To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
taint was first a verb, according to the OED.
for you, in your purerile state, it is a noun. haha, funny. lawlz!!
Someone mongered my taint, once.
But only once.
As forward-thinking media-savvy progressive people, I propose that we acronymize “Wrongfully Accuse Obama” as WAO –or more accurately: “Wrongful Accusation of Obama“–, and then weaponize it post-haste so that we can bludgeon divisive pundits (eg. O’Reilly) when they attack El Prez. with weak shouty attacks.
Example:
OReilly-clone: I cannot believe Obama would stoop so low as to actually kiss a baby! Can you belie–(flap flap flap)
Razor-sharp Progressive: OReilly, your weak-sauce WAO holds zero water here, I suggest you seriously step up your game and start using actual logic for once. The more relevant situation here … (succinct point, with flawless evocative supporting detail. Etc.)
Mmmmm! TAINT!
I’ve been wanting to ask permission. Gossping and making up stuff is not my thing, so I wanted to ask first. One of my recent comments on Slog was about a Savage-Mary Cheney ticket regarding facesitting.
I want to start a thread on a forum I belong to, http://www.mistressdestiny.com/forums/fo…
The title might be
Dan Savage-Mary Cheney in ’08!
I already belong to a a couple of gay and lesbian forums as well as a Politico/Philosophy one (Polysci major – Go Badgers! Dec. 27th). Forums are pretty neat, as you probably know. You can post an avatar, post pictures, youtube, and get into alright discussions.
What do you think? Maybe just a thread on taint licking?
“it is not necessary to spelunk too deeply into the taint sewer…”
BWAAHAAHAAHAA!!!1!!omfg!!!
Twice-tainted. Taint yours, taint mine.
“A Perineal Source of Humor.” Well-played.
(You’ve dropped the “emeritus,” eh?)
That title wins.
Far left rags like yours and Huff Post can giggle important questions about The One away, but that doesn’t make inquiring conservaives like me stop asking them.
There will always be questions about Obama’s involvement with Blagojevich until he answers them.
There will always be questions about Obama’s willingness to associate with terrorists and crooks until he answers them.
There will always be questions about the legitimacy of Obama’s presidency until he produces his birth certificate (and there are still several lawsuits pending seeking to do just that).
There will always be questions about your Messiah’s secret homosexuality and desire to convert our children to homosexuality until he answers questions about his involvement with Larry Sinclair.
Thankfully, there are still enough good Americans asking them.