Savage Love Podcast
-
Episode 161
(Nov 17) -
Episode 160
(Nov 10) -
Episode 159
(Nov 3) -
Episode 158
(Oct 27) -
Episode 157
(Oct 20)
Savage Love Archives
- Mad Men (Nov 12)
- Girl Seeking Girl (Nov 5)
- Moral Bankrupt (Oct 29)
- Plunge In (Oct 22)
- Feeding Time (Oct 15)
More from Dan Savage
-
Today in Traditional Marriage
-
Pit Bulls!
-
Teabaggers Turn On Palin
-
Do Your Balls Hang Low?
-
SL Letter of the Day: Hot & Drunk
Books by Dan Savage
The Commitment: Love, Sex, Marriage, and My Family
Things I've Learned from Women Who've Dumped Me
Skipping Towards Gomorrah
The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant
Savage Love: Straight Answers from America's Most Popular Sex Columnist
Savage Links
- Babeland
- Fleshbot
- Good Vibrations
- Joe Newton/Savage Illustrations
- Planned Parenthood
- Spreading Santorum
- Planned Parenthood's Teen Wire
Contact Dan Savage
Foolproof
May 14, 2009
Tools
Over the past few years, my husband and I have realized that he has needs that I cannot meet. I do not begrudge him these needs, and I would fill them if I could. I want him to be happy and satisfied, not just for him, but for myself as well. We discussed opening our relationship, but our therapist recoiled at the idea. If I can't help him and we can't have someone else help him, what can we do? We can't imagine breaking up, but if we're both unhappy, then I can only assume that we will split eventually. We have been together for over a decade and love each other deeply. I am sick over this situation, and I don't know what to do. I don't know that I fully trust our therapist, and I would like to hear an informed second opinion. I value your advice.
Life Decisions
Here's an informed second opinion: Fuck your asshole therapist. And here's a better-informed bonus third opinion:
"It's incredibly unfortunate that some therapists either aren't educated about open relationships or buy into common myths about them," says Tristan Taormino, activist, author, pornographer, and author of Opening Up: A Guide to Creating and Sustaining Open Relationships. Way too many therapists, she says, "pathologize people who want to open their relationships and try to convince them that they have intimacy or commitment issues. The truth is you can be both intimate with and fully committed to more than one partner, or be committed to one partner and have sex with others."
Tristan interviewed scores of couples in successful open relationships, and she found that many initially opened their relationships because of an issue of sexual incompatibility.
"The scenario you present is not uncommon," she continues. "If both of you really are committed to giving it a go, I'd advise you to find a new therapist, one who has experience with—and not a prejudice against—non-monogamous clients. The right therapist can help you figure out your limits, set boundaries, and make an agreement about this new type of relationship that works for both of you."
You can also check out the stories, advice, and references at Tristan's website www.openingup.net. Good luck, LD.
I've enjoyed your column for years and always found you to be well reasoned. That's why your agreement with Perez Hilton on Miss California was so shocking. I'm a straight guy totally for gay rights in all respects. Still, it's beneath you to call someone who disagrees with your position a "dumb bitch." You're better than that, Dan! Don't you see that you and Mr. Hilton are promulgating hatred against a person for that individual's beliefs, something you both claim to abhor?
Basically On Your Side
I don't think Miss California is a dumb bitch for her beliefs, BOYS, but for her actions. ("Love the sinner/dumb bitch, hate the sin/dumb bitchery.") For the record: There are lots of reasonable folks out there who oppose same-sex marriage, and I can interact with them in a civil fashion. Heck, I voted for an opponent of marriage equality back in November.
What sets Miss CA apart from reasonable opponents of marriage equality, BOYS, is her opportunism coupled with her stupidity.
I thought Perez Hilton went too far when he called Miss CA a "dumb bitch" after the pageant—and said so on my blog. But I started to come around to Hilton's POV after Miss CA, despite having said at the pageant that she thought it was "great that Americans are able to choose" gay marriage or "opposite marriage," joined a political campaign to deny marriage rights to gays and lesbians. Miss CA is leveraging her spat with Hilton for her own personal financial gain. Ghostwritten books, speaking gigs at evangelical churches, a potential guest-host gig on The View—beats work, huh? And so what if it oppresses gays and lesbians?
And that's when I thought, "Hmm, I guess she is a bitch."
And then came her interview on Fox News: "You know what, Greta? I don't have the answers to everything," Miss CA told Greta Van Susteren when asked about civil unions. And when Van Susteren followed up by asking Miss CA "what [she] thinks" about civil unions and gay people adopting children, Miss CA responded, "I'm not a politician, so I can't give you an answer to that." So seeing as she's not a politician, Miss CA can't be expected to know what she herself thinks about adoptions and civil unions.
And that's when I thought, gawd, she's dumb, too—and that's when I had to concede that Hilton was right.
I'm a 17-year-old girl. My 16-year-old boyfriend doesn't like condoms, and I don't like what birth control pills do to my emotions and my skin. Now what?
Pregnancy Isn't Looking Likely
I'll be with you in a minute, PILL. But first...
More stupidity and opportunism: Bristol Palin is now a spokesperson for an organization that encourages teenagers to abstain from having sex. "Regardless of what I did personally," Bristol advised America's youth last week, "abstinence is the only... 100 percent foolproof way you can prevent pregnancy."
Here are a few other 100 percent foolproof ways to prevent pregnancy, Bristol, right off the top of my head: mutual masturbation, oral sex, anal sex (aka "saddlebacking" when practiced by Christian teens), outercourse, sex toys, cybersex, GAY SEX. There are actually lots of "foolproof" ways for teenagers (and adults) to be intimate without risking an unplanned pregnancy.
Instead of telling teenagers to say no to sex—which will work about as well as telling them to say no to drugs—we should tell them there are ways to be sexual that carry no risk of pregnancy. But if they do decide to have sex, of course, they're going to need to know about and have access to contraception and the "morning after" pill—and, yes, abortion services. But if we continue to present being sexually active as either/or—either abstinence or vaginal intercourse—we're going to see more outcomes like yours, Bristol.
When you explain to nervous, inexperienced teenagers that they don't have to jump right into full intercourse—that there are degrees of intimacy, and risk, and they can have enjoyable sexual experiences without vaginal (or anal) penetration—they're often relieved. (And just imagine what we could have been spared—all of us, Bristol, from your family to Levi's family to the McCain campaign—if Levi had limited himself to inseminating your tonsils.)
So, PILL, here's what you do: Enjoy outercourse, oral, masturbation, and sex toys—and tell your boyfriend that these aren't consolation prizes for teenagers, but honest-to-God sex acts that adults enjoy—until you and your boyfriend find the condoms and lube that work for you.
