Savage Love Podcast
-
Episode 173
(Feb 9) -
Episode 172
(Feb 2) -
Episode 171
(Jan 26) -
Episode 170
(Jan 19) -
Episode 169
(Jan 11)
Got a question for Dan Savage?
Call the Savage Love Podcast at 206-201-2720
or email Dan at mail@savagelove.net.
Savage Love Archives
- Curious Business (Jan 28)
- Coin Toss (Jan 21)
- You've Got Anti-Male (Jan 14)
- Pervs and Prejudice (Jan 7)
- Assholes and Gasholes (Dec 31)
More from Dan Savage
-
More Marriage Equality News
-
Marriage Equality Activists In New York City...
-
How's That Hopey, Changey Stuff Working Out For Childhood Obesity?
-
Now That You're Not Fooling Anyone...
-
Palin 2012: Abandon All Hope That Anything Will Ever Change
Books by Dan Savage
The Commitment: Love, Sex, Marriage, and My Family
Things I've Learned from Women Who've Dumped Me
Skipping Towards Gomorrah
The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant
Savage Love: Straight Answers from America's Most Popular Sex Columnist
Savage Links
- Babeland
- Fleshbot
- Good Vibrations
- Joe Newton/Savage Illustrations
- Planned Parenthood
- Spreading Santorum
- Planned Parenthood's Teen Wire
- Kinsey Confidential
- Carnal Nation
- Tiny Nibbles
Want a Second Opinion?
Contact Dan Savage
Saddlebacked
January 15, 2009
Tools
I'm going to Barack Obama's inauguration in Washington, D.C., on January 20. I've spent eight years, one month, one week, and one day waiting for this. (But who's counting?) However, I am looking for suggestions for a respectful way to protest the participation of Rick Warren. As a lifelong Episcopalian, I really don't want to engage in an antireligious protest. (FWIW: I was annoyed with some of the antireligious people at the anti-8 rallies. We need all our allies for this fight, so don't trash the engaged, progressive religious folk!)
While my friends want me to throw shoes, that ain't gonna happen. Ideally, I'd like a peaceful, gracious way to protest Warren's participation that won't undercut this great day, a way that can be picked up (and publicized) by folks on the Mall. Any suggestions?
Faithful Obama Girl
Whatever you do, FOG, don't do those things you, um, already said you don't want to do. No one should boo or throw shoes or do anything disruptive. The American Taliban love to pretend that they're the persecuted ones around here, and booing or throwing shoes or even just turning your back on Warren—the gay-hatin', right-wing Christian bigot Barack Obama invited to give the invocation at his inauguration—will invariably be spun as an attack on people of faith, as a vicious assault on prayer itself, as the moral equivalent of a syphilitic rent boy pissing directly into the open mouth of a crying baby Jesus.
Instead, borrow a page from those long-suffering gay Catholics. To register their displeasure with the pope's revealing obsession with gay sex, gay marriage, and gay shoes (the douchebag wears Prada), some gay Catholics wear rainbow sashes to mass. Perhaps folks disappointed by Warren's participation could coordinate a similar sartorial protest? Everyone wear a button with that rainbow-striped version of the Obama logo? Wave little rainbow flags during Warren's remarks? Head to the Mall in nothing but rubber chaps?
And speaking of Rick Warren, pastor of Saddleback Church and author of The Purpose Driven Life...
My life's purpose over the last week was reading thousands of proposed new definitions for "saddlebacking" sent in by my readers. As with the new definition of santorum crafted by Savage Love readers ("the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes a byproduct of anal sex"), the new definition of "saddlebacking" has to be some act that (1) needs a name but doesn't already have one (we can't just rename "reverse cowgirl," people) and (2) is naughty enough to discomfort, say, a Reverend Warren, but something that actual people might actually do because that's the only way the actual word will actually get used.
So I've disqualified proposed definitions that were too literal ("putting an actual saddle on someone's actual back and actually riding them"), too gross ("to crap on someone's back and then sit on it, moving forward and back while making horse-riding-related noises like 'giddyap!' and 'whoa!'"), too complicated ("one person on all fours with a strap-on strapped to their midsection, a second person riding said strap-on, and a third person hitting the first person from behind while holding on for dear life/giving a handjob to the second person"), or too bitter ("when you give someone some kind of basic human right, like marriage, and then take it away again after a few months"). Here are the proposed definitions that made the cut:
(1) "Logically, if 'barebacking' means having butt sex with no condom, then 'saddlebacking' should mean having butt sex with a condom."
