…same as the old Republican hypocrites: Andy Seré is a spokesperson for the National Republican Campaign Committee. Tearing a page from the playbook of Karl “Protect Traditional Divorce” Rove, Seré has been gay-baiting a Democratic candidate running for office in a red state. “The NRCC,” writes John Aravosis at Americablog, “through Seré, has been especially focused on the fact that a Democratic House candidate apparently has a good body, or works out a lot.” If having a good body and working out a lot makes a guy gay… then, gee, the gay-baiting Andy Seré could be gay too. Just look at these pictures that John found on Facebook of a party—”The GOB Freedom Festival”—that Andy Seré admits to having attended…


“Let me be clear,” John wrote yesterday. “I’m not suggesting that the NRCC spokesman or any of his (international) male friends are gay. I’m simply admiring his soft boyish looks, his seeming obsession with homosexual innuendo and the male form, and his incredibly muscled, half-naked, Bel-Ami boy friends who like to get together for long hot weekends without the necessity of all that clothing covering their tight sweaty pecs.”
Or any women, for that matter.
In response to John’s post Andy Seré took a swipe at gay people adopting children and one of his friends said this in Seré’s defense…
“Andy Seré gets more tail than anyone I know in DC. He’s short, he’s French and the girls love him.”
John fires back:
[One] of his associates went on the record with a Nashville journalist about how much
female“tail” Andy gets around town, suggesting that the seemingly (hopefully) unwed GOP spokesman is having pre-marital sex with an inordinate number ofwomenwhile working for the Republican party, a party that claims to stand for family values and abstinence before marriage. (I corrected this paragraph to reflect the fact that the gender of the “tail” was never defined. And just because the women supposedly love him, doesn’t mean his tail is female—women love gay men too, a lot. But for the purpose of the rest of the post, we’ll just assume, arguendo, that the associate was talking about women, even though the quote sounds like quite a bit of overcompensating.)In fact, Seré’s cheap shot about gay adoption, and his overall gay-baiting, is based on one underlying truth about the GOP: they’re very skittish and moralistic about sex outside of marriage, and about anything that has a whiff of not promoting family values. It would therefore seem rather hypocritical of the moralizing Republican party to hire an unmarried spokesman who “gets more tail than anyone I know in DC.” (It’s also rather un-Biblical to treat women as sexual “tail.”) If the quote is true, this would make the NRCC’s spokesman, and the NRCC itself, rather serious family values hypocrites….
And since the GOP has made clear that it believes condoms are not reliable, then this matter gets all the more serious. Putting aside the sin of knowingly having promiscuous sex when you “know” condoms are “unreliable,” has anyone followed up with all of this “tail” to make sure that we’re also not talking about having children out of wedlock, or worse, abortion? If condoms are as unreliable as the Republicans claim them to be, and the GOP spokesman supposedly “gets more tail than anyone I know in DC,” then pregnancy is a very real danger of such reckless premarital promiscuity—in fact, that’s the message the GOP is always putting out there, sleep around and you’ll get pregnant, or worse, get STDs (or worse). The NRCC needs to come clean about the alleged sexual promiscuity of its own unmarried staff. It might also behoove the media to ask Seré his positions on abstinence, premarital sex, contraception, having children out of wedlock, and abortion.
Another case of “abstinence for thee, not for me.” And I touch on “family values” types like Seré—sexually active single straight guys who claim to be conservative, family-values types—in this week’s “Savage Love“:
Let me see if I follow: If this woman were unmarried and unattached, DIS, your friend with the “traditional values” wouldn’t have any problem fucking her? A point of order: When did premarital sex become a “traditional value”?
I don’t care if your buddy fucks this woman or not. (He should; lots of rebounds turn into wonderful and lasting relationships.) I’m just curious how we got to the point where anything goes—premarital sex, oral and anal sodomy, multiple marriages (hey there, Karl Rove!)—for heterosexuals and nothing is a violation of “traditional values” so long as the fornicators are straight. An unmarried straight man with shit on his dick and three different women’s pubes in his mouth can claim to have a “conservative sensibility and traditional values”—how’d that happen?
The only thing a straight dude like Seré—assuming that Seré is straight—has to do these days to qualify as a modern “family values conservative” is refrain from having sex that doesn’t appeal to him (gay) with people he doesn’t find attractive (men). If they set the bar any lower—for themselves—it would be underground.

For a second there, I thought those aprons said “Rod Rock Ranch” rather than “Red Rock Ranch”. It only made it a little less gay when I read it the right way.
…so where is this Red Rocket Ranch, anyway?
@1, but only a little! Other than the guns in the second picture, I have attended that very party here in Seattle on Cap Hill.
@2: Oh god D:
LOL, the GOP is presently rife with queens like sere and his tails … I mean ‘buddies’, (no females present on any photos), everybody knows it.
And who new that being short was a plus these days. Viva le French leprechaun !