Denying a group of our citizenry certain privileges and rights that the majority of citizens enjoy is not a subject for "belief." It's a prejudiced act perpetrated by our government. A "belief" is whether that prejudiced act is a good thing or a bad thing. If you believe its a bad thing for the government to act prejudiciously towards some of its citizens, great, you're in the company of many beautiful and intelligent people, dead & alive, people who have made this world a better place to live. If you believe its a good thing for the government to do so, great, you're in the company of millions of people who did nothing remarkable, and whose greatest contribution to the world is to perpetrate more hatred, animosity, and misery.
So if you have the "belief" that gays shouldn't be granted the legal benefits of marriage, then the promulgator of hatred is staring at you from the mirror, not some columnist you've never met. And so don't be surprised if I happen to think you're a douchebag, like all the other bigots.
And when we finally did It, when we were both in college and a little wiser, every sexual act had to end in The Act to seem meaningful. Many decades later, I have embraced by inner 17 year old and reveled in so many playful sexual experiences that brought amazing intimacy and climax.
Enjoy all of your options! Even the ones that might not knock you up. You may miss them some day.
(Of course, a suggestion to try an ultra-thin [lubed] condom and try a silicone lube if you aren't using silicone toys is also a good idea, as is the idea that 0 pregnancy risk does not equal 0 STI risk so unless you've both been tested clean twice within a monogamous 6 months some barrier is useful: dental dam aka plastic wrap, etc)
I'm all for her freedom of speech, not just tolerant of her rights but avid that more people should use those rights, and I'm going to use my own to contradict her ideas, but not her right to have 'em. And yeah, sometimes someone is a dumb bitch, and sometimes she's not. Whatever, this discussion shouldn't devolve into a discussion of jerkishness or bad manners.
But from all sides, let's have interesting, intelligent argument. "Agreeing to disagree" or being tolerant of everyone's right to speak without it being acceptable for me to debate or respond fills our heads with grape jelly. I don't tolerate her sentiments, I don't agree to be nice about her bigoted beliefs, but she should keep talking her cutie, empty, topless little self into a tizzy if she'd like. And if she's the new NOM darling, great, just don't tell me that revulsion against a bigot isn't playing nice.
That is SO vague, it's killing me. I hope for Dan's sake that the unedited letter was juicier – I wouldn't know where to begin with such a lack of info. Did her vagina heal shut? Does he want to bang dudes? Screw animals? I need details!
Also, girl whose boyfriend doesn't like condoms? Too fucking bad. And if he 'gives in,' I still wouldn't fuck him – 10 dollars says it'll 'accidentally slip off 'mid-intercourse all the time. (I'm not sure a copper IUD is the answer, either. It increases the flow heaviness for the majority of users, often to the point of anemia and with extra cramps. Plus it can be expensive, especially for a teen who may be keeping her sex life a secret form her parents, Also, despite its safeness, many doctors are reluctant to insert it in women without children).
Here's a great way to keep 99% of straight teens from having intercourse. Tell them to hold off until the guy gives the girl a full-blown orgasm through oral sex or a handjob. No faking, no 'Uh, I think I felt something...'s. Yeah, there may be a few blessed girls (and guys) out there, but they'll be the exception.
I would be iffy about suggesting she perform oral sex on him without a condom unless he's been tested first. That's a way to spread STDs too. Though, as an afterthought, the whole "I don't like the pill" implies that it's not an issue...
And yeah. The whole Miss California thing... I don't think there are words to describe how I feel about her actions. I'm still disgusted that the government in California even thought it was appropriate to have a vote on a human rights issue.
26
27
I was so elated to read about what Dan thought of Miss California because I feel the same way. I'm not sick of her because of her opinion and beliefs. I'm sick because she's pretending she's on a moral crusade when, in actuality, she's just pushing her career.
Bravo again on the abstinence only and Bristol Palin critique.
If he tries wearing a condom a few times, especially an ultra-thin one, he'll get used to it and he'll be fine. If he won't do that, he doesn't get to have intercourse. You can still enjoy all the other activities mentioned, and if he really wnats intercourse after that he'll just have to deal with condoms.
Bottom line is, whichever formulation you choose, whether low dose or otherwise, the pill acts by shutting down your normal ovarian function, blocking testosterone production thought to be responsible for one's sex drive, and binding sex hormones in the body.
Over almost a decade I was prescribed every type of pill available and only continued to suffer from depression, acne, weight gain and low libido the whole time. Lucky you ones who can tolerate it, but don't assume that everyone can.
If this were back in the 60's, would she have given the same answer if she were asked about a black and white person getting married? Would it still be in her "beliefs" that they should not be married?
This is all about civil rights for gay people and has nothing to do with religion. I thought people were so big on "seperation of church and state", cant even say the word God in school.
As to PILL, yeah have a look at IUDs obviously.
PILL: You tell him to suck it the fuck up and put the damn rubber on, NOW. I have spoken to many many men (and have had sex with a few of 'em) about how condoms really feel. The unanimous agreement: It really doesn't make a difference. So, PILL, your boyfriend is simply falling prey to our societies view of sexuality and its prejudices against contraceptives. Also, he is using society's view to manipulate you. This is WRONG. if you want to let him stick his dick in you, he needs to wear a condom. And while all the other types of sexual activity Dan suggested are great fun (really!), you two probably won't be together forever (sorry) and he needs to learn ASAP that condoms are a great thing.
It's not the anal sex itself that causes pregnancy, but if you shoot a big load in a lady's ass, it's got to come back out sooner or later (perhaps as our old friend santorum). And the opening of the vagina is awefully close to the anus... Unless great care is taken, it's always possible that some will inadvertantly make the journey to the wrong hole (or the right hole, depending on how you look at it).
http://www.polychromatic.com/pfp/psych.h… is a good, albeit incomplete resource. I personally know at least ten more therapists in my home state who aren't on this list. Still, it's a starting point!
And seriously, don't be afraid to shop around. The quality of the match between you and your therapist is one of the most important factors in a successful therapy. If you don't feel like a given therapist is a match for you after a few sessions, don't feel bad about trying someone else!
Uh, why do so many people think fucking ass without a condom is a good, safe idea? PILL, if you do decide to do anal instead, make sure your boyfriend doesn't also dislike lube and taking it easy.
I agree with #36. He just needs to suck it up.
PILL, you have other options. There are many pill formulations you could try:
http://contraception.about.com/od/thepil…
If you're on a triphasic pill (one that varies the hormone levels), switching over to a monophasic one (steady dose of hormones) could make a big difference in regulating your mood swings. I liked Yasmin a lot better than Ortho Tri-Cyclen.
