Buster is feeling shy, as usual. Buster is
so acutely shy that researchers at the Seattle Aquarium can’t tell
whether this giant Pacific octopus is a boy or a girl. If Buster is a
boy, he’ll have a special tentacle (the third to the right, going
clockwise, from the front of its mantle) that is both an arm and a
dick. And, since the suction cups on octopuses* also function as taste
buds, his special tentacle will be an arm and a dick and a
tongue—making all octopus sex fisting and intercourse and cunnilingus, simultaneously. The young blonde giving the “feeding
demonstration” to a large pack of squirming schoolchildren explains
these facts more delicately.

“What if you tasted everything you touched?” she asks. The children
are silent. “When you open the bathroom door? When you tie your shoes?”
The kids offer a few ewws to her and each other. An assistant
perched on top of Buster’s tank, her feet dangling above the water,
skewers some oily herring onto a spear. While the assistant submerges
and gently jiggles the herring in front of Buster’s cave (the only
things visible are an eye and an indistinct bulge of octopus flesh),
the guide gives her spiel about octopuses—how the only bony part
of their body is a beak, allowing them to squeeze into small places;
how octopuses have three hearts in their mantles; how they squirt ink
at predators to disorient them; how they are masters of disguise.
They have three sets of camouflage cells that can mimic almost any
pattern behind them—a checkerboard, multicolored coral, the
moving shadow of a passing cloud—and they can flatten and pucker
the texture of their skin to blend into most surfaces. (Compared to
octopuses, chameleons are pikers.) Despite the vast palette of their
skins, octopuses are colorblind.

“Until they’re full grown, octopuses are the cupcakes of the
sea—everybody likes to eat them,” the guide says. Buster shifts a
little, sensing the herring. “If you see his special tentacle, let us
know,” the guide tells the children hopefully. Buster reaches out with
an unspecial tentacle, grabs the fish, and tucks it discreetly under
his body to eat. The children lean forward, mesmerized, quiet. The
mystery of Buster’s genitals abides.

Some aquariums will pay $1,000 for a giant Pacific
octopus—they’re big, they’re weird, and kids love them. (Henry
Lee, a 19th-century naturalist at the Brighton Aquarium, once wrote
that “an aquarium without an octopus was like a plum-pudding without
plums.”) If Buster doesn’t shape up and get over his stage fright, says
aquarium employee Giovannina Souers, they might have to send him back.
Which isn’t as big a headache for the Seattle Aquarium as it is for
other aquariums, because Puget Sound is home to the biggest octopuses
in the world.

The aquarium dives for its own octopuses and sometimes sells them to
other aquariums as far away as Sweden. (One of the four
Scandinavia-bound animals died in the plane because its flight had been
delayed.) Washington State allows divers to harvest one giant octopus
per day anywhere besides Hood Canal. Divers will locate an octopus den
and squirt in a noxious chemical to disorient and dislodge the animal.
Copper sulfate and chlorine bleach were favorites but have been banned
because they killed nearby sea life. Clove oil, Souers says, is the new
favorite. The aquarium sometimes gets donations—an out-of-town
angler once gave the aquarium a 26-pound octopus he accidentally caught
while fishing from his window at the Edgewater Hotel.

Buster’s tank, the guide tells the schoolchildren, sits on top of a
rock outcropping with an underwater octopus den. After watching
Buster’s coy performance, you could, in theory, jump out the window,
swim to the bottom, and wrestle another one out of a cave.

Not that you’d want to. Giant Pacific octopuses are, well,
giant—the largest ever found, according to the Monterey Bay
Aquarium, was 600 pounds and 31 feet from tentacle to
tentacle—and they’re disproportionately strong, all muscle and
protein. While trying to escape, a 40-pound octopus at the Seattle
Aquarium once pushed a 60-pound weight from the top of its tank. They
have venom for drool and their mouths look like something from
Alien: two sharp beaks hiding a drill-like instrument called a
radula that scrapes through thick shells to paralyze whatever’s inside
before the octopus sucks out its innards.

And sometimes they attack divers. A 2007 article from the
Canadian Field-Naturalist described several attacks: One octopus
off San Juan Island grabbed a diver’s legs and held him underwater
while he struggled, long enough that the diver used up most of the air
in his tank and nearly died—as if the octopus knew that divers
have only a certain amount of breathing time. Another octopus in
Washington waters pounced on a diver, flaring its tentacles in a
hunting gesture. The diver fended it off and swam away, but the octopus
followed, crawling toward him on the ocean floor, and pounced again.
Luckily, this octopus was small—but bizarrely aggressive for its
size.

