Film

This Fallen World

The Wrestler: 30 Minutes of Brilliance

This Fallen World

Niko Tavernise

THE WRESTLER Mickey Rourke meets Roland Barthes.

What I can easily do is go on forever about the brilliance of the first 30 minutes of The Wrestler. I can go on about how Mickey Rourke convincingly buries his real being in the beat-up bulk of artificial muscles and tanned flesh called Randy "the Ram" Robinson. All that remains of Rourke in this beast are his eyes; the way they twinkled in his string of '80s hits can be glimpsed during the lighter, more playful moments of the movie. I can also go on and on about how the director, Darren Aronofsky (Pi, Requiem for a Dream), successfully transferred the Dardenne brothers' celebrated brand of European realism to the bleak surfaces and spaces of what critic J. Hoberman called Nowhere, New Jersey: 99¢ stores, parking lots, trailer parks, strip joints, dive bars, neglected community centers, and so on. In the way that the Dardenne brothers force us to see their characters directly, we are forced to look at the Ram directly. We are in his world and nowhere else.

I can also go on and on and on about the core humanity of several scenes—when the wrestler is playing video games with a boy; when the wrestler is in a locker room with other wrestlers; when the wrestler is praising the beauty of an aging stripper (Marisa Tomei); when the wrestler, with permanently broken fingers, is placing a delicate pair of reading glasses on a permanently broken nose. In these moments, the particular connects with the universal, with the lasting truths of friendship, dignity, and kindness. These connections (between fallen and the eternal) constitute the film's highest achievement. Why? Because nothing in the world could be easier than the job of generating cheap laughs about this fallen world, this afterworld (or even underworld), this world of professional wrestling. The film has its laughter, but not at a low price. What we see instead is that rare kind of human warmth that is usually only found in works of high art.

Indeed, Hoberman was quick (if not the first) to point out a link between The Wrestler and Roland Barthes's famous essay "The World of Wrestling." We find in the first 30 minutes of the movie the same honesty with which Barthes examined and explained the structures and themes of professional wrestling in his time (the mid-1950s). Here where everything seems so ridiculous or mindless—the heroic or villainous costumes, the folding chairs smashed on the back, the crashing on tables, the leaping from ropes, the falling backward on a prone opponent, the chanting fans ("You! Sick! Fuck! You! Sick! Fuck!")—even here there is something deeply human and honest.

But all of these things I could go on about get the boot when the movie's plot kicks in. This happens right after a horrific fight with a wrestler who staples money to his flesh (I could go on and on just about that alone). Bloody, bruised, and wheezing, the Ram collapses and goes to the hospital. Once he recovers, the plot starts to do its predictable work: the generation of emotional tension. And what's the closest place to go for some tension? The family. All families are rich sources for Oscar-winning emotional tension because there is no such thing as a family that is not broken. A family is packed to breaking with painful memories, resentments, guilt, sexual regrets. The Ram has a daughter. The daughter hates the Ram because he neglected her. She never wants to talk to him again. Get this: She was so damaged by his bad parenting that now she is a lesbian. Furthermore, her lover is the only type of woman that could appreciate the depth of her pain: a black woman, a woman who unites in her blackness the anger of Alice Walker and the sensitivity of Oprah Winfrey. Women are the niggers of the universe.

The Ram has no one else in the world but his daughter. And now that his health is not so good, it's time for him to make peace with her, to show her that he really cares about her and that he will never abandon her again. Tension, tension, and even more tension.

How shall we end this review? I say, with a wrestling metaphor—and you say, how appropriate. Like a thick and ugly wrestler ("the Bastard"), the plot puts a chokehold on the first and best 30 minutes of the film ("the Ram"), and tries to squeeze the life out of it. But somehow the first 30 minutes breaks free, climbs the ropes, rises, and prepares to fall on the prone plot: The best part of the movie wins the contest. But The Wrestler came that close to defeat. That close! recommended

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (24) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Great Review! I echo these sentiments about the film. It is good in spite of itself.
Posted by DENVEROPOLIS on January 7, 2009 at 3:46 PM · Report
2
You must be a miserable human being when you can't even enjoy this masterpiece without trying to rip it apart.
Posted by c'mon chuckie on January 7, 2009 at 4:09 PM · Report
3
A bit harsh there. I hope it doesn't keep people away from seeing the movie. It was definitely in my top 10 of 2008 (since technically it was released in '08).

And while you're apparently very certain that the daughter is a lesbian, the film paints a bit more ambiguous picture. The viewer is given some clues that the answer may be yes, but ultimately we know his daughter about as well as the Ram did.



Posted by stinkbug on January 7, 2009 at 4:36 PM · Report
4
Having wrestled on shows where people get Dollar Bills stapled to their skin or light tubes jammed into their arms, for NO MONEY... and having close friends from the New Jersey wrestling circuit who have tales of old timey deviancy and new age debaucherous stories of their own. These are not far fetched tales.