You could also try NuvaRing, a ring you insert vaginally once per cycle. It exposes you to a lower level of hormones.
If you really prefer condoms, though, and your guy can't handle using them, perhaps it'd be better to switch boyfriends, rather than your birth control method. If he consistently puts himself first like this, he's not mature enough for sex anyway, and you deserve better.
All the best to you.
PILL, you have other options. There are many pill formulations you could try:
http://contraception.about.com/od/thepil…
If you're on a triphasic pill (one that varies the hormone levels), switching over to a monophasic one (steady dose of hormones) could make a big difference in regulating your mood swings. I liked Yasmin a lot better than Ortho Tri-Cyclen.
You could also try NuvaRing, a ring you insert vaginally once per cycle. It exposes you to a lower level of hormones.
If you really prefer condoms, though, and your guy can't handle using them, perhaps it'd be better to switch boyfriends, rather than your birth control method. If he consistently puts himself first like this, he's not mature enough for sex anyway, and you deserve better.
All the best to you.
Just as one example in the sea of stupidity that was her response (and this was repeated above by someone): no one has the right to "choose between same sex and opposite sex marriage" in this country. No one is out there seeking to choose between the two. There are states where gays can marry and there are states where they are prohibited from doing so. There is no choice involved for gays in the prohibiting states, because if they cannot "same sex marry" they are certainly not going to "opposite sex marry".
I seem to remember a while ago Dan said something along the lines of "guys who consider non-penetrative sex to be "real sex" have a lot more sex!" (I paraphrase wildly) - and not just because they consider all that other enjoyable stuff to be sex...
Guys who get their dicks used to condoms early will also get to put them more places, more often.
Secondly.
PILL, sweetie, tell him to suck it the fuck up. Wear a rubber. or only handjobs for him. Last thing you need is the clap, HIV, or god knows what. Its someting like 1 in 3 people under 25 have had an std?
Just because you found a pill that worked for you and that you're happy with doesn't mean that everyone can! I struggled for years to find a pill that didn't make me psychotic and finally decided that fucking with my hormones is just not worth it, not to mention the problems that it can cause down the road with hormone imbalances and other problems.
And as for the supposedly "safe" non-hormonal copper IUD, well I tried that THIS year after the birth of my first child, and I was one of the small minority if people who got punctured by the IUD. My healthcare providers were really concerned because this is apparently so rare and they hadn't had it happen before, but I can say that it REALLY sucked! I am still healing up nearly a month later. Having a piece of metal puncture your uturus is no picnic.
And I am not a big fan of condoms either, but I think that when you're teenager hellbent on vaginal intercourse then they're really the way to go. Find a decent lube that works. And find out why the boyfriend doesn't like them and what he needs to make 'em okay.
BTW, Dan's right. Dumb bitch. I am happy with my "opposite marriage" and yet I am angry every day that my gay friends can't marry the people they love. Especially the gay parents of some of my friends: people who have been in committed homosexual relationships longer than I have been alive!
@20-22, it's great that you had such a good experience, but you can't extrapolate your reaction to every other woman's reaction. PILL could take the exact same brand (spelled Yasmin, btw), and react with migraines and manic-depressive mood swings. There's no way for her to know without going back to the gyno and getting a different script to try - which, as another commenter pointed out, can be cost-prohibitive for a teenager. Many women can only afford the cheapest, generic pill brand carried by their school health center or by their nearest Planned Parenthood.
I don't like the Pill, so my fiance and I use lambskins. They're perfect for pregnancy prevention, but should only be used in monogamy since they're porous and don't protect against STIs. They're expensive, but a hell of a lot less expensive than a kid.
When I was coming out, my parents were all "be careful of HIV." I pointed out that they should be worried about my sister--because it struck me that straight teens are far more worried about pregnancy than they are about gay sex. And that's only 1/2 of the equation.
But then, I was reading over on Fleshbot that in straight porn, not a lot of condom use goes on. I was quite "WFT??" Most mainstream gay porn has condoms, and bareback porn sort of has a "ooh this is wrong" thrill to it. Is that maybe a straight thing--that the man shouldn't be forced to wear a condom? A power thing?
Because if it is, then it totally makes sense to me that PILL might consider it acceptable to be on the pill without making her BF wear a condom.
Dan, You should recommend the FC every chance you get.
Oh, and I wish the FDA would go ahead and approve them for anal sex.
My long term monogamous boyfriend and I have been on a veritable birth control roller coaster in the two years that we've been dating: I was on the pill, I switched to another pill, and then another. My doctor took me OFF the pill for medical reasons and we had a dangerous summer without any birth control at all, then I got an IUD (intra uterine device) in November (which has been it's own special hell.)
Through all of this my BF has been supportive, but he "doesn't like" condoms either and so the problems of controlling birth have all landed squarely in my court. Suffice it to say the balance of power is drastically askew and I've accidentally absolved him of any reproductive responsibility by accommodating his distaste for condoms so readily.
My best advice to you is to remain assertive about your body, and your sex life. Remind him that it takes two, and that you'll gladly share responsibility equally, whether that means wearing condoms, rides to and from the doctors office, help paying for whatever contraception you two decide on, and support and understanding for whatever transitions you go through once those decisions go into effect.
Even if/when you two break up, being a good advocate your yourself will serve you well for years to come, so start now and build those skills early. Good luck!!
Dan, You should recommend the FC every chance you get.
Oh, and I wish the FDA would go ahead and approve them for anal sex.
67
68
Try to find a therapist who does not feel that their job is to uphold traditional values. There are many out there who will work with you and validate a couple's choice to try an open relationship or other no traditional approaches to life.
The best thing is to interview a counselor before you hire them and ask them how they view questions like this.
It is possible that "Life Decision's" therapist got burned by an ex partner or spouse and is not able to look objectivly at this situation.
-hormone free (or have a dose of hormone so low that you do not get systemic side effects.)
-easy to use and impossible to screw up- after insertion, you're good to go for 5+ years, no pill remembering or patch changing required, just check the strings monthly.
-safer and have fewer side effects than the pill- IUDs got a bad name in the 50s with the Dalcon Shield, but they are back and reengineered and are not your mom's IUD.
-for everyone- IUDs are NOT only for women who have had a baby, as their stupid and outdated PR may suggest. IUDs can be used by women who have never been pregnant.
-the most effective birth control on the planet.
-free for women who qualify for Take Charge (in Washington state)
But like the pill/patch/ring, they do not protect against STIs.