(2) "Saddleback (verb): to submit someone to any kind of humiliating, unreciprocal sex act, either literally or metaphorically, consented to by passive partner due to submissive/masochistic tendencies, desire for approval, or other darker motive. E.g., 'I don't know why Obama is letting Rick Warren saddleback him into presiding over his inauguration.'"
(3) "The saddleback position involves placing your lubed dick between the butt cheeks of your partner. This position can be performed on your sides or on top of a facedown partner (maybe with a pillow under his or her hips). My favorite way of finishing up the saddlebacking is to lift up and come on my wife's sweaty back. The saddleback is a nice compromise position when your partner won't allow anal entry."
(4) "To saddleback is to rail against gay sex in public while secretly indulging in the same in private. Ted Haggard? Total saddlebacker. Larry Craig? Saddlebacker. Rick Warren? Probably a saddlebacker."
(5) "'Saddlebacking' should be the term for the phenomenon of Christian teens engaging in unprotected anal sex in order to preserve their virginities. 'After attending the Purity Ball, Heather and Bill saddlebacked all night because she's saving herself for marriage.' Please, please adopt this definition!"
(6) "Saddleback (verb): to ejaculate on the back of a partner at the culmination of doggy-style anal sex."
(7) "Before being invited to give the invocation, Mr. Warren was most noted for his book The Purpose Driven Life. Therefore, 'to saddleback' is to fuck with a purpose, i.e., to procreate. A heterosexual couple asked if they're trying to have children could reply, 'No, we're not ready for kids yet, but we'll probably start saddlebacking next year.'"
Those are the nominees, ladies and gentlemen. But before we open the polls for a vote—you're going to pick the winning definition!—let me quickly handicap the candidates:
(1) I like the idea that "sex" is understood to include condoms and that sex without condoms—bareback sex—needs a special term. But tons of people suggested that "saddlebacking" should be the opposite of "barebacking," so here it is. (2) Seems a bit tortured and unlikely to come into common usage, but I like the point the reader is making with this definition, so I included it. (3) Technically this kind of assfuckery—butt-cheek fucking à la titty fucking, with no actual penetration—is a form of frottage, but like a woman doing a man in the butt with a strap-on dildo (dubbed "pegging" by Savage Love readers), this particular brand of rubbing off could use a name of its own. (4) One of my favorites—but does a Haggard or Craig tumble out of the closet often enough for the term to come into use? (5) Hilarious—and an entirely appropriate way to honor Reverend Warren, who is a proponent of abstinence education, the "sex ed" that has convinced so many Christian girls and boys that buttfucking isn't actually sex. (6) A common move—and not just in porn—that could use a name. (7) Makes sense, so here it is. But I imagine Warren would approve of this definition—except when lesbians used it (even you, Melissa E.!).
Okay, Savage Love readers, "saddlebacking" is in your hands now. Vote for your favorite definition from the list of nominees by sending an e-mail to saddleback@savagelove.net. You must include "saddleback" and the number of your preferred definition in the subject line to have your vote count ("saddleback: 1," "saddleback: 2," etc.). Vote now!
And in spite of what a few other commenters have said, I've been refreshing the page all day *waiting* for this column. So some of your readers are quite happy with it.
...and am I the only one who knows how to follow directions for the vote to count?...LOL
ah the life.
I vote for 6. In fact, it could be expanded to be:
"Ejaculating on any part of a partner's body except the face (see facial)."
5 is funny and all the first time you hear it but its more of a throwaway political statement than it is something with actual utility and will lose impact fast. 3 more properly soils the name of the church I think, and is an exotic enough move to get gossiped about and spread the word around, unlike 6 or 7.
My only concern with 5 being adopted is that, unlike pegging, the people doing the actual saddlebacking would be very unlikely to call it that - it would be reserved for commentators outside the abstinence-only circles.
- Congressional Right-wing And Pope
#5 is a close runner up but unless you combine two of the following it's not offensive: cum, shit, abortion and violence.
I think number 6 is, in fact, a metaphorical representation of the actual church itself- a giant cum stain on the face of Orange County.
Number 5, for all its popularity, seems to be a interesting application of barebacking, and doesn't, as far as I can tell, incorporate the word "saddle" in any sense into the sex act.
In that light, I chose not to vote for it.
Then again, neither does "4" and i almost voted for it...