Off Vancouver Island, an underwater film crew swam off, leaving one
diver near an unseen octopus den. An octopus crawled out, anchored
itself with two tentacles to the rocks below, and wrapped the other six
around the diver’s face and chest. It ripped off the diver’s mask,
reached for his breathing regulator, and tried to pull him into its
lair:

The diver eventually outlasted the octopus but in the struggle lost
his mask and had his hood pulled partially off and had his dry suit
flooded. As might be expected, he also used up a significant amount
of his breathing gas. The octopus finally gave up on this test of
strength and let go. The diver felt that, had he lost his regulator
or had he been low on air, he would have undoubtedly died. The
octopus was just too strong for him to do anything but hang on to his
regulator and brace himself from being pulled into the den…

So far, we can document no case of Giant Pacific Octopus attack that
has resulted in a diver fatality, but there have been diver deaths
where no cause is found to explain the tragedy. Perhaps octopuses
were involved in these deaths, but even if they were not, it is wise
for all divers to be respectful of the potential danger of these
powerful animals.

In 1940, two years after he opened the Seattle Aquarium on Pier 54,
Ivar Haglund staged an underwater wrestling match between a giant
octopus and an old prizefighter named Two Ton Tony. Haglund and the
octopus’s “trainers” shook its limbs furiously while Two Ton Tony
grimaced and grunted. Tony won, but the fight was a lie—the
octopus was dead before the match began.

The author of the octopus-attack article,
Dr. Roland Anderson, retired this March after 31 years at the Seattle
Aquarium. The man loves octopuses and knows more about cephalopod
behavior than most people in the world. The other day, he arrived at the 14 Carrot Cafe, just a few blocks from his Eastlake apartment, wearing an octopus baseball cap and an octopus T-shirt, and carrying a bag (emblazoned with an octopus) full of gifts he’s gotten
recently: a squid egg beater, a squid soap dispenser, a glittery
octopus Christmas ornament. “I’m not sick of octopuses yet,” he said,
smiling wanly. “I am a little tired of octopus trink.”

Dr. Anderson has written 241 articles, both scholarly and popular,
about cephalopods, but says he still knows precious little about the
giant Pacific octopus. If anyone knew how many live in Puget Sound it
would be him, but he doesn’t know and isn’t willing to guess. “We know
how many killer whales there are,” he says. “We have estimates for
salmon. There’s an annual sea-otter census. But nobody really looks for
octopuses besides me.”

For the past 10 years, Dr. Anderson has run octopus surveys during
President’s Day weekend, asking recreational divers to report
sightings. Typically, 200 divers participate and report around 70
octopuses, but that doesn’t mean much. Puget Sound is too big, cold,
dark, and deep for a comprehensive census—some of its depths
haven’t even been mapped yet. Researchers could chemically estimate the
giant-octopus population by taking biopsies for DNA analysis. (By
comparing variations in genetic samples from different animals,
scientists can get a sense of the population size.) Anderson says the
Seattle Aquarium is getting “close” to nailing down a method but isn’t
quite ready yet. “It takes time and money to figure out the genetic
markers,” he says. “And we’re already dealing with staff furloughs
because of the city budget crisis.”

Similar DNA analysis is used to estimate the population size of
six-gill sharks, another gigantic, mysterious, primitive creature from
Puget Sound’s depths (and a predator of octopuses). Six-gill sharks
live all over the world, from East Africa to Puget Sound, but
scientists know very little about them except that they’re
huge—around 16 feet long. The Seattle Aquarium is unusually well
situated to study the giant sharks because Puget Sound is deep, narrow,
and steep. At night, the sharks ascend to the shallows to feed, right
up to the pilings under Pier 54 where, every few months, aquarium
divers set up cameras, bait traps, and wait in a cage to take biopsy
samples.

One recent weekday in the bowels of the aquarium, among pipes and
tanks and thrumming water pumps, six-gill researchers sat around a
table, reviewing their dive plan. “When’s splash time?” one asked. “As
long as we’re down there, might as well do a kelp harvest,” another
offered. “Let’s get the bags and suit up.” In most other six-gill
habitats, researchers have to catch the sharks, hauling them up to the
surface with rod and reel, to tag and biopsy the animals. “They seem to
recover all right,” says Souers, the aquarium staff member. “But the
less invasive the technique, the better.”

In Seattle, researchers buy fish parts from Pike Place Market,
saving one set until it’s rancid enough to set in a bait trap and
freezing another set into “chumsicles”—giant iced lollipops
anchored to the floor of Puget Sound. The rancid fish attract the
sharks, but the sharks prefer to chew on the chumsicles. The
researchers don’t understand why. Once the divers have set the bait,
they surface and wait. Researchers watch video monitors for several
hours. If they see sharks, the divers go back down to take biopsies and
implant tags. But the sharks haven’t been showing up for the past few
months, since the pier has been reconstructed. The researchers think
something about the new pilings or diver cage is scaring them away.

No sharks show up that night, though ratfish swarm the bait. “We’re
jaded to see ratfish,” says one researcher. “But it’s actually pretty
rare. They typically live at incredible depths.” The tallest building
in Seattle is 930 feet; the deepest trough in Puget Sound is 937
feet—just north of the city. The bright, people-filled
skyscrapers of Seattle are reflected in a dark, creature-filled world
next door.

During the year after college I spent
teaching in Japan, one of my students’ favorite games was Let’s See
What the Foreigner Will Eat. They couldn’t stop taking me to
restaurants, ordering dishes they thought I would think were gross, and
gleefully watching as I chewed raw horse, fish heads, cod sperm,
spaghetti omelets, otoko kaoru (“man-smell”) chewing gum, and
the snottier side of Japanese cuisine (raw sea urchins, fermented
soybeans).

