Saddlebacked

January 15, 2009



I'm going to Barack Obama's inauguration in Washington, D.C., on January 20. I've spent eight years, one month, one week, and one day waiting for this. (But who's counting?) However, I am looking for suggestions for a respectful way to protest the participation of Rick Warren. As a lifelong Episcopalian, I really don't want to engage in an antireligious protest. (FWIW: I was annoyed with some of the antireligious people at the anti-8 rallies. We need all our allies for this fight, so don't trash the engaged, progressive religious folk!)

While my friends want me to throw shoes, that ain't gonna happen. Ideally, I'd like a peaceful, gracious way to protest Warren's participation that won't undercut this great day, a way that can be picked up (and publicized) by folks on the Mall. Any suggestions?

Faithful Obama Girl

Whatever you do, FOG, don't do those things you, um, already said you don't want to do. No one should boo or throw shoes or do anything disruptive. The American Taliban love to pretend that they're the persecuted ones around here, and booing or throwing shoes or even just turning your back on Warren—the gay-hatin', right-wing Christian bigot Barack Obama invited to give the invocation at his inauguration—will invariably be spun as an attack on people of faith, as a vicious assault on prayer itself, as the moral equivalent of a syphilitic rent boy pissing directly into the open mouth of a crying baby Jesus.

Instead, borrow a page from those long-suffering gay Catholics. To register their displeasure with the pope's revealing obsession with gay sex, gay marriage, and gay shoes (the douchebag wears Prada), some gay Catholics wear rainbow sashes to mass. Perhaps folks disappointed by Warren's participation could coordinate a similar sartorial protest? Everyone wear a button with that rainbow-striped version of the Obama logo? Wave little rainbow flags during Warren's remarks? Head to the Mall in nothing but rubber chaps?

And speaking of Rick Warren, pastor of Saddleback Church and author of The Purpose Driven Life...

My life's purpose over the last week was reading thousands of proposed new definitions for "saddlebacking" sent in by my readers. As with the new definition of santorum crafted by Savage Love readers ("the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes a byproduct of anal sex"), the new definition of "saddlebacking" has to be some act that (1) needs a name but doesn't already have one (we can't just rename "reverse cowgirl," people) and (2) is naughty enough to discomfort, say, a Reverend Warren, but something that actual people might actually do because that's the only way the actual word will actually get used.

So I've disqualified proposed definitions that were too literal ("putting an actual saddle on someone's actual back and actually riding them"), too gross ("to crap on someone's back and then sit on it, moving forward and back while making horse-riding-related noises like 'giddyap!' and 'whoa!'"), too complicated ("one person on all fours with a strap-on strapped to their midsection, a second person riding said strap-on, and a third person hitting the first person from behind while holding on for dear life/giving a handjob to the second person"), or too bitter ("when you give someone some kind of basic human right, like marriage, and then take it away again after a few months"). Here are the proposed definitions that made the cut:

(1) "Logically, if 'barebacking' means having butt sex with no condom, then 'saddlebacking' should mean having butt sex with a condom."

(2) "Saddleback (verb): to submit someone to any kind of humiliating, unreciprocal sex act, either literally or metaphorically, consented to by passive partner due to submissive/masochistic tendencies, desire for approval, or other darker motive. E.g., 'I don't know why Obama is letting Rick Warren saddleback him into presiding over his inauguration.'"

(3) "The saddleback position involves placing your lubed dick between the butt cheeks of your partner. This position can be performed on your sides or on top of a facedown partner (maybe with a pillow under his or her hips). My favorite way of finishing up the saddlebacking is to lift up and come on my wife's sweaty back. The saddleback is a nice compromise position when your partner won't allow anal entry."

(4) "To saddleback is to rail against gay sex in public while secretly indulging in the same in private. Ted Haggard? Total saddlebacker. Larry Craig? Saddlebacker. Rick Warren? Probably a saddlebacker."

(5) "'Saddlebacking' should be the term for the phenomenon of Christian teens engaging in unprotected anal sex in order to preserve their virginities. 'After attending the Purity Ball, Heather and Bill saddlebacked all night because she's saving herself for marriage.' Please, please adopt this definition!"

(6) "Saddleback (verb): to ejaculate on the back of a partner at the culmination of doggy-style anal sex."

(7) "Before being invited to give the invocation, Mr. Warren was most noted for his book The Purpose Driven Life. Therefore, 'to saddleback' is to fuck with a purpose, i.e., to procreate. A heterosexual couple asked if they're trying to have children could reply, 'No, we're not ready for kids yet, but we'll probably start saddlebacking next year.'"

Those are the nominees, ladies and gentlemen. But before we open the polls for a vote—you're going to pick the winning definition!—let me quickly handicap the candidates:

(1) I like the idea that "sex" is understood to include condoms and that sex without condoms—bareback sex—needs a special term. But tons of people suggested that "saddlebacking" should be the opposite of "barebacking," so here it is. (2) Seems a bit tortured and unlikely to come into common usage, but I like the point the reader is making with this definition, so I included it. (3) Technically this kind of assfuckery—butt-cheek fucking à la titty fucking, with no actual penetration—is a form of frottage, but like a woman doing a man in the butt with a strap-on dildo (dubbed "pegging" by Savage Love readers), this particular brand of rubbing off could use a name of its own. (4) One of my favorites—but does a Haggard or Craig tumble out of the closet often enough for the term to come into use? (5) Hilarious—and an entirely appropriate way to honor Reverend Warren, who is a proponent of abstinence education, the "sex ed" that has convinced so many Christian girls and boys that buttfucking isn't actually sex. (6) A common move—and not just in porn—that could use a name. (7) Makes sense, so here it is. But I imagine Warren would approve of this definition—except when lesbians used it (even you, Melissa E.!).

Okay, Savage Love readers, "saddlebacking" is in your hands now. Vote for your favorite definition from the list of nominees by sending an e-mail to saddleback@savagelove.net. You must include "saddleback" and the number of your preferred definition in the subject line to have your vote count ("saddleback: 1," "saddleback: 2," etc.). Vote now!


mail@savagelove.net

 

Comments (456) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
(3) is already called Italian, isn't it?

My vote is for (5). Brilliant.
Posted by V2 on January 14, 2009 at 11:18 AM · Report
2
fisrt commetn!
Posted by me on January 14, 2009 at 11:26 AM · Report
3
No contest...# 5 is fantastic and the only one worth considering. I'm not waiting for the results, I'm just going to start using that definition now.
Posted by smf on January 14, 2009 at 11:27 AM · Report
4
just one question? i know you've been heated about rick warren, dan, but come on. some of us read your column for the ADVICE that you give.
Posted by Huh? on January 14, 2009 at 11:35 AM · Report
5
THIS is what I've been refreshing the page for all day?
Posted by pansy on January 14, 2009 at 11:36 AM · Report
6
Maybe this would of been a better editorial and the advice column could be used for the GREAT advice that you usually give? Seems like more and more this column is used for things like this.. Thanks!
Posted by noplace special... on January 14, 2009 at 11:36 AM · Report
7
Personally, I like 7.
Posted by AK on January 14, 2009 at 11:49 AM · Report
8
I think I have to go with #5. Especially since you would have to "sop up" afterwards, which is, as you said to Colbert, what happens after saddlebacking. It is perhaps not the definition that makes the most sense (that would be #1), but it's just too delicious to pass up on.

And in spite of what a few other commenters have said, I've been refreshing the page all day *waiting* for this column. So some of your readers are quite happy with it.
Posted by Robin G. on January 14, 2009 at 11:55 AM · Report
9
I vote for 5 as well. My second choice would be 1. But reading 5 made me smile with evil delight.
Posted by schweighsr on January 14, 2009 at 11:57 AM · Report
10
5!
Posted by thepitts on January 14, 2009 at 12:04 PM · Report
11
#5.

Honorable mentions to #4 and #7.
Posted by yesbut on January 14, 2009 at 12:06 PM · Report
12
Sent in my vote for #5.
Posted by My Name Here on January 14, 2009 at 12:08 PM · Report
13
5
Posted by rachyrach on January 14, 2009 at 12:10 PM · Report
14
Im going with 3.
Posted by eljay on January 14, 2009 at 12:17 PM · Report
15
My only problem with #5 is that it's not mutually exclusive with barebacking.
Posted by Wil on January 14, 2009 at 12:18 PM · Report
16
5
Posted by AnyEdge on January 14, 2009 at 12:18 PM · Report
17
#5 is good. Expecially if it's gay chrisitans saving their virginity for marriage.
Posted by Rick Warren's Dick Porr'n on January 14, 2009 at 12:28 PM · Report
18
I don't know, I mean, I guess I sorta like them all.
Posted by Karey on January 14, 2009 at 12:30 PM · Report
19
saddleback3

...and am I the only one who knows how to follow directions for the vote to count?...LOL
Posted by Caligirl on January 14, 2009 at 12:32 PM · Report
20
I like number 4. I think it's the most offensive to the anti-gay rights preachers such as Rick Warren. Number 5 isn't bad either.
Posted by charity on January 14, 2009 at 12:32 PM · Report
21
#5 ... no competition that is too hilarious ... brings me back to the days of high school life group followed by group make out sessions

ah the life.
Posted by ashley on January 14, 2009 at 12:34 PM · Report
22
5 all the way
Posted by Tony the Tigre' on January 14, 2009 at 12:37 PM · Report
23
I like 5, but this could be a temporary phenomenom, so the term would disappear from use.

I vote for 6. In fact, it could be expanded to be:

"Ejaculating on any part of a partner's body except the face (see facial)."
Posted by Bill on January 14, 2009 at 12:37 PM · Report
24
i would prefer saddlebacking not refer to something i've engaged in, so i must pass on voting for 7, even tho it makes some sense. i think 5 is therefore the best definition, because it's so perfectly refs the absurd denial around sex that warren-type xtians seem to exhibit.
Posted by ellarosa on January 14, 2009 at 12:39 PM · Report
25
#5.

Here's good reading why:

What the Bible Says About... Sex
Posted by Christian Porn Rocks! on January 14, 2009 at 12:39 PM · Report
26
#5, for sure. It ties it back to Christianity, and "technical virginity" needs more public attention.
Posted by punninglinguist on January 14, 2009 at 12:44 PM · Report
27
2, totally.
Posted by Jack on January 14, 2009 at 12:47 PM · Report
28
#3 for me.

5 is funny and all the first time you hear it but its more of a throwaway political statement than it is something with actual utility and will lose impact fast. 3 more properly soils the name of the church I think, and is an exotic enough move to get gossiped about and spread the word around, unlike 6 or 7.
Posted by Karey on January 14, 2009 at 12:52 PM · Report
29
My vote is for 5
Posted by tinfoil on January 14, 2009 at 12:53 PM · Report
30
saddleback: 6 !!!!
Posted by Drew on January 14, 2009 at 1:01 PM · Report
31
My head says 1, but my heart says 5...

My only concern with 5 being adopted is that, unlike pegging, the people doing the actual saddlebacking would be very unlikely to call it that - it would be reserved for commentators outside the abstinence-only circles.
Posted by rhymeswithlibrarian on January 14, 2009 at 1:08 PM · Report
32
5 gets my vote, and props for tying it into crazy-ass religious culture.
Posted by calliope on January 14, 2009 at 1:13 PM · Report
33
Let me try dipping my pen in some digital ink and take a stab at this "saddle-backing" definition. I propose the following: when on person shits on the ass of another to create a "shit-saddle" lubrication then grids ass until orgasm is reached and ejaculation is mixed into the crap stained backside.