And @ rhymeswithlibrarian, I disagree, I think the people doing it WILL eventually call it that because it's so much less of a dirty sounding word than "Anal Sex"
Just like the term "hooking up" is used so that people can feel better about their casual sex, "saddlebacking" will make those kids feel fantastic about butt sex! "Hey, what we're doing MUST be ok... it's named after the church even!!!"
"The saddlebacking felt great, but then we were stuck cleaning up all that santorum."
For the second week in a row Joe Newton's column art inexplicably and (at least last week) unprecedentedly is better than Misako's (over at the Onion), and all people want to talk about is rape and saddlebacking?
Where are your priorities, people?!?
You can get a t-shirt that says "Democracy NOT Theocracy" from the First Freedom First website. http://www.cafepress.com/firstfreedom/21…
#3 is something that I'd love to have a term for and this word itself actually fits that definition a lot better.
I know this logic might be really twisted. But, I think there is a way to combine 4 & 5 with a hint at 2. Both 4 & 5 are about sex-phobes who pretend to be prim, proper and prudent while participating in anal sex out of institutionalized ignorance, submissive/masochistic tendencies, desire for approval, or other darker motives. I think saddleback should be either 4 AND 5. It could also metaphorically be used in regards to the inauguration! "President-elect Obama portrays Rick Warren's participation at his inauguration as a sign of inclusivity, but everyone knows he is just saddlebacking."
4 is also good and would be my second choice (but perhaps we can save that definition and use it for the name of the next gay bashing creep who makes the headlines)
#5 it is.
FICTXAMPLE:
"Hey! Dan here!!!
I just wanted to say hello, and thank you, to all you straight people who read, laughed and spread the word about me when I was doing this column to supplement my income. Now that I am nationally syndicated, I will instead be devoting the majority of the time railing for gay rights; however I will toss off the occasional 'Freak-Fix' column so you keep reading!
Now; before I entice you with the honor of being the one who originates the meaning of a word that shall live in infamy and for all infinity, I would now like you to read my zero-tolerance, take no prisoners political rhetoric!
Hi, my name is Dan and I am an Activist. Thanks for reading, what-has-now, become my glorified blog.
Haters Hate! Hate Haters!
P.S. Sorry to give you the "ol saddleback" but I'm sure I'll see y'all again...
NEXT WEEK: Beastiality-Dominatrix Dwarfs-Mentos!
Though I'm sad I missed out on making a suggestion. I think "Saddlebacking" should be the name for narcissistic blog commenters who self righteously say controversial shit just to get the whole comment section riled up and denouncing them-- then claim it is the people who are angry at them who are doing something wrong. Which seems very similar to Pastor Warren's m.o.. It's a common phenomenon that doesn't seem to have an appropriate name.
By the way, 5 must win !
And I LOVE 7, but if you guys are right about Warren having generally positive thoughts about sex-within-marriage, then maybe not (although who really wants his church named after a sex act). So all that's really left is 4, which is perfect in so many ways. Warren "rails" about all kinds of things (and we know he's in the craig-haggard club - just a matter of time); "saddleback church" is named after a mountain and "brokeback mountain" was a story about at least one closeted gay cowboy; saddles provide a barrier between the man and the animal, much as such men use their railings to provide a barrier between their perceived manhood and their real nature; that act really needs a name; I'm sure there are more reasons to support this one. I need to go vote!
"Allegations of Charlie Crist's saddleback lifestyle have not yet been confirmed, but it's only a matter of time..."
Good work Dan. I predict that before your career is through you will have enriched the English language even more than Shakespeare.
Well, when they feel homosexuality is wrong, homosexuals are stripped of their human rights and hate crimes are ignored.
When people go after Christians who are homophobic bigots (which is not all of them), it is with the intent to keep these Christians from putting their bigoted views into practice.
So you've got one group that wants to be treated as human beings, and one that doesn't want to treat them like human beings. Treating both the same does not add up. There was plenty of Christian support for slavery (and yes, plenty against), but I can't imagine too many slaves thought they should remain subservient and subhuman lest they offend their masters.
Personally I vote for 1.
I can't understand how your advice is like 90% spot on, and your rants are so off. Oh well, your name is Savage, after all. Or is that comment not PC enough, since it may offend Savage-Americans regardless of their sexual identity?
Since those "chastity" teens are so ridiculous, let us now oblige them by ridiculing them.
I've heard that teenagers are easily embarrassed. Would that it were so!