The rules were simple: If I could eat it with a smile, I won. If I
grimaced, I was weak. The game was a complicated mix of cultural
diplomacy, table etiquette, and sadomasochism. They politely applauded
my successes but savored my failures, clucking and laughing. I had won
every round so far except for the slimy natto—fermented
soybeans. They look like deer poop, smell like rot, and taste like
something from the bottom of a porta-potty doused in soy sauce. I lost
that round the last time we all went out drinking. I was determined to
win this one.

We were in a nice restaurant near Osaka, in a private upstairs room
with dark cedar paneling. I was sitting with my legs crossed on a
tatami-mat floor while 20 Japanese adults eagerly studied my expression
as a mouthful of raw, writhing octopus tentacle attacked my cheeks and
tongue. That tentacle had been attached to a living octopus only
minutes ago, finely chopped, and set before me in what looked like a
bowl of pale, squirming worm parts. Its suckers flexed spastically as I
chewed, trying to hurt me as much as I was hurting it.

The battle was protracted and painful. Of all the faces staring at
me, I remember Dr. Booka’s the best. He liked talking about Greek
philosophers and looked like an old-timey doctor from a Meiji-era
photo: round wire glasses, clipped mustache, button-up shirt. I chewed
stoically, using my tongue to pry away the needling suckers. I
swallowed. Dr. Booka smiled. “Mmm, sugoi,” he grunted. “Very
good.”

Dr. Booka later said that this stunt dish originated in Korea
(cheaters!), but Japan has its own deeply kinky relationship with
octopuses (tako is their word for them, which also means “kite”
and “callus”). Japanese octopus erotica has a long and venerable
history. Hokusai, Japan’s most famous wood-block artist, made the
iconic Tako to Ama (translated as Octopus and Diver, also
called The Dream of the Fisherman’s Wife) in 1814: It depicts
two octopuses wrapped around a naked woman reclining on some ocean
rocks. The smaller octopus kisses her mouth and curls its tentacles
around her nipples while the larger octopus nuzzles between her legs,
its mantle pulled back, its eyes bulging. Scholars think the woman is a
mythic abalone diver and the sex is consensual, but later octopus porn
took a turn for the violent.

Japanese censorship laws prohibit depictions of the
penis—though old Hokusai-era porn featured enormous cocks that
looked like gnarled tree trunks—which explains why so much
Japanese porn involves penetration with everything else. One scrap of
manga porn I found floating under a bridge in the small town where I
was living (honest) depicted one schoolgirl stuffing another with the
contents of her pencil box. In lieu of pencils and Sharpies, manga
cartoonist Toshio Maeda started drawing violent tentacle porn. Maeda’s
Demon Beast Invasion was the beginning of the modern
tentacle-rape (shokushu goukan) genre: A race of nasty creatures
invades Earth and impregnates as many human women as possible. (In
1999, a comic-store clerk in Dallas was convicted of “promoting
obscenity” and fined $4,000 for selling a copy of Demon Beast
Invasion
to an undercover cop. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to
hear his appeal.) In an interview on a manga blog, Maeda said he wanted
“Tentacle Master” inscribed on his tombstone. A Google search for
“tentacle rape” turns up 163,000 hits. Plain old “tentacle porn” only
turns up 96,600.

The real sex life of an octopus is sufficiently tragic without
Maeda’s help. A giant Pacific octopus has sex only once, then loses its mind and dies. The sex itself is dull. Octopuses tire
easily—their blood isn’t so good at carrying oxygen—so the
athletics are minimal. Using his special tentacle, the male extrudes a
meter-long sperm packet (it looks like a milky worm) out of a special
sac in his body/head and into the female’s body/head. If the female
doesn’t like it, she’ll push him and his sperm packet away and look for
someone else. If the female likes it, the two might entwine in
dispassionate embrace for three hours or more.

Then the bad times come. “It’s called senescence,” says Dr.
Anderson. “And it’s similar to human dementia. Males go crazy, stop
eating, rove around aimlessly, not being careful. It’s
hormones—females go into senescence, too. My father had
Alzheimer’s, and I’m sorry to say he wandered off a time or two and it
didn’t make a lot of sense what he was wandering off for. Octopuses are
the same way.” Unlike humans with dementia, senescent octopuses
sometimes chew off their own arms.

Their immune systems also shut down, allowing the small lacerations
they accumulate from bumping into things during senescence to develop
major infections. The postcoital male goes directly to feeding the top
of the local food chain (seals and sharks) and the bottom
(Aeromonas, Vibrio, and Staphylococcus bacteria).
The female retires to her cave, decorating it with garlands of
tear-shaped eggs. She tends to the strands, blowing them with soft jets
of oxygenated water for six months. To keep up her energy, the female
metabolizes her own body, losing up to 70 percent of her weight. Soon
after her eggs hatch, she dies. As Dr. Anderson repeated several times
during our conversations: “There’s no such thing as safe sex for
octopuses.”

