Credit: David Lasky

Every year we meet again, Bloomsday, but this time it’s different.
This time I’ve figured you out. On June 16, Dublin and the rest of the
world celebrate James Joyce’s most important work, Ulysses.
Lovers of the book will host readings, bar crawls, Irish breakfasts,
performances of favorite scenes and songs, the publication of long and
short essays, and all manner of “re-Joyce-ing.” In Spokane, there

is even a run called Bloomsday, though it
happens in May.
Seven miles long, drawing over 40,000 participants from around the
world, and won every year by a different East African, the event got
its name, according to its founder Don Kardong, from “the premise of
Joyce’s novel, which is that ordinary people are involved in unassuming
and yet heroic journeys every day of their lives.” This is one way to
read the novel, as the deification of the diurnal. In Ulysses,
ordinary happenings in the age of man (if I may use the language of
Giambattista Vico, a thinker who influenced Joyce) are coordinated with
adventures from the age of heroes.

Set against the background of Homer’s epic, the novel describes a
day in the life of Leopold Bloom (a man who sells newspaper ads); his
wife, Molly (who is cheating on him); and his figurative son (a young
intellectual and reckless alcoholic named Stephen Dedalus). Bloom’s
character corresponds with Odysseus, Molly with Penelope, and Dedalus
with Telemachus. Bloom is a hero in the sense that he is a modern man
with modern problems and predilections. He is open-minded,
cosmopolitan, a flaneur, and interested in science, progress, art, and
good food. Though he has not had sex with his wife in over a decade, he
enjoys masturbating in tubs and in public areas. Bloom’s journey takes
him to a newspaper office, restaurant, museum, bar, and whorehouse.
Nothing much really happens.

Another way to read this novel is as a story about Dedalus searching
for a father. Or as a story about Bloom searching for his home. But
these readings, as with the one by the founder of the run Spokane, are
in essence positive. Searching for the father, searching for home,
finding mythic meaning in your ordinary lifeโ€”not only are these
the sorts of things you’d find in self-help books, they avoid the
destructive and dark side of Ulysses, which happens not at the
level of the story but at the level of words, sentences, syntax. It is
here that Ulysses reveals what it is really aboutโ€”a
massive attack on an institution that oppressed the Irish for
centuries: the English language.

And it is a strange attack indeed. Joyce does not battle English
with the weapons of the Irish language, which was in a very weak state
at the time the novel was set (the early 20th century), but with
English itself. Joyce’s extraordinary mastery (if not sorcery) over the
colonizer’s words mobilized a linguistic assault of unprecedented
magnitude over a wide surface of the language’s history and styles.
There is nothing like this battle in any other book: Each sentence in
Ulysses is packed with small or large explosives. Sometimes a
sentence explodes into a brilliance of fireworks, other times into a
spray of semen and salty water, other times into slime and shit, other
times into blood and guts. This destruction radiates from a center, and
that center is William Shakespeare, Joyce’s ultimate target.

Operation Takedown begins in the first sentence of the book:
“Stately, plump Buck Mulligan came from the stairhead, bearing a bowl
of lather on which a mirror and a razor lay crossed.” That “stairhead”
is in the Martello tower, a decommissioned fort the British built in
the early part of the 19th century to repress the Irish. Mulligan, a
cynical medical student, lives in this fort with Dedalus and Haines, an
Englishman who has appropriated the very language his country has
decimated, Irish. Joyce has begun his assault in the fortress, behind
enemy lines.

The novel makes us aware that when a foreign language dominates a
people, when it enters and shapes their thoughts, when being becomes being in English, there is no going back. This is why
Dedalus (Joyce’s alter ego) is opposed to the Irish literary revival
(or Celtic twilight). Not only is it sentimental, but it also devalues
the present as inauthentic. For Joyce, all that was left for the Irish
was English, the stranger’s words, and it is this that must be
destroyed, not for the purpose of returning to the past, but to create
a space for the emergence of something new.

In the library sequence, early in Ulysses, Dedalus strikes
the center of the power of the English language: the Bard of Avon. He
attacks not in the way Brutus attacked Caesar, but by shredding
Shakespeare’s aura, making him a human by prying into the “poet’s
drinking, the poet’s debts.” He mocks Shakespeare’s sexuality and weak
will:

Do you think the writer of Antony and Cleopatra, a passionate
pilgrim, had his eyes in the back of his head that he chose the
ugliest doxy in all Warwickshire to lie withal? Good: he left her and
gained the world of men. But his boywomen are the women of a boy.
Their life, thought, speech are lent them by males. He chose badly?
He was chosen, it seems to me. If others have their will Ann hath a
way. By cock, she was to blame.

Dedalus further refers to Hamlet as the “absentminded beggar”
and continues assaulting Shakespeare: “A deathsman of the soul Robert
Greene called him… Not for nothing was he a butcher’s son wielding
the sledded poleaxe and spitting in his palm.” Once the aura of power
has been removed from Shakespeare, the oppressive structure of his
language, English, crumbles into the terrificโ€”and at times
terrifyingโ€”chaos of Ulysses. Reading the scene in the
national library (the moment Dedalus attacks the core of English power)
is like the moment when the revolutionaries are on the road to Havana
or Salisbury, Rhodesia: destruction all around but the light of hope
ahead.

