interpretation or the fact he would dare try and use a well-formulated legal document to sort out this situation?
----> It seems like you all are saying "This women says she was raped! Put your brains away immediately and don't ask questions!" Crying rape as a magic bullet is bad for men and women too.
I'll be straight with you. I HATE rapists and other sick abusers. When used properly, I think the death penalty is Great. Rape is a Terrible crime and should be punished incredibly harshly. But women who would call rape falsely are also absolutely despicable. (Not that DREAD is necessarily, but that that is where your attitudes will lead when no one can question a rape victim.)
What you're asking for "he raped me" to equal end of story. And that's wrong.
And I am disgusted by the quality of some of the feminist posts. Shouldn't you be in favor of free speech and discussion? Shouldn't these issues, society's dirty laundry be aired on and discussed?
Imagine if every high school boy had to read this story and the comments and discuss it. Wouldn't that lead to a more enlightened populace? I think many guys would be repulsed to realize that some of the girls who had given in to them hated every minute of it.
And that would be great thing.
Maybe I'm wrong but weren't the beginnings of the feminist movement strongly rooted in the idea of open communication? I feel that some of you rather desire the opposite, the silence of those who dissent with you.
That makes you as bad as the men who think women belong solely in the kitchen and the religious nuts who burn Harry Potter books without ever reading them.
Oh and for the record, I thought mrclean was Hilarious. It was a JOKE!
And he hasn't posted since and isn't reading this, so stop blasting him.
(If he wasn't joking, then it wasn't funny.)
And honestly, anyone who still uses the phrase "She was kind of asking for it" is someone I avoid at all costs.
Plus, her statements on this board are questionable: "And yes, I had been drinking. Whether or not you morons realize it, having sex with a woman who has consumed alcohol--whether you have also consumed alcohol or not--is rape."
What? I hope that was just a mistaken way of writing a different meaning. If not, that's an intention of being of victim at all costs, and I'm sure Dr. Dan wouldn't approve. That statement actually casts doubt on the entire story, unfortunately...
Scare him by telling him you're gonna report his behaviour
Should he have stopped when she said "No" and pulled her pants back up? Absolutely! But is that exactly what she did?
I have been married for 15 years, and if I had rolled over every time my wife said "No", we would probably have no kids and would probably been divorced long ago. But we've talked about it, and she tells me that sometimes she says no because she's not in the mood, or she's tired, or she's pissed off, or she simply wants to be romanced a little. I have rolled over after she said "No" before only to have her roll over and take me, saying I should try harder. The signals are not always clear, it is not always cut and dry, black and white.
While I sincerely doubt the guy is going to log on here and post his version of events (not that we could believe it was really actually him posting anyway), if he unintentionally sexually assaulted her, he probably wouldn't recognize the series of events, and wouldn't know to comment. If he intentionally raped her, then he probably wouldn't comment, and if he did, he would probably lie about it.
My advice to DREAD would be to talk to the ex in a safe environment or via the phone, to find out his story. Unless he is a completely deranged psychopath, then the rules above should apply.
There should probably be a disclaimer on this column:
Warning: Regretting sex the next day does not equal rape.
A strong female voice of reason. Thanks for that.
akseth-
Very well put. Legally rape? Not the way DREAD describes it. She WANTED to cry, WANTED to say "stop" (which she actually distinguishes from what she DID say, which was "no, I can't"), but she didn't.
Her reason for not taking more action--"I was afraid of a confrontation because he and I have been friendly since we broke up." Uhh, there's a different between verbally fighting with someone and letting them take advantage of your body for the sake of friendship. This sounds a lot like a bad case of regret and an aggressive, horny ex, not a clear-cut rape scenario. "I can't"? Why would she say that? I would like the hear the ex's story as well.
Why has DREAD been tiptoeing around telling her current BF that she was RAPED if she believes so strongly that she was?
I think she needs to put her current relationship on hold, seek some counseling, and confront her ex.
The last comment was clearly written by a complete Moron.
I cannot believe that that attitude still exsists!
RAPE means that you DID NOT "ask for it".
NO MEANS NO!!!
What the fuck is wrong with you???? Would you have sex with someone who didn't want you? If you did would you realize what you were doing was rape?
DREAD, Most importantly...get to a sexual assult councelor NOW. This will hurt for a while. Get help dealing with it now.
