Comments

103
@96 The moral claims of veganism are dubious, at best. Humans evolved as omnivores, and cannot thrive or successfully reproduce as pure herbivores absent technological intervention (specifically B12 supplementation). If your moral system tells you not to do something that your species needs to do in order to thrive and reproduce successfully, your moral system is broken.
104
Wow, what a buttsore vegan. Guess that's what happens when you eat way too much roughage.
105
@ 103, But vegans don't think of their moral system as broken, or they wouldn't be vegans. So I suspect that vegans who claim that they don't mind meat eaters' dietary choices are not being honest. Either that or they're confused beyond belief. Even if you're a vegan for environmental reason surely you can't be OK with people eating meat or driving gas guzzlers etc. I think that vegans MUST judge me for eating meat - and those vegans who are honest about it are more worthy of respect. Strangely, instead of respect all they get is vilification. Guess we prefer being judged behind our back.
106
@94: aardvark. I'll be participating in Seattle Slut Walk on Father's Day, and I invite you to join me. You'll be able to identify me by my slutty, slutty outfit. How slutty you ask, you naughty boy?
Are you ready?

I'll be wearing Levis, a red sweatshirt (size large), boots, and one of those black and white Palestinian scarves wrapped around my neck.

Which is exactly what I was wearing 29 years ago, the afternoon I was raped at knife point.

Fuck you and your car stereo.
107
y u mad tho, veganbro?

y u mad?
108
I read Slog despite the often harsh rhetoric, not because of it. There's plenty that's worthwhile amongst all the making fun of people, but the mockery does make it more difficult to read and muddles some otherwise fantastic messages that Dan preaches. It happens often enough that upon reading here, I have to remind myself that sex-positive people are "Not All Like That."

It's tough to be seen as both a jokester without ill intentions AND a serious critic of those who most deserve to be mocked AND a sincere advocate for honesty and consideration standing against bullying and hatred. Dan seems to be all those things, but only upon really close examination. You can rationalize away any apparent contradictions amongst his positions, but it's tougher to stomp out the more visceral emotional tensions between those roles, and sometimes all we can do is watch our own cognitive dissonance play out on the screen.

When push comes to shove, I hope we err on the side of respectful seriousness. Angry mockery has its place when we're really oppressed, and there's still plenty enough that really oppresses us. But once we've got people's attention, it works against us. Dan is at a point in his career where he's got people's attention. He could now speak with broader moral authority if he wasn't constantly defending his more flippant remarks.
109
seems like people like SALAD are actually meat eaters, masquerading as idiot self-righteous vegans to make the rest of us look bad...

i'm not an evangelical vegan, but i will admit to using my superior culinary skills to promote veganism to my friends and family as a healthy but delicious alternative :)
111
@105: Oh, I realize that vegans don't believe their moral system is broken. They're simply wrong. Morality evolved and persists because it strongly benefits the survival of the species. Since strict veganism is inimical to survival absent significant technological intervention, it fails the most basic possible test of the validity of a moral system.

Also, truly sustainable vegan agriculture is likely not possible. Sustainable agricultural techniques work by creating a miniature, domesticated ecosystem that produces a surplus useful to humans. Since animals are crucial links in every land-based ecosystem, it is unlikely that you could successfully built a domesticated ecosystem without them. Since vegan moral systems typically forbid the use of animals for purely human purposes, the choices are to either abandon veganism or abandon sustainability.
112
I've been scouring my Better Homes & Gardens Meat Cookbook (which scandalized me by having a fish section) trying to find something for SALAD, and I think I found it. It really does have something for everyone...

"Turkey-Green Grape Toss"

1-1/2 cup diced cooked turkey
1 cup thinly sliced celery
1/2 cup canned green seedless grapes (who knew they come canned? How convenient!)
1/2 cup mayonnaise
1/2 teaspoon seasoned salt

Combine all ingredients, and serve in avocado halves brushed with lemon juice (so they don't brown) Serves six.
114
106 xx! kisses! have fun! think of me! xx
115
It's hilariously awesome how everyone suddenly becomes experts on human nutrition, biology, farming and food-sourcing techniques whenever vegans and vegetarians are mentioned. American waistlines and dia-beetus esplosions appear to indicate otherwise.
116
@115 I am an actual expert in human biology and evolution as it relates to diet. Humans are naturally omnivores; this is incontrovertible. The obesity epidemic has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with choosing to eat animal products.