Fittingly, Japanese doctors named a heart condition after the
octopus: takotsubo cardiomyopathy or “broken-heart syndrome.”
The condition, in which a part of the human heart suddenly enlarges, is
often caused by emotional stress like the sudden death or disappearance
of someone you love. According to a study by the Mayo Clinic, takotsubo
cardiomyopathy is fatal in 3.6 percent of cases. It got its name from
either the clay jars used by Japanese fishermen to catch octopus (which
resemble the shape of the heart enlargement) or after a story about a
Japanese fisherman who fell in love with an octopus who didn’t love her
captor back. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy is proof that it is medically
possible to die of a broken heart.

Walking from the cafe to his apartment to
look for a rare book on octopuses in Haida mythology, I asked Dr.
Anderson what draws certain people to cephalopods. The way he talks
about them suggests an interest than runs deeper than science—he
talks about why people don’t care about them as much as otters and
killer whales and sharks, animals with “charismatic megafauna effect,”
and the edges of his voice take on a tinge of resentment. “Nobody’s
looking at octopuses besides me,” he said. “There are two species,
maybe three, living in Puget Sound. The Enteroctopus dofleini and the red octopuses, which like to live in beer bottles. Nobody knows
how many there are of those, either. I once found eight in eight beer
bottles in a row. On a night dive, I saw 12 in one spot. But nobody
seems to care.” He talked about how octopuses have personalities and
maybe even emotions. “Nobody has proved that yet,” he said. “It might
be up to me.” It takes a special kind of person, he suggests, to devote
a life to the study of cephalopods.

What kind of person?

He paused. “You have to be different. They’re not cute and cuddly.
Some would say they have a cold intelligence.”

That cold intelligence has confounded and intrigued people
throughout history. Ancient cultures all over the world have assigned
the octopus esoteric and malevolent powers: Hawaiian creation myths
describe octopuses as alien leftovers from another incarnation of the
universe. Kanaloa, one of the four ancient Hawaiian gods, is an octopus
who lives in the underworld—or, alternately, a secret island full
of beautiful people where it is forbidden to weep—and teaches
magic. He’s a little bit scary but also helpful, invoked to protect
fishermen and to help find freshwater springs bubbling up from below.
When Christian missionaries showed up, they tried to recast the four
gods as the trinity and Satan, and Kanaloa became the bad guy. (To be
fair, Kanaloa did lead a rebellion of spirits against the god Kane and
was cast into the underworld, just like Satan in the Book of Revelation
and Paradise Lost.)

The Haida of the Pacific Northwest tell stories about octopuses
devouring canoes and sometimes whole villages, of fights and
reconciliation with the tetchy Octopus People who live under the sea.
Pliny the Elder wasn’t a fan: “No animal is more savage in causing the
death of a man in the water,” he wrote. (Though Pliny also suggested
curing a scorpion sting by incinerating the animal and drinking its
ashes mixed with wine.)

The Roman naturalist and lecturer Claudius Aelianus wrote about an
octopus in the coastal town of Puteoli that climbed through the sewers
into the house of a local fisherman to steal his catch. This story is
not as crazy as it sounds—octopuses get around. In 1998, a group
of Brazilian biologists watched an octopus catch a sea bird that was
standing on land, drag it into a tide pool to drown it, and begin
gnawing on its tail.

Octopuses can leave the water for short periods of time and have
certain skills of escape artists. Keeping an octopus in its tank has
been a major preoccupation for aquariums since the beginning. From
Cassell’s Natural History, 1892:

The Octopus, like many other predaceous animals who seek their prey
by night, habitually returns to skulk in the same retreat in the
daytime. This practice enabled the resident Octopus of the Brighton
Aquaa’ium to enjoy, for many weeks, the run of all the neighbouring
tanks by night undetected, for, like the celebrated robber Peace, he
was always to be found at home in the morning. But the rate at which
he thinned the young Lump-fishes in an adjoining tank led to give
suspicion, and after too hearty a meal one evening he imprudently
stayed out all night, and was caught red-handed, gorged to
distention, next morning, in the Lump-fishes’ abode.

Octopus escapes are the leading reason amateur aquarists are
discouraged from keeping the deadly blue-ring octopus. They’re
gorgeous, iridescent creatures, the size of a golf ball, and one of the
most dangerous things in the ocean. Each blue-ring octopus carries
enough paralytic venom to kill 26 human beings in minutes. While they
have a low escape value (1.7 on a scale of 10; the giant Pacific
octopus rates 6.7), pet-advice sites are unequivocal: “There are many
instances where a hobbyist has stepped on their octopus in the morning
a few rooms away from where the tank is… from time to time you may
see the small blue-ring octopus for sale, DO NOT buy it, they are very
venomous and can kill you. There are a lot of other species available
that pose no danger to you or unsuspecting children or guests.”