No matter what some stupid people have written...THIS WAS NOT YOUR FAULT. Good Luck Sweetie
What horrifies me in what Asketh wrote is the idea that somehow, pushing someone down and repeatedly yanking someone's clothes off is not considered to be force and violence. Force, in dicitonary.com, is defined as including "strength or power exerted upon an object; physical coercion; violence:" it seems quite clear that this was used against DREAD.
The law that Asketh quotes is indeed a well formulated legal document: it is the interpretation that distorts what should be very clear terms.
But one thing I have learned from this discussion, as disheartening as it has been to read some of the comments: the next time I start to date a new man, I will be sure to have a discussion with him about his attitude toward sexual assualt. If I hear attitudes such as those expressed by the critics of DREAD, I am out of there. I am also out of this discussion, which has really brought out the dregs of society. Good luck to DREAD and all survivors of sexual assault--stay strong and don't let these bastards get to you!
The Just World Phenomenon refers to the tendency for people to want to believe that the world is "just" so strongly that when they witness an otherwise inexplicable injustice they will rationalize it by searching for things that the victim might have done to deserve it. This deflects their anxiety, and lets them continue to believe the world is a just place, but at the expense of blaming victims for things that were not, objectively, their fault.
I see a bunch of people saying things along the lines of, "She should learn not to hang out with men like that in the future." How was she supposed to know he was capable of something like that before he actually did it? Is she supposed to just assume every man is "like that" until proven otherwise? Not much of a way to live.
All of the circumstances you listed in your comment are situations that I do believe are rape. That is the problem with what is happening in this thread. People are posting situations that are examples of rape and then saying its the same as what happened to DREAD.
To everyone else:
I'm starting to wonder how many people actually read DREAD's story or like our soon to be Ex-President they "only read the headlines". In this case a sensational, emotion twisting headline of "That's rape".
A lot of posters immediately grabbed their pitchfork and lynch rope, started yelling rape rape rape and actively encouraged DREAD to do the same thing. That's the danger here. This is not a hypothetical situation in a group discussion. It's a real story about real people and a lot of you want DREAD to crucify someone she says she had sex with because "I was afraid of a confrontation because he and I have been friendly since we broke up." Hell a lot of people are encouraging DREAD and her boyfriend to kill or maim her Ex. The Ex-boyfriend she clearly says she had sex with so she could keep his friendship. What the fuck? If DREAD wouldn't have included that part of her story I would be building the bonfire to burn the SOB Ex too.
We should be encouraging DREAD to get help. We should be encouraging her boyfriend to get help. We should label her Ex an asshole and warn other women about him. We should even be encouraging the Ex to get some counseling so he knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that what he did was wrong. But should we be encouraging people to beat or kill the Ex or put him in jail as a rapist. Really?
First, the only aspect of the law that really matters is case law and precedent, not the words on a page.
What almost everyone here agrees on is that even if this ended in court, DREAD would probably lose if the decision was made by a jury of her peers applying community standards of behavior.
Second, there is another rather inconvenient fact that stems from our legal system - the ex-boyfriend is innocent. He has not been convicted of anything and actually, he has not been charged with anything. So, according to the system in which we all live the ex-boyfriend is not guilty of anything. This matters because some of the advice being offered here could leave DREAD getting sued for dafamation of character or libel. Since the truth defense in a libel suit like this would not be there (since she never pressed charges) she would surely lose. Also, if anyone assaults this ex-boyfriend they are the ones who could/should be arrested according to our laws.
Finally, there are two side to every story, which is one reason why we have the adversarial court system that we do...so each and every person participating in this discussion is doing so with an incomplete picture of the events.
With all of that said: does anyone really thing writing to an advice columnist after you have been raped is the best thing to do?
To every woman who has responded to this by 1. telling your own rape story, and then 2. asking everyone why they deserved it - you are just showing the rest of us how much more recovery you have ahead of you - I am truly sorry BUT your contributions are completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
*Some women are taught, and believe, that to "give enthusiastic consent"--to initiate sexual activity, to suggest it, to ask for it--turns guys off.
*Some guys believe that a woman who says "yes" right away is a slut.
*Some guys are turned off by honest/frank/assertive women; they want sex with a "nice girl".