- Congressional Right-wing And Pope
Posted by Congressional Right-wing And Pope on January 14, 2009 at 1:15 PM · Report
34
Double-voting for 1 and for 5, because I can't make up my mind. There is love for both.
Posted by deadcat on January 14, 2009 at 1:16 PM · Report
35
4 is great, but yeah - wouldn't be used often enough. #5 has needed a term for a long time, i have to go with that.
Posted by happyhedonist on January 14, 2009 at 1:16 PM · Report
36
number 5 definitely needs a word, but saddlebacking is kind of ugly... i think we should call it something like delayed hymenation?
Posted by Vanessa & Elena on January 14, 2009 at 1:20 PM · Report
37
I vote for #3 only when used in this context: "I was saddlebacking my wife last now and now my dick smells like shit!"

#5 is a close runner up but unless you combine two of the following it's not offensive: cum, shit, abortion and violence.
Posted by Congressional Right-wing And Pope on January 14, 2009 at 1:21 PM · Report
38
I just tried to vote but apparently my mailserver (common German website) is blocked. Is this vote only for US-citizens? ;(
Posted by lastdaylight on January 14, 2009 at 1:23 PM · Report
39
FIVE!!!
Posted by five on January 14, 2009 at 1:30 PM · Report
40
I have voted for number 6, as I think it is the most demeaning directly to Warren himself. It does not involve the type of saddle he's accustomed to.

I think number 6 is, in fact, a metaphorical representation of the actual church itself- a giant cum stain on the face of Orange County.

Number 5, for all its popularity, seems to be a interesting application of barebacking, and doesn't, as far as I can tell, incorporate the word "saddle" in any sense into the sex act.

In that light, I chose not to vote for it.

Then again, neither does "4" and i almost voted for it...
Posted by Saddle Up! on January 14, 2009 at 1:44 PM · Report
41
There is a movement afoot to wear a white knot to show support for equal marriage. It seems to me that this would be an excellent way to show ones displeasure in Warren and the bigotry he represents.
Posted by TechBear on January 14, 2009 at 1:46 PM · Report
42
I vote for number 5, Christian teenagers doing everything but to preserve their technical virginity.
Posted by QRG on January 14, 2009 at 1:46 PM · Report
43
I vote 5
Posted by Sacha on January 14, 2009 at 1:48 PM · Report
44
#5 for sure, that way I can slam two things that DRIVE ME CRAZY with their bull shit existence.
Posted by Varga_girl on January 14, 2009 at 2:01 PM · Report
45
I'm putting in my vote for #5 here. And since I play for both teams, do I represent two votes? please, 5 is perfect, the definition is common enough to be used in regular conversation, and it doesn't seem like something anyone's going to forget.
Posted by Chiquita Hanana on January 14, 2009 at 2:02 PM · Report
46
I just sent in my email vote for #5. Deliciously perfect!

And @ rhymeswithlibrarian, I disagree, I think the people doing it WILL eventually call it that because it's so much less of a dirty sounding word than "Anal Sex"
Just like the term "hooking up" is used so that people can feel better about their casual sex, "saddlebacking" will make those kids feel fantastic about butt sex! "Hey, what we're doing MUST be ok... it's named after the church even!!!"
Posted by Urgutha Forka on January 14, 2009 at 2:06 PM · Report
47
I can already imagine the bedroom stories...

"The saddlebacking felt great, but then we were stuck cleaning up all that santorum."
Posted by Urgutha Forka on January 14, 2009 at 2:09 PM · Report
48
4 and 5 are both so perfect that I propose we call 4 "saddlebacking" and we call 5 "baddlesacking", or "saddlepacking".
Posted by jboat on January 14, 2009 at 2:15 PM · Report
49
5!! totally appropriate...
I vote for 5
Posted by LingChow on January 14, 2009 at 2:21 PM · Report
50
#3...I've been waiting for a word for that act for quite some time.
Posted by Wally on January 14, 2009 at 2:27 PM · Report
51
What the hell?!?

For the second week in a row Joe Newton's column art inexplicably and (at least last week) unprecedentedly is better than Misako's (over at the Onion), and all people want to talk about is rape and saddlebacking?

Where are your priorities, people?!?
Posted by F'Art on January 14, 2009 at 2:39 PM · Report
52
5 FTW!
Posted by Badger McSpadger on January 14, 2009 at 2:52 PM · Report
53
These are all great suggestions, but in the end (no pun), I've gotta go with #5. It just makes sense, doesn't it?
Posted by Jay on January 14, 2009 at 2:58 PM · Report
54
FOG-

You can get a t-shirt that says "Democracy NOT Theocracy" from the First Freedom First website. http://www.cafepress.com/firstfreedom/21…
Posted by addiejd on January 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM · Report
55
How about a late entry: saddlebacking: taking a bunch of comments from the website and copy and pasting them together to make a column, while having butt sex.
Posted by Your Name Here on January 14, 2009 at 3:10 PM · Report
56
#5, all the way, though I really understand the logic of #1 but I think saddlebacking should be a little more negative (whereas sex with a condom is a good thing we should all do more of.)
Posted by MoreSex! on January 14, 2009 at 3:13 PM · Report
57
#5 Ride them hard & put them away wet!
Posted by david_42 on January 14, 2009 at 3:18 PM · Report
58
5, no contest.
Posted by jamaisjeune on January 14, 2009 at 3:32 PM · Report
59
you're a real credit to liberalism Mr. Savage.
Posted by Patriot on January 14, 2009 at 3:36 PM · Report
60
#5 all they way!!! Bristol Palin shouldda saddlebacked!!
Posted by Nukerebel on January 14, 2009 at 3:47 PM · Report
61
I think #5 if chosen would eventually be adopted by the Christian teens themselves, and the reference would further disassociate anal sex from actually being sex for them because they don't know any better from being kept in the dark by abstinence only supporters. So I'm in favor of #6.
Posted by defman23 on January 14, 2009 at 3:57 PM · Report
62
FIVE!
Posted by Erin on January 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM · Report
63
I saddlebacked my sweet virgin Suzy all night but then in the morning she had the worse case of santorum ever!
Posted by scrufff on January 14, 2009 at 4:14 PM · Report
64
I'm displayed to see all this support for #5. I absolutely agree with Karey that it's something to give a chuckle when you first read it but how often will it get used?

#3 is something that I'd love to have a term for and this word itself actually fits that definition a lot better.
Posted by Owen on January 14, 2009 at 4:18 PM · Report
65
As someone who stumbled through adolescence and (early adulthood) believing that oral/anal sex were more forgivable than "real sex," I say 5.

Posted by MLR on January 14, 2009 at 4:29 PM · Report
66
Hey, I think you have to send Dan an EMAIL with saddleback#5 (or whatever number)if you want your vote to count. EMAIL, not comments.
Posted by SR on January 14, 2009 at 4:29 PM · Report
67
5
Posted by jens on January 14, 2009 at 4:33 PM · Report
68
I vote for 5!
Posted by LaurieinSF on January 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM · Report
69
5 is the best; its the thing that will piss evangelicals off the most, by far.
Posted by Jaya on January 14, 2009 at 4:42 PM · Report
70
4. I suspect this term will be used often, as we speculate about the proclivities of various religious folks, ie, "That Rick Warren, I bet he hits the bars in D.C. next week - he's a total saddlebacker."
Posted by Luckier on January 14, 2009 at 4:44 PM · Report
71
5.
Posted by jman077 on January 14, 2009 at 4:54 PM · Report
72
I vote 5 all the way!
Posted by trxy on January 14, 2009 at 5:05 PM · Report
73
NO question. "Number 5": we get the dangerously misguiding religious advice leading to a forseeable backfire...(we do need a word to cover the Larry Craig effect though (aka "haggarting"); since there hasn't been any allegations of this ilk over in Saddlbackia...Thanks!
Posted by thark on January 14, 2009 at 5:08 PM · Report
74
I liked #5 the best. It's the most suiting and most offensive to Rick Warren. Oh, and #6.. isn't that basically a superman? Or maybe it isn't... A superman is when you jizz on a woman's back and then put a sheet on it so it sticks... like superman.. so maybe not..
Posted by hlr on January 14, 2009 at 5:19 PM · Report
75
444444444444444444444444444444444444
Posted by commentz on January 14, 2009 at 5:26 PM · Report
76
Definitely #5... the irony is just too rich.
Posted by anon on January 14, 2009 at 5:39 PM · Report
77
i vote for #5, second choice #4.
Posted by former Seattleite on January 14, 2009 at 6:10 PM · Report
78
5 all the way. Finally a word to shout at prissy, holier-than-thou teenage girls! Thanks Dan!
Posted by Jane,Calamity on January 14, 2009 at 6:10 PM · Report
79
#5, awesome because it sticks it to 'em twice over, mocks the name and points out just how out of touch with reality fundamentalist religious ideas about sexuality really are. This practice has got to be as old as the concept of preserving virginity for marriage.
Posted by XOXO on January 14, 2009 at 6:39 PM · Report
80
5 is perfection.
Posted by Vera on January 14, 2009 at 6:49 PM · Report
81
3 is what sprung to mind for me... but 5 is pretty awesome.
Posted by tiny on January 14, 2009 at 6:53 PM · Report
82
five all the way!
Posted by Karina on January 14, 2009 at 7:11 PM · Report
83
4 AND 5!!
I know this logic might be really twisted. But, I think there is a way to combine 4 & 5 with a hint at 2. Both 4 & 5 are about sex-phobes who pretend to be prim, proper and prudent while participating in anal sex out of institutionalized ignorance, submissive/masochistic tendencies, desire for approval, or other darker motives. I think saddleback should be either 4 AND 5. It could also metaphorically be used in regards to the inauguration! "President-elect Obama portrays Rick Warren's participation at his inauguration as a sign of inclusivity, but everyone knows he is just saddlebacking."
Posted by Haole Islander on January 14, 2009 at 7:35 PM · Report
84
# 5 is wholly appropriate.
Posted by Buffy on January 14, 2009 at 7:37 PM · Report
85
5 is hilarious!

4 is also good and would be my second choice (but perhaps we can save that definition and use it for the name of the next gay bashing creep who makes the headlines)
Posted by Allyson on January 14, 2009 at 7:40 PM · Report
86
Five
Posted by WenatcheeGryl on January 14, 2009 at 7:52 PM · Report
87
Number 5 all the way. I am still able to wear white, even after 25 years with a wonderful man.
Posted by TroyTim on January 14, 2009 at 7:55 PM · Report
88
Dan is such a douche. His racist commentary of the Prop 8 situation was but one of the many cracks in liberal facade. Today was the final straw. Why is it that he gets to propagate this type of thing but when religious individuals have anything to say about homosexuality it's the end of the world? He, by trying to inflict embarassment on these people, is guilty of the same thing he accuses them of, denying them an opinion or voice. Why don't they get to feel how they feel?
Posted by sick of the double standard on January 14, 2009 at 7:58 PM · Report
89
4 or 5!
Posted by TessH on January 14, 2009 at 8:19 PM · Report
90
5 for the win!
Posted by mbc on January 14, 2009 at 8:26 PM · Report
91
Definitely #5. Millions of saddlebacking Turkish Muslim "virgins" can't be wrong...
Posted by la von on January 14, 2009 at 8:34 PM · Report
92
The best is number 6. Hopefully stupid abstinence education will disappear in our lifetimes, but cumming on your partner's back will be around forever. We want this term to last.
Posted by Biz on January 14, 2009 at 8:45 PM · Report
93
1. clearly.
Posted by thelee on January 14, 2009 at 8:50 PM · Report
94
Gotta go with 5.
Posted by bobo on January 14, 2009 at 9:11 PM · Report
95
I like #3 because Christian heterosexuals saving themselves for marriage, polyamorous genderfuckers, happily married (soon) queers, furries and everyone else can all do it. Maybe after saddlebacking Heather all night, Bill will figure, heck, if that's okay then maybe it's okay to saddleback Ted, the handsome church youth group leader on the softball team, too.
Posted by reduviidae on January 14, 2009 at 9:48 PM · Report
96
Nmber 5 please!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Andrew on January 14, 2009 at 9:49 PM · Report
97
Whatever ends up being dubbed 'saddlebacking' (I like the dick-between-the-cheeks, personally), all these other things need terms, too! Especially the 'everyhting but(t)' religious ttens are so fond of. Round up the homophobic public figures and let's play match up!
Posted by Kiki on January 14, 2009 at 10:16 PM · Report
98
Definitely #5. I can just hear it now "She can't be pregnanat! According to Jeffery they were only Saddlebacking!"
Posted by Willie B on January 14, 2009 at 10:23 PM · Report
99
Absolutely #5
Posted by Alaska Guy on January 14, 2009 at 10:25 PM · Report
100
(5) overwhelmingly.

honourable mention for (2) which is nothing short of genius!
Posted by RS on January 14, 2009 at 10:27 PM · Report
101
1
Posted by logic rules on January 14, 2009 at 11:01 PM · Report
102
It's gotta be 5.
Posted by Lace on January 14, 2009 at 11:29 PM · Report
103
5- hands down. "Her ass was sore, although her virginity was intact, after they were saddlebackin' it all night long." I'm using it already!
Posted by YouKnowWarrenLovesToSaddleback on January 14, 2009 at 11:33 PM · Report
104
I know how much you'd like #5, Dan, and I agree. However, pretty quickly we need to find a name for #4. Too long, dicks like these have gone under the long name of "Hypocritical Gay-Bashing Christian Evangelists," a name hardly befitting of the dickery they have committed. I propose the term "Haggardite," but really, so long as it sounds cool, I'm fine with whatever.

