Born on America’s 28th birthday, Nathaniel Hawthorne is the patron
saint of America’s sadder half. His stories don’t have the unbearable
lightness of French ennui, nor the lugubriousness of Russian pessimism. They are afflicted with the
special depression of the New World, a depression born of thwarted
ambition, imprisoned passion, and soured hope.

He knew the wilderness was dark and scary, full of thorns, beasts,
and savages. He knew the town was dark and scary, full of thieves,
preachers, and even more savages. He knew how desperately we want to be
good and how catastrophically we fail. He knew that God had created the
New World for our manifest destiny and that our destiny was going to be
painful. He knew what evil lurks in the hearts of men. Nathaniel
Hawthorne was writing the blues.

For some reason, it’s easier to find this uniquely American sadness
in musicians: Ma Rainey, Robert Johnson, John Fahey. Along with
Hawthorne, Herman Melville is one of the other few writers who got
it—Melville, of course, dedicated Moby-Dick to his gloomy
friend and nicknamed him “Mr. Noble Melancholy.” Edgar Allan Poe was also a
gloomy motherfucker, but he didn’t have Hawthorne’s bluesy depth. Emily
Dickinson, the Bummer of Amherst, did. America has its happy jokers: James Thurber, Walt Whitman. But this is an argument for another
time.

The point is, Rebecca Brown gets it, too—not just bluesy
American sadness, but Mr. Noble Melancholy himself. Her new collection
of essays, American Romances, is riddled with Hawthorne.

The first story, titled “Hawthorne” (originally published in The
Stranger
as “Unlucky Old Sons”), compares and entangles the lives
of Nathaniel Hawthorne and Brian Wilson of the Beach Boys, who grew up
in Hawthorne, California: “Hawthorne, writer from the east, and
Hawthorne, suburb in the west, are twisted in a Möbius strip: the
child and its evil twin, the maker and its son. The City on the Hill
became the suburb in the sand.” The final essay is a wry gloss on
“Young Goodman Brown” and an oblique, poetic recapitulation of
everything discussed in American Romances: from sex and rock ‘n’
roll to Jesus Christ and The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance.

Even when Brown isn’t explicitly writing about Hawthorne, his long,
deep moans drift through her essays. But, like the blues, they’re moans
of pleasure and of pain, passing from Hawthorne to Brown to
us—breaths intermingling, ideas tangling in unlikely combinations
and positions; they can be thrilling and surprising, leaving you in a
state of blissful exhaustion.

I know it sounds like I’m (a) being hyperbolic, (b) torturing the
metaphor, and (c) singing the obligatory hosannas because Brown once
won a Stranger Genius Award. But the essays in American
Romances
—almost all of them, anyway—really are that
good. Brown’s voice sounds more relaxed, more confident, than ever
before. Her new stories fold history, theory, memory, and outright lies
into rich, articulate essays that stretch the boundaries of your
brain.

“The Priests,” for example, begins as sexually charged
memoir—Brown as a child kneeling in front of another little girl,
waiting to be fed a cookie. They’re playing priest. The other little
girl is a bit of a sadist. “Sometimes she’d pick the sidewalk for the
altar,” Brown writes. “If I was wearing sneakers this wasn’t so bad,
but if I was in flip-flops or sandals, the street felt awful, although
I liked those feelings some.”

The essay gets kinkier, following dozens of digressions from
childhood heresies (they wondered if John the Apostle, who was always
hanging out with the women, was gay) to the history of the Cathars,
also known as the Albigensians:

In any event, for Cathars the worst thing in the world, the
temptation you really had to watch out for, was procreative sex. It
not only brought two bodies together, it could also lead to the
creation of another evil, sinful, carnal, beautiful body… In
addition to renouncing heterosexual marriage and procreation, the
Albigensians also forbade the eating of any form or product of the
flesh, even in the symbolic form of wine-as-blood and wafer-as-flesh.

The church declared a crusade on the vegetarian “buggers” (so-called
because they possibly came from Bulgaria): “Villagers were dragged from
horses, hatcheted, mutilated, used for target practice, fired from
their teaching jobs, waterboarded, and given electroshock treatment.”
Then Alice B. Toklas is the keeper of the recipe for some secret Cathar
cookie, named as a series of interlocking puns by Gertrude Stein: “From
the Latin or meaning gold, re meaning King, and o meaning oh. Starting and ending with ‘O’ the omega, the beginning as/is
the end, the completion of the whole, the roundness of the world, the
lifted belly, the shape of the mouth in ecstasy, whether erotic or
cuisinic…” And so on.

American Romances has a total of 44 endnotes, some of them
pages long. They don’t feel at all academic or precious, just a
necessary tool for a brain as restless as Rebecca Brown’s. She has
things to say about Susan Sontag, Christian summer camps, long-legged
surfer girls, duck hunting in Spain, Radclyffe Hall, Felix Mendelssohn,
Invisible Man (by Ralph Ellison), The Invisible Man (by
H. G. Wells), and The Invisible Man (by James Whale)—and,
of course, about the long, gloomy shadow of Mr. Noble Melancholy,
stretching from the sands of Salem, Massachusetts, to the sun-bleached
boys of California. recommended

American 
Romances: 
Essays

by Rebecca Brown (City Lights, $16.95)

Brend an Kiley has worked as a child actor in New Orleans, as a member of the junior press corps at the 1988 Republican National Convention, and, for one happy April, as a bootlegger’s assistant in Nicaragua....

4 replies on “The Shadow Knows”

  1. The term “Cathars” derives from the Greek word Katheroi and means “Pure Ones”. They were a gnostic Christian sect of tolerant pacifists that arose in the 11th century, an offshoot of a small surviving European gnostic community that emigrated to the Albigensian region in the south of France.The medieval Cathar movement flourished in the 12th century A.D. throughout Europe until its virtual extermination at the hands of the Inquisition in 1245.

    There are an ever increasing number of historians and other academics engaged in serious Cathar studies. Interestingly, to date, the deeper they have dug, the more they have vindicated Cathar claims to represent a survival of the Earliest Christian Church.

    Thank you!
    Brad Hoffstetter
    Communications Division
    Assembly of good Christians
    http://www.cathar.net

    Some credible sources:
    http://www.wmich.edu/medieval/congress/
    http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/sbook.htm…
    http://www.languedoc-france.info /1212b_moreinfo.htm

  2. But what about Rebecca’s allegations then, Brad? She isn’t just pulling that out of the air, is she? I have the feeling you might both be right, which might mean the early Christian church might have been more twisted in ideology and practice than the more romantic historians of the faith would have us believe.

    Oh, Brendan — superb review. I’m going out to buy the book today because of it!

  3. Having climbed in stifling heat through attics of the Goodwin’s, and attics of cow barns in Berwick where farmers have been known to turn up anti-gay rants by Rush Limbaugh really loudly through speakers over the animals upon seeing women with short hair on the property, and attics of foreclosed houses without working plumbing (think weeks in winter below freezing) but with gorgeous stone wall gardens now in disrepair seeking unbound books, thousands of old books to pack into an old university facilities and engineering van with the seats taken out, I’ve sat listening to conversation between the yard sale early bird crowd and the son of the previous owner about benches made of cast iron that have been welded and there are ants climbing towards the shaker furniture in the side yard on a millstone slab and it’s crazy hot, and there’s no water, just one last walk through to see if there are Wallace Nutting prints, or marbles or postcards or proof of the persecution of witches on the wall in longhand scrawl in the kitchen.

    Who do you think invented incest anyway? You say it like it’s a bad thing. Any idea how inbred those Puritans were?

Comments are closed.