It's 'hilariously awesome' how you are suddenly an expert on the obesity epidemic as soon as you criticize other people for DOING THE EXACT SAME THING
117
@114: I'm serious. You should come. You are exactly the sort of person who needs to be educated about what rape really is and who is responsible for it.
I want you to come and march with me and allllll the other women there, and look at them, and talk to them, and realize that when you make your little car stereo analogy you are talking about people. People who got raped regardless of what they wore, or did, or didn't wear or didn't do.
Don't be a rape apologist anymore aardvark. Be a decent human being.

We now return to our regularly scheduled vegan bashing.
119
@ 116,

Post your dissertation or GTFO.

Tick, tock...
120
@105, I assure you that I don't judge meat eaters for eating meat. I don't think meat eaters should judge me for eating meat, and it has to go both ways.

It helps a lot that I believe in reincarnation. I struggled with the idea of meat eating as murder when I had just become a vegetarian, and that's what really helped me get over it. That and feeling certain that many of the animals humans consume would either never be born or would be consumed anyway if humans weren't involved.

Do I want animals to be treated better while they're alive. Yes. Oh, very badly. Do I blame the people eating the meat? No! Most people can't afford grass fed beef, free range chickens, etc. Even if they can, it's their choice, and I can't step in and judge them for it any more than they ought to step into my life and order me to buy this product or that.

Do I think vegetarianism is healthier for people and the earth? Yes. But I also think that eating local, organic, fresh food at every meal would be healthier. I can't do that--I eat bananas, I eat flour and sugar and pasta made who knows where because it's cheap and I'm broke. I eat cheese and eggs and ice cream. I eat Kraft Mac and Cheese when I'm feeling cruddy. People living in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, right?

To relate it to evangelism... If you believe in a different god than I do, or no god at all, then I don't feel like I should be able to judge you for that, and I don't think that you should judge me. I'm not looking to convert people to my beliefs, regardless of how passionate I am about the subject.

Does that all make sense? If not, sorry. I had a much better response typed up, but it got eaten. If you have questions, please feel free to ask.

With that, unless people address me specifically, I think I'll bow out of this conversation. I've said my piece.
121
@119 I'm a phd student currently working on my thesis. I'd be happy to send it along when it's done. In the mean time, feel free to check out any of my publications in major journals if you doubt my credentials, one of which is linked here.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21533…
122
I love vegans/veganism. But in response to that letter, this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfnVHp19-…
123
@121
Oh! Snap!!! Sooo sucks to be @119.
124
I can sort of - sort of - understand why you wouldn't judge meat eaters if your veganism stems from spirituality (you're in charge of your own salvation and it doesn't have to bother you if other people choose to go to hell).

But if something is unethical in your moral system - for example, breeding pets is unethical in mine - then you will speak up against it not because you feel self righteous, but because you want to give voice to those who suffer because of that practice - pets who get euthanized in shelters, in my case. I certainly can't and won't ever be OK with heartless *beep* who breed their pets and take homes away from kittens and puppies who die in shelters every day. If I could make spaying and neutering all pets legally mandatory I would - so it only makes sense to me that if ethical vegans could make veganism legally mandatory they would. Vegans fighting for meat eaters' right to eat meat sounds perverse to me - I can't imagine myself fighting for pet owners' right to produce and give away puppies and kittens, unless I got a brain tumor or something.
125
Also a Stanford University professor, Dr. Christopher Gardner, a 25-year vegetarian, made a video-recorded presentation (on YouTube) "The Battle of the Diets: Is Anyone Winning?" in which he compares four popular diets for weight-loss effectiveness and healthfulness. It's 76 minutes in length, but I'm sure you can fast-track to conclusions by skipping around or by reading the comments or finding study summaries online.
126
The last pork roast I made was rather bland, but not slop (too muscly to be slop). I probably should have put Kitchen Bouquet on it before I put in in the Crockpot (which is probably why it turned out bland). I'll do that next time.
127
If we're talking about health, this diet looks like the winner to me (at least for the typical sedentary types that most of us have become): http://www.drfuhrman.com/library/foodpyr…

