I am from upstate New York, one of those places where a million little lakes freeze over and you pull to the side of a country road on a bleak afternoon and ice-skate. Doing this is like holding hands with the universe. To approximate the transcendence of this experience, I go to ice rinks every year, and every year I am absolutely satisfied, no matter how crowded or dinky the rink, because humans figure-eighting or stumbling and falling with their many-colored mittens as the music plays—punctuated by the clack! of the metal on ice and the fweet! of skaters stopping sideways and sending up sprays of shaved ice—is the most charming thing in the world. Ice-skating is churchless holiday heaven, pure of heart, and you really, really, really shouldn’t have fucked with holiday heaven, 1st Annual Capitol Hill Ice Rink. I was going to skate every single day at you, 1st Annual Capitol Hill Ice Rink! DID SOMEONE STEAL YOUR HEART AND REPLACE IT WITH A SPECIAL PLASTIC POLYMER?
The name itself is a lie. Blatant lying at Christmas! Think of the children! Ice is a noun with a specific meaning. An ice rink is an ice rink: I can’t even believe that sentence had to be written. But there is no ice at the 1st Annual Capitol Hill Ice Rink. No ice! Rather, you skate upon a giant white cutting board made of a “special plastic polymer” that gets sprayed periodically with a “lubricating solution.”
I had to see it for myself. I set out immediately for the cutting board. Nobody else was there. But having all that cutting board to myself was of little use, because I could barely manage to get across it: My skates were in total revolt. They wanted the ice that they were built for. After each push-off, I could get maybe five inches of glide before I was brought to a dead stop. The cutting board was dirty and wet. I longed for the lacy layers of information embedded in the surface of repeatedly Zambonied ice.
“It’s a good calf workout,” the very nice man with the Boston accent who gave me my skates said. “The NHL trains on this.” I was happy that this man had a job, but I did not want a calf workout. I wanted to go ice-
skating. Making matters worse, a cup of coffee purportedly from Vita was so watered down I could swear it was tea. Tea-coffee for plastic ice. My holiday heart was broken.
Then another feeling rose up in me: FURY. It is irrational to care so much about an ice rink, yes, but the 1st Annual Capitol Hill Ice Rink, even though it has no ice, costs $12 for one hour of skating (skate rental included). Meanwhile, at Seattle Center, ice-skating on actual ice costs $7 (skate rental included) and you can stay for hours. Plus, Seattle Center’s ice rink is bigger than Capitol Hill’s (95 by 50 feet versus 80 by 50 feet). If you’re willing to travel a little, you’ve got all kinds of options, including Highland Ice Arena in Shoreline, which costs $7 plus $3 for the skate rental to spend unlimited time on 187 by 85 feet of glideworthy frozen water.
The maker of the synthetic plastic polymer rink is a Bostonian named Michael N. Gallant, and his company is called Artificial Ice Events. This man answered his own 800 number when I phoned him to request the material safety data sheet for the mysterious lubricant. He said he would send it; he never did. Later, one of the organizers of the Capitol Hill ice rink told me it is “fruit-based.” I still am not full of confidence that I want to face-plant into this solution.
Gallant asked me whether I liked the rink, and I told him straight-out no. He said I probably suffered from two problems: dull skates and unrealistic expectations. “The reality of it is, it’s not refrigerated water,” he said to me. “But we spend a lot of time studying the coefficient of friction on it, and there’s only about 7 percent more resistance than on real ice.” He told me a big part of the client’s job is to manage expectations. “If somebody goes there thinking this is gonna be ice,” he said, “they’re gonna go, ‘What a letdown.’ If they go there thinking it’s a remarkable advancement in plastic technologies, and if they appreciate it for being something that’s green, something that’s made from recycled materials…” his voice trailed off. “Have a little bit of holiday cheer in that article.”
I told him it cost $12.
“Twelve?” he said.
“Twelve,” I said.
“Per skater?” he said.
“Per skater.”
He declined to comment when I asked what the typical price is.
I called the offices of Hunters Capital, the private developer that owns, among other local buildings, the Broadway Building, where the private residential lobby is said to contain Dale Chihuly’s largest known painting. The rink had been Hunters Capital’s idea, said Michael Wells, executive director of the Capitol Hill Chamber of Commerce.
Harpur Davidson is the person from Hunters Capital who returned my call, and he is the son-in-law of principal Michael Malone. When I got him on the phone, it was almost 6 p.m. on a weeknight and he was walking the streets trying to drum up skaters for the empty rink. Poor Harpur Davidson. “It’s different, but once you get the hang of it, it’s ice-skating,” he said. But it is literally not ice-skating. Why didn’t they call it just a skating rink, or play up the artifice and call it the Capitol Hill Green Skating Rink or something? And did they have any idea that Seattle Center charged so much less? The poor man was on the ropes.
“We’re doing the best we can,” he said. “All of our intentions were good.”
The rink is set up as a nonprofit so that all the proceeds go back into paying for it. There are several sponsors, including The Stranger. I couldn’t find anybody among the organizers who’d tried artificial ice before bringing it here.
