I went to Craigslist to look at the kinky shit people are into. And I found a picture of my sister. Her eyes are blurred out, but one pic is of her nude and one is of her giving head, and there’s a tattoo that’s unique to her and clearly visible. I’m 99 percent sure it’s her. The ad was from her boyfriend, looking for a “horsecock” to stretch her pussy while he sits in the next room. It’s her business, but it’s a mindfuck. I half want to call her out, shame her out of it. She just turned 22.

Sister Pics Dilemma

Your sister is an adult, SPD, and adults are free to post what they like to CL, and adult females are free to stick whatever they like—mancock, horsecock, whatevercock—in their pussies. It’s hypocritical of you to enjoy the perversity on display at CL and then clutch your pearls in horror when you realize that someone you love—gasp!—is just as pervy as you are. So you’re not going to call your sister out or shame her.

But you are going to say something to her.

There’s a chance that your sister isn’t aware that her boyfriend is posting her pictures to CL. Horsecocks, stretching pussies, the GF getting it on while he sits in the next room—that’s all standard-issue cuckold fantasy stuff, SPD. There are women out there who are into cuckolding, of course, and there are women who’ve given their partners the okay to use their pictures in online personal ads seeking thirds for cuckold scenarios. However…

Lots of men with cuckold fantasies have posted pics of their actual wives and girlfriends to sites like CL without the consent of their actual wives and girlfriends. These guys don’t see—or refuse to see—the potential harm in rubbing one out while fantasizing about the responses they’ve received from men who want to fuck their wives/girlfriends. The harm comes, of course, when the wife or girlfriend is recognized by a sibling, a coworker, or an employer.

On the off chance that your sister’s BF is posting private pics to CL without your sister’s okay, SPD, you need to say something to her. She needs to know those pics are out there if she doesn’t already know it, and if she does know they’re out there, she needs to know that she can be recognized.

Your sister doesn’t need to be called out, and she doesn’t need to be shamed. What she needs is a heads-up from a concerned brother. Give her that, SPD, then butt the fuck out.

I’m a 20-year-old gay male and I entered into a relationship with a guy at the beginning of the summer. The sex has always been really good, but I’m worried about pleasing him. He disclosed early on that he has a foot fetish. Sex usually consists of him topping me while sucking my toes or me jerking him off while he’s fondling the bottoms of my feet. I don’t have any problem with him getting off to my feet. My problem with the whole ordeal is this: I don’t know diddly about foot fetishism. I tried Google, but my results weren’t much better than “Foot fetishism is the most common form of sexual fetishism from an otherwise nonsexual object or body part, and it’s different depending on who you’re fucking.” Not very helpful.

I’ve talked to my boyfriend about what I can do to make things better and what he likes, but he’s so bashful about the subject that I haven’t gotten any information save “I prefer the soles of your feet.” I have tried experimenting with things like footjobs (which didn’t work out very well because I had no idea what I was doing), and not knowing what else to do is frustrating.

I am currently studying in France until the end of August, and I want to surprise him with my newfound knowledge on his kink and new ways to get him off. What should I know? What would you recommend? And could you fill me in on proper footjob technique?

Seeking Orgasm Level Escalation

Male foot fetishists—the straight ones, anyway—will tell you that they react to feet the way most straight guys react to tits: aroused by the sight of ’em, want to do stuff to ’em. Some wanna suck ’em, some wanna fuck ’em, and some kinksters wanna safely, sanely, and consensually “torture” ’em. In other words, SOLE, it’s different depending on who the woman with the tits in question happens to be fucking.

Same goes for foot fetishists: Some wanna suck ’em, some wanna fuck ’em, some wanna “torture” ’em. (That’s called “bastinado,” and it should only be done safely, sanely, and consensually.) To find out what a particular foot fetishist enjoys most, you’ll have to ask the foot fetishist who’s enjoying your feet.

