Love Our Arts & Culture Coverage?
You can help fund it!
Because 17-year-old Jamie Lynn Spears is (supposedly) pregnant AGAIN. Eight weeks pregnant, actually. She just gave birth to her first child in June.
Apparently Jamie didn’t know it was possible to get pregnant while still breast-feeding.
(Update: TMZ is saying it’s not true.)
Megan Seling is The Stranger's managing editor. She mostly writes about hockey, snacks, and music. And sometimes her dog, Johnny Waffles. More by Megan Seling
Comments are closed.
Sign up for our newsletter for news recaps, updates, and more!
So she’s hot for the cock…who can blame her?
She’s on the same birthing schedule as Bristol Palin.
TMZ is reporting that “an unimpeachable source” has told them that Jamie Lynn, is not, in fact, pregnant.
http://www.tmz.com/2008/10/08/jamie-lynn-not-pregnant/
We’re talking about a member of the Spears family here. I think ‘any education’ would work.
Jamie Lynn Spears is TOTALLY qualified to be President. You people shut UP.
Case study evidence suggests that all Spears women should be on a constant Depo-Provera and lithium regimen.
i wonder who the father is? i mean, it’s common knowledge that jamie lynn’s mother paid $50,000 to that 19-year-old to claim he was the father, when in fact, it was the 50-ish producer of Mrs. Spears’ own proposed talk-show. she lied to protect her show. so who is the father this time? maybe Mother Dearest just offered jamie lynn’s body up to satan this time–like in rosemary’s baby. you know, for her career. fucking degenerates. all of them!
PINHEADS!!!!
Really? You mean something reported by the National Enquirer is not true? I find this hard to believe. C’mon!
ABORT! ABORT! ABORT!
Tora! Tora! Tora!
Hasn’t she heard of swallowing?
Thing is, the Enquirer is usually right, even if it takes many months for the truth to come out.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/160082/page/1