To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
I’d sign a referendum repealing the snuggie. It’s an abomination against man and god.
I have to disagree, no gay man would dare be seen in a snuggie let alone have sex in one.
The are trying to market those things here as ideal for the football stadium, complete with LSU logos on them. Unfortunately, in the SEC, most football is played before the temperatures drop below 80.
Well, the night games might get as low as 70. Break out the Snuggie and the hot chocolate!
Santorum on my snuggie? NO THANKS.
It’s a kama sutra for the un-appealing!
From their TV ads, I’d say snuggie sex was intended not for the gays, but for the incestuous.
Slankets are the original examples of the genre. Beware imitations.
I didn’t see it as heterocentrist. It mentions ‘partner’ not wife or gf. In my world pink /= girl.
This post made me scroll back up and take more serious look at Savage’s asexuality post.