Tools
The trailer for The Blind Side went around the internets the other month as a hee-larious meme. Remember? Was it for real, we wondered? Surely it was joking. Surely some WASPy bitch didn't just say to Sandy Bullock, "Honey, you're changing that boy's life!" and then double-surely Sandy B. didn't just whisper all misty-in-the-eyeballs, "No. He's changing mine." Who wrote that? The Original Kings of Comedy? The court jester? Of Chuckletown? The court jester in the throne room, standing before the Original Kings of Comedy, lord regents of Chuckletown, capital city of Laffsylvania, world's leading manufacturer of shoulder pads, double-breasted yellow suits, military defoliant, and the patented Steve Harvey Mustache Fluffer™!? Nope. A real-life screenwriter wrote it. On real-life purpose. To mimic real-life human speech and emotions. REALLY.
That magical quote serves as a handy distillation of this entire movie—a based-on-a-true-story story about Michael Oher, a very large and very homeless black teenager who is plucked from the streets of Memphis and adopted by some very white and very pleased with themselves white people, led by a raving lunatic named Mrs. Benevolent White Lady (the aforementioned Sandy B.), who is either a creepy fanatical football booster for Ole Miss or is achieving the impossible (apparently): learning to love a very large and scary black person.
Stranger Personals
The thing is, this actually happened. (Interesting! So make a fucking documentary, dickbuckets!) Michael Oher is a real person and so is Mrs. Benevolent White Lady, but their on-screen dramatic representations are about as far from real people as you can get without being, like, a fern. And the racial stereotypes (oooh! Dark, roiling nest of inner-city drug dealers!) are as nasty and dated and unconsidered as anything since white people first discovered black people. But instead of making a movie in which real humans do believable things—you don't always have to redecorate the facts to make them fascinating—The Blind Side, unsurprisingly, takes the nonsensical, manipulative emotional boilerplate route. Huzzah.
Michael stares, bewildered and bitter, at a Norman Rockwell book.
Michael has to hear Sandy B. say the words "$10,000 couch." Michael is
easily distracted by balloons. Michael doesn't understand the rules of
football unless the white lady reframes them as a condescending family
metaphor (before every game!). Michael has to put his face real close
to Tim McGraw's hairpiece. Also included: a precocious child, many
mentions of "the Christian thing to do," near-constant having of each
other's backs, Tim McGraw giving a soulful reading of The Charge of
the Light Brigade, and a Ferdinand the bull analogy so unchewable
it's like a mouthful of sawdust and crayons and ham rinds. Frequently,
Mrs. BWL will say a sassy thing, and then later in the movie, Michael
will say it back to her, only slower
(slowness = meaningfulness).
At the very end, out of nowhere, Sandy B. says TO HER ADOPTED SON, "If
you get a girl pregnant out of wedlock... I will cut your penis off."
It's the Christian thing to do. What. The fuck. ![]()
anti-superwhitewomanhood.
Commenters: Write a better review for this shit sandwich of a movie. Especially "Blacks are not amused..." give me a fucking break.
11
You forgot sexy teen vampires and Indian werewolves.
I give this review a C+, with minus points for failing at comedy. Good job though of illustrating how the aura of dubiously intentioned and paternalistic charity surrounding the Tuohy's is sickening enough to discredit the movie.
As far as the drug and gang activity in Memphis being an obvious stereotype--sure it is. But if you've been to that part of Memphis, as I have on several occasions, you know it's actually pretty accurate. You don't even need to go there to see it, though...you can watch The First 48 on A&E and it won't be long before you see Memphis homicide in that part of town conducting a murder investigation. They do it pretty much every day.
Actually, he got a weird break even before the white people realized he was worth millions of dollars as a protector of the blind side - some white religious people, as a result of some very odd coincidences, enrolled him in their religious high school before the realized how totally and literally uneducated he was.
After reading blog discussions of how obviously stupid this movie was going to be, I was still drawn to the book because I was fascinated by the story when I found out it was based on real life events.
After reading the book, I really got the feeling the white family that helped him became genuinely interested and attached to him as a person. These kinds of relationships, going many different directions, aren't wholly uncommon. They are meaningful and teach us a lot about being a human being, but do very little to address wider stereotypes and structural racism.
I recommend reading the book by Michael Lewis. I will not be seeing the film.
Between this movie and Precious, a lot of black people are going to be shouldering a new rash of weird projected stereotypes...
25
28
you're not helping. seriously.
@8 re: the book
the film looks like a poor adaptation of the book. the true life people involved in this story are conflicted between their selfish desire of putting together a winning football team and taking advantage of homeless disenfranchised youth.
no, its not racist. big mike really was black. and his mom was really a crack whore. and he was really adopted by white people. and these said white people openly adopted him because he was worth lots of money to football.
admit you have a prejudice view of the world and read the fucking book.
