Seattle Police Chief Adrian Diaz must soon decide how to discipline Seattle Police Officer Burton Hill after the Office of Police Accountability (OPA) found that Hill violated the departmentโ€™s bias and professionalism policies when he hurled racist and sexist slurs at his Chinese-American neighbor in August 2022. In the past, officers who made racist comments, even off-duty, have faced severe discipline, including termination.

OPA opened the investigation into Hill in September 2023 after a Chinese social services organization filed a complaint on behalf of Hillโ€™s neighbor, Zhen Jin. The complaint said that on August 29, 2022, Hill and his partner Agnes Miggins initiated an argument with Jin, during which Hill used a racial slur for East Asians, calling Jin a โ€œdumb fucking ch***โ€ as well as referring to her by a sexist term for women, calling her a c***. Hill also told Jin, โ€œYouโ€™re going to jail.โ€ The Chinese Information and Services Center (CISC) provided the OPA with a recording of the encounter and said Jin feared for her safety.ย 

After the Stranger published the recording, Diaz released a statement saying that the department had placed Hill on administrative leave while the OPA investigated. He also asked staff to review Hill’s arrest and investigation history.ย 

The recording captured a portion of what court records describe as an ongoing campaign by Hill, who also works as a realtor, and Miggins, to drive Jin out of the Kenmore condominiums where they all live. Hill and Migginsโ€™s condo shares a covered balcony entrance and stairway with Jin, and the two condo doors open a few feet away from one another. OPA records also show that Miggins is president of the condoโ€™s homeowners association. Jin, who works as a school bus driver, lives in the condo with her blind, elderly Palestinian-American uncle. Jin and her uncle speak only limited English.

OPA Investigates

About three months after the OPA opened its investigation into Hill, the OPA investigator, Seattle Police Sgt. Tracy Beemster, interviewed Hill about his possible violations of the departmentโ€™s policies against bias policing, unprofessional behavior, and use of law enforcement authority for personal gain. Beemster played the audio from the night in August 2022 and Hill acknowledged it sounded like his voice on the recording. The recording captured Hill and Miggins arguing with Jin and her uncle for about 20 minutes. During the argument, Jinโ€™s uncle said he knew Hill worked as a police officer.ย 

Hill said that on the evening of the recording, he and Miggins had come home from Leavenworth and found their dog chewing on a bone. Miggins went to confront Jin, believing Jin left out the bone. Hill said he heard pounding and screaming and went out to calm things down but โ€œlost my cool.โ€

โ€œBut thereโ€™s no way anybody can keep their cool in that situation, you know,โ€ Hill said.

Hill said heโ€™d been drinking heavily that night and couldnโ€™t remember โ€œ90%โ€ of the interaction, including calling Jin a racial slur. He denied that the comment had anything to do with Jinโ€™s race, calling it an โ€œexcited utteranceโ€ that came out because he was angry. He denied being racist, and said, โ€œI haven’t talked to my brother for 10 years because he is a racist.โ€ Beemster asked Hill if he believed he violated SPDโ€™s policy against officers expressing, โ€œany prejudice or derogatory comments concerning discernible personal characteristics.โ€ Hill acknowledged violating the policy.

When Beemster confronted Hill about his calling Jin a sexist slur, Hill again denied that he used the term in a sexist manner, saying, โ€œIf it was a man, I could have used that same language.โ€ He claimed he picked up the term while living in Australia. He acknowledged heโ€™d used it to hurt Jinโ€™s feelings.

