To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Depending on who you ask, I’d think most computers are already smarter than Drudge.
Has Drudge been relevant since Lewinsky?
I was just talking about that…
http://you-read-it-here-first.com/viewto…
What Computers Still Can’t Do…
But the amazing thing is that after 50 years of trying, they’re not at all good at answering a simple question…in our case we ask “What is the last name of the President of the United States?”. While someone could write a program that has a database of questions and correct answers and this program would read YRIHF’s question and SELECT the answer, I don’t think anyone has come up with a good bot to read, analyze and answer all questions that we could possibly use as our filter!
Computers are pretty cleve, but I don’t think they’ll ever be clever than humans.
Are you kidding? A 1970’s era pocket calculator would be smarter than Drudge.
Hell, I’ll bet my digital watch IS smarter than Drudge. It can tell me the temperature, the barometric pressure, wake me up on command, and point me in the direction of Magnetic North, none of which I’ll wager he can do.
Ha ha. Drudge is an anagram for Dud Erg.
I think that only #4 got it. He’s the clevest of us all.
You mean NASA and google are thinking of inventing the Commodore 64?
@8 I had a Commodore 64 and freaking ZAXXON. ZAXXON. We gave that shit away. I’ll never recover.
But when will computers be able to love? ;__;
@10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek08KvgqF…
Damn toasters.
At least computers can correct grammar. Looks like Drudge needs a better one for his headlines.
I’m picturing Drudge… and Rush… and Ann Coulter… and Sean Hannity… and Bill O’Reilly… as the five humans trapped inside the computer AM in Ellison’s “I Have No Mouth…” short story. And suddenly I’m sympathizing completely with the computer…
Now…which one ends up with no mouth…?
Drudge is just a man whose circumstances went beyond his control.
@4: Damn! Why must I be so slow on the draw.
Google is already smarter than this entire thread
Is Drudge human?