Queer Issue 2012

Lecherous Marriage

What It's Like Being Hit On by a Married Man—and Then Being Hit On by His Wife When He Leaves the Room

+ Enlarge this Image

Queer Issue 2012

I knew a couple once. I would label them "straight," but "twisted" seems more accurate. For vagueness' sake, let's call them Donna and Steve. I was introduced through an ex-boyfriend at a party, chatted them both up and enjoyed their company, and had four or five dinners or drinks with them. It wasn't initially all that out of the ordinary—relatively good-looking and seemingly well-adjusted straight couple invites me over to a remodeled Craftsman with a fridge full of Kirkland Signature Merlot and a labradoodle puppy that pees in a yard lined with tiki torches. Another liberal married duo tacking a gay friend on for their social portfolio. But somewhere after the second dinner, when I was actually left alone with them, things took a turn for the uncomfortable.

We were about three gin and tonics and one interminable live Dave Matthews album in one night after a dinner party, when I noticed that I was the only person left. Through the fog of wine—we'd also been drinking wine—I realized that both Steve and Donna were on either side of me, eyeing my face like starved orphans peering into a candy store. Steve grasped my neck with one calloused hand and asked me what moisturizer I used, because you could hardly see my pores. This new level of physicality would have had titillating "husband goes gay" potential had Donna not leaned in to confirm the smallness of my pores and touched my leg just south of my groin. This immediately removed the homoerotic hubby vibe and replaced it with a sense of grossed-out dread.

After a childhood spent in the closet, I am rarely mistaken when it comes to sexual vibes. I spent 12 years tweaking the radar into something you might find in a nuclear submarine. But the weird thing about this married couple was that they each seemed to be attempting to come on to me individually, hoping their spouse wouldn't notice them eye-fucking me under the guise of skin-regimen scrutiny. In the confusion, I knocked my drink over, told them I was late for a party, and spent an hour in my car sobering up and trying to get James Blunt out of my eardrums.

Because I thought I might have misjudged two huggers for two swingers—and because it was difficult to turn down free food as a hungry twentysomething—I returned several times to the scene of discomfort for more wine, Rachael Ray casseroles, and discreet groping from both Ozzie and Harriet. The come-ons only got worse, and were performed when one or the other spouse would stumble off to the bathroom or to find another Malcolm Gladwell book to lend me. Steve would nuzzle my neck, bleary-eyed, and tell me how great I smelled, while his fingers made brief trips from my knee to my fly, hovering and then retreating like a cock-teasing hummingbird. Donna would start crying as if on cue when Steve left the room, and confess that they hadn't had sex in months, then proceed like booze-stained clockwork to tell me how "in need" she was for a man's touch—even a gay man's, apparently, according to how often her boobs found my sweaty palms. Sexless beggars can't be choosers, but I wondered at the irony of a woman married to a potentially gay man coming on to yet another gay man. Donna was the saddest type of masochist—the one whose masochism doesn't even get her laid in the end.

Their relationship was sort of funny but mostly grotesque in the light of these overt signals—it made me want to throw up each time I endured one or the other's palpable sadness and their explosions of whispery, desperate grabbiness. As a minor narcissist and a writer, however, I admit to staying around too long just to see how far they would go and how sad it would get. And like most things, it got too sad and went too far, and I stopped seeing them after discreetly rebuckling my belt 10 times in one evening.

But it was more than just curiosity about Steve's sexuality or whatever Donna's deal was. I kept coming back because I was filled with an angry sort of fascination with the two of them. Here were people who were living a lie and putting the burden of their unhappy marriage on a man who wouldn't be able to marry a person he loved if he wanted to—not that I'd thought much about it at 21, but I could feel inside my burgeoning adulthood an inkling that someday I might indeed want to step out of the slut parade and into a tuxedo. But I couldn't. Not legally. And these two could and did, and for what, exactly? To reenact an Edward Albee play with Tony Kushner undertones?