128
@124
Sooo… , then, if, for example, breeding is unethical in mine - then you will speak up against it not because you feel self righteous, but because you want to give voice to those who suffer because of that practice - orphans in orphanages, in my case. I certainly can't and won't ever be OK with heartless *beep* who breed and take homes away from orphans who suffer in orphanages every day. If I could make spaying and neutering all humans legally mandatory I would - so it only makes sense to me that if ethical vegans could make veganism legally mandatory they would. Vegans fighting for meat eaters' right to eat meat sounds perverse to me - I can't imagine myself fighting for parents right to produce children, unless I got a brain tumor or something.
Yeah… I guess I see how that works… Cool!
129
That would work, 128, if there weren't more people waiting to adopt a child than children available for adoption. I wonder how is it possible that so many people don't realize that? (No, you're not the first person to try to use that argument with me.)
130
@124

Well, that's not quite it. (For one thing, I'm not fighting for their rights! I'm not going to be an activist for them, and I wouldn't want to be. I think that you're taking it a little farther than I am, if you think that's what I mean. I'm just saying that they can eat it as long as no one makes me eat it.) Anyway, I think we have different approaches to our beliefs, and we hold different things as the foundations of our beliefs.

I don't want to argue with you, and I can't think of another way to put it that seems like it'll convince you without inciting a potential argument (which would be totally counter to my aims) so I may have to stop here. If you think that my beliefs are contradictory and/or perverse, well, I can't really keep you from thinking that. I just wanted to let you know that this vegetarian, at least, isn't judging you. That's all.
132
No, I didn't think it was contradictory or perverse because I didn't think you were a vegan for ethical reasons (the "you" I used in the second paragraph was a general you, not you personally - I apologize for the lack of clarity in my comment).
133
Oh, I'm not, at least not primarily. Thank you for that clarification. I can only speak for myself, not other vegetarians, so I don't know what to say. I really thought you meant me... I'm glad we cleared that up.
134
@118 I think I love you
135
I'm going to go watch Scott Pilgrim again after reading this. The Vegan Police are so serious.
136
I always thought vegans WERE poofs?
137
I'm not vegan, and I can't get decent food at hospitals, jails, airlines, or other such institutions, either.
138
fifty-two-eighty, age has nothing to do with maturity. Ever hear that girls mature faster than boys? It doesn't mean they age faster, like they have two birthdays a year or something.

I'm a vegetarian, and sometimes do have fun poking people for their carnivorous pursuits. Bite into their steak and I say MOOOOO!!!! Obviously they're friends, I tend not to poke non-friendly carnivores.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lecm30iDH…
139
Sigh. I'm a vegan. Vegans are hardly oppressed (generally they're white and predominantly well-off). And, that isn't the point, SALAD. If you're vegan, animals are the ones being oppressed, not you. Going to prison? Request PBJ and stop implying that any form of sexism, racism, heterosexism, etc, etc is less worse than any others. IT'S ALL WRONG.
140
The guy who sat in front of me in 11th grade history was left-handed. The only benefit I noticed was that no one could copy off of him.
141
Fuck you, LW.
142
@137 for the win!
143
Well maybe an upside-down bar stool would sit four gays, but SALAD needs to get the stick out of her ass.
144
Am I the only one who thinks some vegans are super pissy because they r doing it wrong and are super hungry? I know tons of vegans who eat nothing but pita chips and peanut butter. Like, if we gave this guy a nice steak (cow or vegetable based--whatever) he'd be like "geez, I'm sorrry dan. I don't even remember writing that!"
145
For the life of me I can't understand why people think that vegans are a bunch of petty, humorless, sanctimonious autocrats.
146
Isn't veganism just a reach-around for vegetarianism?
147
@129
"That would work, 128, if there weren't more people waiting to adopt a child than children available for adoption."

