If last week’s Critical Mass melee (see “Critical Error,” Jonah
Spangenthal-Lee) accomplished anything positive, it was that
it sparked a citywide conversation about how cyclists and drivers can
more safely share the road. But the city recently lost one important
tool for protecting pedestrians and cyclistsโ€”and it is going to
court, and Olympia, to get it back.

In 2005, the Seattle City Council adopted an “assault by vehicle”
ordinance that made it a crime (a gross misdemeanor, with the
possibility of jail time) to knowingly assault someone with a vehicle.
Ephraim Schwartz, the driver who struck and killed city council aide
Tatsuo Nakata in 2006, was sentenced under that law.

Since then, two municipal court judges have overturned the new rule,
arguing that it violates a state law that says cities can’t criminalize
violations of traffic rules. City Attorney Tom Carr has appealed their
rulings in King County Superior Court, which won’t hear the city’s case
until later this year.

In the meantime, drivers who strike pedestrians and cyclists may do
so with relative impunity.

Carr says he disagrees that state law precludes a tougher city law.
Unlike the state law, which deals with traffic infractions, Carr says
the city law deals with a criminal actโ€”assault. “The difference
between assault and murder is the result of the actionโ€”if the
person dies, it’s murder, if they don’t, it isn’t,” Carr says.
Similarly, he argues, if a person harms someone with his car, that’s
assault, not a mere traffic violation.

While the city waits for its day in court, Carr says he’s talking to
legislatorsโ€”in particular, South Seattle legislators Sharon

Tomiko-Santos in the house and Adam Kline in the
senateโ€”about changing state law to allow cities to pass tougher
laws for things like intentionally running someone over.

But Cleve Stockmeyer, an attorney who serves on the board of the
pedestrian-
advocacy group Feet First, argues that going to the
legislature could actually hurt the city’s position. He says the real
question is “what is the effect of setting a precedent that means… we
have to ask permission in Olympia every time we want to change our
local laws?” recommended

barnett@thestranger.com