This was the first time in history that the pairing of an artist and a chef resulted in guests eating five flavors of pie—herbs and apple, bread and chocolate, pumpkin chocolate chiffon, chocolate malt, and huckleberry buckle—with large drawings of syphilitic vaginas on the side. One cannot believe this was not intentional, but it was not. The artist didn’t decide until the last moment to bring her symmetrical, legs-spread portraits of baroquely proliferative disease, adding to her portfolio of female hysterics. This mighty coincidence occurred in December at Canoe Social Club in the International District, during the third installment of The New Guard, a new dinner series that features one up-and-coming chef, artist, and musician each; moves venues every time; usually gathers three or four dozen people; and costs 50 bucks per person and makes no profits (it is the brainchild of Whitney Ricketts, who simply likes people, food, art, and music, and was inspired by Michael Hebb’s analogous One Pots).
Yes, yes, very nice—twinkling candles and spices and society. But what about the syphilitic genitalia?
“Curators and critics never really stop to ask simply what artists in this city are doing,” established sculptor Dan Webb once said to me. That’s especially true when a room is full and festive. So I asked. Here are the artists of The New Guard so far.
Jason Hirata was bored making art about himself, so he tried to remove himself. He decided he’d make wood sculptures that had nothing to do with anything, and he wouldn’t make them in any style that suited him or using any skills he’d honed. He’d just write objectives and execute them: make the wood touch the ceiling, don’t raise it higher than x level, use the following pieces. But this presented a new truistic trap that killed his curiosity again: He could only create objectives based on what he knew he could already do. “The actual form was decided before I even started making it,” he bemoans. He solved the problem by writing objectives and inviting other people to make the sculptures, which surprised him every time, and this resulted in increasingly elaborate objectives and some very odd and unexpected sculptures: a game. (Some of these are on view at Plasteel Frames on First Avenue South.)
The photographs with white painted marks that hung at December’s New Guard dinner came from the same impulse: Hirata doesn’t anticipate what a viewer expects. He makes art he wants to look at over time, and the results are layered but literal riddles, available to anyone who really looks. In a grid of six very similar photographs of an abandoned lawn at night, each one with blobs suspended in midair, are the blobs on the prints or were they there that night? And what is this nowhere place with blobs in midair, and why is someone there with a camera taking picture after picture with the flash creating barely noticeably different light each time? In other works, white paint is another source of light competing with the one in the photograph: What looks from afar like a groovy abstraction of thick wavy stripes and fat white glowing circles is actually blinds of paint over pictures of street lampposts. All the photographs came from a set Hirata shot while visiting Iceland a few years ago; he repurposed them because they were just hanging on his studio wall… boring him.
Next up, for his debut show at James Harris Gallery in February, he’s making two identical sets of five line drawings done in ink made from sweat—his sweat and James Harris’s sweat (a photograph on the artist’s website shows the two jump-roping furiously). “I’m interested in how the work is a remnant of the artist’s presence,” Hirata says, “an effect of their artistic-ness.” He doesn’t know or need to know the answer to how exactly that works. As long as he’s interested, he’ll keep making interesting art.
It’s hard to make a stronger impression than Amanda Manitach does with her drawings of syphilitic vaginas. Not that they’re particularly bold. You can’t tell what those whisper-delicate lines and shaded folds are depicting—the ruffles of an exotic cabbage?—until you read the titles, polite and simple things resembling classical music designations, like Four Petite Variations of the Genitalia of a Female Syphilitic. You can imagine this subject being introduced between women of refinement in a parlor, them all nodding until a certain point, when they start screaming their heads off.
Manitach’s other two main subjects at the moment are hysterics and tongues. It’s not an affectation. She grew up in rural northeast Texas in a Pentecostal family (her father was a pastor, and she attended Oral Roberts University before abandoning Christianity) that spoke in tongues on a regular basis, while contorting themselves into positions quite like those of photographed hysterics in institutions, all corseted and wild-limbed. Last year, Manitach’s mother, a strong Pentecostal believer, died. “I’m in revolt against my maternal heritage in some ways,” she says. The tongues she draws, whose undersides are grotesquely ruffled like her syphilitic labia, have the same curved arch as the epileptic spines of the hysterics. Lately she has begun sewing onto actual lamb’s tongues, covering them with beads until they become shiny black clumps on the outside to match their decaying innards. She videotapes the process, then throws them out.
