Comments
Please wait...
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
Editors' Picks
is a proud member of the
network
network
All contents © Noisy Creek, Inc.
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
2- the notion that AIDS education rather than porn has promoted anal would be funny were it not so colossally monumentally asinine.
3- it is sad to see Danny so locked into his prejudices and bigotries....
I'll add that I'm so glad to have a school district that has comprehensive sex education for everyone whose parents do not remove them from class.
Danny, if God made you gay, why didn't he give you a fuckable hole?
That seems cruel and sadistic.....
get it?
HARD on porn....
UWAHAHAHA!
our little Danny is a punster!
Danny, are you aware that oral also can spread STDs?
And that protection is indicated then also?
Did you know that, Danny?
I know you like using the username as some kind of last laugh, so maybe that's why you're enjoying such a copious amount of comment diarrhea, but c'mon, surely you can collect your thoughts enough before writing a reply that you don't have to do it again, and again, and again, and again, and again.
Glad LW is happy, my best to everyone everywhere with what they're happy with.
Oh and just to help out with red flag waving (chortle - does he even know what that signals?): buttsex! buttsex!
*sigh*. Barrel. Fish. Bang.
Saying "period" doesn't give your argument more weight, it only serves to make you look stupid.
The problem isn't "porn", the problem is certain types of erotica, and certain approaches to its consumption.
The majority of porn is terrible, and much of it is unhealthy. Saying "period" ignores the reality of the situation and promotes intellectual incuriosity.
Honestly, though? I don't think it's any one cause. And this chicken and the egg thing will get real tiring really quick. Needless to say there is PLENTY of porn out there that caters to the non-anal gays so why bother getting all riteous a about it?
Me personally? Even before being exposed to AIDS education, long before sex-Ed and the discovery of gay porn I was irreversibly drawn to a nice, round, bubble butt on a guy. I didn't even know why or what I wanted to do with it yet- but I knew i wanted to do something to it. Something hot. I wanted to play with it, rub it, whatever. The discovery of anal sex was less a "oh Jeez is this what they want me to do?" and more of a "FUCK YEAH! I can't WAIT to do that!"
To each their own though. Even an ass-obsessed man like me doesn't want to do anal all the time or even the majority of the time. It tends to be messy and an involved sexual act and is best saved for when both parties come prepared. And if the butt does nothing for you? Good for you! But to think that most guys would think like you if you simply removed the anal from porn or the crazy "condom every time" sex education is honestly ridiculous and very self-serving of you. And sounds eerily like the bigoted line of "if you show acceptance of Chaz Bono on national TV in a positive light it will make girls suddenly want to all become men!"
wow.
making ourselves look stupid.
how embarrassing.
well, it could have been worse.
we could have claimed that AIDS education gives unrealistic and unhealthy attitudes toward sex.
hey, we can do it all night if you like, baby....
Is it fair to wonder if gay anal sex often mirrors bad hetero sex, where one partner enjoys fucking (as the top), and the other puts up with being fucked?
Hoping I'm way off base here...
It gets worse...straight dudes blackmailed into gay sex!!
Boy Posing As Girl On Facebook Extorts Sex
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/02/0…
Suck it, Alleged.
It's all allegation until it goes to court, but more importantly... through what tortured logic exactly do you think that's relevant to this thread?
I felt extremely vindicated when America's foremost sex-advice fag explained (in a YouTube video I shared) that oral sex is sex, mutual masturbation is sex, rolling around naked and getting off is sex, and that there are degrees of virginity and not an all-or-nothing matter of filling a hole. Thanks for continuing to defend us butt-fuck-optionals.
Rates ARE down among normal Americans.
The only demographic in which AIDS is increasing is- guess!- homosexuals.
Why is that, Jr?
HIV and AIDS among Gay Men
Gay men continue to be the risk group most severely affected by HIV. CDC’s most recent data show that between 2006 and 2009, the number of new infections that occur each year increased among Gay men. These data clearly show the urgent need to expand access to proven HIV prevention programs for gay men, and to develop new approaches to fight HIV in this population.
A Snapshot
> Gay men account for nearly half of the approximately 1.2 million people living with HIV in the United States (49%, or an estimated 580,000 total persons).
> Gay men account for more than half of all new HIV infections in the United States each year (61%, or an estimated 29,300 infections).