Aside from the slurs, Beemster pointed out that Hill had used profanity throughout the interaction, using โ€œfuckโ€ or โ€œfuckingโ€ about 16 times, and โ€œshitโ€ three times. SPD policy says that even off-duty SPD officers โ€œmay not engage in behavior that undermines public trustโ€ in SPD. Hill denied violating SPDโ€™s professionalism policies by swearing. A representative from the Seattle Police Officers Guild objected to the questions about Hillโ€™s swearing and accused the OPA of trying to restrict Hillโ€™s freedom of speech. Beemster said, โ€œOPA is not doing that but thank you for bringing that up.โ€

Beemster shares examples of Hill’s swearing during the recording, highlighting how he used profanity against Jin. OPA investigation summary report

Beemster also mentioned that Hill told Jin, โ€œYouโ€™re going to jail,โ€ and brought up jail multiple times. Hill said this while making unfounded accusations that Jin had stolen money from her uncle and left out bones for Hill and Migginsโ€™s dog. Beemster said that Hill threatening Jin with jail, maybe to the point where sheโ€™d sell her condo and move out of the complex, could be seen as him using his position for personal gain, another policy violation. Hill asserted that he genuinely believed Jin could go to jail for, as Beemster put it, โ€œdoing something with the condo sale and dropping bones off that could be consumed by dogs.โ€

Beemster confirms Hill’s claim that he thought he was just stating a fact about how Jin could face jail time. OPA transcript of Hill interview

At the end of the interview, Beemster asked Hill if he had anything else to add. Hill said, โ€œThe worst part for me about this whole thingโ€”other than being labeled a racist, which is probably the worst thing other than a pedophile you can be labeled asโ€”is I look at my fiancรฉe and my dog differently. I resent them both because they put me in this position. And it sucks.โ€

The OPA complaint tracker shows that investigators sustained policy violations against Hill for bias-based policing and professionalism, and on the allegation that Hill used his authority for personal gain, the OPA said the evidence was inconclusive.ย 

OPAโ€™s case summary did not include OPAโ€™s disciplinary recommendations for Hill. The OPA usually gives Diaz a disciplinary range, and according to the timelines set out by the SPOG contract, Diaz must decide on Hillโ€™s discipline as soon as this week.

Ashley Nerbovig is a staff writer at The Stranger covering policing, incarceration and courts. She is like other girls.

8 replies on “Investigation Finds Seattle Police Officer Violated Policy by Using Racial Slur”

  1. Racist cop? No fucking way. (that’s called sarcasm).

    Please, this is like any other day. It’s like reporting “Today is Thursday!”

    ACAB. Defund the police. House the unhoused. Stop closing libraries and start firing cops.

    Lather, rinse, repeat.

  2. Can’t wait for all the people who opposed the new shelter in SoDo as anti-Asian racist because it was close to the CID to rally to demand this officer be fired for being actually demonstrably anti-Asian racist.

  3. @3 If you believe all information can be accessed via technology and that libraries are obsolete there is absolutely nothing that can be said to convince you otherwise. This reasoning is just one of the many reasons why the majority of Americans are so incomprehensibly stupid, uninformed, ignorant, hate filled, corrupt, self-absorbed, and apparently content to live their lives not only believing they are informed (pure delusional fantasy), but they are free (also pure delusional fantasy).

  4. Hill has an excuse for everything and needs all of them to cover a 20 minute interaction. I’m particularly fond of the “excited utterance” excuse. Cop has heard this phrase in court but has no idea what it means or how it possibly applies to his situation (Evidence Rule 803(2), Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay).

    Has Hill been on paid administrative leave all this time? Oh, the travails of the accused.

  5. Nobody cares about the smell of books. But only a tiny fraction of books – even recent ones – have ever been adequately digitized, so losing the books would be a massive cultural erasure, which is one of the main goals of Republican thinking.

    Cops are theoretically valuable but in actual practice they are all liars and (mostly) fascists.

  6. Slow news day? Rehashing a nothingburger story from last year about an interaction between an off-duty cop and his nightmare-neighbor. Maybe the SPD isn’t that bad if this is the worst this site can drudge up.

    People need to use some critical thinking. How long is this interaction? 20 minutes. 20 minutes?!? All recorded surreptitiously by this ‘victim’ as they stood in a doorway she could have been closed at any time. She was so threatened, yet she chose to not close the door, and stand there and exchange insults for 20 minutes with a recording device in her pocket, and then provide the one snippet that might yield her a payday. Think, people, beyond what opinion pieces want you to think.

Comments are closed.