*Some girls get drunk to give themselves *permission* to have sex; they have an excuse to use later that way and they are still considered "nice girls"
*Some guys think that a woman has given permission for sexual activity when she accepts a drink/goes somewhere with him alone.
*Some women have given a guy permission for sexual activity when she accepts a drink.
*Some women are turned off by men who accept "no" at face value, the first time.
*Some men are attracted to assertive women.
*Some men are so terrified of being seen as a rapist, or seen as imposing on a woman, that they don't initiate sex themselves.
*Some women enjoy teasing men by sexually arousing them and shutting them down.
*Some *men* enjoy teasing women by sexually arousing them and then shutting them down.
*Both men and women can go into a disassociative state (paralyzed with fear) when facing an emotionally intense or traumatizing situation. It's a process not fully controlled by our intent or will; it can happen to the strongest, most assertive person--and the fact that one's own brain and body is betraying one's self *as well as* another person is betraying one can be shocking and frightening.
------------------
Basically, the stereotypes about "what men do" and "what women do" are horsepucky. It's more likely in a drinking environment to see "the people who think drinking=consent" in action, working on getting laid, and the "people who are power tripping on teasing them" in action, working on getting their egos stroked. That's a bad combination right there for reinforcing game-playing and stereotypes as well as leading to bad situations. Some people get smarter with age. Some don't.
Now for my poster creds: I'm female and over 40. I own a bar, so I see it all. When I was younger, I too was raped by an exboyfriend, in a similar manner; I was shocked at my own responsibility in my rape and took self defense courses. I have had men respond badly to "enthusiastic consent"; I have had men respond with gratitude for "enthusiastic consent"; I have had men tease me with "no" before getting to "yes"; I have had men grab me; you get the picture.
Basically, people (male and female)who believe that "no doesn't mean no" in sexual situations are going to get into situations where they are, in fact, raping other people; it would be just and fair if everybody recognized that "no meant no" but that isn't how reality is. Explicitly saying phrases such as:
"Goddammit, get the hell away from me."
"I don't want to have sex with you. Don't touch me."
"Get your hands off me!"
"Stop now."
works better. If the assaulter is really drunk, the subtlety of "kissing is nice, but I'm not going to go all the way" is going to be lost. "Don't touch me" is a clear and easily communicated boundary.
And yes, men can be raped by women, especially teenage boys. I didn't understand this for a long time; but they can be sexually aroused (erection, etc.)while disassociated. Being female myself, I thought that an erection meant consent. If we want to talk about male reactions to being raped, we don't have to limit ourselves to scenarios of anal penetration by other men.
1. To Psilly: one, since when are the words of the law irrelevant to the enforcement of the law? (If words did not matter in legal matters, there would be no such phrase as "the letter of the law.) Two, what on earth is wrong with writing to an advice columnist after an attack? I agree with the people who are urging DREAD to go to a counselor (preferably one with some compassion, unlike you), but that is no reason not to write to Dan.
2. For those of you who keep insisting that it was not rape because she eventually "consented" by not continuing to fight: just how far do you take this logic? What more does a woman have to do beyond saying "No" to make it clear that she is not consenting? What more evidence of non-consent do you need? And do you apply this to victims of other crimes? If, for example, I "consent" in the end to a purse snatcher because I fear greater harm to myself if I resist, was I not robbed of a purse because I "gave in" in the end?
I decided to rejoin this discussion, despite my disgust with some of the posters, because I do not want the last word on this discussion to be "there are two sides to every story." Yes, there are: but that point is irrelvant to this situation. Sure, rapists have their "side" too--I am sure that many of them were abused as children--but that does not matter in the end. If she says "no," it is rape--end of story.
In keeping with your analogy. If a friend of yours aggressively and abusively demanded your purse and you gave it to them because you didn't want to lose them as a friend. Then no you weren't robbed of a purse. You were manipulated into giving up your purse by a sick freaking asshole, but no you weren't robbed.
DREAD composed her letter to Dan after the attack had happened and she had time to think about it and analysis it. In her choices of words she shows that she thought it was important to convey to Dan that she was afraid of confronting her Ex about what he was doing because she enjoyed being friendly with.
That is the main reason why it's not making any sense to me. She could have asked Dan about her boyfriend not being supportive of her traumatic event by just saying she was raped by an Ex and he was having trouble dealing with it.
