Food & Drink

Shanik Is Not Vij's

Will This Matter to Your Mouth?

Shanik Is Not Vij's

Kelly O

NOW IN SOUTH LAKE UNION A sister to Vij’s, including the world-famous lamb popsicles.

Last spring, Seattle food nerds completely freaked out. The news: Vij's in Vancouver, BC—the revered upscale Indian restaurant, home of the mind-melting lamb popsicles (not actually frozen)—was going to open a restaurant in South Lake Union. One Stranger online commenter summarized the near-hysteria: "OMG! OMG! The best restaurant in the universe is coming to Seattle!"

Maybe—just maybe—some initial letdown was inevitable. When Shanik opened at the beginning of December, disappointment was rampant. The room was different, more corporate than Vij's. The waits were not as long as Vij's, but still definitely too long (neither take reservations). The sauces were not as rich as Vij's. The portions were small—maybe not smaller than Vij's, but... The prices were as high as Vij's. And there was no Vij (who, at Vij's, famously circles the room greeting everyone). Shanik was not as good as Vij's, and there was gnashing of teeth throughout the land.

Shanik's beginning was about as bumpy as it could get. Not only were there last-minute issues with vital equipment like the fridges, but, disastrously, some of the kitchen staff quit just before the scheduled opening. While Vikram Vij has been the name and the face of the operation, co-owner Meeru Dhalwala has been the guiding force behind the food, and Shanik is her solo project. She makes a practice of hiring all women who are home cooks, and three members of her new Seattle team realized that their commute from south of Seattle was too arduous. Then a resolutely cheerful-sounding tweet from Dhalwala on December 25 said she was seeking day cooks, line cooks, and a head chef (merry Christmas). There were setbacks.

I've never eaten at Vij's. I realize this is an unconscionable personal and professional deficit, but for one reason or another, it's just never happened. How could I possibly review Shanik? I was glad to give the place a while to sort itself out. When I finally went recently, it was at the behest of my friend Annie, who is one of those Vij's superfans. She's waited for an hour in the freezing Canadian cold for Vij's to open, so as to not have to wait even longer later. She'd heard the initial reports about Shanik, and she'd been biding her time, and she still had hope.

And so we went to Shanik. The room, Annie confirmed, is not the same as Vij's. (But then, even Vij's is not the same as Vij's; it started out with just 14 seats before it changed Vancouver locations, don't you know.) Shanik is in the ground floor of one of the shiny new windowed blocks of South Lake Union, and if the decor has the corporate feeling that this implies, it is also elegant, with a couple shimmery-gold pillars and an understated accent of a paisley-like pattern. It is comfortable, with upholstered banquettes, and when it is full, the noise level is indicative of a good time without making you have to shout.

But then here was a thing that was like Vij's: They brought us complimentary cups of chai, smooth and thick, tasting of anise and raisins, and when we finished them quickly (it was a cold night out there), they offered us more. And they brought us each a complimentary pakora—hot and crisp and tender and spicy, two of them freshly made for us, instead of a herd of them cooling on a tray.

Then we ordered more food than god, and it was good. We ate the sautéed onions and tomatoes on layers of paneer ($13). The paneer cheese was firm, almost bouncy, and thinly sliced; its lack of salt was the right foil for the stewy onions and chunks of tomatoes, which tasted eerily, richly meaty. It all had just a bit of slowly building, mouth-coating spicy heat. We also ate the saag paneer with Punjabi daal and chapati ($24). The spinach of the saag was highly pureed, and it had no cloying creaminess or oiliness; it had almost a citrusy brightness, and it was garlic-rich and made the mouth tingle. It was like food for a very adventurous baby. Annie especially liked the daal, made in a soupy style, with a mix of lentils and kidney beans that were whole instead of blended. It was comforting but with nuanced spice, tasting both good and good for you.

The naan at Shanik is not tandoor-cooked, so it lacks the light, puffy joy of the best of its kind, but Vij's doesn't use a tandoor either (so there). We liked the chapati better: It had the nutty flavor of legume flour as well as whole wheat, and an almost al dente firmness to its middle, with a good exterior grease factor.

We ate the spicy Indian crepe (or pura) with bacon, onion, and tomatoes ($12); the crepe, with its chickpea flour, was delicate in texture and lacy-browned, yet not greasy; the topping was like an Indian-spiced breakfast hash, the smoky taste a vivid complement to the earthy crepe. With it was a little salad of nearly raw beets, for color and crunch.

We ate the demerara-sugar-and-tamarind-marinated beef tenderloin with blackened cumin curry ($25), which was a big,inch-thick slab of grill-marked meat resting in a toasty, piney-tasting curry—it was a little sweet and a little sour, and assertive with a taste that nudged right up to almost acrid. The meat was tender, though it did have a bit of gnarly connective tissue (which, at these prices, you'd very much hope would be trimmed). The sauce had barley in it, and we asked for extra spoons; they should always give you spoons here.

