UPDATE: Originally posted at 5:37 p.m. yesterday and moved up to reflect new information.
Seattle Public Schools plans to slash 97 positions from its central office to cope with one of the worst budget shortfalls it has faced in recent history—a move it says was primarily made to save classroom jobs.
Other recommendations for plugging the gaping deficit include cutting elementary school counselors, full-day kindergarten, district-sponsored summer school, and imposing furloughs on everyone from district Superintendent Maria Goodloe-Johnson to the school lunch lady.
Although the Seattle School Board will not vote on the budget reductions before July, it gave district staff directions on how to balance the 2011-2012 budget at a workshop last night. (The board can’t do much until Olympia passes a budget anyway.) The proposed layoffs (.pdf) will by far bring in the biggest chunk of change—$8.3 million—to bridge the district’s current $35 million budget gap. The district has yet to notify all the central office staff (mainly people who work at the district headquarters/John Stanford Center in SODO) on the proposed layoff list.* District Spokesperson Patti Spencer Watkins said that some central office employees may lose their jobs in spring, others will work through the end of August.**
The list of layoffs include approximately five executive directors and directors, 22 managers and supervisors, and 70 line staff (professional staff, office staff, etc.). Seattle Public Schools Executive Director of Finance Duggan Harman refrained from identifying any specific names or positions at a media roundtable today morning.
The $3.9 million that the district will get as a result of across the board non-instructional furloughs will save about 45 teaching positions (according to SPS, average teacher salary plus benefits is about $88,000).
Harman said that there was still room for modification in the district’s proposed budget. “We are finding ways to increase revenue or decrease expenses,” he said, adding that the magnitude of the shortfall was the hardest thing he had witnessed in his 19 years with the district. But the important thing is, “we have kept these cuts away from the kids,” he said.
So far, the Seattle teachers union, the Seattle Education Association, doesn’t know what to make of the district’s claim that the proposed cuts would save teachers’ jobs. “The problem is, the way the proposed budget cuts were presented makes it difficult to accurately know what jobs have been cut,” said SEA president Olga Addae. Addae said she was concerned that the district had set aside nearly $11 million dollars for new textbook purchases and personal service contracts, areas SPS said it would trim back to prevent employee layoffs when it negotiated a contract with the teachers union last year.
*The district wants to stress that central office employees getting layoff notices are only those at the John Stanford Center.
**This post originally said that the district plans to send people on the layoff list pink slips by March. District spokesperson Patti Spencer Watkins said this is misleading because the situation is far more complex. “Any employees at central office who are NOT represented by unions and are being laid off will know that sometime in March,” Spencer said. “A portion of these employees may be subject to mid-year lay off; others would work through the end of the fiscal year (August 31).”

Last list I saw showed that the majority of cuts were coming from maintenance, not the administration where they should be coming from. Has this changed? Also, will the district really be cutting administration, or are they going to play the smoke and mirrors game again where they say the cut admins, but really just moved them into different job classifications at the same large salary (often double a teacher’s salary)?
We should completely get rid of all education. Such a waste.
The school district and its financial apologists will undoubtedly squak about how this is a horrible cut and won’t you think of the children etc. etc. But here is the ball to keep your eye on: after these cuts, the district will still have more employees and fewer students than it did a dozen years ago. Were the seattle schools in unacceptable crisis a dozen years ago? Then they won’t be in unacceptable crises after these cuts either.
It’s all a lot more complicated than it looks (and please don’t believe that hilarious pdf – it’s smoke and mirrors). No, the district is going to lay off a lot of little people, mostly maintenance (they will only be doing “emergency incident” maintenance and we have a nearly $500M backlog). Sure that makes sense.
Riya misses a key point – that Central job cuts will be about $8.5M and school cuts about $7.6M. That is terrible. We have a bloated administration that should be taking far more cuts than the classroom. It should be 2/3 Central adm cuts and 1/3 to schools.
And remember – Seattle passed a supplemental levy back in November to protect the classroom. Is that money going to the classroom? No.
The Board voted to reduce the per pupil supply by one-third – that’s $3.2M right out of the classroom. And they want to get rid of all elementary counselors $2.6M. It’s pretty sad. And, they want to raise the cost of full-day K (state only pays for half-day and district can’t pay the rest so currently parents pay $207 a month if they want full-day K). It is unknown how much they would raise it but probably by $50-60 per month extra.
Sadly @1, @2, @4, and @5 are all correct.