She’s probably saying, “When they’re gone, they’re gone.” Credit: Kelly O

RN74 has that air of manufactured energy, a sort of corporate stylishness, that makes you think it’s surrounded by chiming slot machines and air-conditioning as far as the eye can see. Michael Mina, the celebrity chef who has imposed RN74 upon downtown, has five restaurants in Vegas: AMERICAN FISH, NOBHILL TAVERN, SEABLUE, STRIPSTEAK, and one that goes by his own name in all-caps (why so shouty, Michael Mina?). You actually walk out of RN74 onto Fourth and Pike, which is about as far from a controlled climate as Seattle gets—the valet looks a little unnerved, and the restaurant windows have giant louvered blinds to block out the fray.

RN74 is loud and the tables are close together, the music a distantly bumping bass line. The servers wear sneakers and button-downs—so if the shirt happens to be plaid, they could work a shift at Skillet Diner and then just come on down the hill. The French, or sometimes “French,” entrées cost, on average, $30 each. The guys in the button-downs at the table next to us (no sneakers) last Thursday night loved every minute of it. The one with the Polo emblem explained to the others that Michael Mina “made his bones” at an “awesome” place in San Francisco—he couldn’t remember the name (Aqua)—and now has this whole empire (19 restaurants, including BOURBON STEAKS in four states). Their table basked in the light of Mina’s success—and their own, by proxy—for a moment: “Yeah, so cool.” Then Polo summarized RN74 thusly: “It’s like Balthazar… no… it’s like Pastis. Except it’s missing the starving actresses working as waitresses.” (Workers of RN74: I think he’s calling you fat! You’re totally not.)

The original RN74 is not in Las Vegas, it’s in San Francisco, and it looks uncannily similar to the Seattle version—the same old-fashioned-passenger-train smashed into nouveau-bistro-on-uppers decor, both with a profusion of different light fixtures and a rail-station-style special wine list with flip-over letters. You will learn on Mina’s website that he started the Michael Mina Group in partnership with Andre Agassi, and that his very first goal, when he sits down to design a restaurant, is to “make women look beautiful here.” His key to cooking “lies in balancing… spice, sweetness, acidity, and fat,” which is described as “deliciously counterintuitive” but is pretty much an ancient and universal truth. (There is also a video of his kid making a sandwich.)

With so many of them out there, each of Mina’s places has to be a well-oiled machine. To that end, he concentrates on replicability, with intranet videos of food prep and plating and tableside service for all employees, “so that the quality of the experience does not vary.” Tableside flourishes are a Mina trademark, and for these prices, they should be very flourishy. The ahi tuna tartare ($19), our server explained one night, is a dish Mina is “extremely famous” for, so who were we not to order it? A different server came and mixed it, tentatively, at the table, naming its parts—quail egg, pine nuts, mint, sesame oil, Asian pear, habanero (though the menu said its cousin, Scotch bonnet)—then uncertainly pushed it into an amorphous heap. Maybe she hadn’t watched the video enough? The tartare was good—not as much of a departure as it sounds, wanting a little more hot pepper of whichever variety, served with traditional white toast points. But it was good. Same with the maitake mushroom tempura ($10), with its very thin tempura batter, yuzu salt, and green onion aioli, though it comes in an inhuman portion. It should be ordered with at least three other people or a great deal of restraint (and then it’s horrible to see those beautiful mushrooms go to waste).

At RN74, coq au vin and boeuf bourguignon come with quotation marks and are carefully composed plates with lots of white space, made with braised Mad Hatcher bird and Painted Hills short rib. These are odd recipes to deconstruct—the original homey stews richly make the most of inferior beast. But taken on their own merits, as French-inspired fine dining, these dishes are good. The small mound of herby, delicate house-made egg noodles that came with the “coq au vin” ($28) was outstanding, though the lardons were so big as to have chewy connective tissue intact, and some of the chicken was slightly oversalty; the “bourguignon” ($32) meat was as tender as could be, served with maitake mushrooms and fancy fried potatoes, with its sauce poured tableside to emphasize its rarefication. A “cassoulet” ($29) hardly merited its quotes—it was hearty and filling, full of creamy beans and Anderson Ranch lamb shank and mild sausage and carrot, served in a ramekin. The update here: lovely slices of lamb tenderloin on the side (with some very bitter, unbalanced radicchio). Alaskan halibut ($29) was plush-fleshed and not at all overdone, and every plate you saw going by had the same three geometric stacks of vegetable, with three notably marvelous, crunchy sugar snap peas—and exactly three gnocchi.

RN74 is named after a highway in the Burgundy region of France, and the wine list concentrates likewise, with good selections in what passes for midrange at a place like this (say $40 to $70 a bottle). At the table next to us that one night—eavesdropping at most of the tables at RN74 is not optional—Polo was the taster, the cork sitting on a little silver tray; it seemed to be eyeing him balefully. He swirled ostentatiously while his bros looked on. “Great wine,” he said, then gave a double thumbs-up. “GREAT wine.” He declined a decanter. The sommelier showed no signs of suffering.