(5) is the winner though - that's perfect LOL!
more inventive teens could possibly manage to peg at the same time, though that would probably, as an activity, be developing a life of its own unrelated to maintaining their virginity ;-)
It's Obama's inauguration and he's got no problem with Warren being there. Oh, and Obama's a Christian, too.
Get your knickers out of a knot, this inauguration is NOT about taking a stand on anything. Save it for a later date & venue. You dislike Rick Warren, then you must not care much for Obama or McCain, or whomever you voted for, cause they are all Christians.
I also want a credit line when "Saddleback Mountain" is added to the HUMP! film festival line up.
So 5 is hilarious, but 6 will be getting my vote.
"anal sex performed under the delusion that it isn't really sex"
That encompasses the original proposed definition, expands it to include a lot of delusional hypocrisy, and gets away from the "just picking on Christians" thing.
P.S. My wife and I will be at the Inauguration. Proper respose to Warren is something we discussed. Don't think I have a rainbow Obama button but I'm sure we can come up with something in the right color scheme...
If it didn't take too many words I wanted to make a button that said "Be quiet while Rick Warren prays. He needs to hear God's response."
also, the word for definition number 6 is 'back splash'. i thought that was obvious.
And for the letter, I would be worried about trahing the engaged, progressive religious folk if there seemed to be more than 20 or 30 of you in the whole country.
"Soulja Boy off in this hoe, watch me crank it, watch me eoll, watch me crank dat Soulja Boy, then Super Man Dat Ho"
(when you're doggy style, pull out, and cum on the back/ass. pretend to wipe it off, and when they wake up, thhe will have the bed sheets stuck to their back like superman's little red cape!)
xo
I see this term, simply because it refers to such a frequent phenomenon, spreading rather quickly.
we will have to somehow get the brainwashed youths to get this word in play.
Can the word be used anytime the intent is to have anal sex b/c vaginal sex is off the menu? i.e. "My wife is on the dot this week, so we saddlebacked."
(Modifying the original suggestion)
"After the Purity Ball, Missy and Paulie saddlebacked all night, because Missy wanted to "save herself" for marriage. You should have seen the Santorium all over the Lexus' back seat!"
I tried...
http://www.saddleback.edu/athletics/Foot…
Hmmm -- kinda looks a bit like a saddle, no? Hence, the name. It's attached to everything from Saddleback College to Saddleback Automotive to Saddleback Memorial Medical Center. Not just in OC, either. There's a Saddleback Harley in Utah, a Saddleback Elementary School in Arizona, a Saddleback Ski Area in Maine, even a Saddleback Dental Centre in Alberta.
Sorry, but as an attempted re-branding, Saddleback just ain't no Santorum.
Also, for the original letter- the christian who wants to protest Warren, I suggest you use what is, in my opinion, the best way to piss off fundamentalists: Pray for them.
Get a bunch of people together near the inauguration, and ask God to forgive Warren for his bigotry. Try and get some media there too. Let Warren knows that God loves him, despite his prejudice, and that you hope that with God's help he can learn to respect and tolerate his gay fellow citizens, or, as Jesus put it, to 'love his neighbours'...
Had I had Anubis collaborate, I think 7 would have been a winner. For me, purpose-driven sex automatically meant sex for procreation. But his expansion to any sex not for pleasure is brilliant. It makes "saddlebacking" a fantastic term for all that range of instances of purpose-driven sex: to get the dude to stop hassling you for sex, to get a promotion, to be a sex worker. We'd have three big categories of sex: rape, saddlebacking, and sex.
Now for a defense of 7 as I defined it: having a term for "purpose-driven sex" automatically redefines "sex" as sex for fun. Normal sex is sex for mutual pleasure, and it's that procreation sex that is the exception. It's a perfect fit for pro-gay argument against the claim that "marriage is between a man and woman because marriage is about procreation".
You dislike Rick Warren, then you must not care much for Obama or McCain, or whomever you voted for, cause they are all Christians."
If you take the Bible as the word of God, then yes, the Bible does not condone homosexuality. But God keeps making homosexuals, and actions speak louder than words, don't they?
Disagreeing with Warren's social stances does not mean that you hate all Christians, that is just absurd. It doesn't even mean that you hate Warren personally, it just means you don't like his stance on social issues.
And yes, it's Obama's party and he can celebrate how he wants, but he should be wary about offending too many of the people who loyally supported him.
