This Fallen World
The Wrestler: 30 Minutes of Brilliance
Niko Tavernise
THE WRESTLER Mickey Rourke meets Roland Barthes.
Tools
What I can easily do is go on forever about the brilliance of the first 30 minutes of The Wrestler. I can go on about how Mickey Rourke convincingly buries his real being in the beat-up bulk of artificial muscles and tanned flesh called Randy "the Ram" Robinson. All that remains of Rourke in this beast are his eyes; the way they twinkled in his string of '80s hits can be glimpsed during the lighter, more playful moments of the movie. I can also go on and on about how the director, Darren Aronofsky (Pi, Requiem for a Dream), successfully transferred the Dardenne brothers' celebrated brand of European realism to the bleak surfaces and spaces of what critic J. Hoberman called Nowhere, New Jersey: 99¢ stores, parking lots, trailer parks, strip joints, dive bars, neglected community centers, and so on. In the way that the Dardenne brothers force us to see their characters directly, we are forced to look at the Ram directly. We are in his world and nowhere else.
I can also go on and on and on about the core humanity of several scenes—when the wrestler is playing video games with a boy; when the wrestler is in a locker room with other wrestlers; when the wrestler is praising the beauty of an aging stripper (Marisa Tomei); when the wrestler, with permanently broken fingers, is placing a delicate pair of reading glasses on a permanently broken nose. In these moments, the particular connects with the universal, with the lasting truths of friendship, dignity, and kindness. These connections (between fallen and the eternal) constitute the film's highest achievement. Why? Because nothing in the world could be easier than the job of generating cheap laughs about this fallen world, this afterworld (or even underworld), this world of professional wrestling. The film has its laughter, but not at a low price. What we see instead is that rare kind of human warmth that is usually only found in works of high art.
Stranger Personals
Indeed, Hoberman was quick (if not the first) to point out a link between The Wrestler and Roland Barthes's famous essay "The World of Wrestling." We find in the first 30 minutes of the movie the same honesty with which Barthes examined and explained the structures and themes of professional wrestling in his time (the mid-1950s). Here where everything seems so ridiculous or mindless—the heroic or villainous costumes, the folding chairs smashed on the back, the crashing on tables, the leaping from ropes, the falling backward on a prone opponent, the chanting fans ("You! Sick! Fuck! You! Sick! Fuck!")—even here there is something deeply human and honest.
But all of these things I could go on about get the boot when the movie's plot kicks in. This happens right after a horrific fight with a wrestler who staples money to his flesh (I could go on and on just about that alone). Bloody, bruised, and wheezing, the Ram collapses and goes to the hospital. Once he recovers, the plot starts to do its predictable work: the generation of emotional tension. And what's the closest place to go for some tension? The family. All families are rich sources for Oscar-winning emotional tension because there is no such thing as a family that is not broken. A family is packed to breaking with painful memories, resentments, guilt, sexual regrets. The Ram has a daughter. The daughter hates the Ram because he neglected her. She never wants to talk to him again. Get this: She was so damaged by his bad parenting that now she is a lesbian. Furthermore, her lover is the only type of woman that could appreciate the depth of her pain: a black woman, a woman who unites in her blackness the anger of Alice Walker and the sensitivity of Oprah Winfrey. Women are the niggers of the universe.
The Ram has no one else in the world but his daughter. And now that his health is not so good, it's time for him to make peace with her, to show her that he really cares about her and that he will never abandon her again. Tension, tension, and even more tension.
How shall we end this review? I say, with a wrestling
metaphor—and you say, how appropriate. Like a thick and ugly
wrestler ("the Bastard"), the plot puts a chokehold on the first and
best 30 minutes of the film ("the Ram"), and tries to squeeze the life
out of it. But somehow the first 30 minutes breaks free, climbs the
ropes, rises, and prepares to fall on the prone plot: The best part of
the movie wins the contest. But The Wrestler came that close to defeat.
That close! ![]()
And while you're apparently very certain that the daughter is a lesbian, the film paints a bit more ambiguous picture. The viewer is given some clues that the answer may be yes, but ultimately we know his daughter about as well as the Ram did.
I can say that the Wrestler, from beginning to end, tells a very true story. You are the weekend warrior... some of the greatest stars on the independent wrestling circuit have weekday jobs at TGIFridays or Costco. They put their bodies through pain, year after year, in hopes of hitting the lottery and getting some real cash... when statistics prove you're not even covering gas money most of the time.
You're being very hard on the plot of this film, Charles. It is a reality to many wrestlers, as the later years have no sort of guarantee and you're stuck in a whirlwind of self medication and over exertion with serious risk. You can see from the story, that his daughter was born at his career's height. He was on the top of the world at one point, and the movie just shows all aspects of a man that lost EVERYTHING. Wrestling is an addiction.
I was impressed by the plot, but not really the pacing. There were a few points where the flick felt really and truly alive, but while it was good for a Wrestling-related flick, it was not very good as compared to the rest of Aronofsky's films. I guess you just have to set your expectations properly.
This film feels real. Mickey plays the expired hero/broken ass old man role quite genuinely. It is the brilliance of this film.
It is an original and courageous role for the modern actor.
Of course, maybe I'm more inclined to sympathize with a marked-up mick with a boxer's build and a testy temper than the next man.
If nothing else you must see this flick for Marisa Tomei looking très fine for a non-20 something, non-30-something but 40 something hottie (oh and MR and the film are great too…)
:) What I can easily do is go on forever about the brilliance of the first couple paragraphs of your review and then I guess you remembered that you're writing for The Stranger, so what? A "gay" dig of some kind is a must?
The movie's plot is very simple. There's really nothing to review. It's all built around the main character and the main character was written specifically for Rourke. And he's fucking AMAZING!
"Women are the niggers of the universe."
Sshheeit Nigga,
puh-lleease.
Your ringside foreign correspondent's credential is hereby revoked-
unless you agree to a PPV cage match with Chyna Walls, distressed mistress of Pingpong balls!!
Holy shit, and I used to think I was racist, but then you showed me what a weekend ass-slapping amateur I really am. Experience the hate and ignorance of black men like Tavis Mudede, and you can begin to plumb the depths of true, explosive racism.
Guy, you truly see the world through shit-colored glasses. Do the world an enormous favor: Don't share.
Don't feed the trolls. You wouldn't read this crap if it were on 4chan, would you?
****
Get this: She was so damaged by his bad parenting that now she is a lesbian." ... - weird that you'd see it like that. ... her being a lesbian has nothing to do with being damaged by the absense of her father. How do you draw that conclusion?
****
Maybe Charles visited a women's dorm at a liberal arts college for about 20 minutes and saw 14 examples of this phenomena.
Here's a question for you, dickhead, and I want you to answer me: Do you hate Whitey? If Mickey Rourke's role was played by Otis Sistrunk and Marissa Tomei's role was played by Beyonce would you have written a different review entirely?
The Wrestler was neither cheap nor overtly sentimental in the telling of the story. It ranks in my top 2 favorites of the year for a variety of reasons.
Mickey Rourke. There are no words that could encapsulate the most honest and stunning performance I have ever seen him achieve, and he is an amazing talent.
I would like to say I can separate myself from the hype and don’t take stock in the whole redemption package the film so willingly offers, but quite honestly it simply added to the film and demanded nothing from it.
First and foremost I want to be surprised and entertained and anyone who wasn’t simply read too many reviews!








RSS
Comments (24) RSS