Your boyfriend probably finds it hard to talk about his fetish because he feels ashamed, needlessly so, and may have been rejected or mocked by previous partners when he opened up about his kink. (To avoid making his bashfulness worse, SOLE, avoid using terms like “problem” and “ordeal” when discussing his kink.) It’s possible that the stuff you’re doing for him now—sticking your toes in his mouth while he fucks you, jerking him off while he fondles your feet—fulfills all of his fantasies. Keep doing what you’re doing now, SOLE, and as his confidence levels about his kink and your relationship both grow, he’ll become less bashful about discussing his kink.

As for a proper footjob: Bring the bottoms of your feet together and let him fuck the gap between your soles with his lubed-up cock, titty-fucking style, or have him lie on the floor while you sit on the edge of the bed and move the lubed-up sole of one of your feet back and forth across his cock until he blows his load. Have fun!

If you do end up having to redefine the word “rick,” which you threatened to do in your recent Funny or Die video, I have a suggestion: rick (v): to remove santorum orally. (“He was so grateful for the lay that he ricked his partner.”)

Happy To Help

P.S. Thanks for your efforts on behalf of equality for all.

You’re welcome, HTH, and in case anyone missed my Funny or Die video—in which I threatened to redefine Rick Santorum’s first name if he didn’t lay off the gay bashing—you can watch it here: www.tinyurl.com/ricksick.

Santorum hasn’t laid off the gay bashing, as it’s all he’s got, so it looks like I’m going to have to go ahead and redefine his first name, too. (My apologies to Rick Dees, Rick Fox, Ricki Lake, and all the other innocent Ricks out there.) The definition I proposed in my video was a little too long and involved, so I vote for adopting yours, HTH. Now “Rick Santorum” isn’t just a vile and disgusting politician—he’s a vile and disgusting sentence.

That said, I don’t think someone would rick his or her partner out of gratitude; ricking someone—sucking the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex out of someone’s ass—is something a person would do only under duress or under orders from a cruel BDSM top.

CONFIDENTIAL TO EVERYBODY: Make porn, win prizes! Details at www.humpseattle.com. No rick videos, please!

Find the Savage Lovecast (my weekly podcast) every Tuesday at thestranger.com/savage.

mail@savagelove.net

128 replies on “Savage Love”

  3. I probably would not rick my husband. But if I did, Mr. Santorum would be a perfect thing to think about at the time. Both are stomach-turning and leave an awful taste in one’s mouth.

  9. Great word/definition combo. Succinct, to the point, and will definitely grab attention. I guess this is different from what we old-timers used to call “felching.”

    Those of you named Rick or Rikki or Ricki, you can always go back to Richard and Erika. Ricki Lake, I dunno what you can do–use your middle name?

  12. Isn’t SPC the dilemma of a huge percentage of men (and, okay, people) who watch porn? They want to watch whatever porn they want, whenever they want, but don’t want to consider the real humans involved, and, when they do, judge them harshly, especially if they know them personallyl?

    Maybe this seems a bit much to anyone who’s been to an adult expo, but if 100% of men watch porn, then shouldn’t it stand to reason that women who have done porn or stripped should feel 100% secure in their reputation and employment?

  14. Hoping this one doesn’t catch on, or the BF is gonna have to start going by “Rich” or “Richard” or, hell, even “Dick.” Poop, blood, and vomit make me sqicky. However, lots of other fluids and activities only squick out repressed EWRers, so how about sticking to one of those in consideration of all the innocent, gay-rights supporting, GGG, and otherwise wonderful “Ricks” out there (so much more common than Santorum).

  15. I wonder how many people fantasize about getting Rick Santorum’s Santorum Ricked by Rick Santorum. Perhaps we might add a second definition of “rick” (lower case “r”) as a specific quantity of Santorum, e.g., “Rick Santorum Ricked a rick of Rick’s Santorum. A rick of Rick’s Santorum Rick Santorum Ricked. If Rick Santorum Ricked a rick of Rick’s Santorum. Where’s the rick of Rick’s Santorum Rick Santorum Ricked?

  16. No, rickets is the queasy feeling one gets after ricking (or reading about it, in the case of #14).

    Daveybee, you’re a genius. Will you marry me?

