Back in 2001, when the internet was fresh and new and exciting, SuicideGirls promised to, um, single-handedly turn the porn industryโand what we talk about when we talk about beautyโon its head. The partially women-owned business seemed practically feminist, and the tattooed and pierced naked ladies were utterly unlike anything you could see in Playboy or Penthouse or literally any of the other stroke mags available at the time. But in 2005, 30 models left the site in protest of SG’s decidedly noninnovative business model. And just about every porn site has some tattooed and pierced models at least tucked away in a little ghetto now.
As if to celebrate its ascension to the smutty establishment,
SuicideGirls has released a gi-gantic, glossy coffee-table book full of
photos of its models (helpfully arranged by geographic location so
readers can entertain area-appropriate masturbation fantasies). It’s a
tombstone-sized tribute to the website’s mainstream assimilation.
There’s no Redefined Beauty here: Under the Hot Topic consumerist-chic
trappings, all the models are traditionally gorgeous, most with large
breasts and girly makeup. There’s not one girl who could charitably be
defined as “chubby,” nor are there any skinny women here. And they’re
all white. Wait, not 100 percent of them; there’s an Indian chick
somewhere near the backโwhat’s her name again? Oh, right. India.
What an awful book. ![]()

But this is just a reflection of the reality I see on a daily basis around Capitol Hill.
why cant these smut swillers get that a woman who curves is gorgeous. Damn shame too, cause a curvy gal with tattoo’s is extra delicious.
The girl’s name is India? Really????
i’m going to guess that you still had fun ‘reading’ this book. but, i too, don’t understand why curvy women are ignored for the most part by the porn industry. i love some well proportioned curves…
The girls DO choose their own names, and there are plenty of girls on the site with curves. Shame the book doesn’t reflect the diversity there…
ha! FAIL.
who cares?