Tools
CocoRosie are a divisive, if not flat-out widely disliked, band. The twee, folkadelic, fond-of-beat-boxing sister act's last three albums have landed in the 2.3–5.1 range of Pitchfork's 10 rating system—worse than it sounds given that the big hump of that site's bell curve sits in the 6–8 area, making anything under 5 kind of a slap. Metacritic's more forgiving metrics (it averages the ratings of many reviews) give those albums a mean (in the mathematical, not the snarky sense) rating of 59, 60, and 67 out of 100, respectively. In academic terms, those are Fs and (to quote Kanye West quoting Radio Raheem) "Ds, motherfucker, Ds."
Beyond the numbers, of course, people just say mean things about the sisters Sierra and Bianca Casady. Spin, in a zero-stars review of their 2005 sophomore album, Noah's Ark, memorably said: "They make each shimmer of postnatal whimsy seem like an eternal gulag of the spotless mind." One particularly bone-picking (and off-base) critic, writing for Brainwashed .com, called them "Cocoracist" (for reasons we'll explore later) in an article subtitled "You're So Worldly, How's Mom's Audi?" Why all the hate? The Stranger attempts to get to the bottom of this pressing issue in popular music.
Stranger Personals
Call this the Vampire Weekend argument, and it's as specious here as it is with that band. In terms of privilege, Sierra and Bianca grew up roaming the Southwestern United States and Hawaii, the children of an artist/teacher mother who encouraged them to drop out of school and a father devoted to Native American/psychedelic shamanism. The pair started the band while living in Paris, la-di-da, and recorded their first album, La Maison de Mon Rêve, in a (presumably claw-foot) bathtub. Sierra studied opera; Bianca worked as a model. This apparently luxe life rubs some folks the wrong way, especially when the sisters start dabbling in hiphop tropes or talking up the influence of the Wu-Tang Clan (cf. Vampire Weekend and Afropop, Lil Jon). But even if you're a class warrior, it's just bad form to discount someone's artistic merit because of her supposed socioeconomic background. And it's equally dense and antiquated to accuse CocoRosie's magpie style of unfair "appropriation" when we live in a culture that is, now more than ever, cross-pollinating, globalized, and polyglot, where people can listen to and engage with and produce all types of musics without necessarily being tourists or neocolonialists, where no one "owns" hiphop, etc. (Besides, they claim Syrian and Native American ancestry, so there.)
Although, to be fair, so did John and Yoko and Patti Smith about a million years ago. But context matters, so let's cut to the CocoRosie song in question, "Jesus Loves Me": "Jesus loves me/But not my wife/Not my nigger friends/Or their nigger lives." The song is obviously sung in character, its affected Billie Holiday warble (David Sedaris's is better) and lazy back-porch, blues-guitar plucking an antique grotesquerie in keeping with the band's frequently deployed old-timey affectations. It certainly lands like a reminder that some things from the old-timey times FUCKING SUCKED. Like slavery. And ragtime. Still, this kind of face-value blackface revivalism reads a lot less powerfully than Lennon/Ono's or Smith's pointed uses of epithet as analogy. If you're going to try to shock, you better not forget to awe.
This is the argument that CocoRosie get more shit for all their lame crap than they would if they were dudes. Without pretending we live in some postgender paradise, it's safe to say that all the hate heaped on Vampire Weekend for grappling with the aesthetics of class or, say, any number of white male rappers for playing fast and loose with hiphop's codes of race and authenticity proves that guys get called out on this nonsense, too.
The Casady sisters have a thing for deliberately bad cover art (previously: crayon drawings of unicorns fucking) and they may like to play with hiphop idioms, but the cover for their new Sub Pop debut, Grey Oceans, has a loooooong way to go before it gets around the horn to being so bad that it's good, à la Pen & Pixel's mighty, Master P–fueled run of deliciously lowbrow digital excess in the late '90s. This just looks like their avatars for World of LOLcraft.
This one hits especially close to home for some Seattleites who hold our local mega-indie in almost mythically high regard (and who, just maybe, think their demo should've landed them a deal before these two boho bozos got theirs). But this objection also falls apart pretty quickly when you consider that Sub Pop's storied catalog is full of oddball, occasionally awful records alongside its grunge canon; it has never shied away from signing an unusual act, especially if it might stir up some good controversy.
Okay, so this one is subjective, but it's also the only good reason for hating the band. It's not damning that they engage with hiphop or affect old-timey mannerisms; it's that the results are so facile and fallow and precious. It's that their songs somehow manage to be both grating and yet so flimsy that they're barely even there. Your ears will prick up for the nicked Eastern rhythm and melody (and ignorable playtime rap) of "Smokey Taboo," for instance, only for the tentative goodwill to be dashed by the cloying ragtime intro of "Hopscotch Teardrop." The appealingly múm-like lullaby and hollowed-out trip-hop beat of "R.I.P. Burn Face" turns over into three straight songs of raspy babytalk nonsense. You'll enjoy the music for a moment before those damn elfin, have-one-on-Joanna-Newsom vocals kick back in and you notice the daft lyrics. Repeat ad nauseum.
Or better yet, don't.