Repeated for emphasis. This is one of the most pernicious modern lies and gets children trafficked in poor countries.
149
wow. Why does this feel like an "obvious fake letter" intended to drive a wedge between the rainbow and the vegans? The only truly angry vegan I am aware of, sacrificed himself with a gun shot at the 911 towers site after Bush won the election... This letter doesn't feel real.
150
WTF is wrong with vegans? Christ, they aren't happy lecturing everyone about what to eat, do they have to be so fucking humorless? Lots of vegan food is TERRIBLE. I've eaten it. It's horrid. Yes, I've also eaten amazing vegan food (Greens restaurant in SF among other places) but most of it's terrible. Vegans have to know this. Or are they vegan because they have no tastebuds?

And last time I checked, being vegan most certainly is a choice.
151
I'm not going to read a single comment on this because I know Sloggers already hate vegetarians/vegans, but this lunatic is not representative of a single vegan I know—and I know many. This person is crazy, and just happens to be a vegan.
152
@ 148, yes it's sad that older children and children with disabilities are not as popular as babies when it comes to adoption, but that still doesn't mean that there are more children for adoption than there are people who want to adopt (is that what you're trying to prove or am I misreading you?). It just means that some people will rather stay childless or wait for years to adopt a baby than adopt an older child immediately.

@ 151, shame, I would like to hear your opinion on my comments :P
153
I am neither gay nor vegan, and I don't think being vegan is as hard as being gay or that vegans are oppressed in any way. Most of the vegetarians I've met haven't been jerks about it, either.
154
Am I the only one to whom the letter reminded of that Seinfeld episode with the dentist? (Season 8, Episode 19) Jerry's friend, a dentist, converts to Judaism just for being able to tell Jewish jokes... But then Jerry gets into trouble when he makes fun of dentists ("What's the difference between dentists and sadists? Newer magazines!"). His friends accuse him of bigotry (Kramer: "The next thing you'll be saying they need their own schools or something!" Jerry: "But... but they have their own schools!" Kramer: "YOU SEE?! You're doing it already!") When Jerry tries to assert his right of making fun of dentists by comparing it to the Jewish jokes the dentist keeps telling, the guy goes "It's different! I'm a Jew! You're not a dentist!"
Hilarious episode.
155
How about being gay and black- like say in Uganda? This person gives a really bad name to vegans-especially since their example joke and Savage's pun were orders of magnitude apart...what a fleatard
156
Being vegan/vegetarian is tiring. Not because we malnourished or anything, but because we have to hear all the time this kind of stupid shit about us.
Yeah, SALAD is crazy, homophobic or what ever you want. Why don't you insult him rather than all of us? When a gay piss me off, I don't start yelling homophobic slur. Now, even though I don't agree with this letter, Dan tend to be a prick when he starts to talk about other subjects than sex.

Being veggie is really different from being gay, since it's obviously a choice. Nobody got killed/thrown out of his house for being vegan but we also are being harassed, in a different way.

I've never tried to convert anyone, but I did many time (almost once for every person I've eaten with) had to justify why I wasn't eating meat. I had to politely listen to all the stupid identical arguments:
- but humans have always eaten meat/ got intelligent thanks to meat (even though we have a better life expectancy)
- you're lacking of proteins/iron/ vitamin B12! (yeah, half of the people I've talk believe they are nutrition experts, even though they know nothing of the subject)
- It's not natural! (...)
- You're in a sect (...)
And so many more.
You'll notice than all the examples above can be slightly modified to explain why gay is evil and gay marriage an abomination.

We are against something that cause countless suffering, help damaging the planet and isn't very healthy. Does that really make us worth of all this mocking?
Is it possible that there are "closeted" vegans (omnivores not comfortable with it), the same way there are homophobic closeted gays?
157
Kyrie, you just need to get better friends. I don't know anyone, regardless of their views on vegetarianism, who would take it upon themselves to preach to people about what they eat. I don't really know many vegetarians/vegans who do this either, but I've met one or two. Either you're starting the discussion yourself, or you're friends with a lot of rude bastards.
158
@chicago girl: from my friends, I mostly get reactions of curiosity. The problem is with colleagues and family. (Oh the dreadful Christmas meals...)
And you can choose your friends, but not your friends' friends. ^^
159
I've been veg for over half my life, and vegan on and off during that time period. I'm pretty laid-back. I won't cook meat, or buy yr. ass a meat lunch if we're on a date ('cept my Mom: I bought her chicken pho when she came to visit, but I figure I can sacrifice for her.) If my meal gets screwed up at a restaurant and comes out with cheese, I say "well, that was a freebie" and eat it anyway. I work at a meat restaurant that prides itself on it's bacon burgers and steaks. I never make faces when I'm serving meat, when asked for a recommendation about a meal, I name and describe the most popular items (which are typically meat). People will see me eating my lunch, and that is when things get rude. "What are you, some kind of vegetarian?"

