I love The Stranger, because, what’s not to love? Its irreverence, its wit, and its commitment to progressive change are part of what makes Seattle, Seattle. I have been proud to earn The Stranger’s endorsement in my own School Board Director race (in 2023) because I share the paper’s values of bold leadership, transparency, and equity for working families, and public-school students.

But in this year’s race for Seattle School Board Director, District 2, they didn’t get it right, and I’m writing to express my strong support for retaining Sarah Clark.

Sarah has governed with the same progressive values that The Stranger champions—standing up for students, educators, and communities when it matters most.

When the district floated a plan to close dozens of schools, Sarah didn’t flinch. She met with the community, and asked staff hard questions. In a Seattle Times op-ed, she pushed for data, transparency, and accountability. She did the research, looked at what happened when other cities closed schools (such as Chicago and San Antonio), and the negative outcomes they suffered. It was clear that the proposed closures would have a negative impact on students, deepening inequities and destabilizing neighborhoods, without actually solving the budget crisis. She boldly spoke out against austerity —and against her colleagues who pushed for school closures, like Liza Rankin, Michelle Sarju and Evan Briggs—as she stood with families, educators, and students, and led the way to stopping the closure plan. We owe Sarah beyond measure. 

Sarah’s focus has always been on bringing more resources into classrooms, not taking them away. A former Seattle Public Schools student herself, she’s advocated for student mental-health supports, arts and music programs, and equitable access to advanced learning (yep, she was a Highly Capable Cohort student too, then called the “Advanced Progress Program,” another name for a gifted program). She’s also fought for multilingual learners and students with disabilities. In short, she’s governed with heart and with a progressive’s sense of urgency for justice. All of these qualities make Sarah the clear choice in the District 2 race. 

And I know this because I was twice elected to the very seat Sarah is now running to retain. More than anyone else, I know how demanding that specific role is, and how rare it is to find a leader like Sarah, who has both an intrinsic love and dedication to students, combined with the ability to listen deeply and work collaboratively with the adults in the room. 

Representation matters, too. I was proud to be a member of the most racially diverse school board in Seattle’s history; one that reflected the beautiful diversity of our city’s students and families. Sarah Clark would be the only remaining Black school board director if she wins next week’s election. And as the only SPS graduate on the board, and a former foster child, she’s a product of the very system she’s working to strengthen. She knows what it feels like to walk those hallways, to rely on those teachers, and to believe in public education because it believed in her. Replacing Sarah with someone who doesn’t share that lived experience would be a step backward. 

If we’re going to talk about Sarah’s professional work history—she’s currently the director of policy at the Seattle Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce—then let’s look at her whole record. Sarah Clark worked at the Economic Opportunity Institute, a leading progressive think tank. She worked with the Early Learning Action Alliance, leading support of the successful capital gains tax bill. And she worked for the Children’s Alliance to help fund childcare and early learning programs. All of this is fundamentally progressive work. 

Sarah Clark also has strong progressive support. She has endorsements from nearly every local Democratic Party organization – including King County Democrats – is recommended by the Progressive Voter Guide, and is endorsed by leaders like State Senator Rebecca Saldaña who knows her and trusts her, as well as current School Board Director Joe Mizrahi and former school board director (and now candidate) Vivian Song, both of whom The Stranger has emphatically endorsed this election cycle. 

To say Seattle Public Schools is at a crossroads is an understatement. The next 12 months will include tackling a massive budget deficit, hiring a new superintendent, and bargaining for a new contract with the Seattle Education Association (the teachers’ union), not to mention rebuilding public trust and making bold changes to improve student learning. We need Sarah Clark to be part of a progressive board majority that is committed to taking this opportunity to build a great public school district for our kids. 

Would Kathleen Smith “do a fine job” as a school board director, as The Stranger’s luke-warm endorsement stated? Maybe. Heck, I’ll even give it a “probably,” as I believe any number of people would “do a fine job” if given the chance—and the runway. What really matters are the values a director is guided by, and the proficiency to put them into action. So while Smith and Clark might share similar values, we don’t have the luxury of waiting—and hoping—for Smith to learn the ropes in time to make the immediate changes we need to see. The on-ramp to being an effective board director is a long and winding one, and while Smith gets up to speed, our schools and students will continue to languish in the absence of that leadership. We know Sarah can do the job, because she already is, and she’s doing better than “fine,” she’s doing spectacularly.

Being a school board director is about showing up for school communities, asking tough questions, and voting your values when the stakes are highest. Sarah might have had some missteps as a candidate (yes, staffing changes and health issues caused her to miss the SEA endorsement process), but they should not overshadow or negate her real and impressive work as a school board director. Quite frankly, I’ll take an amazing public servant over a well-staffed candidate any day. 

