As it turns out, SPD policy offers no direction on handcuffing deaf people, who need their hands to talk. Credit: Lester Black

In October of last year, a deaf transgender woman filed a complaint against three Seattle Police Department (SPD) officers for misgendering her and handcuffing her when they involuntarily committed her to a hospital in 2019. A witness, who was a pastor and friend to the woman, called the officersโ€™ reaction โ€œover the top and aggressive.โ€ However, for the most part, the Seattle police officers involved followed SPD policy during the interaction, in part because SPD policies regarding interactions with deaf people fall short of US Department of Justice best practices around handcuffing deaf people.ย 

On April 6, 2019, three Seattle Police officersโ€“Nicholas Evans, Brandon McDougald, and Student Officer Alexander Lamโ€“responded to a call about a person yelling at staff and customers inside a Big 5 in White Center. Officers arrived at the sporting goods store and spoke with employees, who said that the woman, Raticia Austring, had paid for a tent and a propane stove, but she grew frustrated when employees refused to sell her a knife, according to body-worn video reviewed and transcribed by the Office of Police Accountability (OPA). Employees said Austring wrote down threats. In an interview with OPA, Austring denied threatening employees.

When officers arrived at the store, they spoke with Austring, who wrote down that sheโ€™d paid for her items. Officer Evans responded verbally that they understood she paid for the items, but that she needed to leave the store. Austring left, taking her items and walking into the parking lot, but then she walked back to the officers. A moment later, Highline United Methodist Church Pastor Jennifer Partch, who had driven Austring to the Big 5, joined them.ย 

Over the next few minutes, Partch explained that Austring was deaf, a woman, and had schizophrenia. Partch also told officers that Cascade Behavioral Hospital doctors had discharged her from the hospital about two weeks earlier, and that she had been doing well and taking her medication up until a few days before, but then someone stole her backpack with her medication in it. Partch went on to explain that Austring was unhoused, that sheโ€™d been starting to decompensate after she lost her medication, and that the church had struggled to find a way to refill her prescription.ย 

McDougald then called for an ASL interpreter, who never arrived. After speaking with Partch, McDougald decided to involuntarily commit Austring, and Partch agreed.ย ย 

Meanwhile, Evans said that if Austringโ€™s hand jerked one more time, then heโ€™d put her in handcuffs. The transcription notes that she tried to use sign language throughout the interaction. Additionally, up to this point, nothing in the transcription indicated that Austring acted violently toward officersโ€“at worst she asked one officer for a hug and repeatedly flipped them off. Soon after Evans made the comment about handcuffs, Austring tried to walk away, which officers had previously allowed her to do. Lam and Evans grabbed her, and Lam said, โ€œStay here,โ€ a command Austring could not hear. At that point, the officers put her hands behind her back and handcuffed her.ย 

McDougald then radioed back to his sergeant, telling him that Austring โ€œgot pretty violent,โ€ and he misgendered her in the process. When OPA later questioned his description of Austring as violent, he argued that she had approached officersโ€™ faces and then tried to walk away.

After handcuffing Austring, the officers took the her to a bench and continued to give her verbal orders, according to the OPA narrative. No officers gave their commands to Austring in writing. When they got her on the bench Lam began to search Austring and did not ask Partch, who continued to try to write down things for Austring, to write and explain what Lam planned to do. Lam also did not offer for a woman officer to conduct the search. When Austring stood up and tried to resist a cop sticking his hands in her pockets with no explanation, the officers pushed Austring back down, according to the transcription.ย 

In the OPA narrative, Evans began to yell at Austring, and told her to โ€œknock it off.โ€ The OPA investigator noted that Evans appeared to be angry and told Austring, โ€œWeโ€™re not playing games with you.โ€ In an apparent response to Evansโ€™s frustration, Partch reminded the cop that Austring was completely deaf and could not hear the officer. Evans said โ€œokay,โ€ but also seemed not to fully understand, as he made a comment about Austring being partially able to hear. When Evans later spoke with an OPA investigator, he continued to assert that Austring could at least partially hear him.