Telling the story like she did gives a reason to why the boyfriend would be acting upset about it. An "out" for the boyfriend so to speak. I don't know, maybe she wanted that doubt to be there so her current boyfriend would not appear to be an uncaring hateful monster. Any right minded person who's partner came home crying and said "I've just been raped" would NEVER blame the victim. If your partner came home crying and told the story exactly like DREAD has then even a loving caring understanding person would be thinking "did you really just say the reason why you didn't stop him was because you were concerned about keeping things friendly."
Anyways, Allyson, I agree with you in that some of the posts on this subject have been disgusting. I sincerely hope that my thoughts and ramblings on the situation aren't the ones that have disgusted you.
I went to an all-boys high school. Early on, before I was ready to admit my homosexuality, the boys in my school would pull me into a room and touch my crotch and/or dryhump me, especially after I would scream "No!" My mother used to tell me I was "asking for it" when I came home and cried to her. To her, being gay somehow allowed the other boys to violate my body.
DREAD...it is NEVER, NEVER okay for someone to violate you. Even if you say "no" at first and then succumb, it's still rape, at least in Pennsylvania (where I live...I don't know where you live; the laws vary from state to state). If you want, you should consider talking to a prosecutor and press charges. Anything to stop this guy from taking advantage of another girl.
Also, while I don't advocate the use of violence, Erin gave a wonderful piece of advice.
Finally, either talk to your current BF about how his lack of support perpetuates this violation. If he still blames you, DTMFA.
Since, like, forever. Precedence is the foundation of our legal system.
But that's not a real answer. The real answer is that what matters more than what the law says, it what the legal system does with it. If it were as clear cut as people would like it to be, then going to the police with the evidence and having a high conviction rate would be routine but they're not. The FBI reports that rape is one of the most under-reported crimes, for a reason, a sad reason, that "justice" as the law is written is rarely served. There are mechanical reasons for this, and also the fact that the jury is going to react a lot like some of the people in this forum....
But okay, let's look at the objections. Could DREAD have been more clear or more forceful? Sure - but so could most rape victims, at least if we're going to compare their actions to what the ideal actions would have been. Is choosing to avoid seemingly worse consequences the same as wanting or consenting to have sex in this case? Hardly: if any of you detractors were being waterboarded by our dear friends at the CIA, it would exceed absurdity to say that your refusal to commit suicide is tantamount to wanting or consenting to torture. Is DREAD's situation just like giving your purse to a particularly insistent friend? Shit no, and if I have to explain why I might instead find you in person and sock you in the face. Does your personal experience with your ex-girlfriend or whoever make you an expert in what happened here? Nope. Does it diminish other instances of rape to call this rape? No, and even if it did, facts are facts - trying to redefine "rape" to be "nonconsensual sex that's at least as bad as this thing I went through once" borders on the childish. Finally, does it make any sense to defend the current boyfriend? Not much - he was thinking about getting married to this girl, but for some reason now he can't even find it in himself to give her a fair hearing. At the harshest, he should be asking for the same things people here have asked for: for DREAD to go to therapy or learn more how to stand up for herself, etc. It's deeply paranoid to keep the burden of guilt on her after multiple apologies and time to think about it.
This'll be my one and only post on this topic, so in expectation of everyone who disagrees with me: fuck off and die.
Considering the way he was acting, I probably would have done the same in her situation. Decent people think "no" and "I can't" are HUGE turn-offs. If your ex doesn't smarten up, DTMFA, DREAD. you just went through a shitty experience and you deserve better.
He could tell from my body language and the tones of my voice what I truly meant.
I think many girls do say no at first to preserve their own image of themselves only to change their mind soon there after. And unfortunately some are coerced into staying silent and accepting sex without having changed their minds.
Allyson---->
"pushing someone down and repeatedly yanking someone's clothes off".
Now if DREAD had used those words, I would have a much different opinion of this incident. Those are chilling words that inspire disturbing mental pictures and the rightful formation of lynch mobs. :(
But DREAD said he pushed her against the car not down... and that he pulled her pants down not "yanked".
You know my boyfriend pushed me againgst the wall and pulled my pants down and I may have even tried to pull them back up again. But it was so NOT nonconsensual.
