Sawant seems abrasive, difficult, ideological to the point of pathology, which is just what we need to balance out the milquetoasts and corporate toadies that run our city. Having a city Council made up of Sawants would be a disaster. But having one or two? Just what the doctor ordered.
#4, #5, While I am personally fascinated by the place in line of your comments, most SLOG readers don't care even slightly! LOL! It is entirely possible that two, or even more, posters are writing simultaneously. Surely you must realize that the actual placement number does not happen until you click on "Post Comment" at the bottom. Still, I agree that your comments truly deserve a ZERO.
This was thoroughly discussed from the moment that Ms Sawant was elected, (chiefly because folks were disgusted with Conlin; not generally because they understood Ms Sawant's politics). She was a strident activist, and the question was always: could she switch from outsider agitator to insider collaborator working for change, (see also the activist Mike McGinn transitioning to having to work with others on the inside). I think we now have our answer. Of course there are legion, particularly here, who thrill to her non-collaborate lecturing nature, but for good or ill, a city council is by nature and design collaborative. It will forever be the case of the career provocateur who discovers themselves part of the establishment.
@10, Councilmembers don't run for office as part of a collaborative group; they run as individuals. That will be even more emphasized when district elections come; candidates will run as individuals representing one certain area of Seattle. and there is definitely competition among Seattle neighborhoods for attention and resources.
@6
Paul Constant would get dilly dally delicious over some sandwhich place that clsed then reopened, long lines, but dilly dally delicious was the feeling i got from Paul. Pesos? Pecos? Pisso?
If she's pissing off other council members, then clearly she's doing it right. They're so corrupt and oblivious to the needs of working people that they don't even know how deeply unpopular they are. Or maybe they do, which is why several of them are cashing in instead of running for re-election.
@10. Huh? Though it is 'non-partisan', Council Members run on explicitly political platforms and their very election is an implicit or explicit confirmation of those political goals by the majority of voters. "Collaboration" is an interesting term, because (correct me if I'm wrong) the majority still prevails, no? "Deliberative" might be better term.
Sally Bagshaw is really embarrassing herself with this complaint.
The City Council embarrasses itself with it's "Let's work together, but not with Mike McGinn because we don't like him. I mean, we claim to like his policies but we're going to stab him and the city in the back just for kicks because he's not a consensus builder like us. Wah the new council woman has strong opinions and voices them! Waaaaahhhhh!"
Fight the good fight Sawant. You are currently the only one who can bring the message of the 99% to our council. And - as we are seeing - without a voice, those people (us) will eventually start to riot.
Most of us early in life learn how to disagree without being disagreeable, but that lesson is lost on some folks too rigidly wedded to a particular ideology. Sure, tangle on the dais but still be able to go have a beer with your opponent.
The narrative that the councils only issue was that it just wasn't socialist enough, and that sawant is a savior for polices moving forward is going to get dumped on its face pretty fast.
Isn't this all above the placement of chairs? Couldn't the council members just say "Hey, where did the chairs go?" then grab one and sit where they always do? See, I'm a problem solver.
Go Sawant. Seriously, the City Council needs like four of her. We're a progressive city, but all we can do that's actually progressive is pass feel good statements about how we're for or against something, or taxing bags.
Pissing off other Council Members ... that isn't supposed to matter with elected representatives.
Are they elected or the elect.
At any rate, at some point it's going to be clear that the Home Teams, Status Quo and Local Yokels will be challenged for their (most unearned) death grip on power.
However, as someone who's been around here long enough knows....Them Locals Got Bang!
She's not a politician -- in fact, she has no interest in being a politician -- she's an activist using her office as a bully pulpit. What everyone is realizing is that she's polarizing and it's starting to work against her.
"she's an activist using her office as a bully pulpit."
Good. Corporations have been doing this exclusively for far too long. See also: government statements siding with Boeing during 2013's Union contract negotiations.
Okay⌠Iâll try to express my pulled comment @2 using more sensitive words⌠(When did Slog start to have palpitations and a case of the vapors with a drop of the âBâ word?)
"Whatâs going on here?"
Maybe she's irritated enough council members to such a point with her divisive tactics that they donât like her, are tired of having her around and are doing what they can to be rid of her now that election is looming.
So now Bagshaw know what it is like to feel like a constituent....
âI was directed to the audience to sit and listen,â Bagshaw said, âand I ended up standing over here for an hour and I did not feel that that was a city council event⌠I did not feel that any of us were warmly welcome if we were here to listen and have an alternative viewpoint or conversation. I just want the people to know that I really felt personally slighted by that.