Ulysses‘s primary project is to break the ruling power of
English and transform its energies into its opposite, a liberating
power. This project, of course, has little to do with runs,
pub-crawling, and all the other joyful festivities that dominate
Bloomsday. The “re-Joyce-ers” do not realize they are toasting an
attack on Englishโ€”the very language they are using to celebrate.
recommended

Pre-Bloomsday Reading of โ€œCirceโ€ from Ulysses

Sat June 13, University Book Store, 1 pm, free

Charles Mudede—who writes about film, books, music, and his life in Rhodesia, Zimbabwe, the USA, and the UK for The Stranger—was born near a steel plant in Kwe Kwe, Zimbabwe. He has no memory...

11 replies on “Assassinating William Shakespeare”

  1. What seems to be your main thesis, that Ulysses “happens not at the level of the story but at the level of words, sentences, syntax,” is wholly unsupported. There is not one example of syntax or diction given.

    You do discuss interpretations of the words that describe attitudes of the fictional Dedalus and Haines, but those interpretations are entirely, as you might put it, “at the level of” semantics—and a wholly literal and facile semantics at that. I don’t think you’ve really gotten close enough to the words in order to see them separately from literal interpretation, though your thesis at least acknowledges such a thing is possible.

    Additional comments: Do texts have “levels?” Is “dark side” anything more than a folk cliche, and why have you deployed it here? A comma is not a syllogism; “words, sentences, syntax” is not a well supported logical progression.

    Grade: D

    Your actual abilities do not match your imagined ones. Next time get closer to the text, work within your limits, and if you are confused about the distinction between syntax and semantics please come to office hours.

  2. Interesting take, Charles… I’ve never considered Joyce from this perspective. This is a very interesting lens through which to view ALL of his works, culminating in the ‘scorched earth’ of Finnegan’s Wake…

    I believe “YourTA” has graded you too harshly here, I myself would give you a B+.

  3. “The “re-Joyce-ers” do not realize they are toasting an attack on Englishโ€”the very language they are using to celebrate.”

    At last year’s Bloomsday in Dublin, ambassadors from all over the world read excerpts from the novel in their own languages. I heard entire episodes in Korean, Spanish, French, Japanese, among others. The ambassador of Finland was read the entirety of Episode 18 in Finnish, barely pausing for breath.

    What was interesting was the celebration of translation of Joyce’s work. It wasn’t about Dublin itself (as most think Ulysses is a love letter to the city), plot was entirely absent, and readers most often did not differentiate between characters in their voices. It was about language, but more about the fluidity of Joyce’s use of language.

    I’ve never heard an argument contrary to the one above. Formalist readings of Ulysses are popular, and make much more sense than allegorical ones. However, despite Joyce’s disdain for his home country and the English-speaking world, I don’t think he used the language as a weapon. He pushed the language forward, not backwards for the purpose of denigrating his predecessors. He thought himself above that. He wouldn’t take the time to spit on Shakespeare’s grave. I don’t see any malice in his experiments.

  4. I, too, wish you had given more evidence to support your argument. Without it, this piece doesn’t amount to much. Which is a shame, because the premise is certainly interesting.

  5. “true literature is the destruction of literature.” -maurice blanchot

    FUCK, YES, MUDEDE…but i do agree that i’d enjoy a more lengthy dissection. maybe the stranger is not the appropriate place, though?

  6. A problem with your argument is that Shakespeare could easily to be said to have done the exact same thing three centuries before.

    ANY piece of great literature destroys and recreates the language in complex, emergent ways. That’s what makes it great: canonicity is not inherent in anything, but follows from the influence of a work on the language, culture, and future writers.

    Or are you saying that Joyce is attacking the ideological Shakespeare that existed in his time, not the historical man and writer?

    Not a terribly convincing argument either way. I think H. Bloom’s argument that Joyce was trying to out-Shakespeare Shakespeare (Joyce’s agon with Shakespeare) holds a lot more weight. And it carries back to Joyce’s earliest short stories and forward to Wake.

    Regardless, happy Bloom Day everyone! Drink a pint and insist Hamlet was his own grandfather.

  7. Post-mod lit-crit twaddle. Exactly the kind of strained, narrow reading to be expected of the effete critic–and the kind of furrowed-brow, constipated musing that Joyce, a great literary trickster and agitator, predicted would ensue for, as I recall, about 300 years.

    I agree with YourTA; ‘D’.

    I also mostly agree with Lilting Missive: Have twopints and a Happy Bloomsday!

  8. @1 & @7 That POV is why lots o’ talented writers never pan out. the academic echo chamber rewards conservative formalities at the deep expense of insightful instincts this this piece definitely has. Their writers figure they’re rubes and shuffle off. Only the truly great ones, like Joyce, have the cojones to tell the ivories that their focus on structure is intellectually selfish.

  9. I have tried and tried to read “Ulysses” but I always end up with my nose in buried in an E.R.Burroughs’ “Barsoom” novel. What’s with that?

    By the way, if one wants to “…use the language of Giambattista Vico…,” one should write in eighteenth century Italian.

  10. @8 You’ve exceeded your daily allowed count of adjectives and alliteration. “…conservative formalities at the deep expense of insightful instincts…” Didn’t Batman say that?

Comments are closed.