#5 it is.
Posted by A on January 15, 2009 at 12:01 AM · Report
105
Saddlebacking (verb)-the old 'bait n' switch'.

FICTXAMPLE:

"Hey! Dan here!!!

I just wanted to say hello, and thank you, to all you straight people who read, laughed and spread the word about me when I was doing this column to supplement my income. Now that I am nationally syndicated, I will instead be devoting the majority of the time railing for gay rights; however I will toss off the occasional 'Freak-Fix' column so you keep reading!

Now; before I entice you with the honor of being the one who originates the meaning of a word that shall live in infamy and for all infinity, I would now like you to read my zero-tolerance, take no prisoners political rhetoric!

Hi, my name is Dan and I am an Activist. Thanks for reading, what-has-now, become my glorified blog.
Haters Hate! Hate Haters!

P.S. Sorry to give you the "ol saddleback" but I'm sure I'll see y'all again...

NEXT WEEK: Beastiality-Dominatrix Dwarfs-Mentos!
Posted by Gutterlush on January 15, 2009 at 12:02 AM · Report
106
obviously five is gonna win but i'm shocked that after 100+ comments i don't see anyone showing support for number two! if only for the amazing hilarity of the example sentence! i realize it wouldn't be put to use often enough to really work, but come on people.. 'I don't know why Obama is letting Rick Warren saddleback him into presiding over his inauguration.' ?? that's effing brilliant!!!
Posted by devon on January 15, 2009 at 12:14 AM · Report
107
number 5 for fuck's sake man!!!!!!
Posted by Brando on January 15, 2009 at 12:16 AM · Report
108
Peeps need to stop bitching about there only being one question and just appreciate the beauty and awesomeness that is Savage Love. Just because y'all want to get off on peoples kinky sex questions, and there weren't any this week, doesn't mean you have to get all mad at Mr. Savage.
Posted by Hucker on January 15, 2009 at 12:29 AM · Report
109
#5
Though I'm sad I missed out on making a suggestion. I think "Saddlebacking" should be the name for narcissistic blog commenters who self righteously say controversial shit just to get the whole comment section riled up and denouncing them-- then claim it is the people who are angry at them who are doing something wrong. Which seems very similar to Pastor Warren's m.o.. It's a common phenomenon that doesn't seem to have an appropriate name.
Posted by Hermy on January 15, 2009 at 12:32 AM · Report
110
5 is a good concept to name, but it just doesn't go with the word the way 6 does.
Posted by Ducky on January 15, 2009 at 12:33 AM · Report
111
3 and 4!
Posted by Zoe on January 15, 2009 at 1:01 AM · Report
112
As an European reader, never heard of Rick Warren, but I've read he was very influential in right-wing circles. So preventing him from saying that "Obama is a devil", and actually forcing him to endorse the President-elect by playing on his need for public attention seems good enough for me. You don't want to end up with the white bigots starting another civil war, do you ? I don't think that gay rights will be forgotten... but Rome wasn't built in a day.
By the way, 5 must win !
Posted by sissou on January 15, 2009 at 1:16 AM · Report
113
5 is awesome but a study showed that kids aren't really having other forms of sex in lieu of vaginal to protect their virginity. See http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/i…

And I LOVE 7, but if you guys are right about Warren having generally positive thoughts about sex-within-marriage, then maybe not (although who really wants his church named after a sex act). So all that's really left is 4, which is perfect in so many ways. Warren "rails" about all kinds of things (and we know he's in the craig-haggard club - just a matter of time); "saddleback church" is named after a mountain and "brokeback mountain" was a story about at least one closeted gay cowboy; saddles provide a barrier between the man and the animal, much as such men use their railings to provide a barrier between their perceived manhood and their real nature; that act really needs a name; I'm sure there are more reasons to support this one. I need to go vote!
Posted by idaho on January 15, 2009 at 1:27 AM · Report
114
Ohhh! #5 shows the hypocracy of anti-sex education religious fanatics and should be the most embarrassing to them.
Posted by Rob on January 15, 2009 at 1:32 AM · Report
115
#4 ! Hypocrisy has a new name!

"Allegations of Charlie Crist's saddleback lifestyle have not yet been confirmed, but it's only a matter of time..."
Posted by Sawyer Browneye on January 15, 2009 at 2:05 AM · Report
116
1, simply the best
Posted by D. on January 15, 2009 at 2:29 AM · Report
117
I vote for 5. It gives a word for yet another thing I missed out on because when I was that age, it was hard enough for get a girl to give oral much less give up the backdoor
Posted by where were these girls when I was 16? on January 15, 2009 at 3:41 AM · Report
118
Five!
Posted by Sooz on January 15, 2009 at 5:38 AM · Report
119
5 without a doubt
Posted by Not a saddlebacker on January 15, 2009 at 5:55 AM · Report
120
Yup, 5 is my winner, too :D
Posted by ignacio on January 15, 2009 at 6:01 AM · Report
121
I vote 5 too, with 1 as a close second.
Posted by Anne O on January 15, 2009 at 6:06 AM · Report
122
5 it is. Quite right about the column, though. Get to work Savage, you lazy-ass pussy.
Posted by Joe on January 15, 2009 at 6:30 AM · Report
123
Just added the rainbow pin to my Inauguration outfit. I'd been brooding over this too. Thanks, FOG & Dan.
Posted by Jodelino on January 15, 2009 at 6:31 AM · Report
124
#5
Posted by Steph on January 15, 2009 at 6:38 AM · Report
125
5 sounds the best to me. I actually knew a girl that considered having anal sex "perserving her virginity". This ridiculous notion needs a name already.
Posted by Me on January 15, 2009 at 6:48 AM · Report
126
#5 works in so many ways. I love that it ties in "santorum".

Good work Dan. I predict that before your career is through you will have enriched the English language even more than Shakespeare.
Posted by saxfanatic on January 15, 2009 at 6:56 AM · Report
127
Number 5 is Alive!!
Posted by davidio on January 15, 2009 at 7:18 AM · Report
128
5
Posted by JasenComstock on January 15, 2009 at 7:21 AM · Report
129
#5 for sure.
Posted by Everybody on January 15, 2009 at 7:23 AM · Report
130
If someone I am fucking for nearly a year does not call (or txt) in 3 weeks... do I call him? has he left me? fuck............
Posted by so me on January 15, 2009 at 7:27 AM · Report
131
'Why don't they get to feel how they feel?'

Well, when they feel homosexuality is wrong, homosexuals are stripped of their human rights and hate crimes are ignored.

When people go after Christians who are homophobic bigots (which is not all of them), it is with the intent to keep these Christians from putting their bigoted views into practice.

So you've got one group that wants to be treated as human beings, and one that doesn't want to treat them like human beings. Treating both the same does not add up. There was plenty of Christian support for slavery (and yes, plenty against), but I can't imagine too many slaves thought they should remain subservient and subhuman lest they offend their masters.
Posted by JBon on January 15, 2009 at 7:29 AM · Report
132
#3 please.
Posted by Rotten666 on January 15, 2009 at 7:31 AM · Report
133
5
Posted by john doe on January 15, 2009 at 7:34 AM · Report
134
The best and easiest way to protest Rick Warren is to turn your back to him when he speaks.
Posted by Bo on January 15, 2009 at 7:41 AM · Report
135
logically it must be #1
Posted by enna on January 15, 2009 at 7:55 AM · Report
136
5 sounds good but it won't really get use since those people don't read Savage Love. I think you should go for something that the actual perpetrators of Saddlebacking will use though 4 really appeals to me despite that.

Personally I vote for 1.
Posted by Colin on January 15, 2009 at 8:09 AM · Report
137
American Taliban indeed. You are just as bigoted and narrow-minded as those you love to rail against. Perhaps focus on the interpersonal and sex advice topics and lay off these mindless rants.

I can't understand how your advice is like 90% spot on, and your rants are so off. Oh well, your name is Savage, after all. Or is that comment not PC enough, since it may offend Savage-Americans regardless of their sexual identity?

Posted by Bob the Knob on January 15, 2009 at 8:15 AM · Report
138
#5! #5! #5! #5! #5! #5! #5! #5! #5!
Posted by Lose-Lose on January 15, 2009 at 8:26 AM · Report
139
5! 5 is the winner
Posted by sher_bear on January 15, 2009 at 8:47 AM · Report
140
5, and by a mile.
Posted by impulsenine on January 15, 2009 at 9:02 AM · Report
141
Saddleback 5!

Since those "chastity" teens are so ridiculous, let us now oblige them by ridiculing them.

I've heard that teenagers are easily embarrassed. Would that it were so!
Posted by Val on January 15, 2009 at 9:10 AM · Report
142
#5 is hands down the best of the group.
Posted by jon on January 15, 2009 at 9:11 AM · Report
143
I've got to put my vote in for #1 because it is the most logical and I see it catching on into the widest possible group of people. #5 does come in a close second.
Posted by HawkSwine on January 15, 2009 at 9:13 AM · Report
144
#5....please, oh please....#5
Posted by #5, please on January 15, 2009 at 9:28 AM · Report
145
We already have a word for #1, and that word is "fucking." I vote for #5. It made me chuckle with evil intent.
Posted by muzyqman on January 15, 2009 at 9:34 AM · Report
146
duh! #5 of course!!!
Posted by Nanak8 on January 15, 2009 at 9:52 AM · Report
147
(6) was the first that came to my mind. (1) makes sense but does not antagonize enough, also I agree with your comment.