  18. @2 – pls no redefinition of Hinkle, as I have very cool pals w/ that name.

    See also: George Rekers, Eddie Long, Troy King, Richard Curtis, Ted Haggard, Bruce Barclay, Jim West, Larry Craig, Ed Schrock, Mark Foley, Robert Allen, Roy Ashburn & David Dreier. That’d be a whole slew of names to redefine..

    SPD/1st letter freaked me when I read it as a SLLOTD, ’cause the brother seems kinda too into the situation. & very judge-y. Here’s hoping he tells her to be more discreet, & moves on.

  19. Where’s the tattoo that’s “clearly visible”? There’s something a little sus about that first letter.

    Ohmigod, @15, I almost peed my pants! Delightful.

  22. It’s just not fair to give a disgusting meaning to the word “Rick.” There are lots of people named Rick out there, most of whom do not deserve to have their names associated with intense nausea. It’s bad enough that random people who happen to be named “Santorum” can barely go out in public; victimizing the Ricks, as well, is going too far.

  23. Yeah, Dan, please don’t redefine Rick? The video was hilarious, but seriously, if making santorum into a neologism didn’t slow him down, reworking his first name isn’t going to make a dent in that stone cranium either. And there are a LOT more Ricks in the world (many of whom support you) than Santorums.

  34. SOLE, your bf sounds like me, a foot fetishist who loves the soles of feet and who used to find it difficult to talk about it with my partner. After many years we’ve worked through it and his feet are a normal part of our sexual dialog. Most important is his knowing that it’s fine with you, that you don’t think it’s weird or abnormal – that should help him open up and tell you what he really likes. On your giving a foot job, it’s possible that, like me, he’s not looking for any foot reciprocation, so you might not need to give him one to satisfy him. Dan’s foot fucking is a good suggestion, but your bf may also like it if you cover his face with your soles, one or both at once, sliding them over the face so he can lick up to the toes while he strokes. I’d also ask him how forceful he wants you to be, or see if he reacts to your pushing your toes into his mouth, having him lie on the floor below you as you place your feet on his face, etc. Mostly, have fun with it, feet are very sensitive and my bf enjoys having his feet worshiped – I hope you do too!

  35. SOLE, your bf sounds like me, a foot fetishist who loves the soles of feet and who used to find it difficult to talk about it with my partner. After many years we’ve worked through it and his feet are a normal part of our sexual dialog. Most important is his knowing that it’s fine with you, that you don’t think it’s weird or abnormal – that should help him open up and tell you what he really likes. On your giving a foot job, it’s possible that, like me, he’s not looking for any foot reciprocation, so you might not need to give him one to satisfy him. Dan’s foot fucking is a good suggestion, but your bf may also like it if you cover his face with your soles, one or both at once, sliding them over the face so he can lick up to the toes while he strokes. I’d also ask him how forceful he wants you to be, or see if he reacts to your pushing your toes into his mouth, having him lie on the floor below you as you place your feet on his face, etc. Mostly, have fun with it, feet are very sensitive and my bf enjoys having his feet worshiped – I hope you do too!

  36. As a 40-year-old Rick, I read this column with a sinking feeling. Bad enough rhyming with “Dick” throughout school-age days. Stop before it’s too late! Please!

  37. I think part of SOLE’s problem is that he’s 20. Give it a rest kid. You need to practice taking ‘yes’ for an answer and understand that when you insist on reinventing the missionary position to up his kinky game you’re really just telegraphing your insecurity and your sexual inexperience. Here’s a little secret no one tell bottoms when they are 20: Mostly you’re top just wants you to take it like a champ and moan a lot. If you can get that part down you’re doing 80% of the work right there.

  38. To the bi guy…I’m a pansexual woman who dates usually middle spectrum sexual orientations. I tend not to date straight men or lesbian woman. I like my partners heteroflexible, bisexual, pansexual, or honoflexible.