More info at:
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-…
http://fortress.wa.gov/dshs/maa/FamilyPl…
Thanks, Dan- hope next time you'll give IUDs a shout out.
If you allow him to be selfish on the condom issue you are doing yourself and every woman he will ever be with in the future a great disservice. Teach him now that selfish irresponsible jerks don't get laid. Thanks.
The female condom is a non latex alternative. There are male condoms made without latex, but they have a lower effectiveness against STIs and/or break more easily, depending on the material.
PILL- at your ages, you should absolutely require that he take on some of the burden of contraception and infection prevention. Yes, a condom can reduce sensation for a guy, but a thin condom, especially at 16yrs old, and some practice can make condoms a very workable option for him. If he won't cover it, don't let him stick it in you. Go find a sex partner that respects you!
I have a close gal-friend who is the proud mother of a 18 year old girl. She's a tough chick who grew up on the streets of New Orleans and is about as REAL as it gets. She has a great relationship with her daughter and HER advice to her daughter concerning condoms is this: "If a boy tells you he won't wear a condom and tries to pressure you to have sex without one, DON'T GIVE IN!!! HE'S LYING! Call his bluff, tell him its the condom or nothing, and watch him FOLD! Remember that you always have him in the palm of your hand because you have what he wants." This teenager is a smart girl and has yet to become preggers.
As to the IUD question, I got a copper 7 IUD when I was 17 in 1983. I had the horrific cramps and bleeding some have described above. I had to wear a diaper to bed or else it would look like someone was murdered there. I ended up with a staph infection it took over 3 years to kick, severe damage to my tubes (I ended up having both of them removed), and infertile. Oh! And herpes because I didn't think I "needed" to use a condom.
Please don't put your future ability to have children at risk. No responsible OB/GYN would allow that method of birth control to anyone who might want to have children in the future.
I'm a medical professional and I'm disheartened that I'm the first one to mention another non-hormonal, non-permanent method: the diaphragm! There are several different kinds available, and the best online resource is http://www.cervicalbarriers.org/
Also, a few other things:
1) YES, you CAN get pregnant from unprotected anal sex. Not because the semen goes into the vagina during penetration, but because semen can get into the vagina before insertion (pre-cum, anyone?) or after ejaculation. While it's a lot less likely than unprotected vaginal sex, it is still possible.
2) All methods of birth control have risks, and no method is perfect for everyone. Condoms can cause allergic skin reactions, the pill can cause blood clotting problems, the IUD can cause tears in the uterus, etc. All of these are very rare occurrences, but I have to say it's never a bad idea to go talk to a doctor, nurse practitioner, or physician's assistant who you feel comfortable with. They can help figure out if you're at higher risk for one of the above events, and can help you discuss benefits and downsides of each method. Some providers may try to push you to use something you don't want to use, so if that's the case, go find another GYN! It's your body!
Good luck PILL, and make your boyfriend be involved in this process, regardless of what decision you make.
85
Sorry that you had bad experiences with IUDs. However, those experiences (especially yours, 77) are over 30 years old. Things change.
Do IUDs work for everyone? No, especially if you're non-monogamous. Do placement problems occur? They can, and if your doctor didn't tell you about that, then it's on your doctor, not the IUD. That said, there is some risk in everything, but most issues with copper IUDs occur within 30 days of placement. Get that far and you're in for up to 10 years of reversible birth control without problems provided you don't get STIs in the interim. STIs that you can get just as easily while taking the pill.
Ibuprofen and possibly taking the pill for 3 months following insertion of an IUD will dramatically lessen the heavier periods that can occur. If you're used to pill-driven pseudo-periods, once you get an IUD, periods will seem heavier because they are real.
Oh, and the whole "get an IUD after having kids" thing? That's just because it's easier (and less painful) to dilate a cervix to 5mm after it's already been stretched to 10cm+ by a kid. I was/am nulliparous when my IUD was placed. The worst bit of the placement was the uterine sounding precisely because of my unstretched cervix. I think it was totally worth it for the years of monogamous condomless sex my husband and I are getting out of it. As always, individual mileage may vary.
But seriously, PILL, use something other than prayer as birth control.
Is hubby Bi? Poly? Sub? Whatever the issue, the poly community probably has the best answer for her. Open, honest communication between two (or more!) people who want the best for each other. Fuck societal norms, work out what will make YOU happy, as a couple. If there are communication problems, a therapist can help, but you might not even need one once you realise you can sit down together and turn your conservative monogamous marriage into whatever you want it to be!
Ultimately, a strong, loving couple should be able to sit down, talk about what they each want, and compromise. LD needs to not forget her own needs while accomodating her hubby. Feeling insecure? Jealous? Not bringing up her own kink because she thinks it's even weirder? Make sure the accomodating goes both ways. The insecurity one can be tough, and again, LD should look to some of the resources in the polyamory community for help. There are some great forums, blogs, and other resources available to suggest ways to embrace the poly lifestyle, and the tips should apply to just about whatever other lifestyle situation you two find yourselves in.
Also, on the topic of the asshole therapist. It sounds like you guys were on the right track already (you discussed opening your marriage), but your therapist shot that down (STOP COMMUNICATING WITH EACH OTHER! CONFORM TO SOCIETY'S EXPECTATIONS!). Therapists who screw up like this need to go back to therapy school. It sounds like this therapist was busy trying to make you fit a particular mould, rather than helping you deal with a problem.
So I guess I want it both ways, Dan. You shoulda given LD more advice, and played down the therapy thing; and Dan, you REALLY should have come down much harder on the therapist: people like this are out there ruining everybody's fun.
88
89
To PILL: I can imagine that it is an adjustment for a 16 year old boy to use a condom if he is not used to it. Tough: as several other posters have pointed out, the reality of STD's means protection in the form of a condom is mandatory. If he is not man enough to accept that, he is not ready for sex. You can do better, and you deserve better, than a wimp who is willing to risk his health and yours, so stand up for yourself: you won't regret doing so, believe me...good luck...
Love the column, but I feel like it's become more of an outlet for your political commentary more than a sex column. I'd rather read questions that are chosen for a reason other than an excuse to discuss your political leanings.
Every single one I took screwed me up royally, including Yasmin and the Nuvaring. Constant bleeding, depression, lethargy. And my docs assured me nothing was wrong – just that those were typical side-effects (even 'acceptable,' according to some of them). They had me switch a few times before I realized I didn't have the fucking time to take a month or two off from reality.
I was always told that that's how long my body would take to adjust – oddly enough, I'm not sure my bosses would have accepted that as my reason for crying every single day. There's no non-maternity leave.