I knew nothing about them prior to hearing their music (which I liked). So I was surprised to learn of all the hate.
2
Stereogum had an op-ed piece on them a couple of days ago - a bunch of musicians talking about why they like them... I'm not sure that I agree with most of the article, but it was an interesting read.
3
4
Also: "ragtime sucks"?
8
13
*but* to be fair to all you haters, I must acknowledge:
The song where they drop the N word? yeah... not really their song to write.
The new cover of their latest release? awful
14
15
I'm in the hate group. And that new cover is the worst. What the hell happened to Sub Pop?!? First Postal Service, now this crap.
16
I liked the CR song "Lemonade."
FWIW: I think Fever Ray flies the freak flag higher and with more talent.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu3EcAHdH…
18
I was actually contemplating this band today. like Jeff said, that "Lemonade" song is pretty great. nice and haunting atmosphere, rap whispers that are just irritating enough, and a kicky, 1940's-esque hook. to be honest, I wish I thought of it first. but the rest of that album (from a cursory listen) is just self-indulgent bullshit. its like they blew all their ideas on one song and then spent the rest of the 40 minutes phoning it in... which could be said about nearly any other record these days. I dunno, that last record was a tough hang at parts but at least it had a handful of good material. I don't really have an opinion on anything before that. they were always out of my radar prior to working at a record store, and life seemed fine.
19
20
Jeff, I checked out some Fever Ray per your recommendation. Not really my jam, but some cool ideas, and I dig the dark vibe running through most of the songs I heard. Also, unlike CocoRosie, it didn't make me want to strangle kittens.
21
I can see how people might be more quick to dismiss weird music being made by two upper class, pretty ex-models in costume as just terrible than they would if dudely musician types like Climax Golden Twins, Earth, or Sun City Girls were making it.
There was a Souncheck interview with Rachel Maddux from Paste Magazine who'd compiled a list of people with the best "bad" voices, and almost no women were included on it. They asked her why that was and she said she hadn't thought about it. So I think gender is more of a factor with these non-traditional styles of music than people acknowledge.
25
28
@24 - You can't call them CCR!
CocoRosie girl #1, "Hey want to start a band?'
CocoRosie Girl #2: "Sure, but we can't sing, play instruments, or compose songs."
CocoRosie Girl #1: "That's OK... 'cause we can put on shitty make-up, girl-stashes, and stupid Victorian clothes. Then we'll just use some sample tracks while we play with kid toys while you whine in your Elmer Fudd voice... we'll call that music. Oh yeah, we'll get some press photos of us siting in an old-school claw foot tub. Then Sub Pop will sign us."
CocoRosie Girl #2: "So we'll just be a shitty version of Bjork?"
CocoRosie Girl #1: "Bingo!"
@26 - I like the cut of your jib.
Grey Oceans has been in one of my CD players for the last two weeks now. Every time I start to think, "why the hell do I like this, it's annoying" something in the song stands out and I think "this is brilliant, I'm glad I stuck around."
I don't find their music pleasant necessarily, but I do think it's good.
42
if you're going to talk shit, you should probably do it with facts: Cherokee are known for being lighter skinned than any other North American tribe. there are plenty of whiter people out there claiming to be descended from way darker tribes. so as an answer to your question, I suppose so?
I'm not quite sure about this... I actually can't think of the last time I've spent this much time pondering just what it is that makes a cover bad to this degree. I won't argue that that makes it so bad it's good, but it does make it so bad that it's something! I mean, seriously, stare into that cover and tell me how it could possibly be any worse. It couldn't, and to me that means it simply had to have been deliberate.
I haven't heard the album yet, but I took a listen to Hopscotch, and it's actually good. For some reason I expected to hate the ragtime sample too from reading about it, but I didn't. That song is heaps better than a lot of the light-pop crap Sub Pop's been putting out lately, like The Postal Service...
I have a feeling this is going to be one of those bands people will be embarrassed to have owned the albums of, like the Mighty Mighty Bosstones or something.
http://imomus.livejournal.com/468556.htm…
No critical statement is exempt from its own strictures. Every statement which seeks to summarize and critique a pre-existing statement (in other words every statement except for those in the mysterious "world of origins") will tend to exemplify, in itself, the things it deplores in the original statement, thus opening itself up to the same critique, and so on, recursively. And incrementally, for a summary of a statement tends to exemplify its faults more succinctly and intensely.
50
Fever Ray and Coco Rosie are leagues apart. I only like one Coco Rosie song--Rainbow Warriors--I couldn't stand the rest of the tracks. Fever Ray is genius, not quite up there with Bjork, imho, but definitely fantastic.
They get to live their lives wandering around the world being boho and recording weird music? That's great for them. I'm sure I'd enjoy the hell out of that lifestyle. Who wouldn't?
And I don't give a shit about the cover art. The font's not my favorite, but so what? Are we being angry that they aren't doing their jobs as women and being sexy and attractive? What the fuck ever. On to the music. I like the music.
