To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
I think we should require pedestrians to get a license, they clearly are a burden on our roads.
… I read it on Wikipedia, it’s true.
Come on People – this isn’t Rocket Science. You know exactly what’s going to happen here….
When the results come out, the “war on cars” people will claim pro-cycling fanatics volunteered to do the counting and inflated the results, while the “war on bikes” people will claim angry drivers volunteered and intentionally under-reported how many bikes went by.
They use an automated system to do this on highways – an air-hose-activated counting mechanism. Can’t they do this on bike lanes and trails? Or maybe hidden cameras such as those used in the wilderness to record wildlife activity? Then you can review the tape to get a count – AND you have irrefutable proof (you could even see if the same cyclists are riding past over and over again to inflate the count).
Well that sounds both tedious as fuck and terribly inaccurate.
To win the “WAR ON CARS!!”™ we must have a clear plan for “VICTORY!!”©
I suggest throwing a pipe bomb at the next SUV you see driving down the street.
There is no force powerful enough to get me on a bike in traffic without dedicated paths or a physical barrier. So I would not be counted, but it doesn’t mean I wouldn’t like, Seattle politely, to request more bicycle accommodations.
Lame. Measuring car trafic is relatively constant. Most people drive to the same workplace every day, to the same school, or stores. Drivers have a routine that doesn’t change much by weather.
But the weather can have a dramatic effect on how many people are out and about walking or biking. If they don’t take weather into account for their survey, it will be completely worthless. Measure a street corner on a cold rainy January evening. Measure the same street corner again on a warm sunny July evening. The car traffic would be close. The bike and pedestrian traffic will be dramatically different.
@6: Which is probably why they’re doing it in late September, and not January or July…
Yeah. That’s how I wanna spend my free time.
They’d get way more counting done if they had volunteers do it while driving around in their cars.
Just …. LOL
Anyone who’s genuinely interested in learning about this can get in touch with Tessa at the Cascade Bicycle Club. She’s been coordinating the statewide count with wsdot for the last four years. Here’s CBC’s blog post calling for volunteers last year.
http://blog.cascade.org/2010/08/bike-cou…
Oopsie, wrong link. That one was for CBC’s call for volunteers for the City count. Here is the statewide count post. A lot further flung coordination work for Tessa.
http://blog.cascade.org/2010/09/help-cou…
We should be like Yellowstone National Park, and require everyone to ride on horseback, stagecoach, or skis.
Funny, the Seattle Weekly got all sorts of shit for doing exactly this.
@14 Because they sent a poor intern to prove exactly nothing.
Having people stand on the street corner in the wind and weather to count FOR FREE? Are you shitting me?
Maybe they’d get a more accurate count if they… you know… paid people to work for them?
People who count bikes have more sex. I saw it on 4chan.
The state pays a lot of money to count cars every year. Why no pay to count peds and bikes?