To the folks who objected to Dan's taking only one, non-pervy question this week--the podcast this week made up for it.
I can't pick a usage but I promise to try and work whatever wins into normal-heh-converstion.
Rearjerk, hotdogging, and buzuri (the Japanese description, I guess).
The girls are tragic characters because they think they need to somehow put out or the guys they're 'pledged' to will lose interest so they demean themselves with all sort of sexual craziness that they may or may not actually enjoy.
And the boyfriends are comic characters because their girlfriends will do CRAZY kinky shit that nobody else in high school (that I knew of) was doing, and they dont know how lucky they have it, except for the lack of vaginal intercourse, which they put on such a pedestal, I can only assume they're a little disappointed when they finally get it.
I liked 5, but there is already a term for that aside from the whole virginity component.
DAN. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN TO DC IN JANUARY. Otherwise, it would be a fabulous idea.
I guess this definition is like the "half a virgin" comment in Mean Girls.
Sounds like saddlebacking to me!
5 it is.
and to the poster was up at the top who said that religious teenagers having buttsex because it's not "real sex" is a passing phenomenon, i couldn't disagree with you more! the catholics have been doing it for fuck knows how long, and they will forever more.
And for those of you complaining about this column, let's see you come with a better one you numbskulls
The term santorum succeeded because of it simplicity and usefulness: It is straightforward and merely descriptive.
While No. 5 is very good descriptively, doesn't it also carry with it a moral/political argument? The argument itself is valid--abstinence-only education is bunk, and places young people unnecessarily at risk. On the other hand, there's nothing necessarily wrong with buttsex, done in a safe, sane, consensual--and informed--manner. This is all too complicated for one simple verb to handle. Forcing saddleback to do double-duty as a political argument and a descriptive term dilutes its impact.
On the other hand, No. 3 is straightforward and uncomplicated; it merely describes the act of interbuttockular frottage.
And No. 3 is not devoid of subtle political relevance: The man who submitted it describes the act as a "compromise"--which is apt, considering Obama's apparent willingness to compromise with homophobic nutwing Evangelicals.
I think Miley Cyrus is Saddlebacking that 20 year old FELON with her dad's consent
Yay!
and consider that it too is fucking with a purpose,and one in keeping with the metaphor of a saddle.the saddle doesn't keep the horse from being ridden or from either the horse or rider being sore afterwards.absolutely saddlebacking is having sex-usually butt sex-with the pretense/misguided purpose of preserving virginity.
Dan Savage is not often a bit clueless, but he was here. But I guess it´s fair enough as you are dealing with intimate bits of female anatomy.
If the lady did not have a problem with spotting before the pill, then the problem now is caused by the pill.
In this case, she needs to try using different kinds of pills. It can be the 10th kind that is good for her. If she has no spotting and regular periods without the pill (so no other reason to be on the pill but birth-control), she should also consider some of the other methods of birth-control like the vaginal ring or even the coil.
This lady should do some more research, and go to a doctor who is more interested in solving her problem. It should be pretty easily solvable.
Saddleback: 2 the best and one that needs a name, and the more biting of the options:
(2) "Saddleback (verb): to submit someone to any kind of humiliating, unreciprocal sex act, either literally or metaphorically, consented to by passive partner due to submissive/masochistic tendencies, desire for approval, or other darker motive.
Not sure I understand the 5 love: 5 is just 'cute' because it religion-bashes and can be combined with one other Savage(tm)Word, but the act does indeed already have a name. plus there are a dozen more humorous, and more likely to be used, names for 5's silly misguided act
6 for the future!
Yeah, 5 is pretty good. Not as good as Santorum though. As much as #5 needs a word, the image of a saddle has no connection to this meaning. And now that Dan Savage has put this competition out there, he's going to be stuck with the task of standing behind it.
But then, it's probably going to grow on me, and soon enough I won't even notice that this term has word 'saddle' in it.
Preservation of a woman's virginity is paramount people, PARAMOUNT....oh, right and so is keeping the virginity of a guy, too.... yea.... that one is truly stressed :)
xo
Rants, Thoughts & Merde
http://rantsthoughtsmerde.blogspot.com/2…
Of course, we used to say "Queer" for ANYTHING at all that was NOT procreative sex, but people didn't like that because then 90% of people would be queer, no? ;)
Hooray for paying attention!
