From WSJ, Citigroup made a profit!

Gains were paced by shares of Citigroup, which jumped 36% after it said it was profitable during the first two months of the year, defying analysts’ forecasts of losses. Citi is generally seen as one of the more troubled lenders and its upbeat comments sent other banks soaring. J.P. Morgan Chase jumped more than 19% and Bank of America rose 26%.

Amazing!

Charles Mudede—who writes about film, books, music, and his life in Rhodesia, Zimbabwe, the USA, and the UK for The Stranger—was born near a steel plant in Kwe Kwe, Zimbabwe. He has no memory...

18 replies on “That Bad Bank”

  1. So, can they lower their exorbitant credit card rates then?

    And isn’t this after we bailed them out? So how is that a “profit”?

  2. Okay, so $400 million in bailouts and guarantees from the government, and God only knows how big of losses on their “off-balance-sheet” things, but…it’s a profit! I guess relativism really is the thing these days.

    Oh, mass media. Such an amazing job of reporting you guys do.

  3. As much fun as it is to bitch about bank bailouts, let’s keep in mind that these big banks making *successful* use of that bailout money to return to stability is our best case scenario right now.

    The other options are nationalization, which won’t happen without a fight, and failure, which will make the current mess a lot worse than it already is.

  4. I’m still thinking it’s more like Dow 6000 for the literal bottom.

    But, yes, the best thing anyone under the age of say 60 can do is start putting money from each paycheck into a 401(k) or 403(b) low-cost index fund. Total Stock or US Stock is ok, but in general S&P 500 is the best choice due to the nature of financial cycles at this point.

  5. They just used CTRL F and changed all the “losses” in the report to “profits.”

    PRESTO!

    Capitalism is back, bitchez!

  6. Corrected clarification. They didn’t report a profit, their CEO asserted they were profitable in a leaked “internal” memo, as he struggles to avoid involuntary takeover. (Recall similar claims by WAMU execs at similar points in their ballistic trajectory.)

    Doesn’t mean the claims are false, but they should be weighted with an eye to verifiability, history, motive, and jeopardy.

Comments are closed.