I thought it was Red Sock Ranch
“An unmarried straight man with shit on his dick and three different women’s pubes in his mouth can claim to have a “conservative sensibility and traditional values””
This was, without exception, the single greatest sentence I have ever read in my life.
That is a nice punditry confluence!
5, Loveschild, they’re no more hypocritical, or in denial than you.
@4: What? Corgis don’t enjoy a day in the country, chasing squirrels’… tails?
How old is this kid?
“three different women’s pubes in his mouth”
Since when do “traditional values” types go down on women?
People living in glass houses walking around with baseball bats… *smh*
Outing is wrong and violent. Shame on you.
Which one is Sere? PS Too funny that Aravois referenced Bel-Ami in his post.
Question: Is there video of the orgy that happened later than night after they put all those guns away? I wanna watch.
@15 The jerk on the right.
Republicans are dorks. Especially young Republicans.
Ok, that’s like the fourth time I’ve read the word “arguendo” today and I’d never heard of it before that. Is it the word of the day on dictionary.com or something?
His name has an accent mark. That is quite foreign. Should we really have foreign people running around in our nation’s capital? Is Andy Sere (I’m not going to take the effort to do the stupid accent mark, because I’m a real native-born American) a TERRORIST?
You know what’s funny?
Serré is French for “tight.” I guess Andy Seré just took that extra “r” (for Republican) and shoved it up his “serré” ass.
Frat boy types…always one beer away from exploring the mysteries of same-sex lust…
I find it surprising that someone coming to Sere’s defense would describe him as “French”. Which party was it that insisted that the Congressional cafeteria start serving “Freedom fries”? But I guess the Republican attitude toward the French is like their attitude toward democracy. When it works in their favor they love it. When it doesn’t they want to abolish it.
Is it just me, or are the guns in that picture strikingly phallic?
Four of the boys are even holding them with the butt of the gun at their crotch.
That picture…looks like it was taken at Triangle Campgrounds.
Loveschild calling a person a queen is the equivalent of me calling her a n*gger. Both are intended to be derogatory comments. But I wouldn’t do that, because I’m not a bigot like LC.
Closeted gay Republicans … I am so shocked.
Not.
@15
Bel-Ami boys are dee-lish.
@22
That’s the gay male (and my) fantasy anyway.
Here @ 5 and @ 17, a belated Christmas gift.
And, a belated happy new year, pot. You and your kettle friend, aka “the jerk on the right” have much in common.
http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/200…
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/th…
stevema, LC is not african-american, and most certainly not a woman. just some fat white boy with poor personal hygiene and social skills.
Re: 2, it’s probably this Red Rock Ranch near Cotulla, TX, which would be a couple of hours by big-ass truck south of Serré’s [likely] former frat house at UT-Austin.
They offer trophy “hunting” of exotic African hoofstock. Ugh.
I’ve seen gay porn that was less homoerotic than those pictures. What do you want to bet the homeboys get liquored up and start pantsing each other and playing grabass every chance they get?
I like how someone I suspect to be Alleged claims that outing someone is violent and immoral and wrong…when the guy concerned has been trying to convince voters that his opponent is gay. Can you get any more hypocritical than that? Answer: yes, if you’re someone like Alleged.
The solution to homophobic Republicans is… voting for homophobic Democrats?
@32, and why not, when you have a cozy bunkhouse like this?
#30. You forgot repressed and closeted.
“We’re talking about legitimate public policy issues here. That’s the bottom line, that’s our thrust.”
Yup. No gay innuendo here.
@26 (change)
You know that’s not true, no one has been lynched by an angry mob using that word, no one has been abused thru the usage of that word. But leaving that aside, I believed this thread was to have a good light hearted laugh at him, I’m not the only one doing so, but, unlike you, I’m gonna make it clear, if my use of that word offended you then it wasn’t my intention okay, change a little and do likewise when you post offensive stuff also.
@29
So how many cuts were done on that last video? Especially from the speech. Taking a couple of words from here and there to make a video somehow proves what? That anyone who’s been a former homosexual belongs to a ‘hate group’, why? because they turned their lives around. If that’s the case then I know a couple of them, and they have fooled me well because I’ve yet to hear them say anything hateful about those who still engage in homosexual behavior. These ‘hateful’ people have only sought love and to help others and they have not in any way demand the killing of others as you claim.
Bottom line is you really don’t care about the people you say you do, because you want outsiders to keep on inflaming this situation, instead of leaving them alone to take a humane approach. Think about it this way, would you want a stranger coming into your house and telling you what to do in it? Wouldn’t you become more firm in your stance and even be more prone to take drastic measures to repel them? Keep your insults Kim, and I do sincerely wish you and yours a very happy, and above everything healthy new year.
I love the Freudian phallic guns. They’re a nice touch.
I mean, we all knew gun nuts were compensating for something, but seriously, those things could poke someone’s eye out.
@39 “Think about it this way, would you want a stranger coming into your house and telling you what to do in it?”
Yeah, you just keep polishing that mirror….
I AM TOTALLY GAY AND WANT TO SUCK YOU DRY!!!!