I canโ€™t imagine anyone watched Monsters, Inc. and thought to themselves, โ€œYou know, I wonder what those two monsters were like in college.โ€ But maybe Monsters University makes smart business senseโ€”after all, Monsters, Inc. was released 12 years ago, and lots of the kids who saw the original movie are now college-age themselves. Maybe this movie is for those kids, who are looking for inspiration as young adults; perhaps seeing how Sullivan (John Goodman) and Mike (Billy Crystal) became preeminent scare-harvesters will inspire todayโ€™s college kids to reach for the stars? Or something?

Or, more likely, this is just an excuse for Pixar to make a movie in the college-comedy genre. Because thatโ€™s pretty much what you get: Young monsters Mike and Sullivan try to prove theyโ€™ve got what it takes to succeed in the scariness biz, even though the mean old dean (Helen Mirren) keeps getting in their way. They wind up joining a loser fraternity and fighting the alpha monsters in a competition that drags on too long. Itโ€™s maybe the most straightforward, predictable Pixar movie yet (except for Cars 2), and itโ€™s definitely the worst Pixar sequel yet (except for Cars 2).

But you really have to kind of go with the whole academic theme, here, and grade Monsters University on a curve. Itโ€™s got some undeniably funny moments (there are lots of surprising sight gags), and at its best it feels like a blockbuster-budget-level Muppet movie. Kids will love it. But itโ€™s not smart or emotionally involving, there are no strong positive female characters, and itโ€™s not at all memorable. Pixar still has a solid-enough record that such frothy, light entertainment feels like a miss, but Iโ€™d stack Monsters University up positively against just about every other animated movie thatโ€™s come out this year. (Hell, come to think of it, itโ€™s way funnier than The Hangover, Part III.) If you temper your expectations, itโ€™s a harmless enough diversion. recommended