Several years ago, Dr. Roy Caldwell, a biologist at the University
of California at Berkeley, was working on Thailand’s Andaman Sea when
the local morgue called his biology station. A German tourist had died
on the beach near some tide pools, and the police couldn’t figure out
how. Dr. Caldwell found a small incision on the tourist’s right
shoulder, just the size and shape of a blue-ring octopus bite. The
tourist, he concluded, found the lovely, shimmering creature in a tide
pool, admired its pale skin and alien blue rings—the angrier they
are, the more vibrantly beautiful they become—and put it on his
shoulder, maybe for a photo. He was probably dead within minutes.

The last giant octopus escape at Seattle Aquarium was several years
ago, when a night watchman found the creature in a quiet and nearly
dead puddle of flesh on the floor. It recovered quickly after being
returned to its tank, but the aquarium lowered the water level to
discourage future escapes.

When they can’t get out, some octopuses tear up their tanks. Another
octopus at the Seattle Aquarium, nicknamed Lucretia McEvil, destroyed
her life-support system in one night: She dug through several
centimeters of sand, chewed through wires lashing down an undergravel
filter plate (a ridged plate that covers the bottom of an aquarium,
allowing beneficial bacteria to process ammonia buildup), yanked up the
plate, and ripped it into pieces for the staff to fish out of her tank.
Octopuses also squirt water at their keepers (either in play or
hostility—it’s hard to tell), and Dr. Anderson has heard of
sensitive lab equipment ruined by precisely aimed jets of salt
water.

Freud, of all people, was mysteriously quiet on the subject of
octopuses, though he did write a letter from a vacation in Italy,
boasting to his brother about “tickling an octopus.” Some of Freud’s
disciples suggest that, in dreams, an octopus represents the superego.
It did in one of Ian Fleming’s final James Bond stories, “Octopussy.”
In the end, one of the villains—a retired intelligence agent who
snorkels every day in Jamaica—is held underwater and drowned by
an octopus he thought was his friend.

The disturbing sensation of eating the
chopped tentacle in Japan stuck with me—its spastic movements
felt so specific, so alive, like the tentacle knew what was
happening. Strangely, it might have.

“Consciousness” is a hot word among scientists. Hardly anybody
agrees on what it means and whether any species has it besides humans.
But the octopus has a memory and, perhaps, self-awareness. It can learn
to navigate mazes, open jars and bottles, and play—a startling
discovery that landed Dr. Anderson and his coresearcher Jennifer Mather
in the New York Times. Mather and Anderson watched octopuses
play catch with floating pill bottles, blowing them toward the jets in
their tanks, catching them on the return shot, and blowing them back.
One octopus experimented with angles, finding a way to send the pill
bottle in circles.

Anderson also found that giant octopuses could recognize individual
faces using a simple good-cop/bad-cop experiment. Twice a day, five
days a week, one person would feed eight different octopuses and
another person would rub them with an irritating, bristly brush. The
octopuses began to reach out toward the feeder and shrink away
from—or blow hostile jets of water at—the hassler. Within
two weeks, the feeder and the hassler could walk up to the tank without
any food or brush and get the same response.

“Giant Pacific octopuses are not as smart as a dog or a cat,” Dr.
Anderson says. “But they’re smarter than your average tweety bird.”
Giant octopuses require greater intelligence than deep-water octopuses
to survive their changeable tidal environment, Anderson explains. “I
had a friend who worked on the deep-water octopus. Said it was dumb as
a doorknob.” Because giant octopuses lead solitary lives and don’t
learn from each other, they need memory to successfully explore
crevices, find food, and flee prey.

A 2006 paper by Mather suggests octopuses are a lot smarter than
“your average tweety bird.” They lateralize information, transferring
it from one half of the brain to another: something mammals can do but
birds cannot. (The study involved training an octopus to make a visual
distinction with one eye—right eye learning a shape, for
example—which only goes to one half of the brain. They then
surgically disconnected the two halves of the brain and found the
octopuses could recognize the shape with the other, “untrained” eye.
Researchers found that the information, with repeated exposure to that
shape, could travel to the other half of the brain.) Mather also ran
sleep tests, discovering that if octopuses were kept awake, they showed
sleep rebound—longer, deeper sleep—the following night. She
also suggests octopuses have a kind of REM sleep: “During the sleep
time, [Mather and her team] found a specific colour change not seen at
other times, leading them to suggest a cephalopod equivalent of
mammalian REM sleep, which is commonly associated with consolidation
into episodic memory.” Tucked into the nooks of their underwater
skyscrapers-in-reverse, the giant octopuses might be dreaming.

Weirder still is a passage from an article coauthored by
experimental neurobiologist David B. Edelman in a 2005 issue of
Consciousness and Cognition:

A peculiarity of the octopus nervous system is the density of neurons
located in the tentacles, which taken together, exceeds the total
number of neurons in the brain itself. [Three-fifths of an octopus’s
neurons are in its limbs instead of its brain.] Consistent with this
fact, a recent study showed that a detached octopus arm could be made
to flail realistically when stimulated with short electrical
pulses… Accordingly, in a detached vertebrate limb it is simply not
possible to produce the suite of coordinated movements that is
characteristic of complex vertebrate locomotion. In contrast, what is
striking about the octopus is the sophistication of the
semi-autonomous neural networks in its tentacles and their local
motor programs. These observations bear on the assessment of
consciousness in the sense that they may alter the notions of
embodiment and bodily representation as they have been set forth by
cognitive scientists and philosophers. In any case, it is not likely
that the question “what is it like to be an octopus tentacle?” will
ever be posed by any rational philosopher.