Yes.

They begin to mock me, literally, deriding my life choices. They will not ask questions, but just make asinine fucking assumptions about what my life must be like. They will walk over and sit next to me while I am eating (and on my break, thanks douches) and slowly eat their bloody steak. I don't go up to them and announce my lifestyle choice. They seek it out, and then harass me. This happens at least once a week.

Cool Job.
160
I don't side with this writer. Or anyone who represents vegans poorly, such as PETA. BUT Stranger writers and, it seems, a lot of Stranger readers/ comment folks here, seem to have an irrational disgust with vegan-anything (judging from past Stranger articles/commentary in years past as well).
I'm in conservative-mainstream Spokane and whenever folks here find out I'm on a vegan diet they simply seem to think huh, well that's different, ok. I don't sense any instant disrespect as I have had with some in Seattle when I lived there recently. Soooo what is with you Seattle assholes anyway?

It's like deciding that anybody who avoids beans, or rice, or soy, or coffee deserves to be bashed. Other analogies, to help any idiot vegan bashers out there: It's about as dumb as bashing people for NOT liking country music, or for NOT voting for Obama, or for NOT going to the gym, or for NOT drinking alcohol. Are you people just insecure or something? Veganism is only becoming more mainstream, despite all the shit talk, so you might as well get over it.
Either that or you might as well find more demographics of people to bash for NOT living as you do. Heck, if we just all do this eventually we can all end up hating each other!! Totally by choice, with no intellect or reasoning whatsoever!!
161
The letter writer believes homosexuality and left-handedness are a choice and that non-whites have 'extra melanin' rather than precisely how much melanin their bodies need. So we have a homophobic white supremacist vegan on our hands demanding an apology for her/his 'rights' to a vegan lifestyle being violated by society and in a sex advice column?

Whatever. I have a right to Kraft brand Macaroni And Cheese because it's the cheesiest. Do not violate my rights to same or unwittingly suggest we go to a restaurant without it on the menu, or you're a Nazi hypocrite bully douchetard or whatever. Cause I got my panties in a twist and I say so. I'm so oppressed; poor me. I hate everyone. Thank you.
162
I went to a Christian Camp where I learned all about how I could tame my "vegan" side and be holy. Truth is, you're born a vegan, die a vegan. Gay's MAKE that choice.
163
Oh and handedness is arbitrary.
164
I just want to say that I have been vegan for close to 20 years.

It's just a dietary choice that makes sense to me, both morally and in terms of health.

I have no comment on the original letter. You guys seem to have said most of what I was thinking. :-)

Just wanted to post because A) I am a vegan, without being a preachy pain in the ass, and wanted to say so

and

B) The fact that I share a diet with the asshat who wrote this letter does not mean that we have anything else in common, and I also wanted to say that.

Peace and love,
Doc

PS- I just told the barstool joke to a close friend (gay AND vegan) and then showed him the letter. He thinks the joke is hysterical, and the letter writer is a shitstain.
165
There's no law stipulating that vegans should, in any way, have their rights infringed, whether legal, political, marital, financial, or personal.

Vegans find themselves on the wrong side of every food-related argument; while gays would be very unlikely to promote homosexuality to straight people (for what would be the point?), certain varieties of vegan take it upon themselves to tell others what they should be eating. The reason people dislike vegans is the very same reason people dislike fundamentalists. How can we not expect people to behave defensively when their legal lifestyle is being compared with murder?
166
@165 "certain varieties of vegan take it upon themselves to tell others what they should be eating. " In my experience, the opposite is much more likely to happen. Not that, in a perfect world, we wouldn't dream that anybody would stop eating animals, but we (at least the rational among us) know that it is useless to try to convert other (vegetarianism almost always come from personal reflexion for what I could see) and, living in a society were meat is everywhere and is the norm, it would just alienate us from our friends and family.

