Reading allowed, not aloud.

Every first Wednesday of the month at 6:00 p.m., the Fireside Room at the Sorrento Hotel goes quiet and fills with peopleโ€”crazy-haired, soft-spoken, inscrutable, dorky, NPRish, punk, white, black. The reading public. It fills right away, all these people who don’t know each other, and they sit very closely, sometimes three strangers to a couch. By 7:00 p.m., you can’t get a seat.

The party spills into the foyerโ€”there’s a table for chess or whatever near the elevator, and two people sitting there, staring into books. A reporter for the Shoreline Community College newspaper showed up the last time to ask about the event, but it’s not much of an event: Nothing happens. No one ever addresses the room. No one reads anything at you through a microphone. You just sit and read and get waited on, and leave whenever you feel like it. And Manhattans are on specialโ€”$7 until 9:00 pm.

You can read whatever you want, and it runs the gamut. Two reading parties ago, a business lawyer next to me was reading that day’s New York Times. An art critic was reading A Brief History of Curating by Hans Ulrich Obrist. A singer/performer/musician was reading Moby-Dick. A furniture maker was reading Where We Live Now: An Annotated Reader, edited by Matthew Stadler. Charles Mudede was reading Walter Benjamin, possibly for the billionth time. An investigative journalist was reading Robert Greenfield’s Exile on Main St., about the Rolling Stones recording Exile on Main St. A food critic was reading Elaine Dundy’s The Dud Avocado, a drunky 1950s New York novel gorgeously republished recently by NYRB. A woman at the next table was reading Michael Lewis’s The Big Short. Someone else was scribbling in a notebook; there’s one in every crowd.

The insane thing about a party where you’re not supposed to make small talk is that it makes you want to make small talk. You almost can’t not do it. (But what a relief to not have to!) If you go with friends, someone will quietly explode over what they’re reading and you will want to know what it is, or they will interrupt your reading and hand you their book and say, “Just read thisโ€”just this paragraph.” At the last reading party, a man and a woman were sitting in leather wingback chairs in front of the fireplace, and he was reading Joseph Campbell and she was, well, listening to him whisper to her about Joseph Campbell. I unsuccessfully eavesdropped. I could only make out “theological shifts,” “how we live,” “ethical.” Hearing “ethical” sent me back a few pages (in Nabokov’s Pnin) to reread something I’d just underlined: “Some people, and I am one of them, hate happy ends. We feel cheated. Harm is the norm. Doom should not jam. The avalanche stopping in its tracks a few feet above the cowering village behaves not only unnaturally but unethically…” (I was happy to be reading Pnin and not Joseph Campbell. No offense to Joseph Campbell.)

Possibly these two were on a date. Other people in the room were clearly on dates. Still others were not on dates and glancing around the room, obviously in hopes of future dates. Something underrated blossoms between strangers who aren’t talking to each other, especially if they are comfortably doing something together. And it can’t be denied that watching someone read is sexy, seeing them unself-consciously concentrating on something else, wondering what they’re thinking, imagining their brain folds forming. And yet there’s also something sweet about the person who is reading a book in order to be seen reading that book, hoping someone will ask.

The Shoreline Community College newspaper reporter asked how it started: Annie Wagner (former Stranger staffer) and Brendan Kiley (still a Stranger staffer) and I used to read after work together at Brendan’s apartment. Brendan always had tea and cheese and figs and tomatoes and dark chocolate and whiskey, and lived in an apartment with lots of chairs and lamps. We were all going to be at home alone reading otherwise; why not do it together? So civilized. So casual. None of the pressures of talking! Mixed with intermittent talking, when you couldn’t resist! Then Brendan got a new apartment and Annie moved to Chicago and sometimes, walking by the Sorrento, I would think: We should do it there, and it should be open to anyone, and it should be free. And, helpfully, the Sorrento agreed. You should come next time. Bring whatever. recommended

Christopher Frizzelle was The Stranger's print editor, and first joined the staff in 2003. He was the editor-in-chief from 2007 to 2016, and edited the story by Eli Sanders that won a 2012 Pulitzer...

16 replies on “The Silent-Reading Party”

  1. Kudos to the staff at the Sorrento for getting it(finally). They seemed put off by the unusually busy Wednesday nights at first, talking at full volume, inviting regular customers to take advantage of happy hour sans book. The service and general conversations were too much so I skipped the next one for all the noise. But happily I returned to find the room mostly silent, mouths hushed and slogged through sixty pages. It makes one so pent up after reading I want an afterhours of conversation and hot book sex….

  2. Wow. I’m so cool. I read. See. See. See! I read. I really do. And you can see me reading too.

  3. See you in a few weeks (am taking a Wed. night class). Thanks for helping with my “burnout.” For a couple years now I’ve unexpectedly been unable to find time/space to finish books, previously my key mission in life. This, and treadmill access at a nearby community college, is getting me back on track.

  4. #2, #4 …

    Can either of you give some more clear reasons why people reading books, in public, making it clear to others that, in fact, ‘people read’, is a bad thing?

    As someone who reads while they walk, reads at home, reads on the bus, reads when the bridge is up & they’re waiting to drive across it, and reads while they eat in restaurants, I can’t count how many times I’ve been interrupted by some dingbat making a joke about how ‘it’s a bar/restaurant/etc, not a library!’ as though reading a book was the same as shitting on the floor.

    Anything that encourages people to read is good, and if some of the people showing up to this are ‘hipsters’ and reading to show off … so what? They’re showing off that they’re READING. That’s a good thing, right? we want to encourage that, don’t we?

  5. I love this idea. It seems like I never have time to just sit and read a good book, and when I do I need to consciously set aside the time. This seems like it would be a really pleasant way to do it.

  6. Love the idea. As the mother of a 3 yr old, and as most mothers would agree, time to just sit and read is golden. Especially since reading at home for me entails some sort of neglect of my son and hubby to some extent. I feel bad and nothing gets done. I never thought of planning ahead to actually go somewhere just to read uninteruppted. What a treat!

  7. Good work on reading Pnin. Probably Nabokov’s funniest book, all the joy of Lolita without the horror. I recommend it to everyone.

  8. Got to say, still love Campbell. Any guy who checked out of the economic bust during the Great Depression to read books is my hero. While others sat and fondling their empty wallets, he read and got something out of those despairing days. Not a penny to his name, but he said he’d never felt such freedom.

    “Every book, every volume you see, has a soul. The soul of the person who wrote it and of those who read it and lived it and dreamed with it. Every time a book changes hands, every time someone runs his eyes down its pages, its spirit grows and strengthens.” The Shadow of the Wind by Carlos Ruiz Zafon

  9. For supposedly being the biggest city with the largest population of single people, this sounds like a real antisocial thing. And also, what’s wrong with just reading in the library again? Just sayin.

Comments are closed.