Columns

Control Tower

What Happens When Asexuals Want to Get Kinky?

Dear Mistress Matisse,

I'm an asexual who's interested in experimenting with a (nonsexual) BDSM relationship. Can you tell me how to address my particular needs in such an arrangement?

Asexuals seem to have hit something of a tipping point in the sexual-minority community lately, visibility-wise. It's not a completely new thing—I've always known some people who identify as asexual. I admit it has sometimes puzzled me that people who define themselves as not experiencing sexual attraction would choose to socialize in the BDSM community or the poly community. It doesn't bother me—it just seems like a vegan hanging out at a Texas barbecue competition. Surely it must get tiresome to have all these people continually offering you a taste of their brisket?

I presume the odd kinship springs from the fact that some members of the asexual community feel asexuality should be regarded as a distinct sexual orientation. The emerging asexual community clearly has drawn some language and imagery from the queer community, most notably their symbol, a grayed-out (instead of pink) triangle. I'm fine with asexuals getting inspiration from sexual-minority political activism, but I think there's occasionally some confusion about our goals versus their goals. For example, there was a much-remarked-upon blog post recently about how the term "sex positive" is oppressive and insulting to asexuals, because sex is not positive for them. Apparently, people who've previously called themselves such should instead say they are "sex nonjudgmental." Uh, no. If you don't want to have sex, then I support your right to make that choice, but that's not a term I am going to be adopting.

Here's what I can say to the person who wrote to me: In spite of our insistence on viewing sex as a positive thing, nonsexual BDSM is common in the kink community. Especially with a pickup scene that's negotiated and conducted at a kinky social gathering, it is most often assumed that sex will not be part of the program. Still, if it's your first time playing with someone, you should probably specify, "No sex, please." If it's necessary to elaborate, you would say something like "I don't want to do anything sexual, and to me, sex is..." (kissing, being touched here, touching you in these ways, penetration—whatever behaviors you don't wish to engage in).

I cannot advise you about asexuality. But I can advise you as a person who wants to have a relationship, and my advice is: Don't get too bogged down in labels. I've had sex with lots of women who weren't lesbians, and I've spanked plenty of people who weren't kinky. Saying "I'm an asexual" is the beginning of a conversation, but it's not the end of one. It's good to have language for yourself, but what matters more is knowing and communicating what you want to happen when you and your partner are in a room by yourselves. That makes labels unnecessary. recommended

 

Comments (5) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
This is the most sane commentary I've heard from a sexual to an asexual in a long time. (And thank you, Matisse, for telling the aces to stop freaking out about "sex positive" - it's a term by sexuals, for sexuals, and it's not meant to be extended to asexuals.)
Posted by nullandvoid on September 7, 2011 at 1:52 PM · Report
2
i like reading your work
Posted by lizardofoz on September 7, 2011 at 10:03 PM · Report
polygrrl 3
Great column! I've been a fan of your work for a while now, Matisse.

For people looking to find other bdsm play/relationship partners, I've been checking out www.collarme.com. There seem to be some fakes and weirdos, which is probably to be expected, but there are also a lot of really interesting (and some really hot!) people. Most are very specific about what they want, and for some asexual BDSM is just that.
Posted by polygrrl http://www.polygrrl.com on September 8, 2011 at 3:01 PM · Report
4
@1 Actually, sex positive is more of an umbrella term that encompasses all sexuality, even a lack thereof (because in all actuality, asexualism is a sexual orientation, just one that excludes the act of sex.) I do agree though, that people should stop freaking out about as it is a positive thing, not a negative thing. Also, being overly P.C. is ridiculously nitpicky.
Posted by DBG on September 13, 2011 at 4:18 PM · Report
5
Thanks, Mistress Matisse, for coaxing me out of the asexual closet!
You and Dan Savage rock the house! Keep up the good writing.
Posted by auntie grizelda on September 22, 2011 at 9:33 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in Columns