    Keep looking! I love a man who takes it up the ass. 🙂

  39. i have to agree w/ 22 & 23: don’t pursue this, dan. it’s not fair, and it’s also pretty fucking gross. this will not reflect well on you or your fans.

  41. SOLE – on a more prosaic level, maybe book yourself in for a nice foot massage/pedicure before you see him when you get back?

    In addition to Dan’s edge of the bed advice, try massaging his balls between the balls of your feet, or using your big toe to stimulate his taint.

  42. “Rick” isn’t unique enough to Santorum. While I don’t know a whole lot of Rick’s personally, I think you attack on the name is off the mark–not unlike using an automatic weapons for rabbit hunting. You’ll end up doing a lot more damage to innocent people than you will to this one senator, whose name is already in bad shape.

  43. This is a bad idea Dan. You’re attacking a lot of innocent “Ricks” out there for no reason. You’re just doing collateral damage instead of targeting the person you want to attack. It’s the same thing as carpet bombing an orphanage in the hope that you catch a nearby insurgent camp: ie: a bad idea. In addition you start to undo some of the strength of your original campaign to undermine the name Santorum.

    IT would be far better to hijack the twitter feed “Senator Santorum” which was available last time I checked.

  46. Am I the only one to find that “Rick Santorum” would be an awkward phrase with the new definition? It would be redundant, literally something like: “Orally-suck-out-santorum Santorum.” Kinda sounds like a nickname-plus-real-name combo. Awkard.

    Other than that, love the definition! Glad my name is not Rick!

  48. As someone whose name is simply Rick and not a short form of Richard, this is going to make some conversations awkward. Frankly though, Santorum has to go, so I’m willing to give up a bit of my societal comfort to get this gay-bashing reject out of the political ring.

  49. Just call him Dick, which like Rick is a variant of Richard. And he’s a dick, so it works. Reverse his name phone book style and you got Santorum Dick. Nobody wants a case of Santorum Dick!

  54. DAMN!! You guys must lay in wait for Dan’s Column and hop on early. It’s 6pm on the 17th where I am and there’s already 53 comments! Guess I’ll have to get up EARLY next Wed. to have a chance.

  58. @50: Yes!

    Bachmann: the art of dressing up like Conan the Barbarian while punishing one’s lover. Only gay people could practice the Bachmann.

    (I think my definition is too tasteful, but it’s the best I could come up with.)

  59. I don’t think the suggest definition limits ricking to just ricking santorum. I read ricking as a portmanteau of “raunch” and “lick.” So you can rick santorum or you can rick other things too! I love it.

  62. @ 58 – Actually, an enema exposes the tissue lining the rectum, making it more prone to cuts or bruises during anal sex, therefore increasing the risk of aids transmission. This is not a good idea in itself, but even worse if you’re planning on having unprotected sex, which is essential to felching.

  66. @SOLE
    Take it from me, a guy who recently revealed my foot fetish to my girlfriend. What you’re doing right now for him is definitely enough. He’s probably embarrassed (as I am with my girlfriend) that he’s sucking your toes, even though he no doubt it loves it. And he’s probably also gauging your reaction, to see if you’re okay with it, because even though it’s harmless, it is kinda weird – we get it. The more you’re cool with it, the more he’ll open up.

  69. @ 73 – I merely did a search with “enema” and “hiv transmission”, and tons of pages and studies come up.

    If you read my post correctly, you’ll notice that I never said you claimed felching was safe. I was only challenging your assertion that all bottoms should have an enema before anal sex. It IS recognized as a factor in transmission, whether you personnally are aware of it or not.

  71. @ 73 – Following from my post @ 74 – Keep in mind that there’s no such thing as “absolutely safe sex”. Condoms break, sometimes. That’s why at one point they called it “safer sex”.

  72. @73 – this straight woman has had plenty of anal sex, and has never had an enema. The idea of it being a little dirty is part of the thrill, for me.

  73. @73, I’m curious, at what point in the evening does the bottom do the enema? Before heading out that evening? In the restaurant bathroom, while the top has another drink? At home, before starting to make out? At home, after the clothes have come off and things are hot & heavy? I’ve never understood this.