From her wording, this guy was aggressive and stupid... not violent. I'm truly assuming that her pulling up her pants and her pushes were as weak and meek as her "no's". And were possibly misinterpreted.
If they weren't, well that casts a different light.
The thing about this story is that everyone is seeing through a different filter of their experiences. You can tell from the parts of the story they focused on.
You see a rape, I see... well, I'm not sure. I don't think DREAD was lying but... I'm not sure about her perceptions, I guess.
DREAD was horribly taken advantage of by a sick dickhead. She wasn't raped. I think Dan is doing a huge disservice to rape victims by repeatably calling what happened a rape in his response.
Everyone needs to stop thinking about their own stories. Stop projecting their own stories on to this one. Think about what exactly happened here according to the victims own words. And yes she is a victim, a victim of a predator there is no doubt about that.
There are several things that DREAD says that show she wasn't raped. She admits to "making out". She admits to saying "no i can't" instead of "no don't". Any decent person at that time would immediately stop and be cool with it. Obviously this fuckhead kept pressuring her. But christ people! She then says that she consented to having sex because she was "afraid of a confrontation because he and I have been friendly since we broke up." That's not rape!!! You can't be raped if you gave consent because you were afraid your asshole exboyfriend wasn't going to be nice to you anymore! What the fuck!?!
What happened is manipulation by a stronger will over a weaker will and it's wrong and should never be condoned. Something needs to be done about it for sure. I think calling the mother of the exboyfriend is a good idea. Definitely therapy for all the crazies. But pressing charges or beating/killing someone after you consented to sex to keep things friendly, that sounds a little Nuts, a little Crazy.
Your advice is dangerous because it condones letting the woman give in without doing everything she can to stop sex she does not want. It seems that in that situation, the woman is the person in the best position to stop an event that will leave everyone worse off. The ex did not think he was raping her, and I read no indication he would have raped her on purpose. It may be because of societal norms pounded in the heads of girls and young women, but many clearly consensual sex encounters include meek "nos" and "I can'ts," and many boys are too dumb to tell the difference between a DREAD "no, stop it" and a Paris Hilton sex tape "no, tee-hee, stop it, tee-hee."
I am not saying that DREAD wanted to have sex with her ex. But consent given because she wanted to avoid confrontation does not equal no consent.
I wish DREAD the best recovery from her experience and hope that no woman goes through what she is going through.
Anonymous Creep
P.S.: http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2008…
Some quotes:
Researchers found that "men were accurate at interpreting direct resistance messages like 'Let's stop this.' But they were as apt to interpret 'Let's be friends' to mean 'keep going' as to mean 'stop.'"
(Interestingly enough, in previous research, Motley found that women use indirect messages of resistance to avoid upsetting men, but most men easily accept direct resistance.)
I also find it hard to blame men for not correctly reading women's indirect resistance; women are often expected to, in the very least, put on a halfhearted performance as the steadfast sexual gatekeeper . . . .
Also: it was rape. I know there's a lot of fuzziness and weirdness with a lot of the details, but it's pretty clear it fits the definition of rape. That doesn't mean the ex thought that what he was doing was rape or even something she didn't want. That doesn't change his guilt, but it's an important detail to keep in mind.
Also: DREAD knows some fucked-up people. If her ex's way of initiating sex is pulling down her pants and whipping it out in public, Dude has some serious problems and there's no way she could have dated him and not known. Even drunk, nobody who isn't used to behaving like this would suddenly behave like this in public. He's trash and she should have stayed the hell away from him for her own safety even before she learned what he was capable of. I'm not blaming DREAD, I'm just saying rule number one for personal safety is stay away from obvious assholes.
Also: DREAD is clearly not her own best advocate. Every follow-up post by her made the situation worse. Let that be a lesson to the rest of you.
Last but not least:
No means no.
Teenagers are stupid.
Women need to assert themselves more.
Men need to stop being aggressive assholes.
Sex, relationships and emotions will continue to confuse and hurt us, keeping Dan in business.
Now it's time to stop reading this shit and get some work done!
