One of the most visible changes in Apple’s recent iOS 5 update was Newsstand, which puts all your magazine and newspaper subscriptions in one not-easily-ignorable folder. How’s that working out?

Conde Nast might be reaping the most rewards at the moment as magazine publishing house saw a 268 percent increase in digital subscription sales since Newsstand rolled out with iOS 5 on October 12.

That’s not a bad hike, obviously, but imagine what would happen if Conde Nast cut the subscription prices down to something reasonable that reflects the nonexistent printing and negligible distribution costs of the digital format.

12 replies on “Maybe People Do Want to Read Magazines, After All”

  1. Conde Nast makes HUGE bucks from all those glossy fashion and makeup ads in their print products. That’s what pays for all that content.

    That revenue is paltry on the digital side. Plus, those IT costs are anything BUT negligible.

    I realize this is all obvious to most people, but since Paul just doesn’t seem to get it…

  2. I don’t get Newsstand for the iPhone. I subscribed to the NYT because it was free, and I think I might actually be willing pay to subscribe to something else, if it was interesting enough, but so far the options are terrible: there appear to be 15 options — only fifteen!? — and one of them is The Oklahoman (it’s free, by the way). I’m sure it’s much more exciting for the iPad, but, I don’t own one of those.

    Oh yeah, and, Apple insists that Newsstand is so exciting and important that I can’t delete it, nor can I hide it in my Junk folder with the other shit they won’t let me delete (stock prices, that worthless weather app, etc). Not cool.

  3. @ 6, you can make a folder and call it something like “never used apps,” and put the stuff you don’t like there. Not perfect, but they don’t have to just take up space on your desktop.

Comments are closed.