(5) is the winner though - that's perfect LOL!
Posted by DaddyLongLegs on January 15, 2009 at 10:04 AM · Report
148
Its gotta be 5!
Posted by Ben on January 15, 2009 at 10:18 AM · Report
149
5 of course would allow you to get it into the same sentence as santorum.

more inventive teens could possibly manage to peg at the same time, though that would probably, as an activity, be developing a life of its own unrelated to maintaining their virginity ;-)
Posted by Ben on January 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM · Report
150
3
Posted by Jenzi on January 15, 2009 at 10:35 AM · Report
151
5
Posted by saddleback #5 on January 15, 2009 at 10:36 AM · Report
152
Saddleback isn't just the name of his church. It's an entire city in California. Why not use his name and spare the residents guilt by association?
Posted by Resident on January 15, 2009 at 10:44 AM · Report
153
i vote for 5!
Posted by rightsidestogether on January 15, 2009 at 10:52 AM · Report
154
I vote for 4 but 5 is a close runner-up. Good column.
Posted by Louie on January 15, 2009 at 11:01 AM · Report
155
#5 FTW
Posted by cct on January 15, 2009 at 11:18 AM · Report
156
5. No question.
Posted by saltbagginsam on January 15, 2009 at 11:21 AM · Report
157
Gotta love #5!!!
Posted by Laura on January 15, 2009 at 11:28 AM · Report
158
Number 5, number 5, number 5. Absolute genius -- and something that *needs* it's own word, irrespective of Rick Warren's bloated repulsiveness.
Posted by ncarbell on January 15, 2009 at 11:33 AM · Report
159
I vote for #5. So does my girlfriend.
Posted by North on January 15, 2009 at 11:46 AM · Report
160
definitely number 5!
Posted by StarFruit on January 15, 2009 at 11:51 AM · Report
161
Rick Warren isn't a gay-hater. Get your facts straight (oops, no pun intended). He lives by the word of God. The word of God does not condone homosexuality.

It's Obama's inauguration and he's got no problem with Warren being there. Oh, and Obama's a Christian, too.

Get your knickers out of a knot, this inauguration is NOT about taking a stand on anything. Save it for a later date & venue. You dislike Rick Warren, then you must not care much for Obama or McCain, or whomever you voted for, cause they are all Christians.



Posted by Trey on January 15, 2009 at 11:56 AM · Report
162
5 without a doubt!

I also want a credit line when "Saddleback Mountain" is added to the HUMP! film festival line up.
Posted by mydquinn on January 15, 2009 at 12:00 PM · Report
163
5
Posted by katy on January 15, 2009 at 12:18 PM · Report
164
As much as I love #5, #6 makes more sense in context. Remember Dan's appearance on Colbert which sparked this whole thing—"soaking up is what you do immediately after saddlebacking." http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archive…

So 5 is hilarious, but 6 will be getting my vote.
Posted by k on January 15, 2009 at 12:23 PM · Report
Posted by mydquinn on January 15, 2009 at 12:54 PM · Report
166
5 is great
Posted by Panzerlance on January 15, 2009 at 12:59 PM · Report
167
#5 - hilarious
Posted by scout on January 15, 2009 at 1:01 PM · Report
168
Six.
Posted by metut on January 15, 2009 at 1:07 PM · Report
169

Two was covered last week, wasn't it? DREAD was forced to saddleback her ex.

Posted by false equivalency on January 15, 2009 at 1:30 PM · Report
170
#5... offensive but not too offensive, and enough to make certain people squirm in their nethers
Posted by fatalsmiles on January 15, 2009 at 1:43 PM · Report
171
5!
Posted by shannon murphy on January 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM · Report
172
I like Definition 5 best. Ok as is, but I would suggest generalizing it to

"anal sex performed under the delusion that it isn't really sex"

That encompasses the original proposed definition, expands it to include a lot of delusional hypocrisy, and gets away from the "just picking on Christians" thing.

P.S. My wife and I will be at the Inauguration. Proper respose to Warren is something we discussed. Don't think I have a rainbow Obama button but I'm sure we can come up with something in the right color scheme...

If it didn't take too many words I wanted to make a button that said "Be quiet while Rick Warren prays. He needs to hear God's response."
Posted by hbcitizen on January 15, 2009 at 2:26 PM · Report
173
5
Posted by Ian on January 15, 2009 at 2:32 PM · Report
174
#5. Hands down.
Posted by suki on January 15, 2009 at 2:39 PM · Report
175
5
Posted by Mike on January 15, 2009 at 2:46 PM · Report
176
number 5 hands down. number 4 is a close second.

also, the word for definition number 6 is 'back splash'. i thought that was obvious.
Posted by Jo Mama on January 15, 2009 at 2:50 PM · Report
177
5 for sure
Posted by pochta on January 15, 2009 at 3:10 PM · Report
178
# 5 #5 # 5! This needs a word. And as much publicity as possible.
Posted by Bri on January 15, 2009 at 3:15 PM · Report
179
5! It's the most appropriate.
Posted by rainbowharold on January 15, 2009 at 3:21 PM · Report
180
5!! That is special! Giving back to the christian community...go Savage readers go!!
Posted by arkie_lez on January 15, 2009 at 3:35 PM · Report
181
5 is the one that will cause the most uproar and will most likely be adopted because it is an act that cries out to be named.
Posted by Dr. Jim on January 15, 2009 at 3:42 PM · Report
182
Definitely, definitely #5
Posted by rae on January 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM · Report
183
Saddleback:5
Posted by catcall on January 15, 2009 at 3:48 PM · Report
184
I vote for number 5.

And for the letter, I would be worried about trahing the engaged, progressive religious folk if there seemed to be more than 20 or 30 of you in the whole country.
Posted by dave on January 15, 2009 at 4:14 PM · Report
185
5
Posted by chris on January 15, 2009 at 4:14 PM · Report
186
I meant to type "trashing". Like condoms, preview buttons only work if used properly.
Posted by dave on January 15, 2009 at 4:15 PM · Report
187
the act described in definition #6 is already known as 'supermanning' as referenced in that cultural bookmark of a song, souljah boy's 'crank dat'

"Soulja Boy off in this hoe, watch me crank it, watch me eoll, watch me crank dat Soulja Boy, then Super Man Dat Ho"

(when you're doggy style, pull out, and cum on the back/ass. pretend to wipe it off, and when they wake up, thhe will have the bed sheets stuck to their back like superman's little red cape!)

xo
Posted by Jim Bexley-Speed on January 15, 2009 at 4:20 PM · Report
188
I like 7 because "to fuck with a purpose" could also mean to have sex for money, power or some other non-enjoyment purpose. Examples: "Ralph hated his boss Beth, but he didn't care if he had to saddleback her for that promotion." "Marie wasn't a sex trade worker, but to pay the rent the landlord could saddleback her once a month."
Posted by Anubis_Priest on January 15, 2009 at 4:29 PM · Report
189
5!!!
Posted by m on January 15, 2009 at 4:46 PM · Report
190
#5 is brilliant. Perhaps not the most obvious or logical, but definitely the most appropriate.
Posted by wideopenstar on January 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM · Report
191
I really like #5 as well. And it is one that we can all work into casual conversations on a regular basis. "Did you head about those LDS kids saddlebacking it up?" "We all know that Warren's kids must saddleback like crazy!"

I see this term, simply because it refers to such a frequent phenomenon, spreading rather quickly.
Posted by Sarah on January 15, 2009 at 4:58 PM · Report
192
A problem with 5 is that we need to use the term for it to be in play... and i for one... well, i am not a saddlebacker... i'm a lesbian.. that disquualifies me, right?

we will have to somehow get the brainwashed youths to get this word in play.
Posted by girl friday on January 15, 2009 at 5:10 PM · Report
193
Thought I'd be in favor of (1) but am persuaded by your comments.

Definitely (5) then.
Posted by klondike on January 15, 2009 at 5:39 PM · Report
194
It seems a shame that #5 doesn't let non-virgins participate. I wish there was some definition that I could participate in.

Can the word be used anytime the intent is to have anal sex b/c vaginal sex is off the menu? i.e. "My wife is on the dot this week, so we saddlebacked."
Posted by Derek on January 15, 2009 at 6:11 PM · Report
195
I am torn. But since you said "please," and since I've talked to acquaintances who went to Christian high schools and they've verified the truth of it...number 5 it is. Saddlebacking = anal sex by Christian teens to preserve their technical virginity!
Posted by ameliorist on January 15, 2009 at 6:12 PM · Report
196
I go with number 5, as it goes with Santorium...

(Modifying the original suggestion)

"After the Purity Ball, Missy and Paulie saddlebacked all night, because Missy wanted to "save herself" for marriage. You should have seen the Santorium all over the Lexus' back seat!"

I tried...
Posted by Apalita on January 15, 2009 at 6:24 PM · Report
197
5 gets my vote, but it's tinged with regret. Why didn't we do this in Baptist Bible camp when I was a teenager? Why was I born 20 years too late? Why, sweet baby Jesus, am I still denied anal sex? I like being penetrated--I'm not asking for anything I wouldn't do myself, I can be gentle and patient. Why, why, WHY, Lord, why can't I have anal sex like born again teenagers?
Posted by wannabe born again butt f*cker on January 15, 2009 at 6:26 PM · Report
198
5
Posted by yota on January 15, 2009 at 6:29 PM · Report
199 Comment Pulled
200
I have to disagree about protesting Rick being seen as anti-religious. My family member controls the money for a prominant protestant denomination and I can tell you with certainty: a lot of Christians are plenty mad at that mad. For one thing he tried to claim his penthouse under the federal parishoner allowance (intended for the good folks making less than 30k and often less than 20k), which gave the IRS the excuse they needed to suggest the removal of that exemption permanently. He forced the administrations of many denominations to spend outragious amounts of money treking to Washington to fight for their very-much-needed housing allowance. After causing this and many other crises for other Christians throughout the country (the majority) he has never once apologized. Rick Warren is no friend of the Christian community, and only the general good will of those being taken advantage of prevents a row. He is no symbol of Christianity. Obama's selection of him is both confusing and very concerning.
Posted by Simensis on January 15, 2009 at 6:51 PM · Report
201
#3 already has a name: frottage. My vote will probably be either 4 or 5, but as with real votes no one knows but me and my Deity.
Posted by Robin on January 15, 2009 at 6:54 PM · Report
202
5 definitely.
Posted by Mostly Treble on January 15, 2009 at 7:02 PM · Report
203
5 is just too good. I think this should go just beyond smearing a right-wing sexphobic (and likely closeted) ideologue--this definition is a quick reference to the lunacy and wholesale failure of abstinence only eduation. 5, 5, 5!!
Posted by maddy on January 15, 2009 at 7:14 PM · Report
204
One vote for Number 5 please.
Posted by Anon of Florida on January 15, 2009 at 7:26 PM · Report
205
No. 5!
Posted by caraqueño on January 15, 2009 at 7:29 PM · Report
206
Number 5, hands down.
Posted by Aditya Kumar on January 15, 2009 at 7:39 PM · Report
207
I vote 5. Its time the right wing Christian Bible Beaters got a taste of their own medicine...
Posted by Justice on January 15, 2009 at 7:39 PM · Report
208
Dan: Dunno if anyone else has pointed this out, but Saddleback doesn't just refer to Warren's church. Those of us down here in Orange County know Saddleback is the name of the region's tallest mountain peak -- you can see a pic of it at this link:

http://www.saddleback.edu/athletics/Foot…

Hmmm -- kinda looks a bit like a saddle, no? Hence, the name. It's attached to everything from Saddleback College to Saddleback Automotive to Saddleback Memorial Medical Center. Not just in OC, either. There's a Saddleback Harley in Utah, a Saddleback Elementary School in Arizona, a Saddleback Ski Area in Maine, even a Saddleback Dental Centre in Alberta.