***TOPIC CLOSED!***
I would also second the counseling. Something you did or said made this asshole think that he could do this to you, and he was right because you did. You need to figue out what signal you were putting out that made him feel that he could get away with this and confront him about it. You may have some type of hangup on this man because you said you guys have been friendly and you didn't want to mess that up but since you were broken up, friends or not he doesn't get that privledge anymore. THIS MAN IS NOT YOUR FRIEND, now you understand that but while everything was happening your first thought should have been to kick his ass, not let him do it because you were friends.
As for your boyfriend, I can see if you still had a thing for your ex, where he would be feeling the way he feels. On the other hand, clearly the ex took advantage of you in a vulnerable moment, whether you still had feelings for him or not, and he needs to acknowledge that you were raped. I would encourage you to encourage him to go kick his ass. If he can't at the very least admit you were raped then you should dump his ass because anyone who would stand by and let this guy get away with what he did (including yourself), is a giant fuckwad.
ccouch: the difference between "pulled" and "yanked" is not self-evident, to put it mildly: and pushed is pushed, whether it is against a car or down. In either case, having ones clothes forcibly removed several times and being pushed anywhere is clearly the application of force...
Had she TRULY changed her mind about saying "no," there was one clear thing she would have said that would have made this a non-rape situation: namely, "OK, yes, I change my mind, let's do it." No where in this story is there ANY evidence that she in fact changed her mind. In the absence of that, this *is* in fact rape.
Psilly: precedent is not set in a vacuum. It is (when properly developed, at least) based on the written word of the law. So, yes, words matter in the legal system.
And DREAD, if you have the stomach to keep reading these comments: more power to you. I wish you and all survivors well.
Ex-boyfriend if you are reading this thread- Please give your version of incident
Treating rape so simplistically is not good for anyone, including the survivors, because it makes people more likely to try to invalidate the survivor's experience over concern for fairness for the perpetrator.
Why don't we recognize different degrees of rape like different degrees of killing someone? First degree murder is obviously different than involuntary manslaughter because the perpetrator had different degrees of intent or premeditation, even though the end result on the victim is the same -- the victim is dead.
A perpetrator in an unwanted sexual assault can likewise have different degrees of intent or commit the crime in different ways, and therefore deserve different kinds of punishment. But many of us only recognize "rape" or "not rape" and try to apply the same rules to all cases. That's what's broken.
Futhermore, sexual assault is even more complex, because the end result is not something unambiguously undesirable (death). The end result is sex, and some people unfortunately DO at times give mixed signals about whether a particular sexual encounter is desired (consensual) or not, and many of those signals are non-verbal.
DREAD'S ex clearly was sexually aggressive and used some degree of force and sounds like an asshat. Was he also a rapist, and if so, to what degree? Anyone accused of a crime has their own side of the story and deserves their day in court, especially in an edge case like this. I say that not to be disrespectful to DREAD, but because everyone deserves the same respect we would show to DREAD, to listen and try to understand what happened.
DREAD I'm so sorry for your trauma - because clearly what happened was traumatic - and wish you all the best in healing in your own way.
"Savage Love Commenters Don't Know Assault When They See It"
http://jezebel.com/5126221/savage-love-c…
I hope the editors at JEZEBEL are appropriately embarrassed, ashamed and chastened now that the conversation among their more elite readers has devolved into the same arguments here with many of the same points being made.
I personally, having been quoted by JEZEBEL, have tried posting around 5 responses to no avail - they won't publish them.
So, to all of the people here from JEZEBEL, welcome, and do us a favor here, let the editors over there know that their readers aren't any more enlightened than Dan Savage's, or, perhaps, this story isn't as clear as they've portrayed it.
I've been in three car accidents in my life. Two were minor, I was rear-ended by an older guy who reactly slowly and I backed into another car in a parking lot. In the third car accident I was pronounce dead on the scene. I wasn't, obviously [I was in shock and had no pulse, but I wasn't actually dead]. The cop who claimed I was dead later told me he couldn't imaging how someone could sustain such horrific injuries and still be alive.
So my third car accident was worse than the first two - that doesn't mean that the first two weren't car accidents.
Dread was raped.
I had a lot of good guy friends in high school that I trusted like brothers, so I didn't tend to see guys as a threat. Then one day I went for a short hike to spark one with a friend of a friend... I will never forget the energy shift when I realized that he wanted to fuck me, and thought he was actually going to get to- even though I was repeatedly telling him (nicely) that I wasn't interested. Finally I said something to the effect of "it ain't gonna happen, so knock it off" and started walking back to the trailhead... really, anything other then a firm "no" means "try harder" to assholes like this...