On every measure that matters—equity, transparency, fiscal responsibility, and courage—Sarah Clark delivers.

I’ll keep loving The Stranger. But on this one, our progressive camps will have to respectfully disagree. Seattle’s students, families, and educators deserve to keep Sarah Clark’s courageous, principled and proven leadership on the school board.

Lisa Rivera (formerly Lisa Rivera Smith) is a former Seattle School Board Director.

11 replies on “Guest Rant: The Stranger Got It Wrong About Sarah Clark”

  1. Oh Lisa, Lisa! You don’t waste an opportunity to diss those that were not into your shenanigans. Let’s get this straight: you did not win two elections. First time you ran unopposed and second time your opponent Christina Whatever Her Name was, never campaigned.

    Then you quit before your change of address became a scandal. Yes, family structures change but couldn’t your “friend”, a Chair of a certain dems district tell running for a position in a neighborhood you no longer resided in was a fraud? Did you learn anything from your dear friend Song? Or maybe you learned a whole lot – left pretending to be offended by the shadow of doubt.

    Sarah Clark is no school board material and she didn’t pass The Stranger’s smell test. Too bad she is not married to a partial owner of the media conglomerate that owns this publication right? Say hello to your friend that is.

  2. @2, yeah that counts as “winning” two elections. She received the most votes of any candidate even if she was the only candidate.

    And your comment embodies the mean girl ethos that is the SPS parent/activist/stakeholder ecosystem, you went personal instead of taking down her pro-Clark argument on its merits. Turns out that opposing schools closures was a more electable platform than what the Rankin crowd was selling. The Stranger endorsed your candidate, chill.

  3. Huh. So I am an active SPS Parent Advocate whose spent lots of time in the past few years fighting against dumb decisions using direct data. (You can see some of my analyses on medium… starting article is “The 31% No One Talks About”). The thing “District Watcher” just did is a form of group hazing that keeps showing up in multiple forums whenever anyone says something about Rankin — and to a lesser extent Hampson, Sarju, and Briggs. The same attacks are brought up often in the same middle-school rumor tone. (I myself got told in the past year that I “controlled the media” which is very odd application of an anti-semitic trope since I’m Chinese-american. shrug).

    What do I mean by middle-school tone? It’s easily seeable if you swap out the nouns of of District Watcher’s comment with things from Twilight. See the following:

    Oh Bella, Bella! You don’t waste an opportunity to diss those that were not into your shenanigans. Let’s get this straight: you did not win two elections. First time you ran unopposed and second time your opponent Victoria Whatever Her Name was, never campaigned.

    Then you quit before your change of address became a scandal. Yes, family structures change but couldn’t your “friend”, a Chair of a certain Forks Cheer Club tell running for a position in a neighborhood you no longer resided in was a fraud? Did you learn anything from your dear friend Alice? Or maybe you learned a whole lot – left pretending to be offended by the shadow of doubt.

    Rosalie Hale is no school board material and she didn’t pass The Spartan Shield’s smell test. Too bad she is not dating co-editor of the media conglomerate that owns this publication right? Say hello to your friend that is.

    Like…this actually reads as a bad twilight fanfic. And it happens a lot.

    I point this out for those who do NOT pay a lot of attention to the district. If you ask why, in a city with so many folks who are exceptional at finances, data analysis, running organizations, education, etc., no one seems to step in to help…well for me, this type of toxicity is the main reason.

    Much of this has occured in closed FB Groups (eg Future of Seattle Public Schools) and is sprinkled around posts where some advocates share info. It showed up on the Seattle Times comments during the Closure mess. In the last few weeks, its leaking out into reddit, and now here.

    Folks seem to go as far as to create burner troll accounts (created recently, comes in to sealion and concern trolling, and then get banned… I’ve talked with the mods and it is a pattern). You notice them cause they use the same phrases.

    It feels like a handful of active trolls that somehow end up in “SPS advocacy” and make it super toxic.

    It’s time we just start meta-pointing it out and get it to stop. It’s hurting our city.

  4. “Its irreverence, its wit”

    Needlessly writing “fuck” over and over isn’t irreverence or wit, and it actually lessens the impact of a good “fuck”.

  5. @8 wrote this weird thought experiment comment here this morning:

    “If Katie Wilson wins, she’s going to go even more bald. Girmay is already bald. If you photoshopped them together and made the result even whiter than Katie Wilson already is, you’d have Ron Davis’ Nosferatu lookin ass.”

    Yeah, totally normal, non-cult behavior lol. Stupid and naive sounds preferable.

Comments are closed.