The sheer insensitivity of it alone was worth fuming over. Donna and Steve enjoyed the grand old tradition of marriage based on a coupledom that was doomed even before Steve buried his last copy of Butt magazine and got on one knee—this time to propose, not to blow someone. Their marriage's very right to exist was by all moral logic utter bullshit, and they were so physically desperate for outside affection that they didn't see how insensitive it was to put a gay man in the middle of their household dramatics, plying me with disappointingly suburban weed and throwing their sexual frustrations on my shoulders as if I didn't have enough of my own up there. Like two teens having an "accident" in the back of a Honda and becoming "parents," the convenience of marriage even for people who don't want it that badly is maddening for someone who actually wants it but is prohibited. This union, dead on arrival, granted Donna and Steve tax exemptions, a clear-cut recipient of a will, and all the other protections that would have been denied me if I wanted to spend my life with someone and be 10 million times happier than two wallowing bohemians with one mortgage and two mutually exclusive sex drives.

On the final night that I endured Donna and Steve, after pulling Steve's hand from my back pocket and disentangling Donna's tongue from my earlobe, I begged off and escaped out onto their front lawn. I heard a bark and turned to see their labradoodle on the front steps with a look that said, "For the love of God, take me with you." Out of all the players in that domestic farce, the dog was like the audience member who never got an intermission.

I spied Donna, sullenly wiping her lipstick off in their bedroom, and Steve, visible in the kitchen, staring out the back window and into the evening. To the strains of Frampton Comes Alive wafting out an open window, I walked in the direction of the nearest gay bar and left two very unhappy people to their legally sanctioned misery. recommended

 

Comments (12) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Why didn't you simply have a threesome with them?
As a gay writer, you could've had a field day describing it.
The rambling about marriage was fine and dandy, but to titillate with the weird moves they put on you only to wind up talking about being sad you can't marry legally was a disappointment. Both angles would have been interesting. Would Steve break out of his closet and fight to be able to marry his new boyfriend? Would Donna realize gay porn is what floats her boat?
And so forth.
Posted by aeros66 on June 20, 2012 at 11:24 AM · Report
2
As a person who has been drawn into a similar situation in the past, this is wonderfully written.
Posted by Subpar Weed on June 20, 2012 at 12:20 PM · Report
Texas10R 3
One of my best adventures was what turned out to be an occasional interlude with my wife-to-be and a guy who was her co-worker. He was really cool and liked both sexes just fine. No problem. Life is too short to deny yourself the opportunity if it presents itself in an appealing way (and if the health & safety issues are in check).
Posted by Texas10R on June 20, 2012 at 4:25 PM · Report
4
I too think a threesome was the only logical way for all the weirdness and sadness to end.
Posted by the_spiral on June 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM · Report
5
It's strange everyone above thinks the ideal solution is to "have a threesome." Such comments miss the point: human sexuality is a delicate thing made all the more complex the by fiction of normalcy. The real question here is how, dear god how, did you not take the dog with you? For shame.
Posted by ianmikerob on June 20, 2012 at 9:07 PM · Report
6
Thank you for NOT having a threesome; that would have been too Merrick for words.
Posted by vennominon on June 20, 2012 at 10:15 PM · Report
7
This story doesn't ring true. No sane person returns time after time to share meals and get propositioned by people they despise on every level. I suspect the author is exaggerating to make a more compelling narative, and was more welcoming of all that attention than he lets on, then changed his tune later.

Sir, I call bullshit!
Posted by ohthetrees on June 21, 2012 at 7:47 AM · Report
Sandiai 8
Aaaah! Love this:
"I stopped seeing them after discreetly rebuckling my belt 10 times in one evening."

This article is great. And I too am happy (and relieved even) that you did not have that threesome.
Posted by Sandiai on June 22, 2012 at 11:30 PM · Report
Sandiai 9
Yeah, @2. I can totally see how a young poor person would hang around an annoying- but not dangerous- couple for a few weeks too long just for wine and weed and good food.
Posted by Sandiai on June 22, 2012 at 11:37 PM · Report
10
You should write that play.
Posted by because I would watch the shit out of that on June 23, 2012 at 3:22 AM · Report
11
It might be possible he didn't detest them until he actually thought about it later. It's hard to detest friend. It takes effort and introspection.
Posted by R2R0 on June 23, 2012 at 4:51 AM · Report
12
God damn, they just wanted a threeway! Fuck em' or help them find a bi-guy to bang for Christ's sake. Don't be such an emo little bitch about it! They fucking fed you!
Posted by Bloated Jesus is Bloated on June 25, 2012 at 4:29 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in Pullout