> The rate of new HIV diagnoses among Gay men in the United States is more than 44 times that of other men (range: 522 – 989 per 100,000 Gay men vs. 12 per 100,000 other men).
Dudes. Gay, straight, or bi - they'll shove it in anything, anywhere. I'm just grateful that I'm a bit more discriminating with my lady bits. BTW, the HPV vaccine should be mandatory for all boys because their dirty cocks are major disease vectors for us ladies. Fucking bullshit.
In a study of 21 major U.S. cities in 2008, Gay men had high levels of HIV infection, and many of those infected with HIV did not know it.
• Overall, one in five Gay men participating in the study was infected (20 percent).
• Among those who were infected, nearly half (44 percent) were unaware of their HIV status.
• AIDS continues to claim the lives of too many Gay men. Since the beginning of the epidemic, more than 286,000 Gay men with AIDS have died.
Complex Factors Increase Risk
> High prevalence of HIV: The existing high prevalence of HIV among gay men means they face a greater risk of being exposed to infection with each sexual encounter, especially as they get older.
> Lack of knowledge of HIV status: Studies show that individuals who know they are infected take steps to protect their partners. Yet many gay men are unaware of their status and may unknowingly be transmitting the virus to others. Additionally, some gay men may make false assumptions or have inaccurate information about their partner’s HIV status. It is critical to ensure that sexually active gay men get tested for HIV at least annually, or more frequently as needed.
> Complacency about risk: Among young MSM in particular, complacency about HIV may play a key role in HIV risk, since these men did not personally experience the severity of the early AIDS epidemic. Additional challenges for many gay men include maintaining consistently safe behaviors over time, underestimating personal risk, and the false belief that because of treatment advances, HIV is no longer a serious health threat. We must reach each generation of gay men and develop programs that can help gay men remain uninfected throughout the course of their lives.
Because they're DUDES. If you could get laid as easily by your sexual interest as gay dudes can, you *would too*, asshole. But most ladies don't have the incredibly low standards as any-warm-hole-will-do DUDES. You're completely full of shit if you claim that the reason why you don't fuck like a bunny rabbit is because you're on a higher moral plane. It's because most ladies WON'T with you. Fucking idiot.
HIV: Protect Yourself
Be smart about HIV. Here’s what you can do to reduce your risk of infection:
Get the facts — Arm yourself with basic information: Are you at risk? How is HIV spread? How can you protect yourself?
Take control — You have the facts; now protect yourself and your loved ones. There are three essential ways to reduce your risk:
1. Don’t have sex (i.e., anal, vaginal or oral)
2. Only have sex (i.e., anal, vaginal or oral) if you’re in a mutually monogamous relationship with a partner you know is not infected
3. Use a condom every time you have anal, vaginal or oral sex. (Correct and consistent use of the male latex condom is highly effective in reducing HIV transmission.)
Put yourself to the test — Knowing your HIV status is a critical step toward stopping HIV transmission, because if you know you are infected, you can take steps to protect your
partners. Also, if you are infected, the sooner you find out, the sooner you can receive life-extending treatment. In fact, CDC recommends that all adults and adolescents be tested for HIV. Because other STDs can play a role in the acquisition of HIV, knowing whether you are infected with either is critical in reducing your risk for infection.
Call 1-800-CDC-INFO or visit www.hivtest.org to find HIV and STD testing locations near you.
Start talking — Talk to everyone you know about HIV — friends and family, coworkers and neighbors, at work and at places of worship. Have ongoing and open discussions with your partners about HIV testing and risk behaviors. Talking openly about HIV can reduce the stigma that keeps too many from seeking the testing, prevention and treatment services, and support they need.
HIV doesn’t have to become part of your life. Each of us can and must be part of the solution.
Visit www.actagainstaids.org for more information about HIV and what you can do to stop HIV.
you seem a little tense.
woud you like a donut?
I've heard from a few women who think it feels better than vaginal intercourse. This woman wrote entire memoir about her love of anal sex. And these ladies don't even have prostates.
the CDC wants YOU to know:
There are three essential ways to reduce your risk:
1. Don’t have sex (i.e., anal, vaginal or oral)
2. Only have sex (i.e., anal, vaginal or oral) if you’re in a mutually monogamous relationship with a partner you know is not infected
3. Use a condom EVERY TIME you have anal, vaginal or ORAL sex.
did you catch that Danny?