"their legal lifestyle" so what, legal = good? Ecologist also tells you that your life style is endangering the planet, does that make them like fundamentalists?
167
I'm gay, a vegan, and not amused.
168
@166 Political groups with much mass-media attention drive a vegan agenda. I'm sure I don't have to list them. Really, go fuck yourself. So you say you wouldn't, so you imply the issue doesn't exist at all. We wouldn't be having this discussion if certain animal-rights groups hadn't committed murder in the name of this ridiculous cause.

For the same reason that moderate Muslims will obfuscate the perils of their religion driven by fundamentalists, so will moderate vegans obfuscate the same, protecting the fundamentalists with intent merely not to reveal the truth of their insane creed.

Away going, worship your crazy mud-god. But, please first, smear yourself in mud, that we might identify you as a loony from the start.
169
Just because you realize it's useless to try to convert meat eaters to veganism doesn't mean you don't consider them murderers, 166. For example I am convinced that pedophilia can't be cured, but that doesn't mean I'm OK with child rape. Just by being a vegan you're antagonizing meat eaters - you don't have to preach veganism to them, even if you don't say a word it's obvious that you're judging them.

170
@168/169...Why so rude? Just because I live my life the way I am most comfortable I am antagonizing carnivores? And said carnivores don't have enough self-control (must be blood-lust?) to be polite and respectful? Is the consumption of a vegetable a radical-political act that shakes y'all to the very core? Hide yr. children!! Sounds much more like the carnivores in this thread are being judgmental, if we ignore the (obviously) crazy LW.
171
@168: May I know why you started to insult me? I really can't see anything in what I wrote that could offend you or was less than civilized. Why the hate?
A vegan agenda... How funny, this reminds me of something else. Oh yeah, I know, the big scary gay agenda! Sure, we all belong to a church, a very powerful, rich and influential one (we are sooo many) and we are coming for your ham. Hide yourself. Since I don't live in the same country (or the same continent for that matter) I don't know what are the group you're referring to. Not that I care. "Certain animal-rights groups hadn't committed murder" So? People I never met, whom I'm in any way affiliated to committed murder for ideas that looks likes mine. I guess I'm guilty. By the way, I tend to enjoy my properties, am I responsible for anybody who kills a thief? I like peace as well, does that mean I am responsible for all the people that declare war in the name of peace? Am I responsible as well for those who kill in the name of love and passion, because i feel that too?
I don't protect anybody, I don't belong to any group. There are crazy Muslims, crazy Christians, crazy vegans. There are also crazy atheists, crazy Americans.
I don't have any God, any sacred book, any guru. I happen to give intrinsic value to life, and in your twisted, sad logic it makes me an insane fundamentalist. Please keep your insults to yourself.
172
@169: I don't believe you're a murderer. And I do hope that meat consumption will decrease over time, though I wouldn't even dream to die in a society with a majority of vegans. I don't believe omnivorous are murderer, (or I wouldn't have any friend) in the same that I don't consider that all the people who had slave, in say, antic Greek, was a completely inhuman. It is more a kind of blindness to suffering. Veganism is an idea that progress so slowly because no human's rights is directly at stake. If we compare to gays, since that was one of the initial debate, how many people would still not care about gays if none of the following had happen to them: they were gay, their kid was gay, one of their friend/family was gay? It's so difficult to make people care.
And I know too well how difficult it is to change your way of thinking and your way of life to include yet another group among what deserve to live, and to live free from cruelty (intended or not). I know it because I've been omnivorous for more than 20 years and still now I am not vegan but vegetarian. And I also know my occidental way of life partly depend on the exploitation of poor people, of the stealing of natural resources to weaker countries and harm the planet in a way that affect all those who live on it.
So you see, being a vegetarian doesn't mean I scream MURDER! in my head every day I sit for lunch. It just mean that I try to do my best not to participate in actions that, I perceive, hurt others (and not just animals. Meat industry is an ecological disaster)
173
@Tiare

I'm a vegan and I DO judge people for using animal products, but I am also too diplomatic to say so unless directly confronted. I care about animal rights and veganism is a compelling lifestyle choice for me. I think eating animals is wrong, period, but I have to work my way up to actually saying that in a conversation or else I get people freaking out that I'm soooo preachy.