I suppose he could have tackled me, but cowards like that are usually looking for an opportunity to say they 'mis-read' your cues, so he didn't touch me. I think he also realized that he risked the wrath of my guy friends if he pushed any harder, LOL... It was a terrifying moment, but what it taught me helped me avoid worse situations in the future. This was a guy who knew I was into someone else and was only interested in him as a friend, so why he thought this would fly...? He was an opportunist creep! Had I been more intoxicated, more considerate of his feelings, or maybe just more shocked/confused/ambivalent/frozen- I could see how it could have gone down in a similar way to DREAD's situation.
Yes, women need to do everything they can to keep themselves safe. But learning to tell the wolves from the sheep can be tricky, and I don't think it's quite fair to DREAD to look at her situation through anything other then the eyes of an 18yo young woman. Remember, she is barely more then a teen still, and she does not have the life experience that she will at 23 or 28 or... at that age, you are still feeling like the world is in your hands!
DREAD, what happened is fucked, and while making different choices may have prevented it, hindsight is 20/20- I mean, one WOULD think that it would be safer to have a guy friend walk you to your car late at night... right? Sadly, you trusted the wrong guy, but that's NOT 'asking for it'...
Be kind to yourself as you walk through this (((hug))) and if your current BF can't be supportive (and yes, if he's going to hold this over your head as proof that he can't trust you, then he needs to re-examine that) DTMFA! I can understand him feeling like you maybe should have done more, but unless he's been in a similar situation (sadly all too common for young women, but highly unlikely for most guys) he really has no place to make that call. Perhaps he has victim issues and this is interfering with his ability to be supportive of you? If you two are truly serious about a future together, then counseling for BOTH of you might help- then again, 18 is pretty young to be thinking about marriage (and this is coming from someone who married their HS sweetie) and there are plenty of guys out there who have it in them to be SUPPORTIVE when their partner has been hurt, regardless of their own mixed feelings.
That said, if she was 32 instead of 18, my opinion would be a little different... but then, generally by the age of 32 most of us have met enough wolves that we've gotten better at keeping ourselves safe(r)... she's not much more then a baby still, IMO... and this was a shitty way to have to learn who not to trust.
As for the rape question, seems like a big batch of people want to rush to judgement. If the perp would have been a stranger (or not someone DREAD had been w/ b/f) this would be cut and dried RAPE. She said, "No," etc, he wouldn't stop: that's rape. Sure.
But, come on, since they have a history it gets more complicated. We've heard her story and if it's accurate, if they have no history of saying "No" means try harder, or show more ardor, then it sounds like rape. That is, whether she walked out to the car alone w/ him or not, or whether she eventually relented. If there is no history in which "No" does NOT necessarily mean No then it's rape. Based on her story. But, really, we would need to hear his story b/f judging, right? In this kind of case we'd want to hear his side and ask all kinds of questions that are coming up here (of both of them) to ground all the speculating we're doing, right?
Being violated like that by a former boyfriend DREAD must feel qualms ab her actions. Which is why I think some want to rush to the rape judgement. It's out of sympathy for DREAD, as a way to assuage her potential guilt. But I doubt a verdict from the peanut gallery at Savage Love will do the trick. That's the sad part here. I mean, victomhood is a headfuck. Writing a letter to Savage Love is fine but, if you ask me, DREAD ought to start seeing a counselor for awhile.
She said no! She pushed him away. She pulled her pants back up. That's clear. If any of you mean think that means "yes" than I suggest some serious soul-searching. Anytime there are clear signals that someone doesn't want sex, like I don't know, SAYING NO or PHYSICALLY RESISTING, here? Why don't you ask them, nicely, if they would like you to walk them back or have sex with them? Done.
I agree with Dan that DREAD was raped. DREAD should be seeking charges against him. I think that if this was such a henious act that DREAD would have sought help and justice immediately afterwards. This may have just been a clever way to break up with her boyfriend and not seem the bad guy. She did mention that they were having problems and although she seems genuinely hurt she is not taking the steps neccessary to resolve the issue in the mind of the one person she cares for. She seems bent on sparing the feelings of the rapist.
from the way you write, you sound like a confident, self-assured girl. Perhaps that's why your boyfriend is having a hard time believing that you were raped. He probably has no idea what it's like to be victimized by someone who is supposed to be your friend, and how confusing that is even though everything you think you could have done to stop it seems so obvious after the fact.