Maybe not. But with all those “semi-
autonomous neural
networks,” maybe a severed octopus tentacle has a kind of intelligence
that a human limb doesn’t.

I’m beginning to wonder what the tentacle I was chewing, back in
that dark-paneled room in a restaurant in Osaka, was thinking.

Baby octopuses might be the cupcakes of
the sea, but the adult octopus resists cooking. Its arms are raw
power—
great, tapering cylinders with a sticky membrane,
perfectly adapted for reaching and grabbing, but a challenge to a chef.
Prepared properly, well-cooked octopus needs little embellishment. It’s
subtly sweet, not too briny, never mushy, not quite of the ocean but
not quite of the land. The ancient Hawaiians weren’t far off: The
texture and taste is alien.

Like organ meats, oysters, and bone marrow, cooked octopus has a
magical quality, as if eating it gives you special powers. While in
Japan, I taught a terse, hulking high-school student who wanted to be a
professional wrestler. He ate a lot of everything, but his favorite
foods were octopus and rice. “When I eat rice, I feel The Power,” he
would say. “And the tako—makes strong!”

Octopus is easy to screw up. Prepared poorly, it’s as tasteless and
tough as a garden hose stuffed with condoms. Sushi chefs slice the
tentacles very thinly, massage them, then pound them with peeled daikon
radish before poaching. The chefs at Txori—serving some of the
best octopus in Seattle—get their
cephalopods from the cold
Atlantic waters of Galicia, in northern Spain, and serve them in the
traditional way: three-step poaching (put salted water on the stove to
boil, throw in the octopus, bring it to a boil, remove and cool, repeat
twice) before grilling it, dusting it with paprika, and placing the
slices atop a piece of red potato. They also follow the tradition of
placing a wine cork in the poaching water­—whether this
tradition has its origins in science or superstition, they cannot say.
The pulpo is one of Txori’s most popular dishes—it’s the
lead photo on their homepage—but they’ve been out for a couple of
months.
(Txori’s mustachioed chef, Joseba Jiménez de
Jiménez, is currently in Spain, in part to sort out their
octopus situation.)

Right now, you can find octopus (Eledone cirrhosa, also
called the “curled” or “horned” octopus) prepared in a Filipino-Italian
style at Tavolàta in Belltown. The handsome chef de
cuisine
, Morgan Medlock, meets me in the open kitchen and leads me
down the stairs to a walk-in cooler where trays of chanterelle
mushrooms nestle against unlabeled boxes and a raw purple octopus, dead
and reclining in a tub of cool water. Medlock learned to cook octopus
during a year in the Philippines, braising it for four hours in red
wine and salt, then charring it on a grill. A tall, young sous chef
named Brandon, who is also downstairs, had a different idea—he
suggested braising it in red wine and red-wine vinegar, with sprigs of
thyme and a bay leaf, a method he learned in San Francisco.

“We took the Pepsi challenge,” Medlock says. “And his version
won.”

The cooks at Tavolàta discard the head (though Txori chops
and uses its in a salad) then cut the beast in half for the long
braising. The tentacles cook down to a tamed, almost shriveled version
of their oceanic glory. Tavolàta cuts those halves in half and
braids them, leaving the suckers as the “show side.” Back upstairs, a
cook named Brendan rubs the cooked tentacle-braid with oil and salt,
and sets it on the grill. While it cooks, Brandon prepares a dish of
halibut on a bed of chanterelles and greens, carefully sculpting off
loose bits of halibut and wiping the plate while Medlock watches like a
piano teacher at a recital, frowning with concentration but nodding
with approval. Somebody mentions this season of the reality show Top
Chef
(with two contestants from Seattle: Ashley Merriman of
Branzino and Robin Leventhal of the defunct Crave). The chefs, normally
tattooed and stoic and manful, immediately begin gossiping like preteen
girls, swapping rumors about whether Merriman won and the
multimillion-dollar nondisclosure agreement she had to sign.

Finally, the octopus braid is done. Brendan scoops two little mounds
of spicy golden tomato confit, pulls apart some Italian parsley, and
slices baby zucchini and heirloom cherry tomatoes for an accompanying
salad. He sets the braids on top, sucker-side up, and slides the dish
toward me.

Tavolàta does it marvelously: The tentacles are dense, but
not at all tough, their purple color darkened by the wine and the
charring—all those neurons, taste buds, muscle power, and protein
rendered tame, delicious, and still. As I swallow, I can feel The
Power.