I'm also a lesbian and come from an Appalachian coal town with dire poverty. No other vegan I know in person is anything but white and upper middle class. I'm acutely aware of intersectionality and privilege (perhaps I even sound like a working class academic now) and I really try to frame veganism in terms of systems of oppression at first. Vegans have said extremely classist and offensive shit about hunters, and I won't put up with that when I grew up eating hunted meat for literally lack of anything else sometimes. If we're going to be judgmental, it needs to be directed toward those who have much more control over their environments (I'm looking at localvores with their "cage free" eggs and veal who are even more classist and annoying).
174
@ 172, you're right, I forgot about that possibility - rather than keeping meat eaters responsible for their actions, you will let them off the hook because they don't know any better. Frankly I don't know which is more insulting to meat eaters, but I'm guessing it's the paternalistic latter attitude.

Sure, maybe some people, probably children, aren't aware of the reality of meat industry, but I really want to believe that most adults aren't so freakin' clueless. Yes, most meat eaters know that animals are killed and they suffer and they would obviously be happier if they played in the sun bathed meadows for the rest of their lives until they die of old age - they just don't care.

Believing that everyone is so empathetic that they would become vegan the moment they learned about the reality of meat industry and/or reality about animals' mental capacity probably makes your life easier, but the harsh depressing truth is that you're fooling yourself.

@ 173, agreed with everything you said there.
175
@174: I'm not as naive as you think. But I do notice that a huge majority of people I talked to are horrified by the subject of how their meal came in their plate, especially the part where the animal get its throat cut. Without entering with any detail, you can see that people (except those who have been used to watching it) become completely uncomfortable.
A lot of people likes animals. Sure, they care more about the cute ones or those who looks like humans. But they care, more and more. Have you seen the reaction to the football player who kicked an owl during a match. It was a public example of animal cruelty, and it made a lot of people, not just vegans, react. If you don't believe me, go down the street and, I don't know, stab a cat in front of people. See if nobody care. But people are ready to pretend they don't know that way worse is happening every day for their pleasure, as long as they don't have to watch it.
It use to be normal to go on public places to watch a man get its head cut off, people would cheer. Today, not so much. Sensibilities evolve.

Are you as much aggressive with every person you have an ideological disagreement with? You really must hate environmentalists. And everybody that doesn't vote like you.
176
"Are you as much aggressive with every person you have an ideological disagreement with?"

Depends on the disagreement, if they're violating someone's rights then I am.

I know that most people (who are not sociopaths) prefer humane conditions for raising livestock and humane ways of killing animals. And many are against fur trade, too. And killing / kicking animals just for the sake of killing / kicking is considered obviously wrong. This all means that they care about animals - just as long as there is meat on their plate. Pamper the cows, keep them in best stables, feed them the best food, kill them so painlessly they don't even notice - and you will get support from virtually every meat eater. But don't u dare suggest we don't kill them, because that means that majority of humans have to give up some pleasures in life (for some, even a major pleasure), and that won't happen.

Gays would have never won any rights if heterosexuals had had to sacrifice some of their rights. Because Majority won't sacrifice. You can either make it sacrifice from above (Russian Tzar's abolition of slavery, abolition of slavery in the US) or the oppressed classes can rebel and win (the French revolution, and subsequent revolutions in the European countries). Since the latter is not possible with animals, the former remains the only way - enlightened dictators can force veganism on entire countries. Which, while possible in theory, is highly improbable.
177
"if they're violating someone's rights then I am." I am not. No vegan is. Nobody here or anywhere (except lunatics) has suggested we should take the power and force veganism on everybody. And when you see the number of vegans in western societies, the idea is rather laughable.
But you say that the abolition of slavery in the US was an act of dictatorship?