“I would love to be Alfred Jarry,” the 19th-century French absurdist writer, she says. She’s a Francophile. “I’m interested in the Hydropathes and the Incoherents, all those pre-Dada Dada people. I am obsessive, and all of my obsessions are pretty literary.”
Along with the nihilism, she intends a dose of humor. Often she makes repeat drawings that change only slightly, so a series of them stutters, like a progression of cinematic frames, or like a posed photographic shoot that can’t quite get the action right. The repetition is another form of the madness. Her next project involves her singing nonsense; let it ring.
Hair, wind, water, hair: “There’s this looking for answers… but things being kind of wild,” Gala Bent says. The hair has taken over the figures in her drawings; they’re hair-people now, or storms of hair attached to earthbound barnyard legs, hairnimals. The works are just drawings—sometimes they spill out of wounds in walls, onto the floor, rather than staying within the frame of a piece of paper, but still, they’re just marks on a surface—yet they’ve got texture, physicality, extension into another realm.
Bent works with three basic building blocks: planar shapes in saturated colors, hairlike graphite lines (which sometimes depict the hair of creatures whose eyes barely peep out), and stainy backgrounds. Each drawing is a parable demonstrated, like an illustration for an askew children’s book: two restless heaps of hair connected by a braid, rolling around on wheels while trying to keep balance in Interlocutor; four arms sharing a shaggy head and wearing a shiny crown atop a lonely pink planet in Our Agreement. Cuteness is tempered by grossness and excess. Nothing is overtly female, but reference to femaleness appears everywhere: the braiding, the flirtation with children’s illustration (she calls them “half-baked stories”), the visible influence of artists like Amy Cutler, Janine Antoni, Ann Hamilton, and Shahzia Sikander.
A tornado of shapes and hair—one of Bent’s more abstract works—might refer to the artist herself. It’s called She Works Hard for the Money. In addition to making her own work, Bent writes a blog about her dreams and influences and observations that’s as tender and modest as her drawings (it’s called Drifts and Scatters), she teaches at Seattle Pacific University, she does illustration for Asthmatic Kitty Records, and she and her husband, artist Zack Bent, have three young sons. Overwhelm is a regular state for her. No wonder everything she makes is like a growth that’s gone a little too far and now wonders, both nervously and excitedly, what’s next.
It’s apt that certain images follow around the name Troy Gua as if they were corporate logos for his personal brand: The images are latter-day Warhols. And like brand-obsessive Warhols, they’re an invitation to gaze into the soul of the soulless. Pop Hybrids is the name of Gua’s series of slick paintings of candy-colored celebrity faces layered on top of each other. The Queen of England and Boy George look surprisingly alike, it turns out; three Michael Jacksons at three different ages do not. The Elton John Wayne mashes together the homo and the homophobe, and sets them in lavender tones, just in case you wondered which side Gua (a straight, married guy) sympathizes with.
Gua has been showing regularly. At Vermillion this summer was his exhibition about identity, Do You See Me?, and currently at Fulcrum Gallery in Tacoma he’s showing some Pop Hybrids along with another, very different set of works drawing attention to the disfigurement of bodies in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, called Monument. A grid of restroom-style signs bearing bodies missing limbs hangs on a wall above sheets of reflective red Plexiglas on the floor; cut-up doll parts are featured in black-and-white photographs and, in a sculpture, contained in a warren of vitrines.