* People used to think the word “octopus” came from Latin and its
plural was “octopi.” Turns out, the word was probably borrowed from
Greek, making “octopodes” the technically correct plural. But some
Latin inflections offend American ears, and people who aren’t either
scientists or show-offs won’t say “octopodes,” just like they don’t say
“agendum” or “datum” or “dogmata”—which leaves us with
“octopuses.” Both Merriam-Webster’s Tenth Edition and the
Oxford English Dictionary basically throw their hands up on this
question and remain agnostic.

Brend an Kiley has worked as a child actor in New Orleans, as a member of the junior press corps at the 1988 Republican National Convention, and, for one happy April, as a bootlegger’s assistant in Nicaragua....

43 replies on “Sexy Beast”

  1. Great article…My favorite way to prepare octopus is the boil/grill method followed up with a quick coating of chili oil, served over a fresh red onion potato salad.

  2. Yeah , I think it ‘s a great article too. I think these creatures are fascinating. I took my daughter to the Aquarium,and the octopus was by far the highlight of the whole deal. Actually, the pier was her favorite, but she’s a really weird little kid.

  3. Was this article accepted by The Stranger as a bet? I can imagine it: “Kiley you mad fool, no one wants to read your 6,000-word essay on octopusses–but I’ll tell you what: you pull 10 comments online and this skeptical editor will let you at the imported sake I use to ply interns.

    “But fail, Kiley, and I’ll have your nuts for nigiri. Nigiri!”

    I wouldn’t want to be Brendan Kiley’s nuts, but this *was* a terrific read. Thanks for it. And hooray for octopusses!

  4. har har, human writer man

    very funny

    just yank me out from the briny deeps like that and lay me tits-up shoreside so you and all your prissy land lubber friends can get a few cheap XXX jollies talkn smack about my privates????

    OK, fine… so keep croaking out whatever air-breathing smut your two boney limp-wristed arm-flaps can handle, we don’t care…

    If any of you monkeys out there ever knew just how goddamn good it feels raising the old flag pole with eight arms full of moist, rigid-soft suction cups, I think you’d probably be doing a lot less scribbling and spending quite a bit more time down here taking some nice briny baths with us in ye old sea tank

    And you think are heads are too big???

    har har, human writer man

    har har

  5. Does anyone think it’s even mildly disconcerting that Brendan just spend an entire article talking about how amazing, complex, and important octopuses are, and followed it up by describing how we can manipulate and commodify them for our own pleasure?

    Don’t their repeated aquarium escape attempts signal to anyone that these incredible creatures don’t belong in cages?

    They mate *once in their lives* and we find it appropriate to kidnap and exploit them as though we have the right to?

    Fucking deplorable.

  6. Fucking fantastic Science Writing. You don’t see this sort of thing anymore.

    Reading this really made my day.

    If The Stranger had more Science and less Viaduct Drama, it’d be glorious.

  7. Mr. Kiley, you are consistently the most entertaining and most moving of the feature writers for this paper. Particularly when you have some whack-job idea for an article and manage to get it approved, as I pretend/hope you did with this one.

  8. It’s definitely weird for a scientific article about how intelligent and mysterious octopodes are to conclude with a segment about the best way to eat them. And I’m not even a vegetarian.

  9. Science? I agree there are scientific facts and even scientists in this article, but a lot of it is cultural study, talking about how octopuses have historically been perceived and interpreted.

  10. I agree with the comments above regarding the awe of and then consumption of these creatures. This article, though well written, was too short and jumbled to enjoy.

    I was excited for an article about how octopuses are an under appreciated creature (they’re amazing, intelligent creatures … dumb animals do not tear up cages out of boredum/the need to escape and figure out ways to gain more bounty)that exist right here in the Northwest. There is enough literature on how awesome the octopus is to create a magical, intriguing article (really).

    At the end I found myself wondering: What was the point? “Hey guys, octopuses! They exist! We got an aquarium with a Caster Semenya named Buster and our very own outcast scientist!The Japanese like to sub in their tentacles for penis’ because of censorship (which is, funnily enough highly offensive in America)! They might kill you one day, maybe! But the best part is you can eat the fuck outta ’em and that’s how you learn to really appreciate their power!”

    The article didn’t go anywhere, much like this comment.

    I think it was an episode of ‘Weird Eats’ or something where the host, after seeing a writhing octopus making a very honest and intelligent effort at escaping from the ship’s deck vowed to never eat one of those beautiful creatures again.

    Fuck, they’re the coolest.

  11. Refreshing read! in addition to making me think and envision all you wrote it made me think of the James Bond movie named after the octopus.

    Fresh! deep fried in peanut oil with a tempura batter! cook fast so it don’t turn into rubber.

    Octoyummy!

  12. For the best octo fight in literature, I refer readers to ‘The Toilers of the Sea’, from 1866, by that famous author and octopus wrestler, Victor Hugo. In the chapter ‘The Monster’ he writes: ‘You are attacked by a pneumatic machine. You are dealing with a vacuum that has feet.’

    Included are detailed instructions on how to gut an octopus.

  13. ending an interesting article with a long list of ways to cook and eat the subject of said article is pretty lazy in my opinion. Honestly it kind of ruined an interesting read.