  75. @ 78 – If you must have an enema, I’d say it’s preferable to do it before going out. It’s unlikely you’ll have another bowel movement before quite a few hours, so you’ll still be clean inside, but your rectum’s lining will have had a bit of time to regenerate.

  78. @47, I was thinking the same thing. i’d like to propose a different definition for rick.

    rick (v): to orally remove anal contents, especially Santorum (“He was so grateful for the lay that he ricked his partner.”)

  80. dont redefine the word rick, it might out somebody named rick who isnt ready, like if he has a semi-femmy voice and noone suspects and then theres this rick thing going around the school

  81. I’ll take Footjob, Option B, Dan–oh yeah! just make sure the other one’s where it belongs–in my face!

    There are also mfmff websites like footbuddies, myfriendsfeet, etc, where SOLE can go to learn.

  83. I’ve seen that SPD letter before. Has it been recycled or was it on the Savage Love app?

    Re redefining Rick: Not necessary. The damage has been done with Santorum. So much so that even my brain thinks of the redefinition when I hear the word. That video is hilarious btw. Kudos to those participating, esp. Rick Fox.

  84. S.O.L.E. – Being a woman who caters professionally, to foot fetishists, I will say that the biggest thing you can do to please your partner is to just be comfortable with having him love and admire your feet. Keep them in nice shape – you can learn to give yourself great pedicures. Be open to discussion, but also keep it casual, let him open up as he feels more comfortable. Ask him if he enjoys the smell (not stinky, just the intimate perfume of clean feet that have been in shoes and socks all day.) Ask him a bit about how he thinks his feelings developed – this fetish often predates sexual feelings entirely. Try having him lie on the floor while you sit on the edge of a table and dangle your feet over his body, letting yourself rub him softly with your soles. Perhaps shoe shop with him and have him show you if there are any types of shoes he especially enjoys on you.

  87. @ 91 – enemas + broken condoms, not enemas + condoms.

    I don’t see what’s ridiculous about my assertion. The dick up my ass (or my dick up someone else’s) may cause some damage to some parts of the rectum… but much less (or none) if everyone’s properly lubricated.

    Enemas remove the lining of the whole rectum, which is a mucous membrane (that means that it’s highly absorbant, in case you didn’t know). Combined that with a broken condom, and you’ve got a high-risk situation.

    Let’s just say that you care more about cleanliness than about health. Your thing. But please don’t spread potentially hurtful info.

    And also, there’s a very good way to filter the bullshit on Google. It’s called reading and using your brain.

  90. @cockyballsup

    http://www.goaskalice.columbia.edu/0620.…
    “An enema prior to anal sex is not a necessary procedure, and it is uncommon.”

    Tristan Taormino: “If you are in good general health…then the rectum and anus will be generally free of fecal matter after you go. However, if [you have] gastrointestinal problems… you may want to have an enema before anal sex.” (The Ultimate Guide to Anal Sex for Women, p25)

    http://www.pridealive.org/Queer_Health/a… says:
    “it’s very important that you do not use enemas (douche) before anal sex. In fact, if you’re not constipated, or your doctor hasn’t instructed you to do so, you should avoid enemas in general.”

    Besides your own squeamishness, what evidence do you have that most bottoms use enemas, and that it’s safe to do so on a regular basis?

  91. C’mon people- You can’t have Santorum w/o Rick and vice-versa… let’s lock them together in a mellifluous synergy: the oral removal of lube and fecal matter… If the kind-hearted Ricks of the world are concerned about the negative association, then let’s say “Rick” only alludes to the removal of santorum when used in conjunction with the last name “Santorum”. So Santorum’s “Rick” only means santorum removal when you have a full “Rick Santorum”

  92. @ 98 – Have your enemas, then.

    Having had two LTRs with POZ guys, I can assure you that I have received plenty of information along the lines of what Erica P quoted, from various clinics and doctors, and in various countries, and none that correspond to your sources. Sorry I can’t give you the links – there were no links. Most of this was before the Internet. I’m that old.

