In today’s New York Times, Steven Greenhouse tackles the issue that we’ve been braying about here at The Stranger for the last several months—reforming drive to the nation’s ports with stronger labor and environmental standards. From the NYT:
The labor-green alliance is getting under the trucking industry’s skin by asserting that short-haul trucking companies working in ports — and not the truck drivers, who are often considered independent contractors — should spend the billions needed to buy new, low-emission rigs that can cost $100,000 to $175,000 each.
Greenhouse hits all the right notes, particularly the “independent contractor” clause, which allows companies to avoid giving benefits, maintenance, or gas money to drivers who are their employees in everything but name. Greenhouse also (inadvertently) highlights the inadequacy of the Port of Seattle clean trucking program, which offers to give drivers of soon-to-be-banned pre-1994 trucks, which produce high levels of pollutants, $5,000 or less for vehicles. Even with the Port’s help in securing loans, there is no way that the drivers will be able to afford new trucks. The best they’ll be able to get will be slightly newer models that the Port will probably ban a few years down the road.
The issue comes down to reforming the cumbersomely titled Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (F4A) which, if altered, would allow port’s to regulate strong labor and environmental standards, including requiring companies to actually hire their workers (which in turn would allow drivers to unionize) and maintain a clean and up-to-date truck fleet.
“The article made it very clear that Seattle is facing a crisis that almost all other ports around the country are also facing,” said Heather Weiner, spokeswoman for the Coalition for Clean and Safe Ports, the umbrella group for the aforementioned labor-green alliance. “It was also really helpful for the Washington congressional delegation to see that the issue does have a national component and that they need to pay attention.”
Weiner expresses hope that altering F4A and the wider clean port reform won’t become bogged down in the bitter partisan politics that have immobilized Congress recently. She cites a number of Republican lawmakers who support reform, including several House members and multi-billionaire mayor of New York, Michael Bloomberg. She also noted a recent “very good meeting” with Dave Reichert, Republican Representative from Washington’s Eighth District, although she emphasized that he had not committed to either side. (Reichert’s office has not yet responded to requests to comment.)
The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is expected to hold a hearing on the issue within the next two months. Two Washington Representatives sit on the committee, both Democrats. The soon-to-be retired Brian Baird of the 3rd District and Rick Larsen of the 2nd District (Larsen’s record suggests that he would be a reliable voice for reform, despite his New Democrat credentials).

Damn it, I thought the headline said “Pot” for a moment there.
Thanks for letting us know about that… wouldn’t have scanned the NY Times. Ever. And it’s a good article and reminds me… what the heck ever happened to the Port of Seattle’s lobbying against the environment on this? Seattle’s port is to the right of Republicans like Bloomberg?
Dirty Jackass Jake, this issue has nothing to do with the environment. It’s a pretext for the teamtsters and longshore to monopolize trucking at the Port.
Dirty Jackass Jake, when are you going to call Yoko at the Guild and organize the scab Stranger?
It looks like this is shaping up to be a real bi-partisan effort — a rare occurence in D.C. these days. It just shows how fixing the nation-wide port trucking pollution and poverty problems is so critically important to all of us.
I don’t believe any Republican can side with labor and greens and survive the Fox and Limbaugh backlash.
I guess the upside of the NYT article is that Seattle isn’t alone in it’s problem with port trucking. The downside is that our port director is leading the fight for the right of the American Trucking Association to go unregulated. It’s not even like it’s Boeing or Microsoft. Can we trade him in for a different model? I’ll put up the $5,000 “scrappage” fee.
I didn’t know Larsen was Canadian.
Who’s port?
It’s always a good day when environmentalists and labor are working together. But an even better day to hear from the New York Times that this particular anti-port pollution alliance is “getting under the trucking industry’s skin.”
Why again are we (the Port of Seattle and the taxpayers that fund it) carrying the Trucking Association’s water on this?