In December, the Office of Police Accountability published about 50 investigations into cops behaving badly. Those cases included officers Tasing a suspect without warning, blowing off a call about domestic violence, and selling a shooting victim’s car. 

In this week’s installment of Bad Apples, I look at some of the final cases published by the OPA in 2023, which involved an officer repeatedly disregarding the constitutional rights of the homeless, an officer who failed to report hitting a parked car, and a field training officer teaching a trainee to view the people who call 911 with contempt.

Hassling the Homeless

Case #2023OPA-0156

On December 15, 2022, South Precinct Officers Sarah Coe and Mark Rawlins drove with a witness to an encampment to look for a person suspected of slashing the witness’ tires. When they arrived at the encampment, Officer Rawlins saw an occupied tent and ordered everyone to come out and speak with him. He then shined his flashlight in the faces of the four people who exited the tent, and the witness identified the man he claimed slashed his tires. 

After the witness identified the suspect, Rawlins pulled out his gun and told the suspect he could not leave. Coe moved to put the man in handcuffs saying, “Alright, you listen to what I have to say and what I have to say only. If you do anything else, you are subject to being assaulted by officers.” 

The officers then questioned the man, who told them his head hurt because the witness had allegedly assaulted him, and he had no idea if he popped anyone’s tires. After Rawlins repeatedly questioned the man about whether he slashed the tires, the man finally responded, “maybe.” At that point, Rawlins said the officers had probable cause and arrested the man. 

The OPA pointed out multiple issues with the way Rawlins handled this arrest and tied it to a pattern of Rawlins “disregarding” the constitutional rights of the unhoused. In this case, Rawlins had no reason to believe anyone in the tent had committed the reported crime and did not have enough evidence to demand the people inside exit the tent. In a similar case from 2018, Rawlins went searching for a suspect in an encampment and twice ordered people out of their tents without cause. He also cut into several tents to look inside, despite another officer telling him to treat the tents the same as he would a house. The Chief of Police at the time issued a written reprimand for Rawlins’s actions in that case.

The OPA also pointed out in this most recent case that Rawlins should have ensured the man had no injuries before questioning him about the alleged crime, and he also should have Mirandized the man before interrogating him. The OPA recently investigated Rawlins for failing to Mirandize a 13-year-old, who he and three other officers tried to bully into falsely confessing to a burglary, a case I covered in my last Bad Apples

The OPA ultimately sustained two policy violations against Rawlins in this complaint and no violations against his partner Coe. Seattle Police Chief Adrian Diaz orally reprimanded Rawlins, one of the lowest forms of discipline for a police officer.

Failing to Report an “Aw, Shiiiiiiiiit” Moment 

Case #2023OPA-0234

On May 9, 2023, while searching for a suspect in a domestic violence call, Southwest Precinct Officer Jeremy Montgomery hit a parked car and then failed to report the accident, according to a recent finding by the OPA. In the in-car video that recorded the crash, an audible crunch can be heard followed by Montgomery clearly saying, “Aw, shiiiiiit.”

Listen for yourself. 

After a Southwest Precinct supervisor noticed the damage to the patrol car, Sgt. Simon Edison investigated the incident and spoke with Montgomery. Edison said Montgomery seemed surprised to learn that the car sustained damage. Body-worn video revealed a loud crunch noise followed by Montgomery parking, exiting his patrol car, and speaking with two people who were sitting inside the car he hit. He asked them if they were alright, according to the initial complaint to the OPA filed by Edison. 

Nevertheless, Edison told the OPA he believed Montgomery failed to realize he’d hit the parked car, made an “indistinct” sound when the crash happened, and then spoke to the two people sitting in a parked car in the context of checking on two people sitting in a car and talking in the early hours of the morning.

OPA apparently disagreed with Edison’s assessment that Montgomery failed to report the crash simply out of ignorance. While the OPA has not yet published its full investigation, the agency’s complaint tracker shows they sustained a policy violation under Montgomery’s self-reporting obligations, earning him an oral reprimand.

Dawdling on a Call

Case #2023OPA-0197

At 8:42 pm on May 3, 2023, a man called 911 to report that a car prowler had just broken the window of a vehicle outside his apartment building. Dispatchers marked the call as mid-priority. North Precinct Officer Hayden P. Hogg, a field training officer, logged into the call with his student officer, a signal to other officers that they’d handle the call. However, Hogg allowed his trainee to finish a report before responding, which took more than an hour. Meanwhile, the 911 caller repeatedly dialed 911 asking for a police response.

