Film

Tetro: Francis Ford Coppola's Great Big Hands

Tetro: Francis Ford Coppola's Great Big Hands

I believe Francis Ford Coppola's talents are best expressed when working on the social, the continental, the historical, rather than the personal. Apocalypse Now, the first two films in the Godfather sequence, The Cotton Club—these films, which are not about individuals but large movements of time and people, reveal a directorial power that can grasp the big picture, the Whitmanian "all" that determines the shapes and substance of singular experiences. Only big hands can grasp the large events of life. These big hands are useless when it comes to the situation we find in Tetro, which is a very, very personal film. The big fingers on the big hands pick up the little characters and accidentally squash them like peas. Coppola is a sad giant.

Tetro is about two brothers—the eldest of which is played by Vincent Gallo—and their oppressive but dying father, a famous conductor. The elder brother lives in Buenos Aires. He is a failed writer who has survived a terrible childhood and a complete mental breakdown. The movie begins when his younger brother (Alden Ehrenreich) pays him a surprise visit. The younger brother works on a cruise ship, has run away from his father, and wants to become a writer (not of novels but plays). The plot not only reveals a dark (but predictably Freudian) family secret but also the director's ideas about art—where it comes from, what it desires, how its desires are cruel. (Coppola has a very weak concept about the meaning and function of art.) The film's ending is bizarre, and one leaves the theater feeling that Coppola must stay away from subjects that involve a small circle of people. The more, the better. In his oeuvre, this film should be filed with Rumble Fish. recommended

 

Comments (7) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I really liked Tetro And Rumble Fish. Both films were shoot so wonderful.
Posted by sam welend on June 17, 2009 at 12:48 PM · Report
SF in SF 2
Rumblefish is a pretty good movie, Charles. And are you forgetting the The Conversation? One of his best, and most intimate.
Posted by SF in SF on June 18, 2009 at 9:11 AM · Report
3
Jesus, this film review should be filed in the circular bin. Blah, blah, blah.
Posted by Gene Fucking Siskel You Ain't on June 18, 2009 at 3:37 PM · Report
4
This is a Rusty James review. A Motorcycle Boy type could do much better. When does he get back?
Posted by nicky on June 18, 2009 at 7:32 PM · Report
Wac6 5
Couple comments: (1) Why are some of the commentators so hostile? Charles review is tough on the movie, but civil, and he makes an interesting argument about FFC's skills not matching the scale of the story. (2) I disagree with Charles' assessment. I thought the movie was fantastic, with an old fashioned sensibility of how to place and transition us. It earned the surrealism it served. It reminded me of something Orson Welles might have made. Totally a cinematic experience. Good for him for not Hollywooding it up. The "Alone" character could have been from Fellini.
Posted by Wac6 http://www.wac6arts.com on June 22, 2009 at 12:23 PM · Report
6 Comment Pulled (Spam) Comment Policy
7
1. A movie review cannot adequately address a film like Tetro in two paragraphs.

2. Where is Mudede's hyper-evolved concept of art? Give me a break, this movie went over his head. At least he managed to reference Literature!

3. A small mind cannot grasp such big concepts. This film is the best struggle to redefine one's art I've seen.
Posted by El Oso Roñoso on October 28, 2009 at 7:36 PM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in Film

  • The Spazz Age Baz Luhrmann Glitter-Bombs Fitzgerald in the Explosively Entertaining Gatsby