I can say that the Wrestler, from beginning to end, tells a very true story. You are the weekend warrior... some of the greatest stars on the independent wrestling circuit have weekday jobs at TGIFridays or Costco. They put their bodies through pain, year after year, in hopes of hitting the lottery and getting some real cash... when statistics prove you're not even covering gas money most of the time.

You're being very hard on the plot of this film, Charles. It is a reality to many wrestlers, as the later years have no sort of guarantee and you're stuck in a whirlwind of self medication and over exertion with serious risk. You can see from the story, that his daughter was born at his career's height. He was on the top of the world at one point, and the movie just shows all aspects of a man that lost EVERYTHING. Wrestling is an addiction.
Posted by Billy the Fridge on January 7, 2009 at 5:43 PM · Report
5
"Women are the niggers of the universe."
Simply Charles Mudede.
Posted by Speechless on January 7, 2009 at 5:52 PM · Report
6
"You're being very hard on the plot of this film, Charles."

I was impressed by the plot, but not really the pacing. There were a few points where the flick felt really and truly alive, but while it was good for a Wrestling-related flick, it was not very good as compared to the rest of Aronofsky's films. I guess you just have to set your expectations properly.
Posted by charles ain't the heel on January 7, 2009 at 8:14 PM · Report
7
Aronofsky's other films had more meat behind them... Pi was stupifyingly smart and Requiem emotionaly wrenching... where The Wrestler is also, but only if you're in the know... other wise, it's a biopic of a fallen hero... who was never truely much of a hero in the first place. The story doesn't have the draw, because you're looking at the hero and the demon as the same person. It's his choices that ultimately see him fail... but he's doing things the best he knows how. The movie is very easy to write off, based on the stigmas of pro-wrestling.
Posted by "Bones Saw" McGraw on January 7, 2009 at 9:58 PM · Report
8
Avoid the POS Slumdog with the disco soundtrack and over the top cheese storyline.
This film feels real. Mickey plays the expired hero/broken ass old man role quite genuinely. It is the brilliance of this film.
It is an original and courageous role for the modern actor.
Posted by wilburevans on January 7, 2009 at 11:09 PM · Report
9
I'm excited to see this film, and I have a feeling I'm going to love Rourke. But of course, I never really stopped loving Rourke. Yeah, he was apparently a huge asshole in the '90s, and we can drag out Wild Orchid or Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man all we like, but to tout this as his "comeback" strikes me as bizarre. Am I the only one who saw his funny cameo as a transvestite inmate in Animal Factory? I mean, if there's something as simultaneously droll and stupefying in cinema as Rourke saying to Edward Furlong, "Now come on down here and lick my pussy," well, I musta missed it. And what about his supporting turns in Spun, or Sin City (which I think Rourke "got" more than anyone else onscreen)?

Of course, maybe I'm more inclined to sympathize with a marked-up mick with a boxer's build and a testy temper than the next man.
Posted by thelyamhound on January 8, 2009 at 10:59 AM · Report
10
Mudede is incoherent... I have nothing against the man, but seriously, he's rambling. Haven't seen, 'The Wrestler', but it seems to be attracting the most annoying people in the Seattle film scene. Take off your Elvis Costello glasses and grow a spine you pathetic dweebs.
Posted by killerpotato on January 8, 2009 at 4:56 PM · Report
11
Did that review say anything? I often find myself dizzy realizing just how vain these Stranger writers are. All of the staff are so in love with their own sense of being. I can never seem to figure out movie reviews, music reviews, book reviews, etc. The reviews are consistently clouded by the egos of the reviewers. Oh well, at least it wasn't Lindy West.
Posted by stuff on January 8, 2009 at 7:20 PM · Report
12
Who knows, who cares what that schlocky review was supposed to say.

If nothing else you must see this flick for Marisa Tomei looking très fine for a non-20 something, non-30-something but 40 something hottie (oh and MR and the film are great too…)
Posted by Fred34 on January 9, 2009 at 2:27 AM · Report
13
@speechless: More like "Simply Alice Walker"--Mudede's quoting her.
Posted by Dur on January 9, 2009 at 5:59 PM · Report
14
God how I despise Chucky and his horrible movie reviews. Wouldn't he be better placed to review public bathrooms and how they mirror modern life in their sterility juxtaposed with their function of accepting shit and urine. I don't know something like that. He is just an idiot. Lastly I'm fucking tired of blacks being able to use niggar in their speech. Fuck we get it you guys co-opted and are using it for yourselves now. Fuck.
Posted by RLF on January 10, 2009 at 2:40 PM · Report
15
"Get this: She was so damaged by his bad parenting that now she is a lesbian." and the rest of that paragraph - weird that you'd see it like that. Maybe she's not a lesbian - it was left up in the air. And even if she is, her being a lesbian has nothing to do with being damaged by the absense of her father. How do you draw that conclusion?

