Film

Fantastic Mr. Fox: Wes Anderson Makes a Kids' Movie for Grown-ups

<i>Fantastic Mr. Fox</i>: Wes Anderson Makes a Kids' Movie for Grown-ups

Make no mistake: This is a Wes Anderson film through and through. Voiced by George Clooney with his perfectly pitched mix of matter-of-fact cockiness and oblivious confidence, Mr. Fox is a happily married husband and uncertain father torn between 9-to-5 domesticity and the thrill of raiding the henhouse. "I'm a wild animal," he explains. But it's less primal impulse than personality trait here, like a career criminal who wants to pull off one last big job before retiring. The fresh meat is secondary to the feral rush of thieving forbidden fowl.

Toss in a neurotic son (voiced by Jason Schwartzman) who wears a towel like a superhero cape, a sewer rat (Willem Dafoe) who dances like an extra from West Side Story, a rock-and-roll soundtrack, and dryly funny dialogue woven through with emotional disconnection and self- delusion, and you've got an Anderson storybook. In other words, a kids' movie for grown-ups.

Stop-motion animation proves to be a perfect fit with Anderson's sensibility. A filmmaker of tableau imagery packed with defining detail and quirky humor, he's the Joseph Cornell of American cinema, creating colorful cinematic boxes around stories of dysfunctional families, absent fathers, and characters lost in ambition and obsession and the need for affirmation and parental approval.

The combination of elaborately designed sets and minimalist animation looks downright quaint next to the expressiveness of Henry Selick or the Aardman folks, but it evokes storybook illustrations by way of 1950s-era puppet animation. Anderson's animal dolls could have stepped right out of museum dioramas and into their vintage-store wardrobes, and the mix of stillness and sudden action (from discreetly ruffled fur to a sudden acrobatic leap) is an animated analogue to the deadpan performances of his human casts.

Fantastic Mr. Fox is Anderson's most satisfying film since Rushmore, his funniest and his warmest. And it's the second movie this year more keyed to the child within adults than to children themselves. Whether kids will relate to Anderson's anxiety-ridden world is a fair question (I like to think they will), but even if they don't, his storybook-illustration images and elaborate cartoon-panel detail are a playtime delight in themselves. recommended

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (9) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
no mention of the excellent children's book it's based off of??
Posted by carlyallisa on November 25, 2009 at 11:37 PM · Report
2
And no mention of the obvious homage to the master of stop-motion movies, Czech animator Jan Svankmajer?
Posted by meso on November 26, 2009 at 9:58 AM · Report
3
Is there actually an homage to Jan in this film?
If so that's amazing!
Posted by funkathrusta on November 26, 2009 at 12:39 PM · Report
4
That poor animation in so much of the trailer is a stylistic choice? Really? If you say so...
Posted by Knat on November 29, 2009 at 10:58 PM · Report
5
Wes Anderson is doing furry porn now? I guess he caught the kitsunetsuki and is bringing it to the mainstream.
Posted by Reg on November 30, 2009 at 9:40 AM · Report
6
Kids' Movie for Grown-ups.

WHY NOT HAVE GOOD MOVIES TO SHOW YOUR KIDS WHILE ENJOYING IT YOURSELF?

THAT'S A GOOD FAMILY FILM, IF YOU ASK ME.
Posted by whiteshroud on November 30, 2009 at 11:21 AM · Report
Lindy West 7
@1: We had to cut the review down for space, but before the chop, Sean Axmaker did note that this movie is based on "Roald Dahl's children's book about a wily fox who robs local farmers and brings their wrath down upon the local critter community."

Hope that helps!
Posted by Lindy West on November 30, 2009 at 2:51 PM · Report
8
Oh, you cut out that information? What a genius choice! It made Sean look like a dope and pissed off the readers! Great editing!

This movie looks fugly, by the way.
Posted by Blarg on December 1, 2009 at 7:22 PM · Report
9
The movie was well written, executed perfectly and full of the wit Anderson is renowned for. Cleverly done through the painstaking process of the stop motion, I came away from the film sense of fulfillment. Even while focusing on much of the production quality, the writing bears no sacrifice.
Posted by mbrandtt on December 1, 2009 at 11:14 PM · Report

Add a comment