My turn to call you naive. The condition in which livestock is raised is not only far from what you describe, but it certainly isn't getting closer, as the demand for meat augment. But you are right to say that it would be an argument if it was true, since people often make uninformed claim on the well being of animals, and I can only guess it is to give oneself a clear conscience.
And even the law agree. It is forbidden to torture animals. It is forbidden to rape them. But it is allowed to kill them. Which is kind of ironic when you think that it has often been observed that animals, like humans, are capable of inflicting themselves a great deal of pain in order to save their lives.
They prefer the pain over death. We (pretend to) offer them the opposite.
178
Being vegan does not make you part of a protected class. Sorry, princess.
179
That's correct, we do. Because we're thinking in terms of human well being, not animal well being. We don't allow torturing animals for the sake of torturing them because we want people to be empathetic so they don't begin to torture humans. That's also why we encourage children to love animals and treat them well. On the other hand, we allow killing animals for food because there's no reasonable doubt that killing animals for food would lead to killing humans for food.

So because we groom empathy in people virtually everyone would prefer to eat animals that were well cared for rather than animals that were tortured - as long as they can afford it of course. If buying meat from well cared for animals is so expensive they would have to give up some other pleasures in life, the care stops there. Because we don't sacrifice. Unless the law makes us.

And you're right, I am saying that slavery in the US wasn't abolished through democratic process - the abolition was forced on the Southern states when they lost the war.
180
"does not make you part of a protected class" Not one of our claim. No need for it. Personally, all I would ask for the short term would be correct meals in cafeterias and a little more tolerance. I know, crazy.

Animal and human well-being are not two mutually exclusive things.
The love for animals isn't perfect to bring brotherly love for all humans as testify all the lunatics who love their dog more than humans and train them to attack all trespassers. But I guess there is some truth in what you say: we raise kids by telling them it's bad to hurt animals, but ok to do whatever you want to them in slaughterhouses. And you end up mostly with kids that wouldn't hurt their neighbor but couldn't care less if their i-whatever, their branded clothes or shoes,... are made by underage, underpaid, exploited people in china. I guess there is some mimicry.

But I don't see how you draw this weird line. If you torture animals, you might torture other humans but if you do worst with the intent of selling their skin, their flesh or to test the last shampoo, there is no risk? You got me confused.

But even if you may be partly right about the social use of pets, there is more to it. If I go out and shoot my neighbor's dog (not that I have a gun), I can assure you that the first thought he'll have won't be "she could do the same to me" but rather something like "the mf killed my Médor" and he'll be sad. And angry. Because he cared for him, and not just as an educational tool or a property.
181
As a left-handed person, I'm mildly offended by this dude. Sure, being a southpaw isn't a horrible burden, but we do live in a right-handed world designed for right-handed people
182
I'd like to apologise on the behalf of vegans and vegetarians who aren't like this guy (which I do hope is most of us).
I do want to point out though that I found vegetarian food tasty long before I decided to become vegetarian, so I'm not sure where the bland stereotype comes from.
183
"One day, just as lefthanders are no longer maligned, "

Um, excuse me but when the fuck did that day pass? Did I miss the memo?
I still cannot get notebooks that have the rings on the right side so they don't eat up my left wrist when I write. I cannot even get a left handed desk to use at my University. Every doorknob and water faucet handle is either on the wrong side or turns the wrong way.

You wanna see how great and easy it is to be left-handed in our faux-accommodating world?
I dare you to not use your right hand for a week and see if it doesn't drive you crazy being surrounded by everyday items you have to struggle to use.
184
"One day, just as lefthanders are no longer maligned, "

Um, excuse me but when the fuck did that day pass? Did I miss the memo?
I still cannot get notebooks that have the rings on the right side so they don't eat up my left wrist when I write. I cannot even get a left handed desk to use at my University. Every doorknob and water faucet handle is either on the wrong side or turns the wrong way.

You wanna see how great and easy it is to be left-handed in our faux-accommodating world?
I dare you to not use your right hand for a week and see if it doesn't drive you crazy being surrounded by everyday items you have to struggle to use.

    Please wait...

    Comments are closed.

    Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


    Add a comment
    Preview

    By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.