I believe it is sincere. After 9/11, we started getting all sorts of anonymous weird letters from people who wanted to find our way to heaven. They assumed we were Muslims because we of our name (we are Syrian) and genuinely thought that they were doing us a favour. It was a little depressing.
Have to agree with @91's assessment. Everything stated in that post is true, about the Hutch. Don't fool yourselves for one, solitary moment that you're going to "change" what this man believes about gays & lesbians.
His pride would never allow for him to think he might be wrong. E-V-E-R!
Basically, if I were in Eli's shoes and I felt compelled to "do" something, I'd do as @102 suggests - send him a copy of the "It Get's Better Project." Otherwise, I'd simply do nothing - no thank you, no warm & fuzzies, but NOTHING.
Send back a condescending thank note with other citations of the bible nobody believe anymore: women should never gave their opinions, divorce sends you to hell, slavery is normal, rape is ok as long as you mary the girl.
The origin of species can be good too.
I'll take it. I need one. Keep running into clues in the NYT crossword that I have to look up in there. "Hairy man in Genesis", four letters. It ain't Phil (Collins).
I'd send a polite note. You could send some book that is meaningful to you, but that may continue the exchange or further attempts to evangelize. If you want the attempt to evangelize to end, then you must say so very clearly and succinctly. You may need to say it multiple times.
My gut says that you are now a project of his, a soul to be saved. Yes it is arrogant on his part. It has been my experience that evangelicals hold the idea that others have either never heard and that is why they don't believe, or that people are being willfully ignorant and are ignoring the "truth" they have deep inside as an act if defiance. I don't his interest in you stopping, by giving him a platform on Good Friday he has the impression that you want him to evangelize you and maybe even the idea that between the two of you the entire Stranger staff and readership can be saved. He's trying to mentor you, Eli. Do you wish to be mentored and evangelized is a question for you.
This is just my $0.02 on the entirety of your exchange posted on Slog. Feel free to toss it in the dustbin.
@70 Ehhh, so not taking the time/effort to send a thank-you note for an unsolicited gift I didn't want from someone I do not have a personal relationship with... that's what makes me a dick?
You've got a pretty low threshold for dickishness, there, I'd say.
All this fear and fury over the innocuous gift of a Bible is very telling about you folks. I don't share the Muslim faith, or the Hindi or that most evangelical fundamentalist and intolerant one, atheism. But I don't fear them with the soul consuming angst demonstrated here against Christianity.
You might recall that Sanders is nominally Jewish. That kinda means most of what you've been writing is potentially as offensive to him as it's intended to be to Ken Hutcherson.
I knew logic was beyond most liberals. I knew you were wrong about economics and politics and culture, if sincerely wrong. I didn't think common courtesty entirely dead within you. Oh well, live and learn.
When a single one of you roundly condemns the sickening attack on the pastors family at 99, I'll believe the whole tolerant liberal line. Disliking the man is one thing, but decent people leave families out of politics.
Come to think of it, I don't recall a single posting telling scum like the person at 99 to back off. Don't recall a single instance of people telling him, her or it that they are hardly representing the liberal cause well with that kind of disgusting vulgarity. Not once. Ever. Go libs!
@ 125, if that person is a measure of all liberals, then all the people who called Chelsea Clinton "ugly" when she was 14 is a fair way to measure you.
You're right. Cons do it about double the frequency, elan, and zeal.
Respecting those who are different is a hallmark of liberalism, although a few will give voice to their frustrations with the refusal of the cons to see things as they really are. Contempt for those who are different is a hallmark of conservatism, unless they're willing to work completely for conservative ends. There are exceptions, of course, but that's the kind of person who finds conservative ideals appealing.
His pride would never allow for him to think he might be wrong. E-V-E-R!
Basically, if I were in Eli's shoes and I felt compelled to "do" something, I'd do as @102 suggests - send him a copy of the "It Get's Better Project." Otherwise, I'd simply do nothing - no thank you, no warm & fuzzies, but NOTHING.
The origin of species can be good too.
My gut says that you are now a project of his, a soul to be saved. Yes it is arrogant on his part. It has been my experience that evangelicals hold the idea that others have either never heard and that is why they don't believe, or that people are being willfully ignorant and are ignoring the "truth" they have deep inside as an act if defiance. I don't his interest in you stopping, by giving him a platform on Good Friday he has the impression that you want him to evangelize you and maybe even the idea that between the two of you the entire Stranger staff and readership can be saved. He's trying to mentor you, Eli. Do you wish to be mentored and evangelized is a question for you.
This is just my $0.02 on the entirety of your exchange posted on Slog. Feel free to toss it in the dustbin.
Good luck.
You've got a pretty low threshold for dickishness, there, I'd say.
You might recall that Sanders is nominally Jewish. That kinda means most of what you've been writing is potentially as offensive to him as it's intended to be to Ken Hutcherson.
I knew logic was beyond most liberals. I knew you were wrong about economics and politics and culture, if sincerely wrong. I didn't think common courtesty entirely dead within you. Oh well, live and learn.
When a single one of you roundly condemns the sickening attack on the pastors family at 99, I'll believe the whole tolerant liberal line. Disliking the man is one thing, but decent people leave families out of politics.
Come to think of it, I don't recall a single posting telling scum like the person at 99 to back off. Don't recall a single instance of people telling him, her or it that they are hardly representing the liberal cause well with that kind of disgusting vulgarity. Not once. Ever. Go libs!
Vulgarity - cons like you do it too.
Conservatives do it too, but not with the frequency, elan and zeal of liberals. We have a lot of catching up to do, I guess.
Respecting those who are different is a hallmark of liberalism, although a few will give voice to their frustrations with the refusal of the cons to see things as they really are. Contempt for those who are different is a hallmark of conservatism, unless they're willing to work completely for conservative ends. There are exceptions, of course, but that's the kind of person who finds conservative ideals appealing.