Knowing how I react to those, I would never, ever try a shot or hormonal IUD, and even a copper IUD... I can't risk it. I need something I can stop myself. Also, as many horror stories as I've heard about the pill (and there have been tons – it's insane how many women just feel they've got no choice but to 'put up with it'), I've heard more about Depo and Mirena.
So yay condoms and yay Plan B (I'd rather take that once or twice a year than a pill every day).
@ 52 - Just because *you* are not secure enough with your relationship to be able to have multiple partners does not mean that others are not. I am neither cheating on, nor hurting, anyone in either of my relationships by having a committed sexual and/or emotional relationship with them. There is open communication, love, trust, and respect; there is nothing unhealthy about that.
I second the opinion on finding a "kink-aware professional" counselor. I also think that it takes a remarkably secure person to step up to the plate and say "I can't give him what he needs, but I'll do what I can to see that he gets it." I applaud that.
I also second DaveNYC in saying that NO 17 year old should be having ANY type of sex without a latex or polyurethane condom! Ever. Fetuses can be aborted; AIDS, Hepatitis C, HPV, and Herpes cannot. There is absolutely NO reason for any boy (because real men know better) to say that he shouldn't have to wear a condom. A couple men that I've slept with (including my current partner) just never realized that the condoms they were using were too small, and so they just thought that they couldn't wear them... until I promptly went to the store and bought a box of Trojan Magnums (and Magnum XL in two of the cases, after the Magnums were still too tight to even go on) and demonstrated for them that condoms are not the problem.
Given a range of many different sizes and the option of the female condom, you should never let anyone convince you that condoms are not a must.
From the CDC:
"Young women, especially those of minority races or ethnicities, are increasingly at risk for HIV infection through heterosexual contact. ...the rate of HIV prevalence among young women aged 16–21 was 50% higher than the rate among young men in that age group"
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factshe…
And teenage girls? STOP LETTING THEM PULL THAT SHIT!
And while I agree with your response to PILL, and Bristol, I'm a little surprised you didn't tackle the issue of the bf's condomphobia. It may be too early for them to start having sex, and the 16-year-old's professed dislike of condoms may well be an excuse to avoid doing "it", but still he needs to know that, when he's ready for vaginal sex (and probably anal sex, too), Mr. Rubber is a friend to the both of them.
However, lots of words that used to be valid medical terms have gradually changed meanings. Words like "idiot", "moron", "imbecile", "dumb" and "lame" to name a few. I say these all the time and mean no offense. Maybe "retard" is becoming that way. But this gives rise to awkward PC terms like "mentally challanged", "differently abled", which sound silly to me.
We should keep our insults to things like "FUCK YOU ASSHOLE" and not pervert valid medical terms.
So - FUCK YOU Dan! LOL!
However, lots of words that used to be valid medical terms have gradually changed meanings. Words like "idiot", "moron", "imbecile", "dumb" and "lame" to name a few. I say these all the time and mean no offense. Maybe "retard" is becoming that way. But this gives rise to awkward PC terms like "mentally challanged", "differently abled", which sound silly to me.
We should keep our insults to things like "FUCK YOU ASSHOLE" and not pervert valid medical terms.
So - FUCK YOU Dan! LOL!
I strongly suspect that the reason a nervous sixteen y/o boy doesn't like condoms is 1) he loses his erection while messing around trying to get the damn thing on or 2) after wanking with a death grip, a condom fails to provide sufficient sensation for him to stay hard during sex. Societal pressure to be amazing in bed will only be making this worse.
Obviously there are solutions to these problems. Like more practice with condoms, and less intense masturbation for example. But I would advise PILL to do the following things: 1) always insist her bf use a condom, and 2) do so in a patient and understanding manner.
WRAP IT UP OR YOU WILL REGRET IT ONE DAY!!!
i can promise you that.
My boyfriend doesn't like condoms either, but he committed to getting used to them once we realized I shouldn't be taking ANY hormonal birth control due to regular aural migraines + family history of stroke. With this combo, hormones would increase stroke risk 2-3 times for me. Ladies, ask your doctor about this if you get migraines, because I was prescribed pills/nuvaring by several who did not check! (And as for IUD, I would if I could, but my uterus has been measured to be slightly too small... crap!)
Anyway - bottom line is that your priority at age 17 is to find what works for you. Your bf will learn to come just fine with condoms, and realize it's the least he can do in return for sex and your health. If he occasionally still has trouble, perhaps from jacking off too much lately to retain any sensitivity, there are many other ways to help. Have fun!
But Geez...some people here are being awfully harsh on PILL's bf for disliking condoms. Many, perhaps most men, myself included, do not like condoms. Some people might find that they aren't a big issue and don't significantly affect the sensations. The vast majority of these people seem to be women. I successfully used a variety of condoms with and without lubes for years with a number of partners. Successful in terms of no unintended pregnancies but I frequently had a struggle to reach climax with one on. My best comparison for women- it's about like wearing latex gloves to cuddle with a newborn baby. Sure, you get the general sense of what's going on but the details and nuance are all gone. Better than not having sex at all, but not by much.
I do apologize for the curt way this is coming out, but plenty of women struggle to reach climax using a variety of methods. Wonder how that feels.
It's fantastic lots of couples can work out a compromise that works for both sides, but considering the cost (financial and physiological) of hormonal contraceptives and the punishment of unprotected sex, I think most people would shut their mouths and deal with "struggling" that can come with condoms. (Hell, I can't finish at all with intercourse -- condom or no condom.)
People are being harsh on PILL not because he dislikes condoms, but because he's basically putting all the burden of contraception on his girlfriend, and willing to risk her well-being for his own pleasure. What he thinks and what he feels *are* very important, but not next to her risking her health. That's not a good guy, whatever his preferences.
Unfortunately, it's often meant I have to fake an orgasm of my own and make sure my partner never sees the condom afterward. Too many people get hung up on the idea that you can't get off by fucking them. Then you have them feeling guilty or giving you guilt trips. When they can just accept that I can't get off with the condom, but that I'm still having fun then things go smoothly. That's when it can get really hot and nasty and all those other things that Dan talked about get thrown in to the equation.
Here's the thing about outercourse et al. as foolproof: it ceases to be foolproof if the hot-and-botheredness it produces makes the kids say "oh, what the hell" and go ahead with coitus. (Especially a problem if they'd told themselves, "we're only doing manual and oral, no need to keep condoms on hand".) Now, I'm all in favor of selling people on the safer pleasures. But a lot of people don't find them as satisfying as coitus, and don't feel the same visceral drive to engage in them, even if they haven't been taught that sex is coitus or nothing.