But the service at RN74 can vary in ways that might make Michael Mina unhappy. One night, the bartender and the server both gave the same canned explanation about the Last Bottle wine list (it’s the last bottle, and it’s being offered at an exceptional value, and “When they’re gone, they’re gone,” in case the concept remained unclear); the SHAREABLES section of the menu was pushed; recommendations from the rest of the menu were made unbidden (including the extremely famous tartare). It all felt smoothly, opportunistically on message, like a series of video scripts. Different servers also took three glasses of wine that still contained a last sip; maybe it’s the reddish lighting making all the ladies look so beautiful, but I’m guessing that doesn’t happen with a $420 bottle from the Last Bottle list. Another night, our server was friendly but rushed, spiels were absent, lag times between courses were marked, and the Last Bottle list never turned over at all—all of which might make Michael Mina mad.

RN74 can’t help but feel airlifted. Mina Group veteran Michelle Retallack is the chef; she was imported from San Francisco, and she’s pictured on the website buying some green onions at a farmers market, and the green onions are in a plastic bag—probably a capital offense in Seattle’s food culture. The sous chef, Larkin Young, is from Tilth, Maria Hines’s all-organic bungalow in Wallingford; he must have rather serious culture shock. The maître d’, who also moved from some other part of the Mina empire, didn’t quite know what used to be in the space—a Rite Aid, he thought. Correct, sir! And if inspiration is lacking here, it’s an improvement on Rite Aid. recommended

10 replies on “Living Las Vegas”

  1. It’s nice to read a review that’s not quite as “glowing” as the others I’ve read. I did not like this place. It was WAY too loud, and the decor is cheesy. Like TGIF’s richer, more successful older brother. What’s with the weird light fixtures and tinny sound?

    Our food was “meh”. And it’s hard to make “meh” out of foie-gras sliders. Our sweetbreads were barely luke-warm.

    I’m from the Bay Area. I dined at Aqua “back in the day”. I’ve eaten at Michael Mina. I just don’t see how a chef can put his name on 16 locations and expect that the standard of quality will not be diluted.

    Also, are the black-framed-Buddy Holly-hipster-glasses issued upon hire? Or do the servers have to provide their own?

  2. Jesus. We went there like a day later and ordered – no shit – exactly what you did (although we did also order the fois gras sliders).

    The food was astonishingly good. The atmosphere was distractingly loud (and it takes a lot for me to say that). But the service was the low point, for sure. Slow, flaky, not apologetic where apologetic was important – distractingly bad.

    And yet – the food was just good enough to tip the scales in favor of a return visit.

  3. competing with the Turf and Teriyaki bowl restaurants? Brave! very brave! But a deal on a old rite aid spot is hardly a deal maker?

    I love the guy for plugging into Seattle but a area for a pricey joint should have a better view than 4th and Pike? I mean come the hell on!

    Yup! he flew in from Sin City aweight! Welcome to the Emerald City?

    The Brooklyn and the rest of the pricey Icon joints downtown must be doing well as the 20%rich have 80% of the wealth and money to burn so if thats the case again he should have put it somewhere with a view?

  4. “..it’s an improvement on Rite Aid.”

    Oh, I dunno about that. I have a suspicion that the Rite Aid was about 3000% more useful to 98% of Seattlites than RN74 ever will be…

    Srsly, this is a fine review and the restaurant sounds just fine, too. But if I could afford to drop this kind of money on a meal, I think I’d pick a place a little more.. original, and inventive.

    Just sayin’.

  5. Minas was raised in Ellensburg and went to the U, so it’s nice that he has opened a store in Washington state. Friends in San Francisco say that his initials are for “much money” but the prices at this place seem okay. Can one company own nineteen restaurants and keep the quality up? Why not? If one is in Las Vegas, are all the rest tainted by association? No. I just wish they had more to eat on the happy hour menu. Nice glass pours, though.

  6. @4: I’ve considered going to a place like this for a special meal, but I figure one of three things will happen:
    1. It will be a transcendent experience, and I’ll never be satisfied with ordinary food again. I’ll become a gourmet food junky who gains 50 pounds and spends every cent he can get his hands on on food.
    2. It will be O.K. but not great. I’ll have spent a huge chunk of change to feel like a schlub who is incapable of recognizing great food.
    3. The food and service will suck, and I’ll feel compelled to write ONE OF THOSE ANNOYING ALL CAPS ONLINE REVIEWS about how terrible my experience was.

  7. Had a wonderful meal there with my boyfriend and our visiting friend last Friday, but the low point was when I got an incredibly moldy raspberry in my cocktail. A greater eye of detail from the bartender would be appreciated.

  8. The pate appetizer and the lime cucumber drink were delicious, the service was attentive, and the decor is corporate, but who cares as long as the food and service are good.

Comments are closed.