When the EMTs arrived to transport Austring to Harborview Medical Center, the OPA investigator notes in the body-worn video narrative that Austring appeared upset, and as Partch tried to comfort her, Austring began to cry. Evans told the EMTs to put a spit hood on Austring, and they obliged. Austring moved to the gurney without incident, and then the EMTs strapped her down.ย 

โ€œNothing Humane About Thisโ€

In an interview with The Stranger, Partch said she never understood why the officers became so aggressive with Austring. The whole interaction started out pretty relaxed, with the five of them standing around. Then they told Austring to sit down, or to stay, and when she wouldnโ€™t the whole interaction took a sudden turn.ย 

Through an interpreter service, Austring told The Stranger in an interview that from what she remembered about that night she probably โ€œembarrassed myself, to be honestโ€ when she went into the store, but she never threatened employees, and she tried to explain to the officers what happened when they arrived, but the lack of an interpreter limited her ability to communicate with the cops. Then they handcuffed her hands behind her back and she couldnโ€™t say anything anymore.ย 

The OPA investigator noted that while McDougald had two short, written exchanges with Austring, after that, no officer used pen and paper to communicate with Austring. McDougald said the inability to communicate with Austring led to officers putting her in handcuffs.

Austring became more agitated after the officers handcuffed her, and Partch said she remembers just writing over and over for Austring to โ€œplease calm downโ€ and trying to keep Austring focused on her.

In a phone interview, Partch said she was surprised at how rough the officers became, especially when they โ€œslammedโ€ her down on the bench. Reflecting back on that night, she added that she had a very naive idea of what an involuntary commitment would mean for Austring, calling the process โ€œterrorizing.โ€

โ€œWatching how they strapped her down, and put the spit hood over her, I was just like, there is nothing humane about this,โ€ Partch said.

At the time, Partch had hoped an involuntary commitment would mean that the officers could take Austring to a hospital and the doctors could stabilize her. And while that is what happened, Partch called it โ€œa heck of a way to have to get your meds.โ€ Washingtonโ€™s mental health system pushes people into a point of crisis, when a walk-in clinic or easier access to medications could have avoided all of this, Partch said.ย 

After that night, Partch visited Austring at the hospital. Austring thought Partchโ€™s arrival meant she could leave, which made her happy, but she ended up spending two weeks at the hospital before doctors would release her back to Highline United Methodist Church. Austring lived at the church for about two years, during which time the church worked hard to connect her with case workers, finally securing her a housing voucher. Now Austring lives on her own.ย 

Still, Austring called the way SPD handled her that evening โ€œwrong.โ€ In 2023, she decided to file a complaint against the officers.

The OPA investigated and found the officers violated policy in not fully documenting Austringโ€™s side of the story, for leaving some of her money on the ground, and for McDougald failing to address Austring by her correct pronouns. The OPA found the evidence inconclusive on whether Evans had a duty to offer Austring a woman officer to search her instead of a man, because the OPA determined it was unclear whether Evans knew Austring was transgender. The OPA did not investigate Lam, as he was only a student officer at the time.

Regardless of the OPA findings, the officers cannot face any discipline as the departmentโ€™s contract with its police union prevents SPD from taking any disciplinary action for complaints that are more than four years old, unless the complaints involve criminal conduct. The involuntary commitment happened in April 2019, and Austring did not file a complaint until October 2023, missing the window by about six months. The OPA did recommend more training on professionalism for McDougald.ย 

Update: SPD responded with a copy of the internal handbook for officers, which tells officers to consider handcuffing deaf people in front of their bodies rather than behind them, to allow a deaf person to communicate via sign language or in writing. Nothing in the OPA indicates why officers handcuffed Austring behind her back.ย 

Ashley Nerbovig is a staff writer at The Stranger covering policing, incarceration and courts. She is like other girls.

21 replies on “Seattle Police Officers Misgender, Handcuff Deaf Transgender Woman During Involuntary Commitment”

  1. Seems odd to lead with the misgendering in the headline. I know that’s hot-button issue for the Stranger, but the officers’ inability to communicate with a deaf person apparently in crisis is the most troubling issue here.

    Stated differently, I personally don’t really care whether someone calls me sir or ma’am, but I would strongly prefer to avoid getting violently restrained and involuntary committed to in-patient mental health treatment.

  2. Yet another fine example of why we need to defund the police and return the stolen budget to our social welfare programs. It’s been repeatedly proven that we would not have a homeless problem if we taxed the wealthiest appropriately, and used those resources on healthcare for all and affordable housing.

  3. @4, Nearly every problem in contemporary American society can be traced back to the Reagan administration. Defunding federal housing programs and deinstitutionalization leading to the homeless boom, the passage of EMTALA leading to ballooning health care costs. All of this ushered along by his pact with the moral majority and their desire to turn this country into a Christian theocracy who are still unraveling our rights to this day. Turns out when you cut off revenue streams and let rich people hoard wealth, the benefits do not in fact trickle down to the masses.