If it's unrealistic to tell kids "hey, no sexual activity!", then I don't see that it's any more realistic to say, "hey, all the sexual activity you want, except that at the crucial moment you must resist the behavior your gonads are begging you to do!".
Here's the thing about outercourse et al. as foolproof: it ceases to be foolproof if the hot-and-botheredness it produces makes the kids say "oh, what the hell" and go ahead with coitus. (Especially a problem if they'd told themselves, "we're only doing manual and oral, no need to keep condoms on hand".) Now, I'm all in favor of selling people on the safer pleasures. But a lot of people don't find them as satisfying as coitus, and don't feel the same visceral drive to engage in them, even if they haven't been taught that sex is coitus or nothing.
If it's unrealistic to tell kids "hey, no sexual activity!", then I don't see that it's any more realistic to say, "hey, all the sexual activity you want, except that at the crucial moment you must resist the behavior your gonads are begging you to do!".
Here's the thing about outercourse et al. as foolproof: it ceases to be foolproof if the hot-and-botheredness it produces makes the kids say "oh, what the hell" and go ahead with coitus. (Especially a problem if they'd told themselves, "we're only doing manual and oral, no need to keep condoms on hand".) Now, I'm all in favor of selling people on the safer pleasures. But a lot of people don't find them as satisfying as coitus, and don't feel the same visceral drive to engage in them, even if they haven't been taught that sex is coitus or nothing.
If it's unrealistic to tell kids "hey, no sexual activity!", then I don't see that it's any more realistic to say, "hey, all the sexual activity you want, except that at the crucial moment you must resist the behavior your gonads are begging you to do!".
Here's the thing about outercourse et al. as foolproof: it ceases to be foolproof if the hot-and-botheredness it produces makes the kids say "oh, what the hell" and go ahead with coitus. (Especially a problem if they'd told themselves, "we're only doing manual and oral, no need to keep condoms on hand".) Now, I'm all in favor of selling people on the safer pleasures. But a lot of people don't find them as satisfying as coitus, and don't feel the same visceral drive to engage in them, even if they haven't been taught that sex is coitus or nothing.
If it's unrealistic to tell kids "hey, no sexual activity!", then I don't see that it's any more realistic to say, "hey, all the sexual activity you want, except that at the crucial moment you must resist the behavior your gonads are begging you to do!".
122
I too had an age difference in one of my relationships (bigger than yours and your boyfriend's) and my partner wasn't ready for full-on intercourse. So we didn't do it. We did lots of other things until he trusted me enough to attempt it, and since it wasn't so good for him the first time, we took it slow some more until we tried it again. On the other hand the non-intercourse sex I had with him was some of the best I've ever had! Dan gives lots of good suggestions but the main trick is to be creative, find your partner's erogenous zones and above all allow it to be intense, really get into the other person and let yourself be swept up in their reactions and make sure they do the same. Sex, at least good sex, is at least as much about the intense sharing of your body and emotions with someone else as it is about the specific physical thing you do in bed. For instance, SM, very intense, but not necessarily any kind of intercourse - not that I'm suggesting you try SM (unless you're into that sort of thing), it's just meant as an example of how things can get extremely intense without intercourse.
And while we're in the realm of Things Teenage Boyfriends Tend To Do: 17-year-old ladies, don't let your boyfriends talk you into giving them BJs and never going down on you because he "doesn't like it" and don't let him get away with having an orgasm time and again while leaving you with none because "it's really hard" or "I'm sleepy now." I've heard all these stories from too many women and it's getting old.
And while we're in the realm of Things Teenage Boyfriends Tend To Do: 17-year-old ladies, don't let your boyfriends talk you into giving them BJs and never going down on you because he "doesn't like it" and don't let him get away with having an orgasm time and again while leaving you with none because "it's really hard" or "I'm sleepy now." I've heard all these stories from too many women and it's getting old.
Different people have different hormonal levels, and different birth control pills have different hormonal levels. If the hormone level in the pill is incompatible with your personal hormone level, you may experience side effects. A pill with a more compatible hormone level will likely alleviate these side effects.
For example, I've had pills that reduce my sex drive and pills that increase my sex drive. I've had pills that give me acne and pills that cure my acne.
Go to your doctor or clinic, tell them which pills you've tried and what side effects they gave you, and see if they can prescribe you something better. I'd recommend trying at least three different formulations before writing off the entire method of birth control.
http://www.cafepress.com/cp/members/prod…
It says "How can someone argue abstinence is 100% effective when they worship a man born of a virgin?
http://www.cafepress.com/cp/members/prod…
It says "How can someone argue abstinence is 100% effective when they worship a man born of a virgin?
Once again, you score a direct bullseye on your advice to
LD, BOYS, and PILL!!
Miss CA, you truly ARE a dumb bitch!
Keep on rocking the house, Dan!
Asking for sex help at 17 shows you're smarter than me and most of the population at 20 or 30. Dan's advice is amazing again this week. But there's more.
You and all teenagers should have a low cost plan B pill just in case. Have someone over 18 get it if your region still has that restriction. Volunteer for pro-choice groups if that is your side of things. I got one as part of a secret shopper to rat out evil pharmacists. When the condom broke, no drama, she took the pill and period came a bit early and a bit more heavy. But who really knows if the change was random or plan B related. Next period was average.
Sex can be totally wonderful with the right condom and lube. I'm a male and I love condoms. I've never had an STD and had 20 partners, some just for a night. No unintended pregnancy either. When I was younger the condom prevented me from premature ejac. On some occasions things dry up or go wrong, just take off the condom, get him hard again using one of the 4 hands in the room. He will never forget you telling him to come on your chest. He'll think of it every 5 minutes for the next 2 weeks and then taper off somewhat.
At 17 you should be able to go to a sex shop and buy a wide variety of condoms and wide variety of tiny lube packets. If not just send cash to good vibrations in SF. They have a student discount and I'm sure the staff person will cut you a break if you say you are a college student in a low income area with no access. Leave out your age FYI. Have the return address go somewhere safe if your parents don't approve.
I don't know why condoms don't come in a dual foil or plastic packet, condom on one side, lube on the other. You need both. Condom without lube is going to be very so-so to plain old awful for most couples.
Send a letter with cash to good vibrations asking for a low income starter pack with 2 of each condom and mini lube pack. You'll have a ton of fun. If your boyfriend does not like the idea Dump him asap. There are lots of other boys your age who meet your long and short term sexual and interpersonal needs and would die to serve you.
Good Vibrations
603 Valencia St
San Francisco, CA 94110
http://preview.tinyurl.com/goodvcondoms
my tops pics: Skinless Crown, Kimono Micro thin, lifestyles Skyn, Paradise Super Sensitive, Trojan Magnum, Trojan Magnum XL
lube: Liquid Silk, Astroglide
ps: I don't work at good vibes or have any connections to them.