    Of course, I must also disclose that I would never trust medical info from the US anyway, as the pharmaceutical lobby is too strong there to guarantee objectivity.

    And I’m happy to report that I too am in my 40’s and still negative. In spite of the 1000+ anal sex partners I’ve had.

  93. @99, through Googlebooks I can see that Jack Morin says: “If, however, you are concerned about cleanliness, you might want to give yourself an anal douche.”

    That’s hardly a strong recommendation that it’s crucial to do so. And since you’re so vehement that not cleaning out is “barbaric” and “dick-limpifying,” I’m betting your friends wouldn’t tell you if they occasionally have some fun sans enema.

  94. @98, 101: I’m sure they still clean their asses, just in the shower with a finger. You don’t need an enema to clean out and it’s hardly expected.

  95. “Rick” has been submitted to Urban Dictionary — it should be posted in the next 48 hours. Be sure to swing by and give it a thumbs up!

  96. @104 – thanks for the cordial answer, cocky! Me, I’m no longer having anal on those initial dates, for other reasons. But I won’t fuck a new guy when I’m at the tail end of my period, in case a little blood shows up — so that’s pretty similar to your approach.

  97. @104: Yes, but you can be thoroughly clean in your ass without an enema. Just shower and wash carefully.

    @106: Lame! I hate when that stops people. And that’s totally different in that poop is gross, whereas a little blood is no big deal.

  98. @107/106 Erica and Blackrose

    I personally find period blood (which has a different colour/texture) than typical blood to be a little gross actually. Not as gross as poop! At all! But still not a welcome addition to my sex life.

    I don’t like having sex on my period whether it’s a new guy or a LTR. That’s more of a personal preference thing than a “considerate” thing. But yeah in an LTR I’ve definitely had sex on days where I wasn’t 100% there wouldn’t be a trace of blood.

    As for enemas/cleaning/etc, I had always heard that the area is pretty poop-free assuming you’ve gone to the washroom and other tactics are unneccesary/harmful. Maybe we should have some tops weigh in.

  99. Please oh please work on Bachmann. This evil cow and her mean-spirited, dangerous, nancy-boy “husband” have earned their Google-bomb. That “Dr” Marcus dares to call himself “Dr” just because he bought a PHD from overstock.com makes me dislike him enough. That he is using his medicare-funded clinic to emotionally scar young gay men into repressing their sexuality makes me furious. I am a gay man who will be 50 in a month, and I still remember how lonely I was as a boy thinking I was the only one like me. We have come too far. Don’t let the Bachmanns of this world take us back.

  101. Defining “rick” as a verb meaning “to remove santorum orally” seems like it might make the term “rick santorum” redundant. Maybe it should be “to clean up a bodily fluid orally”. Just saying..

  102. SOLE

    Some great ways to let your BF know you’re GGG about his fetish next time you see him is to dress up.

    First, keeping your feet nicely groomed, manicured without using yucky tasting stuff and keeping the smelling nice says, very clearly, that you want him to enjoy your feet.

    Stockings come in knee and ankle length as well as thigh. They can look really sexy on nice feet, and the shorter length makes them more comfortable if you’re a man with hairy legs than thigh-high ones.

    Wear slip-on shoes when you go out to dinner. It’s easy to slip a foot out from the shoe under the table and run your naked or bestockinged foot up his calf. Sexy, too.

    Finally, be proactive in your GGG here. You know he likes feet, to make a point of putting your toes up to his lips for sucking, rather than waiting for him to grab them himself. If he’s sucking the toes of one foot, caress his face or chest with the other.

    Once you make it clear that you’re ready and willing to make his fetish dreams a reality, he’ll be more likely to get comfortable with opening up more.

  103. Oh the law of unintended consequences…Googleads is giving me a link to “Donate to Rick Santorum’s Campaign” in the right column…hilarious.

  104. From the archive page, you can’t actually click through to this week’s column since it’s a link to humpseattle.com. So, after this week, it will be really tough for people to read this.

