“Pop a cold one! You deserve it!!” Instead of a beery, congratulatory text like this one, tucked in after the closing chords of Peter Garland‘s breathtaking Songs of Exile and Wine, scores are supposed to contain notes, rests, clefs, and terse indications of whether to play slow, presto, or allegro con brio. So why do some composers pepper their music with sly, intimate, or abstruse messages?

A few seek to evoke what notation cannot capture, a precise mood or memory. Charles Mingus, in the first pages of his massive, multimovement Epitaph (1962โ€“1979), scrawled exhortations such as “same as 1942 at Club Downbeat” for drummer Dannie Richmond and aimed “Duke’s band remember?” at the prized Ellington trumpeter Clark Terry. Hoping to lure others into his vision of radical desolation, Luigi Nono inlaid passages by the poet Hรถlderlin for the performers to murmur (or think) to themselves during the eruptive passages and cataclysmic silences of the string quartet Fragmente-Stille, an Diotima (1980).

Occasionally, a composer demands explicit control of the musician’s body. Near the beginning of Brian Ferneyhough‘s notorious Unity Capsule (1976), the flutist must “remove instrument from lip abruptly” and then “return instrument abruptly to playing position.” Throughout his opera cycle Licht (1977โ€“2003), Stockhausen prescribes specific, synchronized body movements for his soloists.

But who has equaled Erik Satie for impish mischief? Above four measures of his Vexations (1893), Satie’s threadlike script advises, “In order to play the theme 840 times in succession, it would be advisable to prepare oneself beforehand, and in the deepest silence, by serious immobilities.” No one heeded Satie’s whimsical direction until John Cage organized a complete performance of Vexations in 1963; it took 18 hours and 40 minutes.

After an opening processional theme, Vexations ambles with a serene, inquisitive melody. Heard once, the music almost dares the pianist to improvise, but what happens when Vexations becomes an epic?

Find out this weekend (Satโ€“Sun May 15โ€“16, Jack Straw Productions, 4261 Roosevelt Way NE, 634-0919, 4 pm, free but donations welcome, or listen live at www.hollowearthradio.org) when a tag team of classical, jazz, and avant pianists serve up an overnight, open-door Vexations. How will pianists differ on Satie’s tempo of trรจs lent (i.e., very slow) and pace his lovely, limpid melodies?

In Satie, you might find a kindred spirit; Cage did, declaring, “To be interested in Satie, one must be disinterested to begin with, accept that a sound is a sound and a man is a man, give up illusions about ideas of order, expressions of sentiment, and all the rest of our inherited aesthetic claptrap.” I’m betting that Vexations is revolutionary ambient music that dissolves the boundary between listening (not just hearing) and living. recommended

Christopher DeLaurenti is a composer, improvisor, and music writer. Since the late 1990s, his writing has appeared in various newspapers, magazines, and journals including The Stranger, 21st Century Music,...

9 replies on “The Score”

  1. Well written, lovely article!

    I just submit that this “revolutionary ambient music” must be not only be a revolution of “surroundings” but “involvings” – that of a higher-consciousness listening experience.

    It is almost like ambient music unknowingly traces the ring; but there is a much more courageous music that dares to remain deep inside the circle (Spectral Minimalism).

  2. SHOULD the pianists “differ”? I think the goal (however unobtainable) should be for them all to play it as much the same as possible, as if it really were one person playing it 840 times.

  3. @Michael, yes it would be my hope that the “surroundings” do lead to “involvings.”

    @Nat I had forgotten about John Cale on “I’ve got a Secret” as a performer of “Vexations” – a great link!

    @point of order: You’ve hit upon one of the underpinnings of the piece. As it is impossible for one pianist (or many) to heed Satie’s direction, variations are inevitable – and, if Satie is heeded, built into the piece.

    Played exactly the same, say by a Yamaha Disklavier, I suspect the effect would be the same, but without the human variables that make live music so compelling.

  4. @Christopher,
    I agree. I wasn’t sure from your wording if you meant they would/should be differing *on purpose* as opposed to inevitably.

  5. This was such a great event. Thanks for your wonderful piece, Christopher.

    Ranjit Bhatnagar, an artist in Brooklyn, had a robot toy piano perform a sympathetic Vexations at the same time as Jack Straw’s. You can view the archived video stream (or as much of it as you can handle) at http://www.ustream.tv/channel/vexations

Comments are closed.