134
You're a teen - but believe me you'll encounter this kind of "problem" all your life. You don't have to ingest medication if it's wrong with you. Many women don't use the pill. I'm a 35yo female and I don't : no unwanted pregnancies.
You're both young. You don't want a baby now, you don't want STIs. A condom is the best solution. Don't use a UID : it's for women who already have had all the babies they wanted, it can jeopardize your fertility.
You'll do a good deed if you make the boyfriend use and like condoms. Because, for most of his life, he's gonna have to use a condom for sex - or else he'll end up with STIs and/or on Maury and/or like the Duggars. A guy, that won't put a condom on, and then complains he's been tricked when he has an unwanted kid, beggars belief. Let the boyfriend not become this kind of loser. If he insists on being one, DTMFA.
Try different condoms, play with them and lube, until you're both comfortable with it during outercourse. Don't rush to intercourse, explore your bodies first, you'll get much more pleasure from that (oral sex is great) than from a plain, stupid, botched intercourse. Believe me... years of boring intercourse until I met a guy that was more interested in me having pleasure than in him ejaculating inside me as soon as he could.
And #132 is totally right : get a plan B pill as a precaution. Sometimes the condom slips. As far as I know those pills are not contraceptive, if you're already pregnant it won't kill the egg. But if you're not yet pregnant, you won't be. I've used it twice. Early periods, that's all.
135
What did you all expect, a Stanford Doctoral Candidate?
I can't believe anyone here actually watched the Miss America contest. Wasn't Survivor Appalachia on?
And what's with Perez Hilton? Why is he so ashamed of his real name that he takes the name of a Three Star Hotel Chain?
Would it surprise you to learn that a black person might become so angry that he/she (gasp) becomes impolite when responding to someone who politely advocates segregation and anti-miscegenation laws?
Are Jews expected to "keep it civil" with polite Nazis?
For gays and lesbians, the things these idiots are talking about aren't "beliefs" or "issues"; they're our fucking lives. And damn straight, I do hate people who think I'm less than human. Even when they make their case politely.
Ummm... no honey. Ask 10 people if they know even the first name of the woman who WON the Miss USA title. Or if even five people know what state she is from. EVERYONE knows who Carrie Prejean is. EVERYONE. And she's getting speaking engagements, book deals, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. What price is it again that she's paid? The toils of fame?
Secondly NO ONE has infringed on her freedom of speech. She is allowed to open her damned fool mouth as much as she wants to. She is, however, not allowed to censor the opinions coming from the people who disagree with her, and that seems to be what she wants. She wants to be a hero for standing up for opposite marriage, but if anyone says boo about it? Well, they're just being unfair, and it shouldn't happen in her America. Except if you're the Dixie Chicks. I mean, isn't that what the internet is for? You wanna be a public figure, well, you'd better get used to criticism. Especially when you're roundly criticizing what? 10% or so of the population?
Welcome to grown up land, honey. You sure can say whatever you want, but that means that I can say whatever *I* want too. And we both have to accept the consequences.
i suppose its better to be aligned with men who's life revolves around inserting their dicks in other mens rectums. so much for your credibility.
Umm... I haven't researched this but maybe you are supposed to have the IUD removed once you get pregnant?
We don't even know whether or not the girl LIKES giving blowjobs. For some, vaginal sex is much more enjoyable.
The activities and safety precautions they take should be a mutual negotiations between the partners. Prescribed rules just don't work, especially when they seem to be resting on this old assumption that the guy has to get off. (but what the girl wants is not asked)
To PILL: Girls mature faster than boys for a reason. Use it to your advantage. His excuses are lame (as in useless, not as in crippled.). If he's got sensitivity issues, tell him to quit jacking off for a week and try it again. Either way, you got the pussy, he want the pussy, make him work for it.
Polygamy, right?
Polygamy, right?
Frankly I think Satan gets a bad wrap.
IMO, each partner should see to BC. I completely understand about PILL not being able to tolerate BC Pills (due to medical reasons, neither can I) but their are other options out there. Try to Diaphram or something similar to deal with both STDs and Pregnancy. She should talk with her OB/GYN. Even if they like to prescribe the pill, if she puts her foot down on it, they have to discuss with her other options (or better yet, find a different OB/GYN!!). It's always a good idea to visit with one and talk to a doctor BEFORE thinking about having sex.
The guy should also provide his own BC method for both the STD and Pregnancy issue. The only way you'll ever be sure it's done right is if you do it yourself. How does he know that a year or 10 years down the road that the girl is really on the pill?? How does the guy know that any girl is really clean?? or visa versa. Remember, even with HIV, if you are tested early, sometimes it won't show. It can take around 6 months for a test to come back positive, meanwhile you could be spreading it around and not know. There are too many STDs out there and who knows when the next newest one will show up or what it will be?? Diseases change, new ones are found. Plain and simple, be smart people. If something doesn't work for you, look around, talk to a doctor (yes guys, you can talk to your doc too!). And if your desires for sexual protection aren't being fufilled with your partner, consider it a differnce in belifes, and look for someone who is compatible with you in that same department.
I have a Paragard (copper) IUD and it's worked fabulously. The first six months or so (yeah, six months) blew in terms of the pain and the length of my periods, but in July I'll have had it for a year and my last few periods have been totally, completely normal - and when you think about 6 months in the context of 10 years of hassle-free, reversible birth control, that is totally fucking awesome.
And, since I'm not currently long-term monogamous I still use condoms! It's just nice to not have to run out for the morning-after pill if problems arise. IT IS TOTALLY PRACTICAL AS A BACK-UP METHOD, AS PRACTICAL AS THE PILL. I'm surprised no one's made that comparison. Only for long-term relationships my ass - although I was in one when it was originally inserted, which is probably why they were willing to give it to me.
That said, yeah, PILL, don't fuck him without a condom - and I agree with what one above poster said about teaching him that insensitive jerks don't get laid. But I think the outercourse advice is spot-on anyway.
AS FAR AS MS. CALIFORNIA, THE DUMB BLOND SET HERSELF UP FOR THAT BACKLASH, WHICH SHE DESERVINGLY GOT. PEOPLE SHOULD NOT CAST JUDGEMENT AGAINST OTHERS, OR PRESS THEIR BELIEFS ON OTHERS.......SHE WILL NEVER REPRESENT ANY QUALITY OF MISS AMERICA.
Dan, were you in on that production?
Can't wait - especially since I have never been able to make it to the festival itself.