  4. @7 Reagan defunded mental health care all the way back in 1980.

    I know it’s popular to blame him for our current problems, but we’ve had a half-century to come up with solutions. For at least some of that time, Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress and the White House, and could easily have passed corrective legislation. I think it’s time for the next generation of politicians to share some blame for this situation.

  5. Itโ€™s not so much popular as it is factually correct. All of the problems we fight over today can be traced back to changes introduced by the Reagan administration, even the celebrity himbo politician archetype. Itโ€™s hard to imagine a clown like Trump being elected without Reagan laying the groundwork.

  6. You asked one of the stupidest questions Iโ€™ve ever encountered online and thatโ€™s the answer youโ€™re getting from me. Take it or leave it. Iโ€™m not your person google attendant.

    How does the federal government extract money from itโ€™s citizens to support itself? If you donโ€™t already know the answer to this question I donโ€™t know what else to tell you except that you are beyond any help I could possibly offer. You can look it up yourself if youโ€™re really this clueless.

  7. What do taxes on the middle class have to do with rich people? This is exactly what Iโ€™m talking about. The answer to your question would be obvious to you if you actually took the time to understand what was said in the first place.

  8. There is absolutely nothing surprising about this story to anyone familiar with real life policing. These aren’t even “bad apples” they’re just apples. The pastor’s mistake was thinking they’d actually help her friend.

  9. @17 Absolutely! Elon musk and his fellow oligarchs need to pay at least 98% on every single dime they make after their 50th million of the year. If you look back at when the middle class in America was growing the fastest, and more importantly, when the Black middle class was healthy, we had strong unions, strict anti-trust laws and related government regulation, and very high taxes on the wealthy. That combination forced businesses to reinvest profits in natural growth of the business, and sharing the profits with the workers.

    We need to either highly regulate and tax the financial elite, or break out the Guillotines and eliminate to 1% the hard way.

  10. The most concerning part of this story is the inability of multiple police officers to understand that a deaf person can not hear verbal commands, even with a friend trying to remind them of this. Just keep barking commands and getting upset for the “noncompliance.” So much for all the training and professionalism the cops claim to have.

    @18: if this is intended to be funny, it’s not. But it does say a lot about you.

  11. Ashley your article has a glaring error The Big 5 is not located in White Center it is in Westwood Village shopping center which is in the city of Seattle. White Center is unincorporated King County where the sheriff has jurisdiction not SPD.

  12. If you understood that Reaganโ€™s โ€œtrickle downโ€ tax cuts eliminated the top marginal tax tiers then your inane, whiny-ass questions wouldnโ€™t be necessary because all the clues you need are right there in the first comment you replied to. Of course that would require you to understand the rudimentary basics of US tax policy and how Reaganโ€™s cuts fucked over the middle class to give rich people a tax break. Your questions showed that you didnโ€™t understand the assignment.

    No one owes you a response, no matter how โ€œpoliteโ€ you think you are simply because you donโ€™t curse or call people names when youโ€™re trolling. You donโ€™t want an โ€œinteresting conversationโ€, you want to prod and annoy people into giving you attention, and I gave you multiple opportunities to sulk and lick your wounds so thatโ€™s a win-win-win-win for you. Youโ€™re welcome.

  13. @26, 27 I understand exactly how progressive, marginal tax rates work. The ideal tax rates would be plotted as a logarithmic curve that result in a negative tax rate for everyone below the poverty line that is effectively a guaranteed minimum income that ensures no one is in abject poverty, even those incapable of working. Said rates remain low for the middle class, so that they can save for the future. Once one’s income gets to the point that they they can employ a personal staff off of their income, their tax rate should be over 50%, and the top tax rate should guarantee that it is impossible for anyone to become a billionaire. Those who benefit the most from the economy should pay the highest tax rates. Currently most such people pay far lower rates because they can pay accountants to find loses no matter how much they are making as a whole.

  14. I donโ€™t care what you think about me, or anything for that matter, and the only reason you asked about the wealth tax specifically is because you thought it was the only option for taxing rich people at higher rates than the middle class, because you donโ€™t understand how marginal tax brackets work.

  15. Dude, everyone to the left of the formerly liberal Republicans that make up the Clinton wing of the party, most Democrats support a wealth tax, and everyone in the progressive wing believe that our tax laws should make it impossible for any American to be worth more that $1Billion. No one person or family should be allowed to hoard so many resources for themselves. America needs more Guillotines and far fewer wealthy people.

Comments are closed.