When Hogg and his trainee finally arrived at the man’s apartment building, Hogg’s trainee said he could not see anything and then said something inaudible. In response, Hogg said “No. I would… we’re not going to make it easy for him. Like, he’s going to come down and talk to us if he’s gonna…” followed by another inaudible statement. The man eventually spoke to the trainee officer, who asked a few questions before getting back in the patrol car with Hogg. The trainee told Hogg the caller said he’d drunk a couple beers that Wednesday night, which prompted Hogg to openly speculate that the man may have been an alcoholic. 

The OPA ultimately recommended just a training referral for Hogg, saying he needed some coaching on professionalism and appropriate response to criminal activity.

Ashley Nerbovig is a staff writer at The Stranger covering policing, incarceration and courts. She is like other girls.

17 replies on “Bad Apples”

  1. “He [officer Friendly] also cut into several tents to look inside, despite another officer telling him to treat the tents the same as he would a house.”

    are you Kidding?

    rumor has it the guy

    Chainsaws his way

    into his domicile

    on the Daily

    and uses the Jaws

    of Life to enter/

    exit his Prowler

    doors and zippers

    being Commie

    Plots. perhaps

    a lg. dose of

    common sense

    critical thinking

    & Civics might

    be in Order.*

    *not to Mention:

    the fucking Law.

  2. There’s always this perverse delight in reversing the roles of victim and victimizer in these police/criminal stories. While investigating someone slashing another’s car tires, a bizzarely aggressive thing to do that creates a massive expense to someone and directly impacts their means to their livelihood, an officer had the temerity to shine a flashlight – right on the suspect! Adding insult to injury, he even questioned him until he confessed he “maybe” did the thing he was obviously guilty of! When an insane criminal is subject to such abuse, how can any of us be safe…

  3. @4 — what?

    @4, 5 — wait’ll Chainsaw

    Cop shows up at Your

    doors with a Warrant*

    a Bad Appletude and

    his Chainsaw. y’all’ll

    be Thee Biggest

    Whiners since

    El trumpfster

    hey — send us some

    pix of the door-size

    Holes right next to

    your front door &

    the Bill$ to Repair

    them. thanks!

    I Fart in your

    general di-

    rections.

    ‘warrant’?

    we don’t Need

    no Stinkin’ ‘Warrant.’

    we don’t Have To show

    you no Stinkin Warrant!

    I can almost

    hear the

    Saw

  4. @8 No, someone broke the law, and then someone else told a group of people to come out of a tent and talk, in what is debatably a misapplication of policy, not breaking the law. He shouldn’t have cut into the tent in the other incident, but that appears to be a completely different occasion. I suppose to answer your question I “care” about the first because it was the incident I was talking about.

  5. @9 he also questioned a suspect in custody without giving Miranda warnings. You’re trying really hard to excuse conduct that even the relevant oversight agency found to be wrongful. Do you have some personal connection to this officer or are you just opposed to police accountability in general?

  6. @10 Again, not a crime. Instead of trying to read my mind, try and assess what really happened – I don’t really care what some bureaucractic org has to say with regard to nitpicks about their policy – I am more opposed to the form of “accountability” that equates flashlights and questions from the police to the acts of a psychotic tire slasher.

  7. @13 I realize it doesn’t rise to the level of the brutality of a cop shining his Assault Flashlight, but yes, tire slashing is a little antisocial.

  8. @7 “someone else told a group of people to come out of a tent and talk, in what is debatably a misapplication of policy, not breaking the law”

    No, it is actually breaking a law. The cop is violating their civil liberties under color of authority. Cops do not have the right to make people come out of their home on the allegation of a crime the cop did not witness. They can ask, but if the people in the tent tell them to pounds sand absent any other idicia of crime the cop cannot intrude.

  9. @16 Then it’s a good thing the cop didn’t intrude, and that there isn’t any indication they refused (which would have been their right). Am I the only person who read this article?

  10. “They can ask, but if the people in the tent tell them to pounds sand absent any other idicia of crime the cop cannot intrude.”

    –@16

    you mean

    Unless it’s

    Chainsaw/

    //Boxcutter

    rogue Copper:

    then All

    Bets’re

    Off.

Comments are closed.