It is not your fault. It is her fault. Credit: Katee Wright

A fit model is a special kind of model who doesn’t have to be beautiful. (“She can actually be really ugly. She totally can,” said one designer.) Her job is to be a mannequin, but with human qualities, and all day she tries on clothes. You see, a garment must look a certain way to succeed, of course, but it also has to fit well and move with the body. Unlike a dress form, the fit model has limbs; they’re intricately articulated, and she can move them with ease. She feels the clothes against her body, she thinks thoughts and then expresses them. Dummies have their own unique and valued features, too—they’re a fantasy blend of measurements and symmetry. But none can replicate the many bizarre and marvelous human qualities that affect fit: a chest that bloats with breath, muscles that swell when flexed.

This model is a big deal to a company, because it customizes its full range of designs and sizes to her proportions. If her figure happens to be similar to yours, the system works—but if it fails, the shame is violating. Perhaps you’ve been jeans shopping, and out of everything in the store, not a single thing fits, from the slim tapers to the trouser cuts to the relaxed mid-rises. “Surely, there is something fundamentally wrong with the shape of my body,” you thought to yourself—when, instead, you should’ve been blaming the fit model all the while. (Sometimes, misshapen fit models get hired, which is completely idiotic, but it happens. One major company’s fit model had a sway back. Another’s had fake breasts, and all the tops patterns had to be altered after she left.)

In choosing a fit model, the company wants someone just like its target customer: an ordinary person who is neither too tall nor too lean, for a change. But companies’ decisions don’t always make sense, or they end up cutting out entire demographics by choosing a rather skewed version of “average.” Take Arika, an attractive Seattle-
area fit model with blond hair and blue eyes. In one of her roles, she’s a tops model for a large company targeting middle-aged women—but bewilderingly, she’s decades younger, with a full bust and a slender torso, and a modest high-shoulder-point-to-apex measurement (this means her breasts sit pert). To the aging woman, Arika’s body is nothing more than an impossible dream.

Arika has held many fit modeling jobs for many companies. She gets to interact with the newest clothes, and the money is insane: Fit models make $50 per hour at the low end. But she can’t allow her weight to fluctuate by even three pounds—a bleak and looming demand. The fittings take several hours, and while she stands in a room before a group of designers, “They’re thinking of me as a mannequin, so it’s important I express my human needs. I often have to remind them I need a break—so I can take a drink of water or sit down and rest.”

There’s a good deal of manhandling. Something like the crotch seam is not only complicated, it’s hard to see, so deeply wedged in its valley of butt and shadow. The technical designer has to touch where the seam rests on the model, and this gesture, usually so intimate, is performed with the same prompt yet weary manner of someone opening a can of dog food and placing it in a bowl. “I’m desensitized,” says Arika. “I feel like my body is a commodity. It’s harder to feel sexy.”

It gets worse during outerwear development. Arika wears a shirt and sweater under a coat and stands beneath bright lights for hours while everyone studies her. Jackets with fur-trimmed hoods are especially brutal. Still prototypes, their shapes are off. “The hood is right in my face… I’m eating and breathing fur. I’m too hot, my eyes are bright red, I’m tired. I go home and use a neti pot to flush out my sinuses, and what comes out of me is like the lint from a dryer trap. This is the stuff I’ve been breathing in all day. Who knows what chemicals it’s been sprayed with”—probably a disturbing potpourri of stain guards, wrinkle resistants, and fungicides for garments produced in muggy climates and transported on boats. They arrive unwashed from overseas factories and, sometimes, workers leave upsetting clues: “I’ve seen stuff on the samples that looks like blood,” Arika says.

In one of these factories in a faraway town somewhere in rural China, a mannequin with Arika’s body rests among the endless piles of clothes. Even though it’s just a perfunctory fitting tool—used to test the garments bound to be shipped off and then tested again—the scene has a strange glamour. It recalls Jay McInerny’s Bright Lights, Big City, a great book about loss and human pain and beauty just out of reach: The character encounters a window mannequin molded from his ex-wife, a model, taken while she “lay face down in a vat of latex batter for ninety minutes, breathing through a straw.” recommended

Special thanks to technical designer Victoria Walters.

Attention, makers of fashion and workers of garmentry: Let me know what you’re working on at mjonjak@thestranger.com.

Marti Jonjak—The Stranger’s fashion columnist—has a technical degree in apparel design and works in the garment industry. Her treasured casual-wear aesthetic is both glamorous and trashy, suggesting...

12 replies on “Worn”

  1. Mildly interesting. But spare me the complaints of the rigors of the job, and spare me the attempted insightful ending. I don’t even understand what that means.

  2. You find this “glamorous”

    “The character encounters a window mannequin molded from his ex-wife, a model, taken while she “lay face down in a vat of latex batter for ninety minutes, breathing through a straw”

    I would love to hear what you find “fancy” or “awe inspiring”

    what’s your opinion of jello – wrestling?

  3. As a designer in the clothing industry for over 10 years who has worked for numerous well known large companies and has conducted countless fit sessions with fit models, I just have to say…. WTF is this about?

  4. No slam against the article, which was interesting, but I’m always interested in which situation the commodification or objectifying of bodies comes up. I just don’t know of any job where bodies aren’t commodified.

  5. Glamour is a noun derived from the Old English equivalent of Grammar: grammarye. It was a reference to grammar, or language facility and manipulation, as being a form of magic or trickery. Hence the word for a magician’s book of spells is a Grimoire.

    I imagine this idea of ‘glamour’ is meant to express a similar notion of falsehood or trickery. In fashion, the model is the impossible, manipulated ideal. Dehumanized to the point of being replicable only in latex.

    But seriously, the neti pot story? Try pouring concrete on a road crew for 15 hours and see what comes out of your sinuses.

  6. This is a very disappointing article on what could have been an insight into how clothing companies determine sizing and fit. There are a lot of new technologies (body scanning and body mapping) that allow retailers and consumers to create and purchase the best fitting clothing for their body type but none of that was mentioned here. Instead it was a long complaint list of what I would consider a great job, especially for the rate of pay. As much as the article was about the fit model, fit sessions are not about her they are about the clothing she is putting on.

    Also, if you try something on and think “there is something fundamentally wrong with the shape of my body” try a different brand. It’s why so many exist.

  7. no job is as easy and fruitless as being a critic. these people are expected to live their life in such a way as to never change – a rather unrealistic expectation. to be excellent at something, you must commit. it means a great deal of self-control and excellent communication skills. these things are constantly reinforced when going to work by a technician in a stuffy room with a measuring tape, critiquing every dimension of your body, tugging at your buttons and zippers. concrete workers, food handlers and the ubiquitous office drone would find many of the subtle insanities of the apparel intolerable. take this information and instead of denying it – understand how it is a tangible part of your daily life. carhartt, levi, dockers – every last one of them has a fit model. next time you put on your concrete schlepping togs and wonder ‘why is this so awkward/uncomfortable”, think of this article.

Comments are closed.