Davidson asked me to come back, to try it again. Have a little bit of holiday cheer…
Fine. The next morning, he organized a four-hour skate that would be free of charge for everyone. I stopped by, and the Bostonian behind the counter sharpened my skates in a blaze of sparks (it seriously looked like welding) while I waited; this took about 10 minutes. Davidson explained that the man out on the cutting board blasting it with a leaf blower was trying a new technique to make the surface more slippery. A friend of Davidson’s was out there skating, avoiding the leaf blower and trying to demonstrate speed. Davidson agreed to skate, too. “The blades need five minutes to warm up, so we can warm up our blades together,” he said.
The skating was slightly better. I got the promised calf workout. I found one transcendent moment of glide. Davidson, also attempting to demonstrate speed, fell down several times. We parted ways amicably, but I told him: If I’d expected ice, spent 12 bucks, or fallen into fruit-based lubricant on his cutting board, I’d be sour. Change the name, change the price, then we’ll talk.
As for Harpur Davidson, he’s a good son-in-law. I asked him to consider waiting for the right moment at the holidays, maybe after the big dinner, to sidle up to Michael Malone and tell him he had one word for him, just one word: ice. ![]()

How could they have brought this thing in when none of them had seen or skated on it? That’s just stupid. Also, not receiving the MSDS is kind of scary. I don’t get why so many commenters seem personally hurt by this article; I thought it was funny. Finally, someone suggested losing the lube and calling it a roller-rink, which made me remember how much I loved that as a kid (from the PNW, where the lakes most decidedly do not freeze). Maybe not as Christmasy, but probably more fun.
Thanks for the heads up. You saved me $12.
I guess their intentions may have been good, but the people that set this up clearly have NO CLUE what is going on in the wallets of parents in this neighborhood.
$12/pp for an hour – so,what? this was a non-profit rink they set up for the Sinks and Dinks?
I appreciate the review. I would have been very disappointed if I drove all the way up to Capitol Hill from some (any) other part of town for some **ICE** skating – only to be greeted with an oily cutting board. Not Grinchy, thanks for the heads up. I’ll go to Bellevue or Pac Center instead, and give my money to the charities I deem worthy.
“…or play up the artifice and call it the Capitol Hill Green Skating Rink…”
Yes, why didn’t they? Seems this would solve the problem Jen has with trying to square her experience with her memory.
“Blatant lying at Christmas”
Oh, the irony!
I was all set to try the Cap Hill rink out until I read this article. I grew up in northern Minnesota ice skating nearly every day as a kid. You know… on ice. This is a joke. I’ll be going to the Seattle Center instead. You know, where they have ice.
Thanks for the warning, Jen.
Jen is correct. Skating on plastic may be sort of OK, but it is not ice skating. Ice is ice. Ice skating on a cold winter night is (can be ?) a transcendent experience. Add a moonlit night, a frozen lake or river, and a some real snotty kisses with a pretty girl bundled up in down and wool, and you approach the sublime. So why not just call it something other than ice skating?
Why don’t they just put up a lot of holiday twinkle lights, put down a non-oily snap-together cutting board surface and have a HOLIDAY ROLLER SKATING RINK?
I agree with Jen (who is NOT a jerk, @4) that the skating doesn’t feel like ice skating; real speed is out of the question, as are any fancy turns. However, I skated there on Monday, and it gave me a good excuse to spend an hour with a good friend, laughing, being outdoors, getting a little exercise, and generally having a good time. It wasn’t great ice skating, but it was in the neighborhood, kind of fun, I was very happy to be there and to try it. I strongly prefer ice to roller, but if real ice is out of the question with the resources and power available — why not roller skating?
Okay, HarpUr just guaranteed that I will never, EVER go near that place, even if you promised me it would save every kitten born on earth from now until this green ball of goo explodes! Love how people figure that it’s okay if it sucks, it’s sucking for a ‘good cause’.
Sure it sucks, but it’s for a good cause
Sure it costs more, but it’s for a good cause
Sure you get less time, but it’s for a good cause
And their way of coping with it? Blame the skater. Typical Seattle. Not only that, but make snide remarks at them.
It’s so simple, as noted: It is either ice or it is not. And the nice man with a Boston accent who operates the rink on-site? I wonder what people here in Boston, where I now live, would say about an ice rink with no ice? I can tell you: “What the friggin’ f**k?! This is WICKED f**ked up, yo! What are youse guys, nuts?!
And so….
A skating rink? Yes. A roller skating rink? No. An ice skating rink? Definitely not.
When you’re scraping your skates across that synthetic lubricated cutting board, close your eyes and think of this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwvfYmpYd…
link above didn’t work, but look up ‘windy arm, yukon’ on youtube and watch the first result!
I found the article to be unusually harsh and unfair. I think Jen really likes the sound of her own voice and had more fun writing a rant piece. This sort of cranky rhetoric is what gives Seattle a bad name. Lighten up people!
Jen’s article is as fair, and her tone as moderated, as the circumstances allow them to be.
People living in a fake city full of fake culture get a little too accustomed to being surrounded by fake shit all the time.
Everyone keeps attacking Jen for attacking this “non-profit” but all the article said is the proceeds go into paying for “it.” So if any actual profit is made after that then where does it go? It’s not like they’re telling us all the proceeds go to Northwest Harvest or anything. Could someone please tell us if this rink is actually generating revenue for any actual cause, and what cause it is?
Skating on fake ice is like walking on fake grass