1 abstinence
2 monogamy
3 use a condom every time
now please don't be such an ignorant prick.....
Was it photoshopped? or did they smear shit all over it?
you've got a case, dude.....
...which it is, of course, but I just thought you deserved to know.
did you see the picture?
I could do without it myself, but I mostly try to watch amateur porn anyway.
Dan, can you verify your support for this principle in writing so that maybe Alleged will shut up about it?
sorry if we take it personally when celebrities use their fame to spread deadly misinformation.
we plead guilty to having a pathological obsession with The Truth
are you kidding?
Danny thought those CDC campaigns advocating condom use were bullying him into taking it in the ass.
and his idea of 'monogamy' is cheating nine times in six years of "marriage"....
Now I don't know where you get your information, but I know nothing of Dan cheating on Terry. To the best of my knowledge, he hasn't made any public statement to that effect, so how would you know if he was cheating unless...
Oh.
Alleged, humping a Dan Savage love pillow* does not count as Dan cheating on Terry with you.
*best four-word phrase of the month, IMHO
As for anal, I think a lot more guys would like it if they relaxed and gave it a chance.
People wear something on their feet in professional porn because the movie sets are filthy places. It would be a huge turn-off for most viewers to see those dirty feet waving around.
Just me I'm talking about here, however.
The second thing that increases the possibility of transmission is the NUMBER OF EXPOSURES. Bar cruising every night with strangers tilts the scale in favor of transmission. But seeing your fuck buddy three times a day, 24/7/365 doesn't unless he's HIV+ and you're engaging in high risk sexual behavior.
As I remember (and It's been about a years since I read this), the odds of getting infected via oral sex is something like 1 in 50,000 exposures. With anal sex it's like 1 in 500 exposures but changes drastically if a condom is used.
So what Dan is pointing out is that the incidences of new infections has dropped dramatically because 1) condoms are being used in buttsex and 2) people are opting out of buttsex in favor of oral sex.
Then there's the little known factor that the Religious Right ignores/lies-about and it's that there's an entire sub-group of gay men who simple don't do buttsex. Period. I'm in the "practically never" sub-group as viewed over the course of my whole life and the *never* group as viewed in the last 15 years - or - when AIDS education finally matured to the point where I could be informed about what choices to make
Actually America is weary of homosexuals giving themselves (and their innocent unsuspecting lied to significant others) AIDS then whining because we haven't given them a pill that lets them engage in unhealthy dangerous behavior with impunity.
It is a tired old song.
It doesn't really matter what word Reagan ever uttered or not or when.
It doesn't really matter what fundamentalists think or believe or say.
All that is relevant is that homosexuals keep shoving filthy germ and virus ridden things up their asses and infecting themselves then whining to the rest of the country to fix it.
The country really doesn't care what you shove up your asses and would love you to keep it your own business.
But you keep showing up at public health clinics with STDs at 80 times the rate of normal Americans and making it everyone's business.
And if you ever get Single Payer government health insurance you can expect the government to start telling you what you can shove up your asses, just like it tells smokers when and what they can puff on.
So do us all a favor;
1- quit infecting yourselves
or
2- STFU about it when you do and quit expecting everyone else to cure/pay for the infections and diseases you keep shoving up your asses.
don't forget oral and throat cancers.
zippity-do-da!
oh look, your sunny optimism is infectious.....
"can be" is nice but "really is" is a good bit uglier.
The reality is that gay sex infects with AIDS 50-80 times as much as hetero sex.
And other STDs at similarly high rates.
Is that a lot of fun, too?
you're right.
we'll go on despising AIDS, Bob.
how about you?....
we're happy you're happy, Rob.
really.
we hate to see lives wasted.
ignorance really IS death.....
what parts do you consider 'flaming'?
its all pretty cut and dry factual stuff.....
ah- we reach the crux of the matter;
if we disagree with Danny and Bob we must be closeted homosexuals.
gee.....we've never heard that one before.
ps...don't sell yourself short; your name is plenty cute
I understand that some women enjoy being fucked vaginally. It doesn't automatically assume that being fucked makes them want to then fuck their partner. Sometimes it is nice to have a role and something you are good at and enjoy. This has been "gays sex 101" thanks for your attention
Also, the data is flawed: asking guys 'did you do anal the last time you had sex' is going to give skewed results. I had sex this morning with my hand, so no, I did not have anal sex. Geez.