For example, the whole idea of them being Native American. Cocorosie are a quarter Cherokee, maybe less. Their father was a white dude who went around acting like a "shaman." They grew up totally as rich and privileged white people without ever identifying as or having been treated like a Native person. That gives Cocorosie no right to claim a Cherokee identity and prance around in headdresses, not to mention to use this so-called heritage of theirs to attach some kind of mystical earth-mother shamanistic we-are-so-much-more-spiritually-elevated-than-you element to the music/band's image. This is worse than just an annoying gimmick.
It's part of the reason why I do believe they are indeed racist, albeit probably not consciously. They are like many white people who appropriate the shit out of other cultures and thereby promote harmful generalizations and stereotypes (ahem Neon Indian).
AND, I have a problem with their privilege because I DO think you can discredit Cocorosie's credibility based upon their socioeconomic background. So much of their music is lauded as coming from "artists" who are "free" and have some kind of preternatural insight into what it means to be a "child" or live outside of cultural norms. Well, it's easy to be a total weirdo and a "nomad" if you have never had to work a real job in your life and your mom pays for you to travel and to live her in french countryside house.
Aaand I'm spent.
For example, the whole idea of them being Native American. Cocorosie are a quarter Cherokee, maybe less. Their father was a white dude who went around acting like a "shaman." They grew up totally as rich and privileged white people without ever identifying as or having been treated like a Native person. That gives Cocorosie no right to claim a Cherokee identity and prance around in headdresses, not to mention to use this so-called heritage of theirs to attach some kind of mystical earth-mother shamanistic we-are-so-much-more-spiritually-elevated-than-you element to the music/band's image. This is worse than just an annoying gimmick.
It's part of the reason why I do believe they are indeed racist, albeit probably not consciously. They are like many white people who appropriate the shit out of other cultures and thereby promote harmful generalizations and stereotypes (ahem Neon Indian).
AND, I have a problem with their privilege because I DO think you can discredit Cocorosie's credibility based upon their socioeconomic background. So much of their music is lauded as coming from "artists" who are "free" and have some kind of preternatural insight into what it means to be a "child" or live outside of cultural norms. Well, it's easy to be a total weirdo and a "nomad" if you have never had to work a real job in your life and your mom pays for you to travel and to live her in french countryside house.
Aaand I'm spent.
In fact, I love CocoRosie's music.
The whole "oh it's bad music" bullshit is an OPINION, rather than a FACT.
"appropriating culture" crap are dumbshits! Who gives a shit? Shamanism is awesome! And dumbshit actually wants to to slag them for being part Cherokee! WTF? Why do you think they need some kind of pc permission to be into the shit we should ALL be getting into. I just think these pseudo-intellectual critics are a fucking joke and CocoRosie rocks! They're a credit to Subpop or any record label. You think three chord grunge is the fucking height of musical expression? CocoRosie is miles ahead of 99% of the bands out there. It's really sad that people rip on a brilliant band like this so hard. You better think again fools.
Besides, CCR are actually saying something about the limits and rules, we, you guys, are making for what is "normal" or "good". Do you find a particular CocoRosie vocal track, narrative or piece of clothing annoying? Chance is, they do too, and it is included for that very reason.
Truth is you're going to have artistic CLASSICS complementing and in complete awe of CocoRosie on a wide variety of reasons (which they actually have, Including Yoko Ono)...
Whereas, if "artists" like Miley Cyrus, Taylor Swift and Katy Perry were to listen and view the music and aesthetic. They would do as so many others have done and just consider it shit without having any idea what's going on.
There is a whole set up behind their music that hasn't obviously been very throughly looked into. Do your homework before you claim to know your shit.
This band is only cut out for the people that can understand real art and respect unique details without a closed mind.
1) They're whiny, non-leftist yuppies claiming to be (so-called) Liberals that have nothing better to do with their bored, mundane existence but make fun of/condemn someone/somebody who happens to be more original than them.
2) Because their stupid (really, really, really stupid).
3) They don't read and or enjoy, deliberately, being illiterate (otherwise, they'd shut up and go read Schelling's "Oldest Program Towards a System in German Idealism" among the many Fruhromantik works out there available so that they might expand their tiny little brain cell just enough to actually realize what the hell the band is getting at).
4) They're Hipsters.
5) They're incapable of appreciating anything beyond the extremely limited, boring, bland, and capitalistically driven/dominated Hip-Hop culture.
1) They're whiny, non-leftist yuppies claiming to be (so-called) Liberals that have nothing better to do with their bored, mundane existence but make fun of/condemn someone/somebody who happens to be more original than them.
2) Because their stupid (really, really, really stupid).
3) They don't read and or enjoy, deliberately, being illiterate (otherwise, they'd shut up and go read Schelling's "Oldest Program Towards a System in German Idealism" among the many Fruhromantik works out there available so that they might expand their tiny little brain cell just enough to actually realize what the hell the band is getting at).
4) They're Hipsters.
5) They're incapable of appreciating anything beyond the extremely limited, boring, bland, and capitalistically driven/dominated Hip-Hop culture.
People can get very shallow. Cocorosie make experimental music and it's very inspiring.
72
no one'd understand me,
maybe i should go and live amongst the animals. ♥
- animals, cocorosie












RSS
Comments (74) RSS