The cultural bias in these question is staggeringly repellent. Very disrespectful of the "don't give a fuck about no logic" ethos of bastard Irish dirt farming people like mine. I feel belittled, as if yesterday's finger-measuring wasn't humiliating enough...
@2 - How so? They look exactly like the "logic games" section of the LSAT. Which would be the section I scored worst on. So, no. I will not play along with your evil mind games, Bethany.
Studying for the bar exam is making me downright nostalgic for the good old days of the LSAT. 3 hr multiple-choice test > two-and-a-half day 24-essay hatefuck.
@#11, It sure looks like the test I took two years ago.
I refuse to do this ever again. It was my worst section EASILY. Having only gone to ultra shitty California public schools, then Evergreen, i had never even seen a logic puzzle before the LSAT. It was pretty miserable.
Thanks for nothing, Bethany Jean Clement. Thanks for nothing.
@20 From where I see it, that's why @19 is correct. V is first, U must play immediately after, Y or Z must play immediately after W, which must go after X. So to start, only T, Y, or Z can go last, but neither T or Y can go last, so it must be Z that plays seventh.
My answers matched up with the posted solutions, but I'm confused as to what this has to do with being a lawyer. Did I miss my calling? D: (Mathematician here.)
*insert horrible, horrible LSAT/Law School/Bar Exam flashbacks*
A: So their foreskins don't creep up over their heads.
2.) C
3.) D
4.) E
5.) C
6.) E
7.) A
8.) C
C
C
A
A
C
E
A
C
Reading comprehension FTL
I refuse to do this ever again. It was my worst section EASILY. Having only gone to ultra shitty California public schools, then Evergreen, i had never even seen a logic puzzle before the LSAT. It was pretty miserable.
Thanks for nothing, Bethany Jean Clement. Thanks for nothing.
I got the same answers as @19.
As for #5, potential combinations are: NLJM, NLKQ and NLKM. Therefore, C.
sqrt(-1)
sqrt(1) is the answer you're looking for