When I saw the trailer it made me sad, because the movie should be about the kid. But the trailer made it seems like it was about the mom.
The mom is an important character in the book. But she is not the main character. Michael Oher is. Sad to see that get lost.
What an amazing life he has had so far. What an amazing story about the possibility a person growing and flourishing with the right kind of help.
In any event, the adoptive parents were already very rich. I don't think they particularly needed whatever money Michael Oher will make in the NFL. It is true that they had the ties to Ole Miss. But I can't imagine anyone would have gone to that much trouble on behalf of this kid just to get him to play football at their college. It's bigger than that.
When I saw the trailer it made me sad, because the movie should be about the kid. But the trailer made it seems like it was about the mom.
The mom is an important character in the book. But she is not the main character. Michael Oher is. Sad to see that get lost.
What an amazing life he has had so far. What an amazing story about the possibility a person growing and flourishing with the right kind of help.
In any event, the adoptive parents were already very rich. I don't think they particularly needed whatever money Michael Oher will make in the NFL. It is true that they had the ties to Ole Miss. But I can't imagine anyone would have gone to that much trouble on behalf of this kid just to get him to play football at their college. It's bigger than that.
I haven't read this book, but just finished "Friday Night Lights," which this reminds me of. That book addressed the issues of race and football in Texas and how black high school football stars were only as valuable as their scores on the field but as soon as they suffered injuries, they were blatantly referred to as "just another dumb n***er" and basically disposed of by the majority of white people in the town, many of whom did not even consider themselves racist.
I'd imagine that this kid dealt with the same kind of treatment, but from this review it doesn't sound like the white characters were portrayed as anything but selfless & benevolent.
36
umm... you can't make a documentary about something that already happened. it doesn't work that way.
37
umm... you can't make a documentary about something that already happened. it doesn't work that way.
39
41
Really shitty movies, too, are soon gone forever, but not soon enough.
42
Obviously, you're not a racist. You wouldn't be working for the Stranger if you were. I have no intention of seeing this film. Largely because it appears to be a family friendly feel good movie that just doesn't seem believable but is apparently based on true events. Probably happened but not likely to. Sorta like "The Pursuit of Happyness". Just not my fare. And that doesn't make me a racist. I did like your review BTW.
You can't be serious.
But you need to get off the white guilt thing. These were in fact good people who happened to be white. They weren't always acting totally selflessly (we're talking about a big, strong football player, after all), but to reduce them to stereoptypes is unfair.
Um, hello?
...but their on-screen dramatic representations are about as far from real people as you can get without being, like, a fern.
Lindy is saying the MOVIE reduces them to stereotypes. Read the entire review, people.
Rich people love making more money.
48
just what cats do sometimes so i partied all nite with 2 big ole siamese and regretted it in the morning but luckily i learned that all the people want to do is burn us black kitties but girl i wear protection i wont get burned by you or any white thang
you think just because im a smallish blacker type dumpster born alley cat i cant be law and order about it
at night you cant see me and i watched the episode of cribs with you in it so i know the floorplan and security system you had no bent you had no bucket thus you aint no big dog and smallish type dog animals just cant stand how proud i tend to be
I am not sure this is one of them, but it has all the symptoms, including the fact that the trailer doesn't even tell you who the fuck the black kid is.
50
Maybe the movie itself is better, but the trailer is pretty damn offensive.
Yeah, I can't really get how 36 playtex doesn't think any documentary has ever been made about any event that already happened. I'm pretty sure a lot of documentaries are historical in nature.
That being said, thanks for the review, Lindy! Good piece of writing. And I'll probably skip this movie, it's not worth the $6 -err- $14 by any means. The preview does a pretty shitty job of selling it (and they're trying!), but Lindy's review kinda puts the last nails in the coffin.
If it's on a cable, maybe I'll stop on it for a couple minutes before switching to the Daily Show. If it happens to be good, maybe I'll keep watching. But I certainly won't pay for it.
...WHY THOSE AND NOT THESE??
maybe the critics should see the movie first, not just the trailor. see how the audience responds.......
And the reason you see movies like this and not the reverse (black family taking in a homeless white kid) is because that just doesn't happen in real life (or the movies or TV, for that matter). I know several families (some in my family and on my block, ftm) who are white and have adopted black children (granted, they weren't homeless teenagers, but stay with me). These people wanted children. These children needed families. Why does everything have to be about race? Why can't it be about families providing homes to children who need them?
Granted, there are still a whole bunch of prejudiced people out there (of all races, not just whites), but it's fucking 2009, for Pete's sake! Can't a movie just be a movie? Must we read ulterior motives into everything?
(And btw, the book is always better than the movie. It's a natural law.)










RSS
Comments (56) RSS