And we ate the lamb popsicles with split-pea-and-spinach mash and coconut curry ($27). There is a geek-out treasure trove of information about the lamb popsicles to be found online, both concerning the original recipe at Vij's and the somewhat different treatment at Shanik; eating the Shanik ones, the memory of the others was pushed out of Annie's mind enough that she was able to just be happy, for they are marvelous. "Popsicle" refers to the long-stemmed, lollipop-style cut, and they are fully spice-encrusted (coriander, sumac, turmeric, and more), and so tender, and so smoky... Their saffron-colored curry was creamy, piquant, glorious; the mash of vegetables almost submerged in the sauce was salty but nuanced, itself surprisingly great.

There were a ton of leftovers, the kind that get even better overnight. We went on a Monday, and we didn't have to wait at all. When I went back on a Thursday (and ate a lot more—the samosas and their trio of chutneys were outstanding, and so was a portobello mushroom green curry), the restaurant was full, but still, no wait. This will change as people realize Shanik is finding its footing, but the wait will probably never be as bad as at Vij's (and there's a lounge for a drink, or there's always Monday, or weekday lunch). The service is team-style, but generally smooth; when you want that spoon, someone will be there before you know it. Is it too expensive? The portions are medium to large, with three dishes probably enough for two people—and everything's made with high-quality local and seasonal ingredients (unlike at your neighborhood Indian place, and just like at Vij's). The rice alone—delicate, dainty, cloudlike grains with a basmati scent so restrained, it's like a whisper—is just fantastic.

So, now, is Shanik as good as Vij's? Or is it just the most refined, well-sourced, and delicious Indian food in Seattle? Which is a better question? recommended

Agree with this review? Disagree?
Write your own damn review.
 

Comments (16) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I have been to both and thought Shanik was amazing. Not quite the same "hole in the wall" feel that Vij's has, but a feel all it's own. And while the lamb popsicles were the clear highlight at Vij's, they were just one of many amazing dishes at Shanik. Dare I say it's better? Let the hailstorm begin...
Posted by emost on March 6, 2013 at 10:47 AM · Report
Max Solomon 2
I don't remember Vij's well enough to say better or worse than Shanik (I typically go to Rangoli because you can get a seat). I just know I was underwhelmed, which is typical when I have too many items ("bites"). And the location, in the middle of Amazontown, isn't that much fun.

I'm going back next month so we'll see.

PS - there's a private room you can reserve.
Posted by Max Solomon on March 6, 2013 at 1:49 PM · Report
Porcupine 3
I went to Shanik a few weeks ago and it was a big disappointment. Very weird vibe and service and the food itself is a huge letdown. Had the Brussels sprouts (textures and flavors just thrown on the plate without rhyme or reason, sprouts overcooked and mushy), beef tenderloin (cooked well but one-dimensional flavor, sauce very thin) and chicken (too charred on the outside, again one-dimensional and with a thin, watery sauce.) Even the naan was not great: doughy, flat and without char marks, really seemed more like chapati cooked on a skillet (makes sense after reading Bethany's explanation but WTF they call it naan?)

It could have been one night off but reading reviews online doesn’t seem like my experience is that uncommon.

Posted by Porcupine on March 6, 2013 at 2:00 PM · Report
Porcupine 4
And to contrast the experience to another modern twist on ethnic food, last week I visited the relaunched Joule. In-your-face and surprising flavors and textures, unusual ingredient combinations, well priced considering portion size and a casual and professional service. It felt like a well oiled creative machine which is what Shanik should be, but currently is miles away from.
Posted by Porcupine on March 6, 2013 at 2:10 PM · Report
5
I went to Vij's once and was disappointed. Not by the food, though -- by the time we'd waited for two hours in near-fainting hunger, we were so exhausted and famished and overwhelmed by the crowd and noise that we just couldn't enjoy ourselves. I'm sure the food was good, but but we just couldn't tell any more.

On the other hand, Vij's cookbook is excellent.
Posted by Big Adventure Steve on March 6, 2013 at 2:14 PM · Report
Fnarf 6
No, Bethany, I'm too poor these days to eat out. My big restaurant adventures now mostly involve hot dogs from the gas station.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on March 6, 2013 at 2:21 PM · Report
biffp 7
They have a lunch pickup window. It's great to try it on the cheap.
Posted by biffp on March 6, 2013 at 2:49 PM · Report
8
I think popular places refuse to take reservations just to create buzz, but I for one refuse to fall for it.

No place - not Shanik, not Walrus & Carpenter, no place - is so good that they should demand that their customers stand in the cold wet Seattle weather waiting for the honor of giving them business.

If a restaurant so popular that they regularly have a waiting list for a table, they should offer reservations.