  14. For everyone who liked the article: Thanks. I’m glad you enjoyed.

    For those who dislike the ending section, sorry. The primary relationship most people have with octopuses is on their plates and in their mouths. That seemed as good a place as any to end up.

  15. Although I loved your description of octopus copulation, I have to add that you recognize the ligula of an octopus by looking for the arm without suction cups, so no taste buds on the penis. Also, he inserts the sperm packet into her siphon, not her mouth, which is the water-out after respiration, the end of the digestive system, and where eggs are laid. So I can’t agree with concurrent intercourse and cunnilingus, but it’s kinky in its incomparable way.

    Also, the frequent use of “tentacle” makes me slightly squirmy. Many other Cephalopods have arms and tentacles with different functions. The octopus’s are technically arms by function. So it’s fine to say tentacle as long as you know this, but if you’re ever doing a squid dissection later it might be confusing.

  16. I love to see the octopus when I scuba dive. There are resident Giant Pacific Octopus at Sehurst Park about 200′ from where the Elliott Bay Water Taxi docks. This afternoon I’ll be visiting some octopus dens just South of the Tacoma Narrows at Day Island.

    Good video of a GPO at a Hood Canal location http://www.vimeo.com/2962482 (first 43 sec. are lead in).

  17. Fact check: google search for tentacle rape = 220,000. Tentacle porn = 266,000. Fuck you, non-consensual sex with a bizarre appendage.

    God I’m an asshole.

  18. Iffy “scientific facts” aside, this article contains a great deal of misinformation. Washington State harvest regulations for octopuses appear to be misrepresented, for one thing. For another, I do not believe the Seattle Aquarium sells octopuses for profit, an action likely contrary to the Association of Zoos and Aquariums Code of Professional Ethics. I also do not think they would harvest using chemical irritants as implicated in this article, since such a method is illegal in Washington State. Mr. Kiley should do his research more carefully before publishing such potentially libelous statements.

  19. @ 32. Prove it. I have the WA State Fisheries Guide on my side for point #1 (you can pick up a copy in any bait shop in the city) and quotes from longtime Seattle Aquarium employees on my side for point #2.

    I take my research *very* seriously and I’ve got no patience for casual, anonymous aspersions. You’re wrong and if you doubt me, I’ll be happy to show you my evidence. 323-7101.

  20. Yes the ending of this article is unfortunate. As is a fair bit of the rest, which always seems to wander back to Japan and…more about eating octopus or other creatures. The focus of cooking and eating the “sexy beast” for me just continues to reinforce the stereotype that the Stranger just can’t mention animals without digressing into how to kill it (Brendan Kiley, “Urban Hunt”), cook it (current article), eat it (how bout foie gras BJC?) or fuck/kill it (Mudede and his horses).
    At least Savage just complains about dogs being in bars. That’s harmless.

    Titling the article “Sexy Beast” was just dangling the carrot in front of the type of person who just wants to read an article about how cool some animals are (as living, breathing, free-ranging animals). Then you jerk the carrot away and leave us disappointed.

  21. Agree, that pornography is outlawed in Japan, but having lived in Japan for four years and attending their Fertility Festival, they don’t need it.

  22. I do personally disapprove of the eating of creatures (especially such fascinating, intelligent ones as cephalopods), but I enjoyed the article nonetheless. Maybe Mr. Kiley will come speak at the next Cephalopod Appreciation Society meeting?

  23. For everyone who points out the ending is “unfortunate” and sees this as Kiley’s fault, I think Brendan’s point about it being apt because it’s *common* is crucial.

    By writing it this way, he’s basically highlighted to some, if not many, people that eating an octopus is weird and twisted. The fact he goes into so much detail, I felt, was a pretty loud argument *against* octopus consumption because it makes the reader so squirmy. Ignoring or minimizing the fact they’re eaten would have been disrespectful.

    @21: I thought it was a really good way to summarize several interesting things to hook people. I’m much more interested in reading *more* about these creatures now, but I might not have paid attention if this article was 32,000 pages of exhaustive detail.

  24. DON’T EAT THE OCTOPUS. EVERYTHING THAT LIVES WANTS THEIR LIFE.
    OF ALL THE WONDER, MYSTERY AND MAGIC OF THIS CREATURE THAT
    THIS CREATURE EXCITES IN OUR MINDS AND IMAGINATION TELL ME WHY
    IT IS THAT THE ONLY TRIBUTE WE HONOR THAT WITH IS NOT ONE OF
    ALLOWING THAT WHICH GIVES US WONDER TO CONTINUE TO GIVE WONDER .AND LIVE ON IN THE WORLD, BUT TO TERMINATE IT ? A SPECIES SO ALIEN TO THE CONCEPT OF ALL LIFE AS SACRED , THAT ALL
    THAT LIVES WANTS THEIR LIVES JUST AS YOU WANT YOUR OWN. WE ARE
    AN ALIEN SPECIES NOT COMMEASURATE WITH THE BEAUTY OF THIS WORLD, NOT WORTHY OF IT. BLOOD LUST. FOOD. WAR. WE EVEN
    CONSUME OUR OWN.

Comments are closed.