Sorry, but as an attempted re-branding, Saddleback just ain't no Santorum.
Posted by Rich Kane on January 15, 2009 at 7:40 PM · Report
209
Saddleback: 3
Posted by Rougelatete on January 15, 2009 at 8:00 PM · Report
210
"Saddlebacking" = anal sex with a vaginal virgin. Works for me!
Posted by If Only It Had on January 15, 2009 at 8:27 PM · Report
211
I like #5. #3 is called a "Tip Drill," I believe.
Posted by Currer813 on January 15, 2009 at 8:42 PM · Report
212
#5. Awesome.
Posted by Athena714 on January 15, 2009 at 9:00 PM · Report
213
While I think 5 is hilarious I am hopeful that we won't need a word for that in the near future so I am throwing my support behind 6. I don't want this term to EVER go out of use!
Posted by Zil on January 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM · Report
214
I feel like a naive dork for being stunned to hear that some Christian teens believe that they can engage in unprotected anal sex and preserve their virginities. Holy crap indeed.
Posted by Stupidity Still Surprising Sometimes on January 15, 2009 at 9:37 PM · Report
215
I am for number 4 all the way!!!!!!
Posted by mystik on January 15, 2009 at 9:48 PM · Report
216
Gotta be #5. Fits the criteria to a tee!! And I liked today's column.
Posted by m3498 on January 15, 2009 at 10:34 PM · Report
217
lovely 5 - and um, I don't mind you using your column for things like this at all.
Posted by lfa on January 15, 2009 at 10:35 PM · Report
218
Gotta be five!
Posted by Jyo on January 15, 2009 at 10:48 PM · Report
219
5 for sure!!!!
isn't 6 already called "superman"-ing?
Posted by lann on January 15, 2009 at 11:05 PM · Report
220
#5 without a doubt! It is too appropos.
Posted by SaltyGawd on January 15, 2009 at 11:05 PM · Report
221
#5 all the way!
Posted by ET on January 15, 2009 at 11:37 PM · Report
222
5
Posted by LFB on January 15, 2009 at 11:41 PM · Report
223
5: Because Britney had been saddlebacking, her new mother-in-law was able to hang the bloody nuptial sheet in the window with pride. In response, Britney's ex-boyfriend hung a santorum-stained sheet in HIS window.
Posted by J on January 15, 2009 at 11:43 PM · Report
224
5
Posted by JC on January 15, 2009 at 11:49 PM · Report
225
i'll join the lazy revolution of people commenting rather than emailing you their answer. it's obviously 5.
Posted by tobes on January 16, 2009 at 12:19 AM · Report
226
Number 5, hands down.
Posted by Michelle S on January 16, 2009 at 12:37 AM · Report
227
5 made me laugh so hard I cried!
Posted by dd on January 16, 2009 at 1:19 AM · Report
228
5 it is!!!!!!!
Posted by Chunkeeboi on January 16, 2009 at 1:20 AM · Report
229
I'd vote for Number 5.
Also, for the original letter- the christian who wants to protest Warren, I suggest you use what is, in my opinion, the best way to piss off fundamentalists: Pray for them.
Get a bunch of people together near the inauguration, and ask God to forgive Warren for his bigotry. Try and get some media there too. Let Warren knows that God loves him, despite his prejudice, and that you hope that with God's help he can learn to respect and tolerate his gay fellow citizens, or, as Jesus put it, to 'love his neighbours'...
Posted by johnny_haiku on January 16, 2009 at 2:21 AM · Report
230
5
Posted by second on January 16, 2009 at 2:39 AM · Report
231
Voted 5.
Posted by greazeball on January 16, 2009 at 2:55 AM · Report
232
#1 is the most practical, I can see it being used often.

I vote #1.
Posted by saddleflakes on January 16, 2009 at 4:01 AM · Report
233
#5!!!
Posted by Jess* on January 16, 2009 at 4:52 AM · Report
234
I proposed 7, and despite that I voted for 5.

Had I had Anubis collaborate, I think 7 would have been a winner. For me, purpose-driven sex automatically meant sex for procreation. But his expansion to any sex not for pleasure is brilliant. It makes "saddlebacking" a fantastic term for all that range of instances of purpose-driven sex: to get the dude to stop hassling you for sex, to get a promotion, to be a sex worker. We'd have three big categories of sex: rape, saddlebacking, and sex.

Now for a defense of 7 as I defined it: having a term for "purpose-driven sex" automatically redefines "sex" as sex for fun. Normal sex is sex for mutual pleasure, and it's that procreation sex that is the exception. It's a perfect fit for pro-gay argument against the claim that "marriage is between a man and woman because marriage is about procreation".
Posted by MarcParis on January 16, 2009 at 4:59 AM · Report
235
Number one. Fo' shizzle.
Posted by starfireming on January 16, 2009 at 5:20 AM · Report
236
My vote's for #5!
That's a good one!
Posted by Female over 40 on January 16, 2009 at 5:21 AM · Report
237
"The language of love" lyric from "Who's that girl" is repeating over and over in my head all of the sudden. Number 5 is great because it brings attention to the problems with abstinence only education, so it gets my vote.
Posted by the_force on January 16, 2009 at 5:57 AM · Report
238
Poster Trey wrote: "The word of God does not condone homosexuality."

You dislike Rick Warren, then you must not care much for Obama or McCain, or whomever you voted for, cause they are all Christians."

If you take the Bible as the word of God, then yes, the Bible does not condone homosexuality. But God keeps making homosexuals, and actions speak louder than words, don't they?

Disagreeing with Warren's social stances does not mean that you hate all Christians, that is just absurd. It doesn't even mean that you hate Warren personally, it just means you don't like his stance on social issues.

And yes, it's Obama's party and he can celebrate how he wants, but he should be wary about offending too many of the people who loyally supported him.

Posted by J on January 16, 2009 at 6:08 AM · Report
239
5 is definately the best one!
Posted by Eileen on January 16, 2009 at 6:59 AM · Report
240
So after saddlebacking, you end up with santorum? Brilliant!
Posted by UKChris on January 16, 2009 at 7:19 AM · Report
241
Maybe poster Johnny Haiku's prayer group could use Jesus' line about getting the log out of your own eye before you complain about the speck in your neighbor's eye. Oh, or the one where he tells his followers not to be like the hypocrites who pray loudly in the marketplace. The list goes on...

To the folks who objected to Dan's taking only one, non-pervy question this week--the podcast this week made up for it.

I can't pick a usage but I promise to try and work whatever wins into normal-heh-converstion.
Posted by pat on January 16, 2009 at 8:07 AM · Report
242
glad to see that savage love is back to talking about political bullshit instead of sex and relationship advice.
Posted by yr name here on January 16, 2009 at 8:23 AM · Report
243
NUMBER 5 FOR SURE
Posted by Matt on January 16, 2009 at 8:49 AM · Report
244
Can't gay peoople's protests be represented by more than sex acts? How very adolescent. Dan, sometimes I think your mental development stopped at 15 years old.
Posted by Allen on January 16, 2009 at 9:13 AM · Report
245
#5
Posted by Bombshell on January 16, 2009 at 9:25 AM · Report
246
my vote is for #5.
Posted by d on January 16, 2009 at 10:13 AM · Report
247
5!!!
Posted by emily the haikubot on January 16, 2009 at 10:47 AM · Report
248
5 is the best of the lot, 7 was OK too, but I doubt either will catch on. Those words would mostly be used in Fundy contexts by sexually actuve christians (typical protestant sluts), who will never adopt the terms.
Posted by not impressed on January 16, 2009 at 10:52 AM · Report
249
I vote for 5
Posted by Natey Abes! on January 16, 2009 at 10:57 AM · Report
250
Mos def 5
Posted by E on January 16, 2009 at 11:01 AM · Report
251
Number 5 is the bestQ My friend and his christian girlfriend did this in high school, but he stayed a "virgin" into his 20s. It is such a funny idea. Jesus doesn't want you to put a penis in your vagina before marriage, he would prefer that you stay pure and clean and only put the penis in your butt. That dirty Jesus has a kink I think.
Posted by Brian Q. on January 16, 2009 at 11:13 AM · Report
252
"butt cheek" sex, like tit-fucking, already has a ton of names associated with. I just discovered them this week, in fact, during some totally inappropriate internet browsing. Some of these are:

Rearjerk, hotdogging, and buzuri (the Japanese description, I guess).
Posted by Anon on January 16, 2009 at 11:19 AM · Report
253
(5) please! Please! It's utterly perfect!
Posted by Marina on January 16, 2009 at 11:19 AM · Report
254
absolutely #5. I grew up in the church and I know plenty of those people. They're self-righteous about their virginity, but they're some of the biggest sluts I've ever met. No joke.
The girls are tragic characters because they think they need to somehow put out or the guys they're 'pledged' to will lose interest so they demean themselves with all sort of sexual craziness that they may or may not actually enjoy.
And the boyfriends are comic characters because their girlfriends will do CRAZY kinky shit that nobody else in high school (that I knew of) was doing, and they dont know how lucky they have it, except for the lack of vaginal intercourse, which they put on such a pedestal, I can only assume they're a little disappointed when they finally get it.
Posted by safeway on January 16, 2009 at 11:25 AM · Report
255
um, no place special- i have read every single savage love and Dan does things like this all the time. if you don't like his style then go away- Dear Prudie gives away advice every week on Slate!
Posted by TKHooker on January 16, 2009 at 11:37 AM · Report
256
I'm a little late to the game in submitting nominations for what to name saddlebacking. I can tell you what saddlebacking means to me. Saddleback is an action that creates in me and other gay people that feeling of injury and anger. It makes me just want to rise up and say 'Stop f--king saddlebacking me!' Clinton did it. We spent the last 8 years being saddlebacked on a daily basis. Obama did it when he chose the Rev. Warren. Every person who voted for and supported Prop 8 saddlebacked me. When I saw "Milk" I saw that they were being saddlebacked and that saddlebacking was viewed as an ok thing in society. Well no more! Now that we have a name for it we can demand that it stop! To all who wish to saddleback me, just pack up your saddlebacking ways and go home!
Posted by DontSaddlebackMe on January 16, 2009 at 12:00 PM · Report
257
FIVE.
Posted by wickedzoot on January 16, 2009 at 12:00 PM · Report
258
Definitely #5.
Posted by c4L on January 16, 2009 at 12:11 PM · Report
259
saddleback 1.

I liked 5, but there is already a term for that aside from the whole virginity component.
Posted by Yakdan on January 16, 2009 at 12:11 PM · Report
260
Head to the Mall in nothing but rubber chaps

DAN. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN TO DC IN JANUARY. Otherwise, it would be a fabulous idea.
Posted by Flamethorn on January 16, 2009 at 1:02 PM · Report
261
Unfortunately 5 *is* brilliant and I can hear it now. "Of course not girl, I ain't letting him get the goodies till we get engaged, but when he's really horny, we do some saddlebacking... I gotta keep him hooked on the line to reel him in, ya know?" But I'm going to vote for #2 - we really do need a descriptive-slang word for that kind of coercion.
Posted by Kni on January 16, 2009 at 1:07 PM · Report
262
I like three, but five works too, put me down for both.
Posted by Flamethorn on January 16, 2009 at 1:15 PM · Report
263
I think it has to be 5.
Posted by Heemahaw on January 16, 2009 at 1:15 PM · Report
264
3 is already known as a tip drill
Posted by colin on January 16, 2009 at 1:37 PM · Report
265
I vote for #5.
Posted by Heather on January 16, 2009 at 1:44 PM · Report
266
Urban Dictionary has already adopted #5:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.ph…
Posted by chicagobikedyke on January 16, 2009 at 1:45 PM · Report
267
5
Posted by jett on January 16, 2009 at 1:55 PM · Report
268
5 please!

please please please!
Posted by dckatastrophe on January 16, 2009 at 1:56 PM · Report
269
5 would be my vote
Posted by virvane on January 16, 2009 at 2:23 PM · Report
270
#5... definitely
Posted by me on January 16, 2009 at 2:51 PM · Report
271
Hm, I voted before I read the comments. Looks like it's gonna be 5, eh?
I guess this definition is like the "half a virgin" comment in Mean Girls.
Posted by DF on January 16, 2009 at 2:56 PM · Report
272
5 all the way!
Posted by johnny mayday on January 16, 2009 at 3:10 PM · Report
273
#5. end of contest.
Posted by and so it is on January 16, 2009 at 3:17 PM · Report
274
#5 for the win!
Posted by gingeranne on January 16, 2009 at 3:40 PM · Report
275
I know it's late to add a new suggested definition, but it just hit us. Does anyone watch Boomerang on tv? They have these little in-between bits showing wind-up toys walking, joined together, one behind the other. Like Magilla Gorilla and his owner. As if they were joined at the groin and still up and shuffling along.