If I'm going to 'put my name on a list and check back in an hour' I'll end up 'waiting' at another bar or restaurant around the corner and having dinner there - which is what happened when I tried to eat at Walrus & Carpenter at 6pm and told they might have a spot for me around 10pm. By then I'd finished a fabulous meal at another Ballard restaurant instead of waiting cold, wet and hungry for the 'privilege' of saying I'd eaten at a place that clearly takes its customers for granted.
Posted by SuperSteve on March 6, 2013 at 3:21 PM · Report
9
Apologies if I've missed this (I did a quick look, but not a research-project-look) but I would really love it if Bethany would cover SuperSteve's issue stated above. Why DO restaurants do that, aside from (likely) creating a buzz or (less likely) the joy of torturing customers? Does it cut down on their infrastructure/process costs somehow? How much does a reservation book cost, after all? Are there good and bad ways to take reservations? (Answer: YES. I hate calling a voicemail and then waiting hours, hoping I got the table).

I know it's not as fun as writing about food, but I would love to see you take your pen to this as it something this hungry Cornball has always wondered when waiting in line at Walrus for two hours...and vowing never to go back. But going back. Wait...is THAT why they do it? Thank you.
Posted by Massive Attack on March 6, 2013 at 5:25 PM · Report
undead ayn rand 10
I went there on the first day, never been to Vij's. I did note the lighter sauces mentioned by others, but I enjoyed myself.

FWIW, I don't have a problem with places that don't take reservations, I just go wherever right when they open.
Posted by undead ayn rand on March 6, 2013 at 9:54 PM · Report
stinky 11
I've never waited more than 25 minutes in the line-up before opening at Vij's. (Have cut it too close a few times and ended up at West around the corner, not the worst consolation prize.) I think if you are there by 5:05 you are all but guaranteed to get in for the first seating.

I'd like to see some gas station hot dog reviews here.
Posted by stinky on March 7, 2013 at 6:37 AM · Report
12
I could not understand the hype over Shanik. My dish was floating in a giant pool of oil, the samosa was nothing to write home about, and the saag paneer was also nothing special. Our complimentary appetizer was so spicy my mouth was numb for several minutes. I had much nicer food at Rangoli (next door to Vij's) in Vancouver.
Posted by Flyingserval on March 7, 2013 at 12:47 PM · Report
13
Tired of the 'freezing Canadian winter' comments. As a regular traveller b/w the 2 cities I find the weather pretty much the same. Dined numerous time at Vij's, always great food. Looking forward to going to Shanik, suggest diners forgo the comparisons and just enjoy what they have to offer. They don't take reservations for a very good reason, if you don't want to wait then go early.
Posted by Burp on March 7, 2013 at 11:28 PM · Report
tim koch 14
we make great palack paneer at home now and then we get these indian sauce things and throw them in the pressure cooker with some chicken and then make rice. we usually have to go buy the naan separate though. we get that at the restaurant that we get our paneer cheese at downtown.
Posted by tim koch on March 10, 2013 at 7:12 PM · Report
15
Not taking reservations allows the place to fit more people in during the evening. When you have reservations, there will always be spaces of time when tables are not being used. No reservations means tables are used as soon as they are ready.

I am very happy that the no reservations system is becoming more popular among good restaurants (Walrus, Whale Wins, Canon, Cantinetta, Shanik, Vij's). My favorite restaurant in DC is a little hole in the wall that serves Ramen, Toki Underground. I was only in town for a limited time and never would have been able to get in if I had to book a reservation a great deal in advance. (They also had the brilliantly good sense to take your # and text you when your table was about to be ready.) 'No reservations' lowers the restaurant's cost, so that they can ostensibly pass the value on to the customer. It's basically a way for them to serve the same amount of tables in one night as they could if they operated in a bigger more expensive space. This rewards those who really want to go, versus those say they want to go, but are in reality offended that someone might ask that they wait their turn.

I have not yet been to Shanik, but am greatly looking forward to it, as I've been to Vij's a half dozen times. (Can anyone honestly say they've only been there once? Not if they've had the lamb popsicles.) I really admire Vikram Vij sticking to his guns on this. *Everyone* waits. John Legend was turned down one night when we were up there. Allegedly (according to Vikram Vij) Obama and the king of Saudi Arabia have both been told they would have to wait.

Go early. Put your name on the list. Go grab a drink somewhere else. Come back and enjoy some chai or drinks and apps while waiting a last little bit. OR, don't go. I don't care. That'll make it less of a wait for me.
More...
Posted by dandan on March 11, 2013 at 5:59 PM · Report
16
My boyfriend and I went over the weekend, and it was underwhelming. I'm actually really sad to say it, because an Indian restaurant in the States that uses fresh ingredients and doesn't overload the dishes with grease and salt is a rare prize indeed, but Shanik's faults are too serious to ignore.

First, it's bad enough for Indian restaurants to serve meat but beef? How do they manage to recruit Indian cooks? Are they all Christian?

Second, the food was bland. Ridiculously bland. It's not just that there wasn't any heat, the spices were so subtle as to be unnoticeable. The strongest spiced item I had that night was the chai, and even that was relatively bland.

Third, the price point combined with the tiny portions and the bland food was really just too much.

My best guess for why Shanik gets above average reviews is that Seattlites really don't know good Indian food, not that that should surprise anyone.
Posted by keshmeshi on March 11, 2013 at 6:36 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in Food & Drink