f335/1242925502-pantieraidpiheadline.jpg

But as HistoryLink.org—”the Free Online Encyclopedia of Washington State History”—reminds us, May 20 was the 57th anniversary of the University of Washington’s most humongous panty raid:

On May 20, 1952, about 1,000 male students at the University of Washington stage a panty raid, storming women’s dormitories and sororities and shouting “We want panties!” Panty fever also struck Washington State College (now Washington State University) and more than 50 other campuses around the same time, in what Time magazine called “the first really daffy outbreak by U.S. college students since the days before World War II” (June 2, 1952).

Full UW panty-raid history here. And lawyers: Were such a thing to happen today, what kind of lawsuits would be most likely to arise from a thousand male UW students storming women’s dorms to steal their panties?

(Thank you, Slog-tipper-without-peer Jake.)

David Schmader—former weed columnist and Stranger associate editor—is the author of the solo plays Straight and Letter to Axl, which he’s performed in Seattle and across the US. His latest...

14 replies on “I Cannot Believe I Neglected to Mention This Yesterday”

  1. Such a thing would not happen today, since dorms are coed and panties so readily accessible.

    True story: freshman year, there was this really annoying girl on our floor who had her hooks into my roommate. She gave him a pair of her panties to use as an eraser for the dry-erase board on our door.

  2. It didn’t make it into the Guinness Book Of World Records. Which means someone else’s panty raid was bigger and better than the 1,000 Fratboy Army. I’m thinking it was probably Arizona State. Does anyone know?

  3. That’s so sickening. Men may still make 43% more money than women for the same job, but at least now it’s technically illegal for men to rape, beat, and steal from women.

  4. @7: if it were Notre Dame it would probably have been a raid on camp Nearestyoungboy, and if it were Brigham Young University, eh, probably not, they all already have their own magic frillies.

  5. Today this would result in 1000 new records in the WA sex offender database.

    Strange to think we’re more prudish now than in 1952.

  6. come on, it’s not that we are more prudish… we are way less prudish. we are more respectful for someone to choose (especially a woman) for themselves how they want to be prude or not a prude instead of letting men decide for them.

Comments are closed.