Sounds like saddlebacking to me!
Posted by linda in Ohio on January 16, 2009 at 4:06 PM · Report
276
I think #4 is the best for pissing off Rick Warren and his type of people. It's true that a Larry Craig doesn't happen that often, but it would be fun to accuse people of being saddlebackers when they act like Rick Warren.
Posted by Emlbee on January 16, 2009 at 4:26 PM · Report
277
5 all the way! (or not, as the case may be)
Posted by TeamCanada on January 16, 2009 at 4:47 PM · Report
278
Number 5! Christian zealotry combined with unprotected anal sex FOR THE WIN!!!
Posted by brainybard on January 16, 2009 at 5:00 PM · Report
279
Hmm, hard to choose between 1 and 5...1 is just so logical, but I agree that "sex" ought to include condoms without a qualifier.

5 it is.
Posted by Rebecca on January 16, 2009 at 5:22 PM · Report
280
5, for sure -

and to the poster was up at the top who said that religious teenagers having buttsex because it's not "real sex" is a passing phenomenon, i couldn't disagree with you more! the catholics have been doing it for fuck knows how long, and they will forever more.
Posted by 5FTW on January 16, 2009 at 5:34 PM · Report
281
#5 !!!
And the readers wining about this column should fuck off.
Posted by TheConditionedSoul on January 16, 2009 at 5:36 PM · Report
282
definition 5
Posted by alex on January 16, 2009 at 5:50 PM · Report
283
Anything that mocks abstinence-only sex ed is cool in my book. #5!
Posted by Joe Wack on January 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM · Report
284
I originally thought I'd want 1, but I'm loving 5.
Posted by saffry on January 16, 2009 at 5:57 PM · Report
285
I don't believe that in the many years I have weekly looked forward to my dose of "Savage Love" I have ever been as disappointed with such a total waste of space. The reality is, no matter how much we dislike the choice of Rick Warren, the decision has been made, the invocation is going to happen and remarkably enough life will go on. Warren is getting more attention for his selection than he deserves and he's such a fame pig that he's totally wallowing in this attention. I say let it go - that will greatly disappoint him and his followers who are all hoping for yet another reason to single us out for their bigotry and hatred. Pick your battles carefully, save your strength for winning the war.
Posted by chrisM on January 16, 2009 at 6:18 PM · Report
286
#5 Hands down.
Posted by Byata on January 16, 2009 at 6:40 PM · Report
287
Please noooooooo. There are a lot of people living in the Saddleback Valley, and in the Santa Ana Mountains (sometimes referred to as the Saddleback mountains), who would really rather not be connected with that church. The church is a relative newcomer.
Posted by canyon-gal on January 16, 2009 at 6:47 PM · Report
288
5 all the way!!
Posted by Uptu on January 16, 2009 at 7:21 PM · Report
289
5 needs to win
Posted by king on January 16, 2009 at 7:29 PM · Report
290
saddleback: 5

And for those of you complaining about this column, let's see you come with a better one you numbskulls
Posted by King on January 16, 2009 at 7:40 PM · Report
291
Definitely choice 5!!!
Posted by David on January 16, 2009 at 7:52 PM · Report
292
This long winded definition of saddlebacking is a bit over the top. Yahhhhhh! Yahhhh!!
Posted by Smarlarpi on January 16, 2009 at 7:55 PM · Report
293
Okay. Call me crazy but it's looking like #5. Great. Thanks for playing. Chris M hit the nail on the head: Can we move on and let Rick Warren go back to his church now? I'm hoping next week's column is back on track.
Posted by wolfbone on January 16, 2009 at 8:01 PM · Report
294
#5! I didn't even realize that *was* a phenomenon... how sad, and what an appropriate term for it!
Posted by JD on January 16, 2009 at 8:02 PM · Report
295
5 is just too good.
Posted by Alan on January 16, 2009 at 8:12 PM · Report
296
I vote for #5!
Posted by Vansa on January 16, 2009 at 8:15 PM · Report
297
no question: five. the people have spoken.
Posted by eris on January 16, 2009 at 8:44 PM · Report
298
5!
Posted by jctrang on January 16, 2009 at 8:53 PM · Report
299
4 is best
Posted by Your Name Here on January 16, 2009 at 9:06 PM · Report
300
I agree that No. 5 does have cachet. However, In the interest of maximizing saddleback's chances of widespread adoption, it seems No. 3 is the best choice. Please consider this reasoning:

The term santorum succeeded because of it simplicity and usefulness: It is straightforward and merely descriptive.

While No. 5 is very good descriptively, doesn't it also carry with it a moral/political argument? The argument itself is valid--abstinence-only education is bunk, and places young people unnecessarily at risk. On the other hand, there's nothing necessarily wrong with buttsex, done in a safe, sane, consensual--and informed--manner. This is all too complicated for one simple verb to handle. Forcing saddleback to do double-duty as a political argument and a descriptive term dilutes its impact.

On the other hand, No. 3 is straightforward and uncomplicated; it merely describes the act of interbuttockular frottage.

And No. 3 is not devoid of subtle political relevance: The man who submitted it describes the act as a "compromise"--which is apt, considering Obama's apparent willingness to compromise with homophobic nutwing Evangelicals.
Posted by Brandon Burt on January 16, 2009 at 9:11 PM · Report
301
Im on board with 5


I think Miley Cyrus is Saddlebacking that 20 year old FELON with her dad's consent

Yay!
Posted by Q on January 16, 2009 at 9:26 PM · Report
302
have to go with #5.
and consider that it too is fucking with a purpose,and one in keeping with the metaphor of a saddle.the saddle doesn't keep the horse from being ridden or from either the horse or rider being sore afterwards.absolutely saddlebacking is having sex-usually butt sex-with the pretense/misguided purpose of preserving virginity.
Posted by proud on purpose on January 16, 2009 at 9:31 PM · Report
303
Sorry, I know it's too late, but I really think the definition for saddlebacking should be "the act of farting during or after, and as a result of anal intercourse".
Posted by Tardy on January 16, 2009 at 10:46 PM · Report
304
saddleback 5!
Posted by skyhawk on January 17, 2009 at 12:08 AM · Report
305
it's obviously #5...
Posted by LECK on January 17, 2009 at 12:25 AM · Report
306
5 with the expanded definition of either 1) hetro anal sex or 2) teen anal sex. such as practiced by christian teens to preserve vaginal virginity.
Posted by Press Play on January 17, 2009 at 1:12 AM · Report
307
FIVE FIVE FIVE!
Posted by cfox on January 17, 2009 at 2:15 AM · Report
308
About the spotting:

Dan Savage is not often a bit clueless, but he was here. But I guess it´s fair enough as you are dealing with intimate bits of female anatomy.

If the lady did not have a problem with spotting before the pill, then the problem now is caused by the pill.

In this case, she needs to try using different kinds of pills. It can be the 10th kind that is good for her. If she has no spotting and regular periods without the pill (so no other reason to be on the pill but birth-control), she should also consider some of the other methods of birth-control like the vaginal ring or even the coil.

This lady should do some more research, and go to a doctor who is more interested in solving her problem. It should be pretty easily solvable.
Posted by jane on January 17, 2009 at 2:37 AM · Report
309
totally agree with kni

Saddleback: 2 the best and one that needs a name, and the more biting of the options:

(2) "Saddleback (verb): to submit someone to any kind of humiliating, unreciprocal sex act, either literally or metaphorically, consented to by passive partner due to submissive/masochistic tendencies, desire for approval, or other darker motive.

Not sure I understand the 5 love: 5 is just 'cute' because it religion-bashes and can be combined with one other Savage(tm)Word, but the act does indeed already have a name. plus there are a dozen more humorous, and more likely to be used, names for 5's silly misguided act
Posted by TheRev on January 17, 2009 at 3:17 AM · Report
310
5!
Posted by Leily-jan on January 17, 2009 at 8:19 AM · Report
311
5 is funnier but 1 makes more sense. I vote for 1 and we'll have to find another word to mean 5, maybe something Dobson uses.

Posted by Brooklyngirl on January 17, 2009 at 9:48 AM · Report
312
#1 is logical winner but #5 is funnier
Posted by biju on January 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM · Report
313
5, hands down (and asses up?)
Posted by virginal whore on January 17, 2009 at 12:33 PM · Report
314
Save yourself for marriage young Christians! #5 please.
Posted by before the mortgage on January 17, 2009 at 12:57 PM · Report
315
5 by a mile
Posted by Vivek on January 17, 2009 at 1:20 PM · Report
316
#5 is perfect, that will just kill those abstinence only religious freaks!
Posted by angela on January 17, 2009 at 1:26 PM · Report
317
#5 Dan. #5.
Posted by Gerz85 on January 17, 2009 at 1:27 PM · Report
318
I can't believe there's hardly any support for 6. I want a term I can use myself, dammit. how often do you talk about "abstinent" teens? now how often do you come on someones back/have your back comed on?

6 for the future!
Posted by think of the grown ups! on January 17, 2009 at 1:39 PM · Report
319
5!
Posted by pickle on January 17, 2009 at 2:05 PM · Report
320
Dan, I must disagree with your anti-Rick Warren crusade. I believe Barack made a wise choice in this, and no I'm not a born again evangelical gay basher (I am an atheist, pagan, heathen). I believe gays should have the right to marry and all the other accompanying civil rights. The last thing this country needs is a mirror image of Bush- that is a left side idealogue who makes an enemies list of all who disagree with their ideology and shuns them ("you're either with us or against us"). That way leads only down. Barack understands this and is interested in moving forward and bringing as many Americans with him as he can. This can be so powerful. Think about the effect this decision has on Rick Warren and all his followers. I gaurantee you it is even now stirring up some great discussion and disention in the religious community. This is how we move forward. Patrick Stewart
Posted by Patrick Stewart on January 17, 2009 at 2:20 PM · Report
321
5!
Posted by Jenni Unicorn on January 17, 2009 at 2:33 PM · Report
322
Yeah, I think the winner is 5.
Posted by BombasticMo on January 17, 2009 at 3:10 PM · Report
323
Thanks for the enthusiastic support of definition #5! Listen to the people, Dan!
Posted by Addlebacked on January 17, 2009 at 3:23 PM · Report
324
Number 5 gets my vote.
Posted by Nixxy on January 17, 2009 at 3:57 PM · Report
325
5!
Posted by chipkali on January 17, 2009 at 4:09 PM · Report
326

Yeah, 5 is pretty good. Not as good as Santorum though. As much as #5 needs a word, the image of a saddle has no connection to this meaning. And now that Dan Savage has put this competition out there, he's going to be stuck with the task of standing behind it.