:) What I can easily do is go on forever about the brilliance of the first couple paragraphs of your review and then I guess you remembered that you're writing for The Stranger, so what? A "gay" dig of some kind is a must?

The movie's plot is very simple. There's really nothing to review. It's all built around the main character and the main character was written specifically for Rourke. And he's fucking AMAZING!
Posted by Gaiana on January 10, 2009 at 10:15 PM · Report
16
What starts out as a promising review from a former contender, degenerates into a stale gumbo of pop sociology mumbo-jumbo:

"Women are the niggers of the universe."

Sshheeit Nigga,
puh-lleease.

Your ringside foreign correspondent's credential is hereby revoked-
unless you agree to a PPV cage match with Chyna Walls, distressed mistress of Pingpong balls!!
Posted by Hulkster on January 11, 2009 at 12:09 AM · Report
17
@speechless & Dur - I thought that was John Lennon?
Posted by Joey the Girl on January 11, 2009 at 8:34 AM · Report
18
"Women are the niggers of the universe"

Holy shit, and I used to think I was racist, but then you showed me what a weekend ass-slapping amateur I really am. Experience the hate and ignorance of black men like Tavis Mudede, and you can begin to plumb the depths of true, explosive racism.

Guy, you truly see the world through shit-colored glasses. Do the world an enormous favor: Don't share.

Posted by Peas on January 12, 2009 at 2:44 PM · Report
19
"Furthermore, her lover is the only type of woman that could appreciate the depth of her pain: a black woman... Women are the niggers of the universe."

Don't feed the trolls. You wouldn't read this crap if it were on 4chan, would you?
Posted by stumbletown on January 12, 2009 at 8:59 PM · Report
20
Quoting John Lennon will always be appropriate in a weekly alt newspaper. For the readers who don't get it, stay with the Dr. Seuss books until you become a full-fledged grown-up.
****
Get this: She was so damaged by his bad parenting that now she is a lesbian." ... - weird that you'd see it like that. ... her being a lesbian has nothing to do with being damaged by the absense of her father. How do you draw that conclusion?
****
Maybe Charles visited a women's dorm at a liberal arts college for about 20 minutes and saw 14 examples of this phenomena.
Posted by Sir Vic on January 13, 2009 at 9:17 AM · Report
21
The criticism that the plot is stock, predictable schlock, misses the point entirely. The Ram is meant to be a human archetype, and we're meant to gain some insights about the human condition from his story. Sure, had the Ram won a MacArthur Genius Grant and decided to stage a third-order meta-representation of his 'art', the movie might've been less predictable. But the predictable plot is, I think, part of the archetype. It's the subtleties in this film that really matter--dancing to Ratt, reminiscing about the 80's and hating on Cobain in a dive bar in Nowhere, NJ. Fucking priceless.
Posted by Nexus_6 on January 14, 2009 at 9:33 AM · Report
22
His reviews are the funniest things in The Stranger. Does he sit down in front of the computer and say "How can I make race an issue in this movie?" Can I work "nigger" into it for bonus points?
Posted by Some Guy on January 14, 2009 at 12:03 PM · Report
23
So, You didn't like The Wrestler but you did like the stupid movie about Chess Records, or whatever. Dude, you are lost, Lost, LOST!! The Wrestler might be the greatest movie since Urban Cowboy, and all you can coherently comment on is the first 30 minutes of the film--which was good, but basically discursive and documentary--and then complain about including a very skillfully handled plot. This movie is about the stages of life, and not so much the progression through life as the actual stages that we all have to stand on and perform on. In the movie these stages were the wrestling ring, the stripper stage, the boardwalk, and the rubber mats of the deli. If you weren't in such a hurry to get to your name dropping (Roland Barthes? You fatuous mother fucker!) you probably could have written something good, but that doesn't seem to be your concern.
Here's a question for you, dickhead, and I want you to answer me: Do you hate Whitey? If Mickey Rourke's role was played by Otis Sistrunk and Marissa Tomei's role was played by Beyonce would you have written a different review entirely?
Posted by Fred on January 14, 2009 at 3:05 PM · Report
24
I have some irritation because I held off seeing this film because of your review. I despise film that both relies and banks on the sentiment of the viewer. Although I am an “easy cry” I will hate you for it when credits roll.
The Wrestler was neither cheap nor overtly sentimental in the telling of the story. It ranks in my top 2 favorites of the year for a variety of reasons.
Mickey Rourke. There are no words that could encapsulate the most honest and stunning performance I have ever seen him achieve, and he is an amazing talent.
I would like to say I can separate myself from the hype and don’t take stock in the whole redemption package the film so willingly offers, but quite honestly it simply added to the film and demanded nothing from it.
First and foremost I want to be surprised and entertained and anyone who wasn’t simply read too many reviews!
Posted by hmmm on March 1, 2009 at 2:32 AM · Report

Add a comment