Ambitious Housing Reform Has a Real Shot This Year
Years Into a Housing Crisis, the State Might Let Us Build More Places to Live This Year!
How Washington Plans to Fix the Behavioral Health Crisis
Crisis Care, Not Jail, Is the Answer
The Strangerâs 2023 Bill Tracker
A Big List of Promising and Not-So-Promising Proposals to Fix the State’s Polycrisis
Are We Going to Tax the Rich or What?
Probably Only If You Scream at Your State Reps for the Next Several Years
The Strangerâs Big-Ass Preview of Washington's 2023 Legislative Session
Guns! Abortion! Housing! Police Reform! Health Care! Taxing the Rich! And Steamrolling the GOP! Or Not.
Get Jesus Out of Our Uteruses
Democrats Vow to Make Washington an Abortion Sanctuary
Washington Democrats Defeat Transphobic Bills as Most LGBTQ Protections Clear Hurdles
If the Protections Ultimately Pass, We Could See Big Gains for the Community
Washington's Next Police Reform Battle
Ending Qualified Immunity Won't Be Easy, but It's Necessary
Washington Takes Aim at the Gun Industry
We’re Banning Assault Weapons! Requiring Gun Permits! And Unleashing Bob Ferguson! Maybe!
In his State-of-the-State address on Tuesday, Governor Jay Inslee told state legislators to act with âdecisiveness, ambition, and audacityâ this year on his agenda to create a Washington where our âschools are safe from gun violence.â
To help move the state closer to that ideal, he identified three specific gun violence prevention bills that he wants the State Legislature to send to his desk: a ban on assault weapons, a requirement to get a permit to purchase guns, and a pathway for the Attorney Generalâs office and victims of gun violence to sue gun manufacturers and sellers.Â
If Democrats in Olympia are willing to push through each proposal on party-line votes, their newly-expanded majorities in both chambers of the State Legislature make Republicans largely helpless to stop them. Letâs take a look at each of the proposals and see just whatâs got the National Rifle Association up in a tizzy.
It's Finally Time to Ban Assault Weapons
In his speech, Inslee called out the need to ban military-style assault weapons as a critical part of protecting children from gun violence. He argued that the guns are âdesigned for the sole purpose of destroying livesâthe lives of school children, law enforcement officers, concert-goers, nightclub patrons, and people gathered in houses of worship.â
And though Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson has been trying to get the State Legislature to ban assault weapons since 2017, the public has finally come around on the measure. Several polls have found more people support the idea than oppose it on both sides of the Cascades, and voters approved more regulations on purchasing semi-automatic assault rifles when they backed I-1639 at the ballot box in 2018.
This yearâs proposal to ban assault weapons, Senate Bill 5265, would make importing, distributing, selling, or marketing the prohibited guns a gross misdemeanor. It does provide exceptions for selling to law enforcement or the military, and for people who inherit guns that would otherwise be banned. The law would take effect immediately after the governor signs it.Â
In a press release, the Attorney Generalâs office pointed out that eight states already have similar laws on the books, and that multiple federal courts have upheld those bans after gun rights groups brought lawsuits challenging them as unconstitutional.
Dylan OâConnor, the Alliance for Gun Responsibilityâs lobbyist, said in an interview that the prospects of passing this version of the ban are the best heâs seen in recent years. He noted that prior versions of the assault weapons ban didnât make it onto the Allianceâs legislative agenda, but that the organization sees a successful path for the legislation this year.
âWe think it can pass and it should pass,â OâConnor said. âThereâs a lot to say about why this is the moment, but the stigma for a swing district legislator voting for these bills is broken. Running on these policies is a way to get reelected, and once youâve crossed that threshold psychologically, the game changes. Itâs shifted the dynamic in its entirety.â
Permit-to-Purchase Laws Save Lives
The second of Insleeâs proposals to reduce gun violence, House Bill 1143, would overhaul Washingtonâs gun licensing regime to require anyone who wants to purchase a gun to get a permit to do so first.Â
The permitting process would require the prospective gun owner to get fingerprinted, take a class in gun safety, and pass an enhanced background check before they could walk into a Cabelaâs and pick up a new gun.Â
Passing the proposed legislation would likely save lives. In Connecticut, research has shown that permit-to-purchase laws have reduced firearm homicides by 28% and firearm suicides by 33% over a 22-year period. By contrast, the same research showed Missouriâs repeal of similar legislation led to a 47% increase in firearm homicides and a 23% increase in firearm suicides.Â
OâConnor explained that the permit-to-purchase laws work by reducing the flow of guns from legal purchases to the black market and by forcing people who might be experiencing a mental health crisis to wait longer before they can get their hands on a gun that would turn their breakdown into a fatal encounter.
He also explained that equity concerns about who bears the burden of enforcement for gun laws played a factor in designing the penalty for violating the proposed law. Rather than repeat the mistakes of prior gun violence prevention measures, whose penalties disproportionately fell on people of color due to the racial bias of the criminal legal system, the proposed legislation places liability on the gun seller rather than the buyer. Â
Itâs possible the permitting law could face legal challenges similar to the lawsuit that stalled the implementation of Oregonâs permit-to-purchase law last month, though the details of the lawsuits against Oregonâs regulations make predicting how Washingtonâs courts would handle the issue murky at best.Â
Unleash Bob Ferguson on the Gun IndustryÂ
The final bill on Insleeâs gun violence prevention agenda, Senate Bill 5078, would take advantage of a gap in federal regulations to allow victims of gun violence and the Attorney Generalâs office to sue gun manufacturers and sellers in civil court under Washingtonâs consumer protection law.Â
The victim or the AGâs office would have to establish that the manufacturer or seller failed to enact âreasonable controlsâ to avoid allowing their guns to fall into the hands of someone who the law prohibits from possessing a gun. If they can prove that the lack of those reasonable controls contributed to the harm caused by the person who used the manufacturer or sellersâ gun, victims or the AGâs office can make the industry pay for the damage they caused and get a court order forcing them to change their business practices.Â
Since Congress enacted the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) in 2005, these kinds of product liability lawsuits against the gun industry have been barred in federal court. However, Congress specifically provided states with the authority to pass laws like SB 5078 as part of the PLCAA, so itâs unlikely that any legal challenge to this part of Insleeâs gun violence prevention agenda would get much play.Â
If Democrats in Olympia pass SB 5078, Washington would join New York, California, Delaware, and New Jersey as the only states to take Congress up on that invitation to regulate the gun industry. Doing so would allow suits like the case that forced the gun shop that sold the guns used in the 2002 Beltway sniper attacks to proceed in Washington state courts.
At the end of the day, itâs unlikely that any Republican will risk a primary challenge by crossing the gun lobby and supporting any of the three bills. That means itâs up to Democrats to answer Insleeâs charge to prove to Washingtonâs students that âthe gun lobby doesnât make the rules in Washington state â we do.â