But then, it's probably going to grow on me, and soon enough I won't even notice that this term has word 'saddle' in it.
Posted by Sacha on January 17, 2009 at 5:05 PM · Report
327
5. Gotta be.
Posted by Guil on January 17, 2009 at 5:37 PM · Report
328
The boyfriend and I both vote for #5!
Posted by Eugene, OR on January 17, 2009 at 6:20 PM · Report
329
So what is a Jew who decides to have anal sex to preserve her virginity? But... in light that we absolutely unequivocally are upset with Obama's choice of invocation meanderings... vote for cinco (5)!
Posted by Nat and Teresa on January 17, 2009 at 7:52 PM · Report
330
number 1 for sure
Posted by pilg on January 17, 2009 at 8:08 PM · Report
331
I vote for #5, except that it needn't be unprotected by definition. Any anal sex, with or without condoms, is acceptable to protect the virginity of Christian teens.
Posted by hanniegurl on January 17, 2009 at 8:53 PM · Report
332
5!
Posted by EmilyTakesTokyo on January 17, 2009 at 11:31 PM · Report
333
"Worrying that the santorum would stain their good white sheets, Tom decided to saddleback his partner instead."
Posted by a.james on January 18, 2009 at 12:30 AM · Report
334
Definitely 5. A friend of mine said all her catholic girlfriends did this in high school. Perfect. Bristol Palin's baby daddy is probably wishing he had saddlebacked.
Posted by bradzio on January 18, 2009 at 1:19 AM · Report
335
I vote for #4.
Posted by That's Obvious on January 18, 2009 at 4:42 AM · Report
336
Number 5 is just too perfect.
Posted by Jeffrey Smith on January 18, 2009 at 5:25 AM · Report
337
#5 for sure.
Posted by jere on January 18, 2009 at 9:07 AM · Report
338
I like both #4 and #5. I propose adopting #5 as a 'saddlebacking' definition and holding another contest to name #4. Because I think the term (whatever it is)is increasingly necessary. In fact, this kind of hypocracy has become so common, I am beginning to think there is a god after all.
Posted by Redblues on January 18, 2009 at 9:25 AM · Report
339
5
Posted by remix on January 18, 2009 at 9:51 AM · Report
340
number 5 all the way
Posted by Maestro on January 18, 2009 at 10:12 AM · Report
341
I definitely vote for #5 it is the perfect definition given the context under which this contest is based :)

Preservation of a woman's virginity is paramount people, PARAMOUNT....oh, right and so is keeping the virginity of a guy, too.... yea.... that one is truly stressed :)
Posted by Tommie Lee Starling III on January 18, 2009 at 10:15 AM · Report
342
Number 5, as I know some people who've outgrown conservative parents from hell and conservative religious upbringing, and some of them actually did do this!!!! Unprotected anal sex in order to preserve one's "christian virginity" is something that actually happens.
Posted by vaxorcist on January 18, 2009 at 11:00 AM · Report
343
Number 5 is the most entertaining.

xo
Rants, Thoughts & Merde
http://rantsthoughtsmerde.blogspot.com/2…
Posted by NativeNYker on January 18, 2009 at 11:11 AM · Report
344
I vote #5. It's not as perfect a fit for the word as #1, but it's infinitely more appropriate for the person. Lets pin that bastard for something his pseudotheology actually encourages. To quote someone-or-other's holy book- "by their fruits you will know them".
Posted by PPE on January 18, 2009 at 1:52 PM · Report
345
I vote for 5. My second choice is 6.
Posted by squallcloud on January 18, 2009 at 2:09 PM · Report
346
5! Young Christians made hypocritical by their enforced ignorance needs a word.

Of course, we used to say "Queer" for ANYTHING at all that was NOT procreative sex, but people didn't like that because then 90% of people would be queer, no? ;)
Posted by stephen strepsi on January 18, 2009 at 2:19 PM · Report
347
Totally 5!
Posted by Homo Will on January 18, 2009 at 2:41 PM · Report
348
Number five, no contest! Also, because I don't have a crippling short memory, I was able to remember the good advice you gave at the start of the column by the time I got to the end of it. You make a very good point: we need to give voice to our displeasure in a way that is unlikely to be misconstrued as something it's not, so we don't end up shooting ourselves in the foot.

Hooray for paying attention!
Posted by D on January 18, 2009 at 4:07 PM · Report
349
5 5 5 5 5!!!
Posted by Andy Schultz on January 18, 2009 at 5:25 PM · Report
350
5!
Posted by Nina on January 18, 2009 at 5:41 PM · Report
351
Go for #5, Dan!
Posted by karenw on January 18, 2009 at 5:54 PM · Report
352
My vote is for 5.

Also, as was brought up in the santorum debate, a healthy person wouldn't want anything fun or loving to be considered saddlebacking. To my mind, that eliminates definitions 1, 3, and 6. I want to adopt whatever definition is ultimately chosen into my vocabulary, but I love and respect my wife too much to saddleback her.

Definition 5 does not describe an action practiced by healthy (or rational) people, so it's fair game. And really funny.
Posted by facet on January 18, 2009 at 5:56 PM · Report
353
Number 2 has a real "keeper" ring to it. Like "You saddlebacking bullies! Just leave us alone!" Or "he saddlebacked him into submission for Jesus! Hallelujah!"
Posted by dmills on January 18, 2009 at 6:53 PM · Report
354
definitely 3. this is a position used by many straight couples for many reasons: yeast infections, post-birth sex, herpes outbreak by receiving partner (though this could be on the edge of safe). I especially like the compromise formation element. best to make it specific to the face down position. it's dirtier that way. also good is that it involves potentially uncleaned ass and ejaculate going somewhere that requires cleaning before it becomes crusty. of course the phenomena of crusty ejaculate stuck on someone's back could also be a good candidate for saddleback.
Posted by LMSW on January 18, 2009 at 6:57 PM · Report
355
5, definitely.
Posted by Athena123987 on January 18, 2009 at 6:58 PM · Report
356
I'm torn between #1 and #5.

Can I vote for both?
Posted by lu_lu on January 18, 2009 at 7:09 PM · Report
357
oops. I clearly don't know how to vote properly. so here goes again.

saddleback5
saddleback1

(I really am torn between the two - I like them both! But I agree with Dan's reasoning about #1)
Posted by lu_lu on January 18, 2009 at 7:12 PM · Report
358
#5
#5
#5
Posted by Roger on January 18, 2009 at 7:35 PM · Report
359
5!!!
Posted by queer_canuck on January 18, 2009 at 8:25 PM · Report
360
5, please please 5!
Posted by carpy on January 18, 2009 at 8:27 PM · Report
361
I vote for #5.
Posted by Zanne on January 18, 2009 at 9:08 PM · Report
362
definitely 5
Posted by CAlove on January 18, 2009 at 9:48 PM · Report
363
Number 5 for sure. It's enough to horrify any self-respecting religious nut job to support sex ed.

Incidentally, the psychoanalytic term for #4, "reaction formation," could be given a punny twist... I dunno, "Erection falsification?"
Posted by frogg on January 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM · Report
364
#5 is great but I would change the term to Bible Thumping or Bible Bumping instead. Saddleback does not have the proper Fundamental Christian sound.
Posted by hhiser on January 19, 2009 at 1:01 AM · Report
365
5 - if for no other reason than if we go with this definition, saddlebacking is an activity likely to produce that frothy mix of lube and fecal matter ...

'After attending the Purity Ball, Heather and Bill saddlebacked all night because she's saving herself for marriage. Then Heather had to sneak her bedsheets to the laundromat before her mom spotted the santorum.'
Posted by Alex on January 19, 2009 at 1:35 AM · Report
366
As a placidly happy kinky married woman who woke up from Christian stupidities about sex, I vote for #5. Has to be #5. I will now use it a lot.
Posted by Alexandra Lynch on January 19, 2009 at 4:26 AM · Report
367
Nothing could be more appropiate the #4, but wouldn't the appropriate term be a "saddlebacker"?
Posted by A boy who likes girls. on January 19, 2009 at 7:29 AM · Report
368
5 please - it's perfect!
Posted by Rick on January 19, 2009 at 7:29 AM · Report
369
yeah 5!
Posted by nastyrose on January 19, 2009 at 8:56 AM · Report
370
#5. Definitely.
Posted by Andie on January 19, 2009 at 10:05 AM · Report
371
My youth pastor and I are both voting for #5!
Posted by DN on January 19, 2009 at 10:22 AM · Report
372
emphatically, 5.
Posted by ccj on January 19, 2009 at 11:06 AM · Report
373
#5!!!
Posted by riKu Matsuda on January 19, 2009 at 11:20 AM · Report
374
definitely 5. i think it was the word's use in a sentence that really sold me on that one.
Posted by lauren on January 19, 2009 at 11:33 AM · Report
375
Number 5. Or, as an alternate, number 5 seems appropriate. Of course, if I had to compromise, I would also consider number 5 a worthy choice.
Posted by jb on January 19, 2009 at 12:47 PM · Report
376
I think that #1 makes the most sense and will get the most usage! How often are we really going to be referring to anal sex between abstinance seekers? Just doesnt seem to come up much these days.
Posted by Oblique on January 19, 2009 at 12:59 PM · Report
377
I voted for #5, but drop the hate-based Christian reference and just leave it at ill-educated teens of all belief systems.
Posted by IDisposable on January 19, 2009 at 1:11 PM · Report
378
I'm for 1. Too logical to pass up, and it's still buttsex enough to piss Warren off.
Posted by Jud on January 19, 2009 at 2:37 PM · Report
379
My vote is for 5, but without restricting it to christian teens.

As written above it contains an implicit knock on the intelligence of christian teens, and it also obscures the fact that abstinence-only sex ed is happening in public schools and failing teens of all belief systems.

Lots of girls I grew up with, christian and not, were reserving their virginity for one thing or the other (fortunately our sex ed was comprehensive).
Posted by CraigMacTG on January 19, 2009 at 3:11 PM · Report
380
I like 4 the best. Why bring teens into it with 5. Just point out that the most vocal oppenents seem to be the people in the closet.
Posted by Teach Me Tonight on January 19, 2009 at 4:12 PM · Report
381
#4. Yes, Dan. It happens all the fucking time. And it associates the Church with scandal, hypocrisy and humiliation
Posted by Raphael on January 19, 2009 at 5:54 PM · Report
382
5.
I've been looking for a word for this practice or years. It is just too perfect.
Posted by Miles on January 19, 2009 at 6:48 PM · Report
383
5, bigtime. it's perfect.
Posted by xnmby on January 19, 2009 at 7:13 PM · Report
384
Definitely 5.
Posted by rick warren on January 19, 2009 at 7:44 PM · Report
385
I know it is late, but the appropriate protest, the one even those in the military and in uniform can use is a black armband worn from Noon -3PM.
Posted by LOrion on January 19, 2009 at 7:45 PM · Report
386
I vote for number 3; add tit fucking to the definition and you've got everybody covered!
Posted by Larry Thomas on January 19, 2009 at 8:04 PM · Report
387
5.

p.s. i love you dan
Posted by Molly on January 19, 2009 at 9:03 PM · Report
388
Number 5.
Posted by drlenee on January 19, 2009 at 9:56 PM · Report
389
My vote goes for 5!!
Posted by Ava on January 19, 2009 at 11:23 PM · Report
390
FIVE
Posted by Steve on January 20, 2009 at 3:41 AM · Report
391
5
Posted by obama on January 20, 2009 at 4:48 AM · Report
392
#5 - great!!
Posted by bunny on January 20, 2009 at 9:08 AM · Report
393
#5. Dan, you should rush over to Cafe Press and patent the "Saddleback Virgin" pink tanktops.
Posted by Rev. Jim on January 20, 2009 at 10:42 AM · Report
394
Number 5. Totally
Posted by Karl42 on January 20, 2009 at 11:08 AM · Report
395
Number Five, by a long shot.
Posted by al.bebop on January 20, 2009 at 11:29 AM · Report
396
5 is my favorite.
Posted by anavarra on January 20, 2009 at 11:51 AM · Report
397
I vote for 5.
Posted by The Milkman on January 20, 2009 at 12:18 PM · Report
398
5 please. Classic.
Posted by djse on January 20, 2009 at 12:21 PM · Report
399
(5) is already called "The Greek", isn't it?
Posted by SugarRae on January 20, 2009 at 12:30 PM · Report
400
i ahve to say 5 is the most brilliant term ever.
Posted by zoe on January 20, 2009 at 12:32 PM · Report
401
I definitely have to go with 5!
Adult Dating
Posted by Gary on January 20, 2009 at 1:14 PM · Report
402
#5 is a winner! I wish someone had told me about Saddlebacking while I was at Catholic School. All we ever did was dry hump until we shot in our pants - try explaining that stain to Sister Felicitas.
Posted by esteboner on January 20, 2009 at 4:08 PM · Report
403
I like #4 a bit more than #5, but #5 is my second favorite.
Posted by Omnifarious on January 20, 2009 at 4:21 PM · Report
404
5 is wonderfully ironic and appropriate
and 6 is sure to come up enough to really make him blush.
Those are my votes.
Posted by Debauched Wenchlett on January 20, 2009 at 5:03 PM · Report
405
Saddleback: definitely 5.
Posted by pistwoman on January 20, 2009 at 5:43 PM · Report
406
Isn't #3 called tip-drilling? Nelly (the rapper) made a song all about it.