157
In this PARTICULAR circumstance, "try poly" seems like good advice. The relationship is good, sex is lacking, and an absence of monogamy doesn't seem to bother either partner.
Go to any poly community forum and try asking any sort of "my relationship is in trouble, will trying poly help?" question, and they'll sound all sorts of alarm bells and tell you that polyamory is for strong, secure relationships only. You should never turn to poly to help fix a relationship in trouble, unless the ONLY trouble is someone not getting enough sex/intimacy/dates/whatever AND both people in the relationship are comfortable with the idea.
I like what you told PILL but wish that you had mentioned all the other kinds of birth control out there. There's the Depo-Provera shot, the patch, the implant, the ring (which is very low dose and many women prefer to the pill) there are IUDs (both with and without hormones) and cervical caps that can be used with spermicide. Also, there are many kinds of pills (from low to high dose, mini-pills, various hormone combos, etc) and PILL should talk to a professional about which pills she was on and the specific things she didn't like about them.
Some are much more effective than others, there are serious cost barriers to some of these if they're not covered by insurance, and there can be side effects to any sort of hormonal birth control, but it's good to be aware that they exist.
I also had awful experiences with hormonal pills and it took years until I finally got a great doctor who took the time to ask about how my pills were working for me and to explain all my options -- and there are so many! I now have a non-hormonal IUD, it is fantastic for me, and I am grateful for my doctor's advice.
Here's a great list/effectiveness chart: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-…
Thanks!
I knew a couple in an open relationship, where he went one way and she went another. Jealousy and competition ensued, and they fought bitterly until they divorced. Perhaps they weren't doing it right and not true to the open relationship. I also knew a couple in an open relationship, but it was only open when they were physically separated, it was more like a free pass to play when not home. That did not seem like an open relationship, it seemed like allowed cheating that neither of them discussed.
To me it sounds like you are going to try some sort of 'allowed cheating' to have his needs filled, why not share the intimate experience? Even if he has BDSM needs you probably can find some way to be a part of that experience.
My thoughts though are if you are currently in a sexually monogamous relationship, don't jump to into the deep end and try an open relationship, start with threesomes first and then if that works well try swinging.
I prefer the sharing aspect to swinging. We both get so turned on by seeing our partner enjoying themselves. The swinging is like extended foreplay for us and then at the end of the night we make love to each other. It has greatly enhanced our trust and faith in each other.
164
The pill is not a good thing for the human body and doesn't protect against STDs. As so many have said here. Another problem is if an irrisponsible partner knows you are on the pill he is more likely to push you to have sex without a condom, there-by risking your health.
Someone who doesn't want to use a condom with you won't be likely to use them with others and this is a rist to your health. In the age of aides - a big risk.
While an IUD is not as risky to your everyday health (or long term, down the road health), it doesn't protect you like a barrier method would.
Do all the fun stuff Dan recommends. Keep condoms and lube on hand. No penetration without a condom. If you are pressured, get up and leave. Standing seriously behind your requirements is a strong statement. Have enough self respect to put your own health first.
Good luck!
otherwise pregnancy will be ALL TOO FREAKIN' LIKELY.
Mr. Hilton may be tasteless and vapid, but he's right. Miss Prejean is a dumb bitch not because she doesn't toe the homo party line, but because most reasonable people would surmise that her actions are bitchy and her statements are stupid. She's welcome to say whatever she wants. And I am welcome to criticize her for it.
Opposing marriage equality isn't like opposing a bond issue or not liking how one's taxes are being spent. Opposition to marriage equality simply is not a justifiable position. It's prejudice, pure and simple. Quit bitching about being forced to agree with the gay community (whatever that is), and own your own bias. Only then can you move forward and work through it, for the country's benefit as well as your own.
Think about it. What is "locally"? It's your PARTS that's what it is. Lack of sexual response, lack of lubrication, lack of sensation, all signs of low libido which is a by now well-documented side effect of hormonal birth control methods, whether Nuva ring, Mirena or progesterone-only.
Remember: "low dose" only means lower than in the pills women took in the 70's. But the amount of hormones in modern pills still packs a huge punch, no matter how you look at it.
And then she can explain to him that not all condoms are the same and the things he doesn't like about one type can probably be fixed by buying a different kind. (I hate the smell of Nonoxynol-9, for instance, so I get the Trojans in the light green box -- no idea what they're really called, which have lube but no spermicide and for whatever reason seem to be easier to put on than others.)
that girl should try different pills. She should work with her doctor till she finds one right for her. Or look for a doctor who will get an IUD implanted. Also PLEASE reiterate the importance of condom use to her in preventing STDs, and testing for STDs if they're in a monogamous relationship, but that condoms are really the way to go when you're dating hormonal roving teenage boys.
Interestingly, according to surveys done both in the US and in my home country of Norway, a large percentage of christian youngsters do not consider sexual acts outside of vaginal penetration sex. Mutual masturbation and oral sex? Quite fine. The Reverend Bill McGinnis even goes as far as *stating* that dating with petting until achieved orgasm can be an option to avoid sex among unmarried christians.
Which I find pretty awesome, really. If only they preached this belief more loudly - I think my time in the youth club of my local church would have been much more awesome (and I probably would have had my sexual debut in the form of a threesome at a skiing trip :-P )
I agree with your general sentiment, but the type of Christians who thump Bibles do not revere Mary or vice versa. There's this little thing called Catholicism that you might have heard of, as well as my neighbors the fundamentalist evangelicals. They are very different, and knowing matters for all sorts of reasons, not least because they are some of our primary opponents in fighting for gay rights and reproductive rights, and it's a lot harder to fight people intelligently when you don't know a fucking thing about them.
I must be getting old.
When I was in youth groups 10 years ago or so, they were much more concerned with the idea of "purity" than sex. Vaginal and anal sex, oral sex, and mutual masturbation were all right there on the same tier of pre-marital badness. There was near-consensus that nipple play impinged purity, but a lively debate on where there were "pure" tongue kisses.
I don't think I ever heard "virginity" mentioned.
Is this a denominational thing or a generational thing?
My partner of ten years can't tolerate the pill or IUD, she can't find a diaphragm that fits and it hurts her like hell to even try to remove the cap let alone succeed, and I'm allergic to every spermicide we've tried anyway (including all options for use with the diaphragm/cap). So "outercourse" it's been, for ten years. It IS real sex. And uh...it's really not difficult to "resist" "saying 'Oh, what the hell!'" It's...just not.
Just like it's not difficult to learn to tolerate condoms. (And the cap never hurts anyone -- she must be lying -- DTMFA!)
IOW: People are different. Accept what they say about themselves.






RSS
Comments (183) RSS