So find some other sources to back up your claim. Show him the letter to Dan Savage, the responses, websites explaining date rape. Show him other sources that explain why even tough, confident women can be reduced to whimpering victims in the face of sexual assault. Does he have a good female friend, sister, maybe a cool aunt who you might feel comfortable enlisting for help?
If that still doesn't work, you should think long and hard about how much you want to save a relationship with someone who doesn't trust you. And rape is a terrible thing to go through on your own. You might think you're over it, but the fact that you're feeling guilty doesn't bode well for recovery. If you can, talk to a counselor or therapist. It really does help.
This woman has been victimized twice: once by her ex and continually by her societal training.
as for the victim, talk to the cops, get some conseling, drop the new boyfriend. he's really not all that much better than the rapist.
Bullshit. First of all, men and women shouldn't be treated differently under the law. Second, if you get drunk and consent to sex (even if you wouldn't have while sober), that's YOUR DECISION. Take responsibility for your actions. If you get drunk and drive a car, you have to accept the consequences. If you get drunk and punch someone (even if you otherwise wouldn't), you have to accept the consequences.
Now, if you're passed out or otherwise incapable of giving consent, then it's rape. But if you consent to having sex, then it doesn't matter if you've been drinking: it's not rape.
A gay man knows my woes more than I do.
I am not going to get into a large speech about how women have been dealing with a wound so deep we can't recognize it ourselves, but thank God someone gets it. Dan you helped that girl more than you know, and a lot of other women as well.
So few people realize how mistaken we are about ourselves.
I am so happy it was you and not myself who answered her letter.
I would have told her to stop pretending, to admit she must have wanted it if she didn't stop it.
Even after being in the same position myself, having sex just so the guy wouldn't be annoyed that I came over to his house for nothing.
Thanks, Dan, for this glimpse of understanding that I hope will grow into a permanent awareness.
She eventually consented, and while it was under a certain degree of duress, it wasn't a degree comparable to the threat of violence.
She chose to let him have his way out of a desire to avoid a scene and not damage their relationship.
She feels violated and she was, but she wasn't raped. I think to call it rape diminishes the term. If it matters, I'm a woman.
-I hope this thread gets men and women really thinking about these situations BEFORE they happen, so if any of us are put in the situation later on, we'll be more prepared to deal with it at the time.
-I hope young women especially are getting ideas about how a lot of "rapish" situations occur: with alcohol, with an aggressive ex, alone with a stranger, etc. When I was a younger woman, I used to put myself in risky situations without thinking. I would go back to a guys apartment I had just met, had been drinking with all night, then be surprised when he assumed we would have sex. I know it seems rediculous, and it is, but I was really just very naive.
-I suppose in retrospect, when I told that one guy I didn't want to have sex with him multiple times, but then was naked and making out with him, it was mixed signals. I thought the line was clear, but I don't think my situation would have held up in court, because I had consented to making out with him. I probably would have been written off as being a tease. And, in my situation, the guy was really drunk as well, and probably didn't think my 'no's' meant 'no,' since I was rubbing him on me. (yes I'm being vague; don't feel like going into too much detail.)
-I think a lot of women have these "YuckFuck" stories and just accept them or don't talk about them.
-I also think I used to be so scared of being labeled a bitch or a feminist (sad that that's a bad word) when I was younger, that I wouldn't take an confrontational stand when appropriate. I'd think about it later on my own, and then make a decision about the issue. As I've grown up, I've gotten less and less scared to say BACK THE FUCK OFF.
-Putting yourself in a dangerous situation can seem like an okay idea at the time, it might even be fun, like being alone with a stranger at a party, or going to an afterbar.
-Just talking from personal experience, not about/regarding DREAD.
-DREAD- don't be afraid to talk to a professional if you have some issues due to this. If you are in college, it may be offered for free.
The claim that any man is able to rape any woman if he wishes is the kind of illogical myth that keeps women hiding indoors and seeking protectors.
And totally agree you should slice the ex's nuts off.
Comments (620) RSS