I vote for #5.
Posted by gm88 on January 20, 2009 at 5:59 PM · Report
407
#5
Posted by Greg on January 20, 2009 at 7:49 PM · Report
408
i love this post!

i vote #3. i really like #5 aswell, as a definition and poking fun at the dimwitted christian youths that don't consider anal as sex. however i like it when words are suggestive of their meaning - i think ass-fuckery frottage makes sense in this way, because it's like you're saddling up a cock/dildo with an ass.
Posted by nadia on January 20, 2009 at 7:56 PM · Report
409
I'm going for 5. It's a problem that needs an embarrassing fucking name. Idiot kids not being educated by their idiot parents and thus get STDs.
Posted by Betsy on January 20, 2009 at 8:33 PM · Report
410
Number 5 without a doubt.

It's perfect.
Posted by Left-Coaster on January 20, 2009 at 8:52 PM · Report
411
If only because I want the term to get a lot of use (and I like the idea of a the word being used to refer to safe and healthy sex that abstinence only morons discourage) I like #1.
Posted by Park on January 20, 2009 at 9:19 PM · Report
412
5 will not come into common usage because, by definition, the people who do it do not know enough about sex to have encountered the term.
Posted by monk14 on January 20, 2009 at 10:13 PM · Report
413
Ohhhh...so many lovely choices...I'll go with #5!
Posted by skye on January 20, 2009 at 10:31 PM · Report
414
4 and 5 are both genius.

1. While it IS the most logical one, it doesn't have enough 'punch' to it, the way 'santorum' does.

2. This inauguration issue will soon fade from the public mind, while stupid teens and hypocritical politicians are here to stay.

3. I wouldn't want to 'saddleback' anyone I loved.

6. See #3

7. Too contrived, and possibly attractive to the people in question.
Posted by makenna88 on January 21, 2009 at 7:03 AM · Report
415
I vote for #2 - it's something that would certainly repulse the likes of Warren.
Posted by TrekBear on January 21, 2009 at 7:34 AM · Report
416
@ first comment: I thought that position was called drunken frat boy can't get it up. Why would it be called Italian."
Posted by whatever on January 21, 2009 at 8:11 AM · Report
417
Add me to the 5's too.
Posted by WeaverRose on January 21, 2009 at 9:11 AM · Report
418
VOTE 7. As a breeder, I would love a different word to suggest that my wife and I are fucking to reproduce. “Trying” is too wimpy a word and suggests flaccidness which would be contraindicated. VOTE 7.
Posted by Jeff on January 21, 2009 at 10:02 AM · Report
419
definitely 5!
Posted by Cap'n J on January 21, 2009 at 10:24 AM · Report
420
It's gotta be #4!
"The frothy mix of self-loathing and shit-talking that is often the byproduct of being a religious closet case".
Er.
Seriously, though, this is the root of the most destructive homophobia that exists in this country. Whether it is a respected religious leader working to take away rights, or an insecure asshole that beats up a gay person, it warrants more attention.
If Warren is actually gay, maybe he's been maturely delaying gratification of these urges his whole life. I don't think that would make him any less of a hypocrite. He's already shown himself to be a bigot, and a destructive one at that. He should be linked to public hypocrites because he behaves like one, and his anti-gay religious message is helping to create more of them.
The miserable saddlebacker.
Posted by jd rebellato on January 21, 2009 at 11:03 AM · Report
421
4 & 5 are the two standouts, for sure. I lean toward #4, but I think #5 has a better shot at taking the title.
Posted by JoJo on January 21, 2009 at 1:21 PM · Report
422
cinco!
Posted by Flossy on January 21, 2009 at 3:17 PM · Report
423
5!
Posted by mr. roboto on January 21, 2009 at 3:48 PM · Report
424
I would absolutly side with number (5), it just seems appropriate to me.
Posted by Drumknot on January 21, 2009 at 3:55 PM · Report
425
I like saddleback: 1, but saddleback: 5 is even better.
Posted by Elle on January 21, 2009 at 6:45 PM · Report
426
5!
Posted by SundaySchoolTeacher on January 21, 2009 at 9:43 PM · Report
427
My vote is for #5!
Posted by BobbyP2001 on January 22, 2009 at 7:53 AM · Report
428
I vote 5
Posted by prenks on January 22, 2009 at 12:21 PM · Report
429
5
Posted by cw on January 22, 2009 at 12:59 PM · Report
430
5!!!
Posted by kurisu on January 22, 2009 at 4:46 PM · Report
431
(5), have to get my vote in
Posted by fashnable1 on January 22, 2009 at 5:01 PM · Report
432
OH, 5... I like several of the others too, but 5 seems like the best fit all the way around... please 5.
Posted by siouxiequeue on January 22, 2009 at 9:37 PM · Report
433
5 kicks ass.
Posted by substrata on January 22, 2009 at 9:39 PM · Report
434
#5, definitely.

But I must also object to your comment on #3 - I'm a woman, and when I fuck men with my strap-on, it's *sex*, not just rubbing off.
Posted by myth on January 22, 2009 at 9:40 PM · Report
435
No. 5. Absolutely. Clear, to the point, and *appropriate*. And just to add to the gall, I can utterly imagine the teens in question adopting the term, if it's carefully seeded.
Posted by PatK on January 22, 2009 at 11:05 PM · Report
436
5, without a doubt. (I am amused by 7, but it doesn't make the cut.)
Posted by ken the librarian on January 23, 2009 at 6:32 AM · Report
437
5 is it!
Posted by The Dactyl on January 23, 2009 at 10:57 AM · Report
438
While 1 makes a ton of sense logically, 5 was too hard to resist for the "evil glee" quotient.
Posted by feelslike1sttime on January 23, 2009 at 3:24 PM · Report
439
5
Posted by Jude Fawley on January 23, 2009 at 5:10 PM · Report
440
saddleback: 5

christian teens!

the other contender is good, but not enough of an anomaly to come up in conversation very often - why would you mention the guy who wanted the opposite of barebacking? The douchebag who wants to bareback is much more of a conversation-causer.
Posted by mgm27 on January 23, 2009 at 9:05 PM · Report
441
#5
Posted by Natasha on January 25, 2009 at 11:39 AM · Report
442
Voting for (5).

Irony is desirable in this case.
Posted by Solitethos on January 25, 2009 at 11:41 AM · Report
443
Saddleback: 5 (this time so it counts!)
Posted by Natasha on January 25, 2009 at 11:44 AM · Report
444
I'd like to add another definition for "saddlebacking". Using DP or double penetration is too unwieldy or puzzling to some, so why not "saddlebacking" to describe this practice?
Posted by Liz on January 25, 2009 at 1:49 PM · Report
445
I got bounced by your email address.

#1. I'll go with this as the most logical... but I believe you CAN rename a sex act as you see fit. After
all, look at the name churn in America's sports stadiums. Nothing is sacred.

Come to think of it, Monster.com should have spent its money on having a sex act renamed for the company. It
would have sounded less silly than a ball park.
Posted by Geek Porn Girl on January 26, 2009 at 3:43 PM · Report
446
5 is the clear winner here. For creativities sake, lets go for it.
Posted by GOD on January 26, 2009 at 5:28 PM · Report
447
saddleback 4.....


warren is probably a saddlebacker.
Posted by Iloverain on January 28, 2009 at 11:09 PM · Report
Posted by J on January 29, 2009 at 2:20 PM · Report
449
O crap, I forgot to case my ballot. Gotta go with #5. That is classic and I could totally see those Christian gals using their ars to save their vag.
Posted by J on January 29, 2009 at 2:21 PM · Report
450
As for the attempted rebranding of the name "Saddleback" and "Santorum", evangelical Christians would be wise to ignore it (with the possible notable exception of Rick Santorum). If gay groups have the audacity to co-opt even a symbol of God's promise to humanity (in the view of Christians), a rainbow, certainly trying to abuse a church's or person's name is par for the course. Though it is mildly surprising that the community would attempt to generate more fuel to feed stereotypes and derogatory comments. Perhaps it should even be viewed as an honour. You know, "Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me." (Matt. 5:10-11), kind of thing.
Posted by bfordc on January 29, 2009 at 4:28 PM · Report
451
mambo #5
Posted by czechmate66 on January 31, 2009 at 7:49 AM · Report
452
It's too bad the first choice wasn't the one taken. It makes sense, and would likely get a lot of use, unlike "defauxnitions" like "santorum".

Saddlebacking (as opposed to barebacking) makes more sense. In an ideal world, we wouldn't need to bother with condoms, but unfortunately, it's still a better world than ours where "sex" carries an automatic and implied "with a condom". As a synonym for "barebacking (to save virginity)", it's almost as weak as a synonym for "to procreate" (or, if you prefer, "to procreate (and eradicate virginity)" )

Saddlebacking (as protected anal sex) is enhanced by the whole macho Cowboy image, making the whole thing sound more appealing than the alternative. After all, a nude guy with a saddle still looks like a cowboy, but a named guy ready to ride bareback is just a naked guy. Isn't anything that gets people thinking (and talking) about using condoms a good thing?

As a shorthand for "anal sex (with a condom like every good cowbou shoud do it)" it likely has the legs to carry it into common usage fast enough to make that PILF wonder why he didn't choose another, less suggestive name, like the "Brokeback Congregation".

Now, if anyone has some photos of Mr. Warren in a speedo... (or better still, not in a speedo...)
Posted by Gr1zz on February 4, 2009 at 4:36 PM · Report
453
5! 5! 5!
Posted by Anonymous on February 7, 2009 at 1:57 AM · Report
454
1) too literal
2)too broad a category, might as well be called "fucking"
3)my info bitch told me this is called hot dogging. It ruined her marriage and contained the humiliating elements of 2)
4) needs to have some reference to it happening in the barn, like "slopping"
6)why would anyone do this? why miss out on the memories you'll enjoy later if you just take it all the way? Doesn't deserve a cool term like this. Reminds me of a t-shirt I saw at coachella: "spitters are quitters."
7) Maybe warren's purpose is to do more pig slopping in the barn.
I vote for 5.
Posted by judipod on February 17, 2009 at 8:56 PM · Report
455
And in response to Press Play, straight girls like me (and their men) might not want to be stuck in the same category as hypocritical uneducated health risk-taking kids who are too stupid to just stick a condom on it, do it and lie about it (to themselves and others) like we did in catholic school. #5, no amendments.
Posted by judipod on February 17, 2009 at 9:30 PM · Report
456
this is a vote for 5!
Posted by jon on March 9, 2009 at 10:19 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in Columns