The artist keeps his imagery simple in part as a reference to plastic-fantastic mainstream culture and in part as a practical matter. “I want people who aren’t artists to like my work,” he says. “There are things I want to say, but at the same time, I want to make a living on it.” Would Warhol appreciate the homage? Yes and no. Gua is still developing; too many of his sculptural and photographic works feel like a first idea in need of a few more rounds of cognition in order to push past cliché, and most of the Pop Hybrids are tidy fun, free of the menace beneath the surface (if there is such a place) in Warhol. But tidy fun can still be fun. Mao wears Mickey Mouse ears so well. ![]()
Details about the next New Guard dinner, on February 27 at the Fremont Abbey are at www.hopegrocery.com.

Super happy The New Guard is getting the attention it deserves – though i must say it is strange that the 3 other core partners (who are all geniuses) don’t get proper mention: Joey Veltkamp curates the art, Sarah Jurado takes the gorgeous photos, and hometown hero Damien Jurado books the bands. I know Whit would want them all front and center. The New Guard is a beautiful example of the power of collaboration – and the power of the common table – keep it up!
We were so very ecstatic to highlight the work of Troy, Gala, Amanda, and Jason in our last four dinners. The artists are selected and curated by The Happiest Man on Earth, Joey Veltkamp, who is the Art Brain of The New Guard.
And yes, Michael’s absolutely right: I just want to emphasize that this little bubbling baby isn’t the brainchild of one mind, but of four: Joey Veltkamp, Sarah & Damien Jurado, and me.
I love the New Guard. Sarah, Damien, Joey and Whit do an amazing job.
I love the New Guard. Sarah, Damien, Joey and Whit do an amazing job.
I’m honored to be mentioned among such amazing company, and thank you Whitney Ricketts and Joey Veltkamp for allowing me to be a part of such a wonderful experience. Here’s to New Guard!
hey is there a photo credit?
Congrats Troy, Gala, Amanda, and Jason. New Guard is honored to have worked with all of you; thank you Joey Veltkamp for bringing everyone together.
@6: DANIEL CARRILLO! http://www.daniel-carrillo.com/blog/
@7 Thanks Sarah – so great to have met you and Damien and hope to see more of you soon!
keep the flag aloft new guard!
@Jen.
The photo of homeboy with the beard on the right sidebar where all the other artists are pictured is Robert HARDGRAVE, not Hardgrove.
@Jen.
also, SHARON arnold, yo. ain’t no SHANNON about it. yo.
(also, SHARON Arnold is wrong. word.)
guh… timed out comment fail.
Thanks for putting words to the *whole* tornado, Jen. It’s pretty amazing what these folks orchestrate, with great generosity and enthusiasm.
Sweat ink? I love it love it love it.
Great Press for alternatives to art showcasing in so many forms. Bravo!
*haha* Thanks ShauniQUA!
What a great feature about New Guard, Jen. I’m so appreciative of the group’s efforts to unite three communities that go together so seamlessly!
Congratulations, you wonderful people, you! xo
The picture of ‘Shannon’ Arnold is actually of SHARON Arnold.
Someone’s getting SharOWN3D.
That’s great that these artists are showcased in the paper, but personally, I’d rather see their art than their portraits! Where’s the art, man?
@20: In alphabetical order of the artist’s last names:
http://www.zackandgalabent.com/?gala
http://www.troygua.com
http://www.jasonhirata.com
http://www.amandamanitach.com
Voila!
A Grave Error
Jen Graves’ “art writings” have been saying so little for so long, that any lack of critical depth has come to be expected. However, her article entitled , “The New Guard”, published in volume 19, number 22 of The Stranger, was such an inane piece of shit, that it must be called out for what it is: at best, lazy uncritical writing, and at worst, nothing more than a regurgitation of what four mediocre artists think of themselves and their art.
First and foremost, let’s look at the title of the article: “The New Guard”.
What does that mean?
Who was “The Old Guard”?
What makes “The New Guard” new?
And most importantly, what are they guarding?
Or maybe, “The New Guard” is just a cool looking title at the top of a page…and important sounding to boot!
Regardless, calling these four artists Seattle’s “New Guard” is a pretty serious declaration. A declaration that demands some pretty serious critical attention. Critical attention that leads to some pretty serious justification. However, Jen Graves’ article contains none of this…so why don’t I go ahead and critically review this “New Guard” to see just how far ahead of the rest of Seattle’s up and coming art community they really are.
