On the evening of Friday, September 9, police were called to Pacific Place to investigate a reported assault on a security guard, which involved some Avon-inspired chemical weaponry.
A male security guard reported that he had been trying to get a woman to leave the swanky mall, where “she had been camped out in the bathroom for an hour,” according to the police report. The security guard added that the woman had “done this on previous occasion.”
But when the security guard repeatedly asked the woman to leave, she reportedly said “she did not have to listen to him.” And when the security guard then got on his radio to call the (real) police, the woman “threw a bottle of perfume at him.” Police reviewed surveillance footage of the encounter, which “clearly shows the suspect throw a bottle at a high rate of speed,” the report notes. The bottle narrowly missed the security guard’s head and smashed against the wall behind him. The suspect voluntarily left her self-anointed throne before police arrived. They were unable to locate her for questioning.
The burning question on everyone’s mind is obviously what kind of perfume did the suspect throw? Unfortunately, we’ll never know: “The perfume bottle was smashed to little shards of glass so was not collected as evidence.”
Pacific Place is swanky? Huh. I think you have one of the letters wrong.
I bet it was Jean Nate.
@1, swanky for Seattle. It makes me sad someone thinks “Avon” when they read the word “perfume”. Really, Marley Zeno?
@3 – Think aggressively pitched cosmetics.
@4, I will think only of D & G Light Blue.
Well, in her defense, mall cops are some of the most monumental assholes in the country. He’s lucky she only threw a perfume bottle at him.
No, the burning question is NOT what kind of perfume it was. The burning question in MY mind is: How did “surveillance footage” come into being in a LADIES ROOM in the first place?
@7 Because a Ladies’ Room is everything a Men’s Room is not.