Just want to say I like this article, guys. Fits The Stranger's voice (at least as I recognize it), but doesn't take it overboard. It's cynical and skeptical and subjective, but it reads more like journalism, and less like a blog. It's not packed full of smears and rants or naive assertions and blatant manipulation. Keep this kind of stuff coming, please!
@26: If that's the case, then I hope we fill City Council with more activists and fewer politicians. I look forward to voting for Sawant as my district representative on City Council. Best I can tell, my views have been better represented by her than by other members of the council.
Good writeup, but I just have to call attention to the headline: "The City Council Is So Over Being Nice to Kshama Sawant." This makes it sound like the City Council is some entity separate from Ms. Sawant, never mind that she's actually a member of the council.
Reminds me of the classic conservative phraseology where the only real people/voters/Americans are {Republicans, people who hate taxes, automobile drivers, etc.}, and, by definition, the other people don't count. Only, this odd exclusion was clearly inadvertent.
Some of the comments here clearly don't have a clue about how a city council functions. You don't accomplish anything if you're a long, shrill voice railing against your fellow council member. All Sawant is going to accomplish is alienating them and ensuring she doesn't get their support for her little socialist agenda. One runs as an individual for a city council seat, but nothing gets done unless it's done collaboratively. She'll either learn that or be the one-term candidate she seems destined to be, and that I hope she is. Just like McGinn, she's an activist, not a politician.
Some of the posters here clearly don't have a clue about how a city council functions. You don't accomplish anything if you're simply a lone, shrill voice railing against your fellow council members. All Sawant is going to accomplish is alienating them and ensuring she doesn't get their support for her little socialist agenda. One runs as an individual for a city council seat, but nothing gets done unless it's done collaboratively. She'll either learn that or be the one-term candidate she seems destined to be, and that I hope she is. Just like McGinn, she's an activist, not a politician.
I am so surprised that Sawant survived for so long. She is a Tankie after all. She believes in some arcane Trotskyist Socialist philosophy left over from before the wall came down.
34) Some people on here don't have a clue about opinion polls showing Sawant's popularity or the fact that she has passed policy with multiple members of the council. Even the 43rd Dems strawpoll she demolished her closest competitor in this race.
Sawant managed to bridge the gap between the poor and the middle class. I know her intentions were good, but does she really think she's taking a bite out of big business? All they're going to do is cut back as much as they can, overwork their employees, and if they still can't make their nut, close up shop and move out of this city. I've already seen it first hand. I'm sure they'll put up more overpriced housing where that place once was. She should really take a giant step back and look at the shit-hole picture. I'm all for a higher minimum wage, but not if it gets taken out of my medium income. Please somebody stop her before she destroys this city and moves on to the next!
Paul Constant would get dilly dally delicious over some sandwhich place that clsed then reopened, long lines, but dilly dally delicious was the feeling i got from Paul. Pesos? Pecos? Pisso?
...oh wait.
The City Council embarrasses itself with it's "Let's work together, but not with Mike McGinn because we don't like him. I mean, we claim to like his policies but we're going to stab him and the city in the back just for kicks because he's not a consensus builder like us. Wah the new council woman has strong opinions and voices them! Waaaaahhhhh!"
Sawant is exactly what we need.
Are they elected or the elect.
At any rate, at some point it's going to be clear that the Home Teams, Status Quo and Local Yokels will be challenged for their (most unearned) death grip on power.
However, as someone who's been around here long enough knows....Them Locals Got Bang!
Good. Corporations have been doing this exclusively for far too long. See also: government statements siding with Boeing during 2013's Union contract negotiations.
"Whatâs going on here?"
Maybe she's irritated enough council members to such a point with her divisive tactics that they donât like her, are tired of having her around and are doing what they can to be rid of her now that election is looming.
(Who didnât see that coming?)
âI was directed to the audience to sit and listen,â Bagshaw said, âand I ended up standing over here for an hour and I did not feel that that was a city council event⌠I did not feel that any of us were warmly welcome if we were here to listen and have an alternative viewpoint or conversation. I just want the people to know that I really felt personally slighted by that.
Reminds me of the classic conservative phraseology where the only real people/voters/Americans are {Republicans, people who hate taxes, automobile drivers, etc.}, and, by definition, the other people don't count. Only, this odd exclusion was clearly inadvertent.
And that means he's a drop in appointment not a local.
Way to go Seattle, you elected a Tankie.