New Guard #1
Jason “Self-Indulgent” Hirata
According to Jen’s article, Jason Hirata wanted to remove himself from his art because he found art about himself boring. He decided to create “random” personal objectives that he somehow believed removed him from his process. How these objectives removed him is unexplained.
However, even this bored him, so he blamed it on picking objectives based on what he knew he could already do.
Once again, no explanation.
Why didn’t he simply pick objectives based on what he knew he couldn’t already do?
Or better yet, why pick objectives in the first place?
Utilizing these inflexible objectives led to predictability. This actually surprised him…and once again bored him.
So what did he do?
He continued writing objectives, but now had other people execute them. EUREKA! Finally he wasn’t bored. Having other people do the boring work was the trick.
Why this change in his process doesn’t fall into the same “truistic trap” that previously killed his curiosity isn’t mentioned. Perhaps Jason isn’t really interested in making anything. Perhaps Jason shouldn’t make anything.
One thing is for certain, he is completely absorbed by his own interest in his own art. The viewer is superfluous. If Jason only “makes art he wants to look at over time”, why does he show it to anyone else?
As far as “repurposing” old boring photos…nothing but a lazy cop-out. Boring shit by any other name, hung in any other way, is still boring shit.
But wait…what’s this I read? In his upcoming show he plans to employ bodily excretions (sweat) to make drawings with? WOW! You’re supposed to draw with ink, silly . SWEAT? That’s so weird, so “New Guard”.
Perhaps we’d all be better off if Jason removed himself from any art making process even further…like entirely. Please, for the sake of the viewer, have mercy. We’re all as bored with you as you are.
New Guard #2
Amanda “Cheap Shock” Manitach
As I read Jen Graves trumpet the virtues of Amanda’s syphilitic vagina drawings I couldn’t help but think back to her article on the Calder exhibit at the SAM , and her dismissal of his overall impact.
Let’s see here…
Invention of the Mobile
vs.
Syphilitic Vagina Drawings
Now, which overall has had more impact on the art world?
Syphilitic vaginas?! OOOH, now I get it! They’re gross and shocking! WOW! Who’s ever heard of employing such devices in a fine art context? Completely original. I’ll bet no one’s even thought of doing that before. BRAVO! The Seattle art community will never be the same again!
To quote Amanda herself, “I would love to be Alfred Jarry”… that statement sums it all up. Even Amanda Manitach isn’t interested in Amanda Manitach. Why should anyone else be?
New Guard #3
Gala “One Trick Pony” Bent
I’m not even going to comment on the ridiculousness of a formulaic device like cool lookin’ hair being “New Guard”.
“Hairnimals”?
You’ve gotta fuckin’ be kidding me.
New Guard #4
Troy “Pop Art Is Played Out” Gua
Employing a movement that is nearly fifty years old is “New Guard”? Lampooning pop culture is so obvious that it’s redundant. Honestly, is there anyone left on the planet that views politics and consumerism juxtaposed with popular culture as fresh?
It’s as archaic and obvious as arguing that the world is round.
NO DUH, TROY GUA.
Now, my critical examination of these four artists may seem a bit abrasive, but the moniker “New Guard” implies a pioneering vision and the breaking of new ground. This description applied to any of these artists is patently absurd.
What’s more, it is irresponsible to cast such unsubstantiated claims in any light of relevance, let alone publish the shit. The article might as well be a press release of four individual artist’s statements. There is no critique whatsoever.
No one that I’ve spoken to in the Seattle art community believes that these artists represent a “New Guard”. Apparently Jen Graves does, but she either doesn’t really know why, or is too lazy and unconcerned with critical thinking to bother expressing it.
Either way, I guess Seattle is just expected to take her word for it.
So…VIVA LA NEW GUARD! Jen…VIVA LA NEW GUARD!
Finally, as a publication, if The Stranger takes its art column seriously, please consider printing some thoughtful criticism for a change.