Blogs Jul 6, 2011 at 9:00 am

For Amusement Purposes Only

Bethany Jean Clement
Back to article

Comments

1
The cultural bias in these question is staggeringly repellent. Very disrespectful of the "don't give a fuck about no logic" ethos of bastard Irish dirt farming people like mine. I feel belittled, as if yesterday's finger-measuring wasn't humiliating enough...
gloomy gus on July 6, 2011 at 9:03 AM Report this
2
Sorry to spoil the fun, but these aren't real LSAT questions.
Fifty-Two-Eighty on July 6, 2011 at 9:06 AM Report this
3
"Ah my morning SLOG. What's this? No. No....NOOOOOOOOO!!!!"

*insert horrible, horrible LSAT/Law School/Bar Exam flashbacks*
Foghorn Leghorn on July 6, 2011 at 9:13 AM Report this
4
Ha I took the LSAT once without studying for fun. So far I have #1 as A. I hated this section though, and think I'll leave the rest for everyone else.
prompt on July 6, 2011 at 9:26 AM Report this
5
@2 - How so? They look exactly like the "logic games" section of the LSAT. Which would be the section I scored worst on. So, no. I will not play along with your evil mind games, Bethany.
evilvolus on July 6, 2011 at 9:45 AM Report this
6
Q: Why do lawyers wear neck ties?

A: So their foreskins don't creep up over their heads.
Mahtli69 on July 6, 2011 at 9:53 AM Report this
7
Fuck this, I am not helping you get into law school without a promise for pro-bono representation the next time I am in jail.
wisepunk on July 6, 2011 at 10:07 AM Report this
8
1.) C
2.) C
3.) D
4.) E
5.) C
6.) E
7.) A
8.) C
beansarelame on July 6, 2011 at 10:09 AM Report this
9
Studying for the bar exam is making me downright nostalgic for the good old days of the LSAT. 3 hr multiple-choice test > two-and-a-half day 24-essay hatefuck.
Oliver W. Holmes on July 6, 2011 at 10:11 AM Report this
10
I agree with you on all but 6.), bean. I got A.
yourmom.com on July 6, 2011 at 10:15 AM Report this
11
It sure doesn't look like the test I took. 35 years ago. Ahem.
Fifty-Two-Eighty on July 6, 2011 at 10:22 AM Report this
12
C
Amanda on July 6, 2011 at 10:23 AM Report this
13
Got nerd-sniped big time on this one

C
C
A
A
C
E
A
C
on July 6, 2011 at 10:27 AM Report this
14
@10: For 6, if you choose A, the sets of possible letters can include J,L,N,M or J,L,P,M. With E, the only set of possible letters if M,Q,K,P.
beansarelame on July 6, 2011 at 10:27 AM Report this
15
derp.
yourmom.com on July 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM Report this
16
Lawyers fuck best.
uhhnananana on July 6, 2011 at 10:36 AM Report this
17
Whoops, that should be 4: C

Reading comprehension FTL
on July 6, 2011 at 10:42 AM Report this
18
1. C 2. B 3. D 4. E 5. C 6. D 7. A 8. B
The Max on July 6, 2011 at 10:42 AM Report this
19
I got: 1. C; 2. C; 3. D; 4. E; 5. B; 6. E; 7. A; 8. C
keshmeshi on July 6, 2011 at 10:48 AM Report this
20
@19: For #2, VUTYXWZ is an acceptable series.
beansarelame on July 6, 2011 at 10:54 AM Report this
21
@#11, It sure looks like the test I took two years ago.

I refuse to do this ever again. It was my worst section EASILY. Having only gone to ultra shitty California public schools, then Evergreen, i had never even seen a logic puzzle before the LSAT. It was pretty miserable.

Thanks for nothing, Bethany Jean Clement. Thanks for nothing.
dangerousgift on July 6, 2011 at 11:03 AM Report this
22
Me get automated time release blog posting software someday ...
Will in Seattle on July 6, 2011 at 11:09 AM Report this
23
@20 From where I see it, that's why @19 is correct. V is first, U must play immediately after, Y or Z must play immediately after W, which must go after X. So to start, only T, Y, or Z can go last, but neither T or Y can go last, so it must be Z that plays seventh.

I got the same answers as @19.
Schmooze on July 6, 2011 at 11:36 AM Report this
24
My answers matched up with the posted solutions, but I'm confused as to what this has to do with being a lawyer. Did I miss my calling? D: (Mathematician here.)
JBB on July 6, 2011 at 12:04 PM Report this
25
@23 Yup! I meant @18, not @19.

As for #5, potential combinations are: NLJM, NLKQ and NLKM. Therefore, C.
beansarelame on July 6, 2011 at 12:10 PM Report this
26
@11 I suspect you can take these kinds of questions and just substitute details to make a new story. LSAT madlibs, if you will.
Sir Vic on July 6, 2011 at 12:25 PM Report this
27
How many lawyers does it take to contribute improve societal well being?
Valpey on July 6, 2011 at 12:30 PM Report this
28
How many lawyers does it take to contribute toward improved societal well being?

sqrt(-1)
Valpey on July 6, 2011 at 12:32 PM Report this
29
@28: http://www.q-law.org/LegalClinic
sqrt(1) is the answer you're looking for
on July 20, 2011 at 8:58 PM Report this

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview
Posted by (your name here)

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Editors' Picks

Losing My Bearings with Cascade Orienteering Club
Stop Doomscrolling for Three Minutes and Watch the New Mudhoney Video
Seattle Is the Anti-Fashion Capital of the World
Getting Patrick Pregnant
The Woman in 606
The Long Con
The Stranger
is a proud member of the network
Masthead Ad Info & Rates Jobs at The Stranger Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Use Takedown Policy Find The Stranger Near You
Support The Stranger
All contents © Noisy Creek, Inc.
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134