Also, as was brought up in the santorum debate, a healthy person wouldn't want anything fun or loving to be considered saddlebacking. To my mind, that eliminates definitions 1, 3, and 6. I want to adopt whatever definition is ultimately chosen into my vocabulary, but I love and respect my wife too much to saddleback her.
Definition 5 does not describe an action practiced by healthy (or rational) people, so it's fair game. And really funny.
saddleback5
saddleback1
(I really am torn between the two - I like them both! But I agree with Dan's reasoning about #1)
Incidentally, the psychoanalytic term for #4, "reaction formation," could be given a punny twist... I dunno, "Erection falsification?"
'After attending the Purity Ball, Heather and Bill saddlebacked all night because she's saving herself for marriage. Then Heather had to sneak her bedsheets to the laundromat before her mom spotted the santorum.'
As written above it contains an implicit knock on the intelligence of christian teens, and it also obscures the fact that abstinence-only sex ed is happening in public schools and failing teens of all belief systems.
Lots of girls I grew up with, christian and not, were reserving their virginity for one thing or the other (fortunately our sex ed was comprehensive).
and 6 is sure to come up enough to really make him blush.
Those are my votes.
i vote #3. i really like #5 aswell, as a definition and poking fun at the dimwitted christian youths that don't consider anal as sex. however i like it when words are suggestive of their meaning - i think ass-fuckery frottage makes sense in this way, because it's like you're saddling up a cock/dildo with an ass.
1. While it IS the most logical one, it doesn't have enough 'punch' to it, the way 'santorum' does.
2. This inauguration issue will soon fade from the public mind, while stupid teens and hypocritical politicians are here to stay.
3. I wouldn't want to 'saddleback' anyone I loved.
6. See #3
7. Too contrived, and possibly attractive to the people in question.
"The frothy mix of self-loathing and shit-talking that is often the byproduct of being a religious closet case".
Er.
Seriously, though, this is the root of the most destructive homophobia that exists in this country. Whether it is a respected religious leader working to take away rights, or an insecure asshole that beats up a gay person, it warrants more attention.
If Warren is actually gay, maybe he's been maturely delaying gratification of these urges his whole life. I don't think that would make him any less of a hypocrite. He's already shown himself to be a bigot, and a destructive one at that. He should be linked to public hypocrites because he behaves like one, and his anti-gay religious message is helping to create more of them.
The miserable saddlebacker.
But I must also object to your comment on #3 - I'm a woman, and when I fuck men with my strap-on, it's *sex*, not just rubbing off.
christian teens!
the other contender is good, but not enough of an anomaly to come up in conversation very often - why would you mention the guy who wanted the opposite of barebacking? The douchebag who wants to bareback is much more of a conversation-causer.
#1. I'll go with this as the most logical... but I believe you CAN rename a sex act as you see fit. After
all, look at the name churn in America's sports stadiums. Nothing is sacred.
Come to think of it, Monster.com should have spent its money on having a sex act renamed for the company. It
would have sounded less silly than a ball park.
Saddlebacking (as opposed to barebacking) makes more sense. In an ideal world, we wouldn't need to bother with condoms, but unfortunately, it's still a better world than ours where "sex" carries an automatic and implied "with a condom". As a synonym for "barebacking (to save virginity)", it's almost as weak as a synonym for "to procreate" (or, if you prefer, "to procreate (and eradicate virginity)" )
Saddlebacking (as protected anal sex) is enhanced by the whole macho Cowboy image, making the whole thing sound more appealing than the alternative. After all, a nude guy with a saddle still looks like a cowboy, but a named guy ready to ride bareback is just a naked guy. Isn't anything that gets people thinking (and talking) about using condoms a good thing?
As a shorthand for "anal sex (with a condom like every good cowbou shoud do it)" it likely has the legs to carry it into common usage fast enough to make that PILF wonder why he didn't choose another, less suggestive name, like the "Brokeback Congregation".
Now, if anyone has some photos of Mr. Warren in a speedo... (or better still, not in a speedo...)
2)too broad a category, might as well be called "fucking"
3)my info bitch told me this is called hot dogging. It ruined her marriage and contained the humiliating elements of 2)
4) needs to have some reference to it happening in the barn, like "slopping"
6)why would anyone do this? why miss out on the memories you'll enjoy later if you just take it all the way? Doesn't deserve a cool term like this. Reminds me of a t-shirt I saw at coachella: "spitters are quitters."
7) Maybe warren's purpose is to do more pig slopping in the barn.
I vote for 5.



RSS
Comments (456) RSS