  105. @24, there’s nothing wrong with going by Richard, but it’s really hard to get people to change what they call you almost 40 years into your existence. And, you know, it’ll take a bit of training to get me to call him something other than “Rick” (in general, and in bed), since I’ve been calling him that for several years. Go by what you want, but changing it is hard…

  106. @108: In general, it’s pretty poop-free if you’ve recently pooped and taken a shower. Cleaning the anus with your finger in the shower (insert it just a little) helps a lot and is neither unnecessary nor harmful. Just don’t use soap or anything cause it can irritate the mucous membranes.

  108. @118: Baby wipes. They should be standard in every bathroom. Or at least wet the toilet paper. I seriously do not understand how people can wipe with dry toilet paper.

    In theory washing before any sex would be ideal but in practice it means taking a few minutes and dealing with the annoyance of getting wet and drying off every single time, right when you are horniest and most need to bang. That’d be way too many showers.

  109. @118/120 In this it is crucial to know your partner.

    Many people are committed to hygiene and insist on that extra effort to be totally clean.

    Other people see those people as uptight, and not so fun in bed. What’s the line? “Sex isn’t dirty, unless you’re doing it right.”

  113. Why not define rick as something that can be done to any bodily fluid, not just santorum? People could still rick santorum, but they could also rick semen, rick vaginal fluid, rick urine, et cetera…more opportunities to embarrass poor Rick.

  115. Dan:
    You’re giving far too much attention to Mr. Santorum. You should save some of your/our re-naming ammunition for the other whack jobs on the Republican right wing … like Michele Bachmann and her husband who just might be in the closet. What can we do with their names?

  116. @Hunter: Anal is fantastic after 10-15 minutes of intense ass stimulation (spanking, scratching, caning). I’ve said that often enough. Conversely, I hate being anally assaulted, no prep, no lube (like two NSA guys did to me last year). Is that so hard to keep straight?

  117. Don’t mean to suggest SL readers should know my sexual preferences. But Hunter (@122/124) was acting as if he knew, but getting it all backassward.

  118. I would never want to remove Santorum orally, but I would like to have him removed permanently. I’d like to SHOUT him out like the stain that he is, or make him VANISH, or wash out with the TIDE so we could ALL – CHEER.

  119. @135 – one guy shoved it in “accidentally,” when he slipped out of the other hole; the other guy blew past my hard limit during a D/s scene. I call the second one rape, though I didn’t report it. Thanks for your concern; I’m okay, just moved from the short-term (“sex with strangers!”) plan to the longer-term (“get to know them by dating first”) plan.

  122. I’ve had to write the email that SPD had to write and it went something like this:

    ***

    Hey Dearest Friend,

    So I was getting my kink on scrolling CL and I saw your pictures up. If the pictures are up with your consent then let me say, you look fantastic. But if they aren’t up with your consent or knowledge, I thought you should know. If someone found my pics on the internet I’d like to know, no matter how good I looked.

    Love,

    Dearest Friend

    ****

    In this case it was CL, it was another site, but the pics were up with her permission and all it did was give me a reason to buy her a drink and forget all about it. Had she not known, she told me over that drink, she would have much rather I find it than anyone else.

    So there you go and fwiw.

  123. Rinsing out the rectum with a few bulbs of tap water is a pleasurable end in itself. Beyond that, your mileage may vary as to the amount of fecal matter hanging about inside you. Some people don’t have the luxury of producing movements that are so cohesive that nothing is left behind. I like the term “toothpaste” used above. I’m thankful every day for the invention of flushable wet wipes.

  125. Haven’t a clue why one would even bother with Rick Santorum. My dog has a better chance of getting the GOP nod than Santorum – hell, he couldn’t even draw a crowd if they was giving away $100 bills. The man is an idiot and not worthy of the time it takes to even google his name. I say leaving him alone is the best way to deal with him – he’s such a media whore that the lack of attention might finally make him shut up and go away.

Comments are closed.