Also- love the way Period Troll is so frothed out today! Way to go Dan and Sloggers! BUTTSEX, BUTTSEX, BUTTSEX, BUTTSEX, AND DOUBLE BUTTSEX ON THE SIDE FOR YOU, troll!
so you think all heterosexuals who post on slog are closet homosexuals? deep thinking there, bob....
@70: Only the ones who obsess over gay sex. I'm straight, so I only ever contemplate gay sex from a clinical or statistical perspective.
I'm not that experienced as a bottom, either. It's definitely not on the menu for a first encounter (most of the times -- there have been exceptions). But that's not because I need emotional intimacy for it so much as that if I'm unfamiliar with a guy, that will make me a little more tense, and that's going to make it harder for me to either (1) relax enough to bottom, or (2) be comfortable enough to get him relaxed enough, if I'm topping, without getting all tense and stage-frighty and losing my erection.
My personal experience, at least, which may not be representative of all of us in our 40s.
However, I also love the buttsex! Giving and receiving. I find it much easier to find a gay guy who will give it to me, than a woman who will strap it on for me (or take it from me, for that matter).
I feel like I'm in denial when I say I'm straight and yet like a cock up the ass. But maybe not - if there are guys who consider themselves gay and don't ever like the buttsex, then what the heck.
That said, both of my teenagers have gotten shitty sex-ed at their otherwise very excellent school. We're on the border of Bachmann country, so 30% of the parents opt out completely. But still, the curriculum focuses on the physical changes during puberty and avoiding death by avoiding sex. There was no coverage of birth control and no mention that unmarried people under 21 might occasionally have sex.
Not that it's any of anyone else's business what anyone does with their junk with another consenting adult. OMIGAWD, BUTTSEX!!! The horror, the horror!!!111!!!!!!
In my experience I've found that the vast majority of women - including some 'queer' or 'bi' women - pretty much apply the bi-male double standard: touch one dick and you're gay, for life, Q.E.D., followed immediately by: get the hell away from me before you give me HIV or some other STD.
I've thought it would be a natural fit to find a bi woman who enjoyed strapping it on with me, but not so much in reality. I've been rejected over this a few times. There may be a few women I've known where this would not be an issue, but they were not attractive to me for other reasons (not all physical). It's a unicorn thing.
This is not a big part of my sex life. I have fantastic, fairly vanilla sex with my current partner - who expressed exactly this male/female double-standard WRT to bisexuality outright while discussing a "yesterday straight, today lesbian, tomorrow who knows?" friend of hers. I'm very masculine in my walking around identity, quite happy that way, and very happy being a dominant/masculine lover. When my sex life - even vanilla - is feeling good and fulfilled, the urge for kinky goes way down. While bi-phobic in some regards, my current partner is willing to play and explore, so it looks promising.
But now, in my forties, with children nearing their teen years, I see bi men very differently. Now I find it hot, and would love to get my husband together with another guy. If I were on the market again, I would be very open to a bi guy. I no longer see bi men as more of STD vector than straight men, and I am more concerned that a partner be interested in hot sex than stability :-)
I don't know how old you are, but if you have had these bad experiences with women in the 20s, I would try again with women in their 40s or 50s.
I'm not telling anyone what to do. I'm just not sure why there is such a large contingent of males who don't like things that ought to feel even better for them than vaginal feels for chicks. If a woman doesn't want vaginal sex, we classify that as a sexual dysfunction. I'm just curious.
Yep, I'm a bottom and proud of it.
What do you call someone who perverts the use of a bodily part,
who deviates from what is biologically intended?
What do you call that?
What do you call someone who ascribes intent to biology? What do you call that?
I call that person a numbskull, a twit, and a Creationist, if you'll pardon my redundancy.
use your rectum to shit and everything is good.
use it as a sex organ and biology bites you in the ass, so to speak.
How high can the AIDS rate among ass fuckers go?
20% is really just the floor.
twits?
You don't have one.
Spoken like a true Creationist.
or a biologist.