Film

Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows: The Plot (and Wit) Thickens in a Superior Sequel

Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows: The Plot (and Wit) Thickens in a Superior Sequel

The last Sherlock Holmes movie thoroughly underwhelmed me. It was basically a steampunk-tinged superhero movie with Robert Downey Jr. as the star and Rachel McAdams as the Catwomanesque love interest, complete with the dumb climactic battle with a sneering villain over a MacGuffin that ends with the bad guy falling from a great height. Of course, Sherlock Holmes quickly became a holiday blockbuster, with critics and audiences alike praising the movie for its bickering banter between Holmes and Jude Law’s Watson, and for its fresh take on Holmes as a manic, druggy genius at detection and hand-to-hand combat. So perhaps it’s bad news for everyone else that I consider Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows to be a great improvement on the original.

Part of the enjoyment here comes from the superhero rule of sequels: Without having to waste time on exposition establishing the hero and his supporting cast, the second movie in any superhero series is sure to be better than the first. We already know that Holmes and Watson fight like an old married couple and that Holmes hates the fact that Watson is about to marry, so we can just dive into Downey and Law making hurt eyes at each other while desperately trying to maintain their Victorian-era dignity behind a thick veil of wit. And we’ve already been introduced to the idea of Moriarty, Holmes’s criminal counterpart (an excellent Jared Harris, all barely concealed rage and derision), so we can launch into the plot without much ado.

Shadows runs the detective and Watson all around Europe, partnering with a Gypsy (Noomi Rapace, sadly unremarkable after her star turn in the Swedish Girl with the Dragon Tattoo series) whose brother was kidnapped, and uncovering a massive conspiracy. It’s not gunning for the balls-to-the-wall fun that the previous entry attempted; we get more serious moments, and the stakes are raised considerably, which may disappoint fans who appreciated the slightness of the original. While Shadows slackens a couple of times too many, and even though the recent BBC modern-day-set Sherlock revamp makes this Holmes look a little silly in comparison, the game between Holmes and Moriarty is always compelling. Even if the audience isn’t given the necessary information to be able to solve the mysteries along with Sherlock—he’s that kind of movie genius who makes tremendous leaps of logic simply because the script calls for him to do so—there’s much to be said for a movie hero whose superpower is a great sense of observation. recommended

 

Comments (4) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Oh no! Paul, I was all ready to miss this one and now you wrote a decent review for it! Damn you and your usually dead-on reviewing. I've found that in most things if you liked it, I should give it a chance, so at some point I'm going to have to give this one a whirl. Thanks!
Posted by DevoutAtheist on December 20, 2011 at 12:41 PM · Report
Camembert 2
Guy Ritchie is a dreadful, dreadful director and I found the first film to be quite mediocre but he surprised me with his characterisation. I think Downey Jr & especially Jude Law are spot on as Holmes and Watson and I don't see how Holmes as a manic, druggy genius at detection and hand-to-hand combat is a fresh take on the Holmes of Conan Doyle's books.

It's definitely a fresh take if you consider Basil Rathbone or Jeremy Brett as the definitive Holmes but their portrayals were much different to the Holmes I've read and re-read.

And don't get me started on the BBC version with Holmes as an earnest sociopath.
Posted by Camembert on December 20, 2011 at 5:15 PM · Report
Cato the Younger Younger 3
Of the new variations of Holmes the only character that has been worth watching is the new Moriaty on the new BBC series. Andrew Scott ROCKS that role. This American version and the remainder of the new BBC version suck.
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on December 21, 2011 at 3:33 AM · Report
4
I enjoyed the first one for what it was, a fun enjoyable film that I enjoyed with my daughter, and it sounds like were going to enjoy this one even more. ah, the joys of being the father of a 19 year old! Thanks for the review and I look forward to seeing this when I return to the States.
Posted by SeMe on December 21, 2011 at 8:40 AM · Report

Add a comment